sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Recent Advancements in Sustainable Design and Performance of Buildings

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Materials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2022) | Viewed by 8598

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Interests: sustainable building; lifecycle carbon assessment; community resilience; construction informatics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Interests: sustainability in a built environment; sustainable buildings; sustainable construction materials and products; industrial ecology and circular economy; lifecycle assessment
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues:

Over the past few years, tremendous efforts have been devoted to enhancing sustainability in the building sector, in terms of sustainable design, selection of low impact materials, waste recycling and reutilization, and so on. The evaluation of sustainability performance of buildings, including the development of quantification methods, indicators, etc., has also been extensively studied globally. Recently, with an increasing demand for construction materials, scarcity of material supply, and growing environmental concern, resource-efficient construction is highly debated globally in particular after the concept of circular economy (CE) has emerged at various levels, viz. the government, industry, and academia (Reike et al., 2018; Kirchherr et al., 2017). When the CE principle is integrated to buildings, it can help to achieve several objectives, e.g., improving material and energy efficiency through the sourcing of sustainable materials; enhancing the collaborative benefits between the associated industries; maximizing the recycling and reuse of materials and components; significantly reducing waste generation; and avoiding the waste disposal problem and saving landfill space (Ghisellini et al., 2018). Furthermore, moving toward a CE model would provide an opportunity to reduce the use of primary materials, ensure material efficiency, and reduce the associated environmental impacts (Kanters, 2020).

However, the implementation of CE in buildings is not straightforward, as buildings are unique entities and are often the result of one-off projects. The design of material circularity is a challenging task. Thus, new technologies and design approaches are required with a desire to address the challenge of material circularity based on the CE approach, particularly from the traditional ‘take–make–dispose’ system to a circular perspective on material reuse. The adoption of CE requires a system thinking circular approach for the whole building lifecycle and construction value chain that shifts to sourcing sustainably, maintaining material productivity over the lifecycle of developments, and reducing the losses of materials (Cambier et al., 2020; Herczeg et al., 2018). Several challenges have also been identified for effective CE implementation, such as design for circularity, materials selection, supply chain, business model, uncertainty and risk, collaborations among actions, knowledge of understanding, relevant policy, integration of urban metabolism, and methodology for CE evaluation (Hossain et al., 2020). In addition, concepts such as design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) and modular integrated construction (MiC) to deliver sustainable reconfigurable buildings are attracting increasing attention in the sustainable building community. However, effective frameworks, tools, and techniques for evaluating such designs are yet to be developed and validated by the case studies.

The aim of this Special Issue is to welcome theoretical, case demonstration, comprehensive reviews, methodological advancement, and framework development studies from scholars investigating the needs for effective implementation of CE into building to enhance the sustainability performance of buildings beyond the existing efforts.

This Special Issue is interested in, among others, the following topics:

  • Sustainability performance of buildings;
  • Recent advancement of CE into buildings;
  • Recent development of tools and techniques for sustainability evaluation of buildings;
  • Framework, tools, and techniques of CE;
  • Sustainable design of buildings;
  • DfMA/MiC for circular building design;
  • Sustainability evaluation of building with DfMA/MiC;
  • Lifecycle environmental impact assessment and cost analysis;
  • Alternative and low impact construction materials;
  • Recycled building materials;
  • Materials efficiency and circularity; and
  • Climate change and sustainability in buildings and building materials.

References

Cambier, C., Galle, W., De Temmerman, N. (2020). Research and development directions for design support tools for circular building. Buildings 10, 142.

Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., Ulgiati, S. (2018). Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 178, 618-643.

Herczeg, G., Akkerman, R., Hauschild, M.Z. (2018). Supply chain collaboration in industrial symbiosis networks. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 1058-1067.

Hossain, M.U., Ng, S.T., Prince, A.A., Amor, B. (2020). Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 130, 109948.

Kanters, J. (2020). Circular building design: An analysis of barriersand drivers for a circular building sector. Buildings 10, 77.

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recyc. 127, 221-232.

Reike, D., Vermeulen, W.J., Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or refurbished as CE 3.0?—Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resour. Conserv. Recyc. 135, 246-264.

Best regards,

Prof. Thomas Ng
Dr. Md. Uzzal Hossain
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • circular economy
  • sustainable building
  • design for circularity
  • alternative materials
  • material efficiency
  • lifecycle assessment
  • modular integrated construction
  • design for manufacture and assembly

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

21 pages, 3682 KiB  
Review
BIM Integrated LCA for Promoting Circular Economy towards Sustainable Construction: An Analytical Review
by Kai Xue, Md. Uzzal Hossain, Meng Liu, Mingjun Ma, Yizhi Zhang, Mengqiang Hu, XiaoYi Chen and Guangyu Cao
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1310; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031310 - 27 Jan 2021
Cited by 50 | Viewed by 7726
Abstract
Sustainable construction is widely regarded as one of the best decisions to reduce the environmental impact of the buildings. Numerous scientific efforts have been devoted to promoting sustainability by adopting different techniques such as life cycle assessment (LCA) and building information modeling (BIM). [...] Read more.
Sustainable construction is widely regarded as one of the best decisions to reduce the environmental impact of the buildings. Numerous scientific efforts have been devoted to promoting sustainability by adopting different techniques such as life cycle assessment (LCA) and building information modeling (BIM). The recent circular economy (CE) agenda is prioritizing in different sectors including construction due to increasing concern on the materials efficiency and resources consumption. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the implications, considerations, contributions and challenges of BIM integrated LCA and the CE adoption in the industry by critically analyzing the recent literature. A scientometric analysis was applied to the selected studies to show the knowledge among BIM, LCA and CE relationships. With a comprehensive analysis of major challenges and opportunities of LCA and BIM for construction sustainability, key drivers for sustainable building design were identified and analyzed. A prospective integrated framework for CE adoption into BIM-based LCA of buildings and an evaluation method are proposed by analyzing the contemporary issues. It is believed that the analyzed critical issues, identified future research direction and proposed frameworks and this methodology should contribute to effective implementation of CE into the building for promoting sustainable construction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop