sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

ESG Impact Management and Corporate Social Responsibility

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2024) | Viewed by 4644

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM University, Casamassima, Italy
Interests: corporate disclosure; integrated reporting; intellectual capital; digitalization; crowdfunding
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM University, Casamassima, Italy
Interests: corporate finance; sustainable finance; impact finance; Islamic finance; real estate finance

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
Interests: corporate finance; sustainable finance; impact finance

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM University, Casamassima, Italy
Interests: strategic management; corporate disclosure; integrated reporting; intellectual capital; corporate social responsibility; digitalization

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the last decade, CSR has undergone a great evolution because the economic, financial and social scenarios have changed. In this framework, greater attention has been paid to “impact investing”, and, as a result of the commitment of the regulatory bodies, the Esg pillars have become essential. At the same time, in recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated processes and strategies to build a new perspective to improve business value creation in the long term. In this scenario and in line with the regulatory authorities’ guidelines, it is possible for the companies and for the major stakeholders to use new and different financial tools to raise capital, to build green and sustainable investment as well as to improve the best practices to write a corporate disclosure and integrated reporting. In light of the above, the aim of this Special Issue is to present an updated set of studies, theoretical ideas and methodological developments related to sustainable finance, ESG impact management and CSR evolution; in this sense, this Special issue will include, but is not limited to, the following topics:

(i) The relationship between ESG aspects and corporate financial performance;

(ii) CSR evolution in light of economic, financial, social and demographic changes;

(iii) The role of corporate disclosure and integrated reporting in sustainable finance.

References

  • Morales-Parragué MA, Varela-Laso RA, Araya-Castillo L, Molina-Luque F. Corporate Social Responsibility: Where Does It Come from, and Where Does It Go? Evolution of the Conceptual Structure from 1975 to 2021. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075770.
  • Transition finance for transforming companies – 2022; Climate Bonds Initiative.
  • Daumas, L; (2021). Should we fear transition risks - A review of the applied literature, Working Papers05, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
  • Mariani M., Pizzutilo F., Caragnano A., Zito M. (2021). Does It Pay to Be Environmentally Responsible? Investigating the Effect on the Weighted Average Cost of Capital. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
  • Fatima, T., & Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 105-121.
  • López‐Concepción, A., Gil‐Lacruz, A. I., & Saz‐Gil, I. (2022). Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 19-31.
  • Iqbal, U., Nadeem, M., Gull, A. A., & Kayani, U. N. (2022). Environmental innovation and firm value: The moderating role of organizational capital. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115253.
  • Lahouel, B. B., Zaied, Y. B., Managi, S., & Taleb, L. (2022). Re-thinking about U: The relevance of regime-switching model in the relationship between environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 140, 498-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.019.
  • Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199603)5:1%3C30::AID-BSE38%3E3.0.CO;2-Q.
  • Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387.
  • Busch, T., & Friede, G. (2018). The robustness of the corporate social and financial performance relation: A second‐order meta‐analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 583-608. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1480.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Nicola Raimo
Prof. Dr. Massimo Mariani
Dr. Alessandra Caragnano
Prof. Dr. Filippo Vitolla
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • CSR
  • ESG
  • green financing
  • socially responsibility investing
  • environmental investment
  • corporate disclosure
  • integrated reporting
  • ESG impact management

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 294 KiB  
Article
ESG Performance and Enterprise Value in China: A Novel Approach via a Regulated Intermediary Model
by Xuming Shangguan, Gengyan Shi and Zhou Yu
Sustainability 2024, 16(8), 3247; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083247 - 12 Apr 2024
Viewed by 553
Abstract
ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance increasingly influences enterprise valuation. While researchers debate about the precise nature of this influence, most assume a positive linear relationship. This study introduces a novel ESG responsibility performance metric utilizing a regulated intermediary model using representative data [...] Read more.
ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance increasingly influences enterprise valuation. While researchers debate about the precise nature of this influence, most assume a positive linear relationship. This study introduces a novel ESG responsibility performance metric utilizing a regulated intermediary model using representative data synthesized from leading ESG rating agencies in China. It investigates the pathways of this influence and examines the mediating effects of corporate reputation, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory compliance. The findings reveal an inverted U-shaped relationship between ESG performance and enterprise value, moderated significantly by financing constraints. These findings remain robust after accounting for potential endogeneity using instrumental variables. Heterogeneity analysis highlights that this inverted U-shaped relationship depends on the industry characteristics and ownership structures, particularly noticeable in non-polluting and non-state-owned enterprises. Moreover, enhanced ESG performance correlates with a reduced cost of equity financing, thereby augmenting enterprise value. Financial institutions might consider employing innovative financial instruments to diversify their enterprise financing channels and effectively bolster ESG-focused enterprises. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ESG Impact Management and Corporate Social Responsibility)
18 pages, 293 KiB  
Article
ESG Performance, Auditor Choice, and Audit Opinion: Evidence from an Emerging Market
by Ahmed Diab and Aref M. Eissa
Sustainability 2024, 16(1), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010124 - 22 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1323
Abstract
This study examines the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on auditor choice and audit opinion for Egyptian-listed firms. We use univariate and multivariate analyses of 612 firm-year observations for a sample of 68 firms listed on EGX100 over 2014–2022 using [...] Read more.
This study examines the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on auditor choice and audit opinion for Egyptian-listed firms. We use univariate and multivariate analyses of 612 firm-year observations for a sample of 68 firms listed on EGX100 over 2014–2022 using binary logistic regression models. Consistent with the ethical perspective of corporate social responsibility, we found that firms listed in the ESG index are more likely to assign one of the Big4 auditors, and less likely to receive a qualified opinion. Through an additional analysis, we found that COVID-19 moderates the relationship between ESG performance, auditor choice, and audit opinion. Our results confirm the value of ESG performance for audit practices in emerging economies. This research indicates that ESG performance can enhance financial reporting quality. Further, it ensures that binding guidelines and regulations are crucial to oversee corporate ESG performance, especially during crisis times, and enhance investors’ protection and firms’ sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ESG Impact Management and Corporate Social Responsibility)
35 pages, 960 KiB  
Article
Impact of Environmental Leadership on Environmental Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Green Culture, Environmental Management, and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility
by Li-Ping Fan and Hung-Chang Chung
Sustainability 2023, 15(24), 16549; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416549 - 05 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1025
Abstract
With rising global environmental concerns, businesses are prioritizing environmental preservation alongside economic growth. This research investigates the influence of environmental leadership on corporate green culture, environmental management, strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR), and environmental behavior. Surveying high-tech industry professionals in southern Taiwan, the [...] Read more.
With rising global environmental concerns, businesses are prioritizing environmental preservation alongside economic growth. This research investigates the influence of environmental leadership on corporate green culture, environmental management, strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR), and environmental behavior. Surveying high-tech industry professionals in southern Taiwan, the study obtained 479 out of 600 questionnaires that were valid, yielding an 80% response rate. Key findings include the following. (1) Environmental leadership positively impacts green culture, environmental management, strategic CSR, and environmental behavior. (2) Green culture and environmental management mediate the relationship between environmental leadership and environmental behavior. (3) Strategic CSR mediates the influence of environmental leadership on environmental behavior. Through environmental leadership, knowledge dissemination, and attitude shaping, the paper proposes that high-tech industries can alter their worldview and daily practices, thus addressing environmental degradation at its core. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ESG Impact Management and Corporate Social Responsibility)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

32 pages, 832 KiB  
Review
Company-Level Factors of Non-Financial Reporting Quality under a Mandatory Regime: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence in the European Union
by Oana Marina Radu, Voicu D. Dragomir and Ningshan Hao
Sustainability 2023, 15(23), 16265; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316265 - 24 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1179
Abstract
The relationship between non-financial reporting quality (NFRQ) and various company-level factors has been studied extensively, considering the mandatory requirements applicable under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD) of the European Union. The purpose of this research is to systematize the results of previous [...] Read more.
The relationship between non-financial reporting quality (NFRQ) and various company-level factors has been studied extensively, considering the mandatory requirements applicable under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD) of the European Union. The purpose of this research is to systematize the results of previous published studies on the relationship between NFRQ and company size, financial performance, corporate governance, market performance, and sustainability performance, under a mandatory regime. Our study contributes to the literature by proposing a taxonomy of company-level factors grouped into five categories. We analyze the post-2017 period, focusing on the application of NFRD in the European Union. By applying systematic inclusion and exclusion criteria to a population of 618 articles from Scopus, we obtain a sample of fifteen articles that are subject to an in-depth analysis of correlation matrices. The systematic review resorts to the vote counting methodology to assess the existence and strength of relationships between the NFRQ and company-level factors, based on correlation coefficients. The summarized results indicate that company size, corporate governance, and sustainability performance are positive factors of NFRQ. Regarding corporate governance, we find that board independence, board size, foreign ownership, gender diversity, corporate governance quality, the existence of a sustainability committee, and sustainability-linked remuneration positively influence NFRQ. Our findings emphasize the need to explicitly consider the role of corporate governance and sustainability performance in improving NFRQ while transitioning to improved corporate sustainability reporting under the new Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive 2022/2464 (CSRD). Our study has implications for academics who seek to engage in empirical research on various factors with positive or negative influence on sustainability reporting, throughout the transition from the NFRD to the CSRD. Policymakers may find our study useful in addressing specific areas of sustainability reporting that have a negative impact on corporate transparency, while practitioners may obtain valuable information on the challenges of transitioning to sustainability reporting and the implementation of mandatory assurance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ESG Impact Management and Corporate Social Responsibility)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop