sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Design Education for Sustainability

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Education and Approaches".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2021) | Viewed by 34693

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Design, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The role design has played, and will continue to play, in creating both unsustainable and sustainable futures is not a recent realisation. For more than half a century design has been ‘called out’ for fuelling overconsumption, designing for discard, focusing on products over systems. Designerly thinking has been labelled “one of the most dangerous of all human characteristics” (Baynes, 2009).  Design activists have highlighted both issues and solutions through manifestos such as “First Things First” and the Hanover Principles and alternative approaches such as Slow Design (Strauss & Fuad-Luke, 2008) and Transition Design (Irwin, Kossoff, Tonkinwise & Scupelli, 2015).

This duality has been mirrored in design education, as a focus on product has often overshadowed education that focuses on the potential of design for sustainable futures.  The Journal of Sustainability has identified a need and opportunity to bring together research in a special issue on Design Education for Sustainability.  Recognising the imperative and potential for design to create solutions to sustainability challenges, this special issue is for contributions from those focusing on design education in schools to those focusing on undergraduate and postgraduate levels.  The aim is to provide a spectrum of insights that enable a progressive, joined-up collection of issues, challenges and ideas to create a continuity of development and learning. Contributions will be welcomed of research that focuses on pedagogical approaches to sustainability-focused design education; that addresses dilemmas in focusing on sustainability when designing, such as the ‘product’ paradigm and cognitive dissonance in designing for sustainable futures; that explores fresh thinking in design for sustainability such as circular economies; and alternative approaches such as user centred design, co-design, critical speculative design, transition design and decolonising design.

Prof. Kay Stables
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • design education;
  • sustainability;
  • design pedagogy;
  • dilemmas in designing for sustainable futures;
  • alternative approaches to designing for sustainable futures.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 1457 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Civil Engineering: Incorporating Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education Curricula
by Irantzu Álvarez, Paulo Etxeberria, Elisabete Alberdi, Heriberto Pérez-Acebo, Isabel Eguia and María José García
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8967; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168967 - 11 Aug 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 6743
Abstract
In the current climate emergency context, many national and international organizations have adopted measures to integrate sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in all their fields of action. Within education, steps have been taken to incorporate the perspective of sustainability at all levels. [...] Read more.
In the current climate emergency context, many national and international organizations have adopted measures to integrate sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in all their fields of action. Within education, steps have been taken to incorporate the perspective of sustainability at all levels. This process has also started at the university since it plays a fundamental role in the strategy for the implementation of specific policies to promote sustainability. However, sometimes it is difficult to include this type of knowledge in the curriculum, due to the lack of flexibility of the university structure or the lack of time to cover the syllabus. In this scenario, civil engineering plays a main role as a fundamental activity in the creation of services and infrastructures with a high environmental impact. The objective of this study is to show a multidisciplinary approach to working on sustainability in a transversal way in the civil engineering degree and to analyze the impact that this type of initiative can have from the learning point of view. The study shows a curricular trajectory supported by problem-based learning and project-based learning designed to promote sustainability in the practice of civil engineering. The good results obtained in the evaluation of the project and the growing incorporation of the SDGs in the final degree projects suggest that this methodology can be implemented by other university degrees. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Education for Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1208 KiB  
Article
Design Education for Sustainability: Identifying Opportunities in Ireland’s Second Level Education System
by Beineán Conway, Keelin Leahy and Muireann McMahon
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 8711; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168711 - 4 Aug 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2701
Abstract
Design Education for Sustainability has the potential to accelerate and encourage education that contributes to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. (1) Arguably the potential of Design Education for Sustainability remains underutilized in Ireland’s second level education system. (2) This article reports on findings [...] Read more.
Design Education for Sustainability has the potential to accelerate and encourage education that contributes to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. (1) Arguably the potential of Design Education for Sustainability remains underutilized in Ireland’s second level education system. (2) This article reports on findings conducted as part of a research project which examines Education for Sustainable Development in Irish secondary school Design Education subjects. The research draws on data gathered through critical ethnographic interviews with teachers in practice. (3) The findings explored in this article are the barriers faced by educators in relation to the further integration of Education for Sustainable Development in Ireland’s Design Education subjects. These findings offer a unique insight into the realities of educators in progressing towards Design Education for Sustainability. (4) In identifying the challenges, this article offers a starting point to tackle the barriers associated with integrating sustainability in Design Education within the Irish second level education system. (5) The article concludes by identifying how these barriers can be tackled head on in order to progressively integrate Education for Sustainable Development in Design Education subjects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Education for Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4043 KiB  
Article
Teaching Sustainable Responsibility through Informal Undergraduate Design Education
by Louise R. Manfredi, Meriel Stokoe, Rebecca Kelly and Seyeon Lee
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8378; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158378 - 27 Jul 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2699
Abstract
Recent reports, initiatives, and activities around higher education institutions revealed the relevance and value of sustainability education through both formal curriculum and informal curriculum activities. While the significance of sustainability education has continuously improved by raising awareness among new generations of students, it [...] Read more.
Recent reports, initiatives, and activities around higher education institutions revealed the relevance and value of sustainability education through both formal curriculum and informal curriculum activities. While the significance of sustainability education has continuously improved by raising awareness among new generations of students, it has not adequately promoted pro-environmental behaviors or attitude changes. This research study used a linear pretest–posttest experimental approach to understand whether two codesigned interventions; a trash and recycling bin system, and a Materials Exchange program, could improve sustainability literacy and material conservation behaviors across the School of Design. Additionally, a mid-experiment focus group study was conducted to provide text-rich data for analysis of 3R behaviors. Analysis of the data collected revealed that these interventions were reasonably successful in improving responsible material management. To have a greater impact on sustainable behavior, it is suggested that a formal educational experience should supplement the informal interventions described in this paper to onboard students as they enter the design studio culture. Additionally, the expansion of the trash and recycling bin station system into the university dormitories is discussed. This work has successfully catalyzed a collaboration between all School of Design stakeholders to address studio waste in a tangible way. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Education for Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 7355 KiB  
Article
A Pedagogical Approach to Incorporating the Concept of Sustainability into Design-to-Physical-Construction Teaching in Introductory Architectural Design Courses: A Case Study on a Bamboo Construction Project
by Xingwei Xiang, Qian Wu, Ye Zhang, Bifeng Zhu, Xiaoji Wang, Anping Wan, Tongle Huang and Luoke Hu
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7692; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147692 - 9 Jul 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4105
Abstract
Sustainable architectural education is offered in colleges and universities all over the world. Studies have emphasized the importance of sustainable architectural education in introductory courses of architecture major programs, but methods and strategies for teaching sustainable architecture at lower levels are scarce. This [...] Read more.
Sustainable architectural education is offered in colleges and universities all over the world. Studies have emphasized the importance of sustainable architectural education in introductory courses of architecture major programs, but methods and strategies for teaching sustainable architecture at lower levels are scarce. This study focuses on the design-to-physical-construction process and creates a teaching framework that incorporates the concept of sustainable development from the perspectives of sustainable economy, environment and society. Based on the teaching method of learning through the design-to-physical-construction process and referring to the grounded theory, a case study on a bamboo construction project was conducted to explore approaches and strategies of sustainable architectural education in introductory courses. Results reveal that five systems, including the system of sustainable development, consist of a framework that illustrated the teaching effects. Based on the framework, we discovered five factors that should be considered in incorporating the concept of sustainable development into architectural design teaching, including the necessity of conducting sustainable architectural education in introductory courses. This study helps explore the potential role sustainability plays in incorporating interdisciplinary knowledge, connecting specialized knowledge across different program levels, and motivating student learning. It also provides a reference for the practice of sustainable architectural education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Education for Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 12883 KiB  
Article
Development of the Animal Conservation Digital Learning Aids and Assessments through the Industry-University Collaborative Course
by Yu-Horng Chen
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7524; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147524 - 6 Jul 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2035
Abstract
Due to the rapid changes caused by globalization and internationalization, this study focused on achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 4 and 15 via specific digital learning materials—animal conservation apps—particularly designed for enlarging primary school pupils’ knowledge of biodiversity and conservation of natural habitats, [...] Read more.
Due to the rapid changes caused by globalization and internationalization, this study focused on achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 4 and 15 via specific digital learning materials—animal conservation apps—particularly designed for enlarging primary school pupils’ knowledge of biodiversity and conservation of natural habitats, and promoting sustainable development and lifelong learning abilities. Through a collaboration with Taipei Zoo, this study recruited 37 undergraduates who took the Learning Design and Practice course to develop the digital learning-assisted materials, namely animal conservation apps and assessment tools that suited the digital learning materials. In the initiative stage of the course, the undergraduates were required to work as a team and to learn in a group by observing and experiencing the model apps provided in the class. The provided apps were developed in compliance with the ADDIE model. In the middle stage of the course, each team was asked to develop their team app and assessment tools following the ADDIE model. In the final stage, each team’s design results were evaluated based on the digital learning material scale and core competency test evaluation: art domain. The results show that the undergraduates were able to integrate the expertise they gained in the course to developing high-quality digital learning materials. According to the educational professionals’ evaluation, the assessment tools designed by the undergraduates scored high marks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Education for Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1982 KiB  
Article
Key Competencies for Design in a Circular Economy: Exploring Gaps in Design Knowledge and Skills for a Circular Economy
by Deborah Sumter, Jotte de Koning, Conny Bakker and Ruud Balkenende
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 776; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020776 - 14 Jan 2021
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 7318
Abstract
In a recent study, we identified seven key circular competencies for design: (1) Design for Multiple Use Cycles, (2) Design for Recovery, (3) Circular Impact Assessment, (4) Circular Business Models, (5) Circular User Engagement, (6) Circular Economy Collaboration, and (7) Circular Economy Communication. [...] Read more.
In a recent study, we identified seven key circular competencies for design: (1) Design for Multiple Use Cycles, (2) Design for Recovery, (3) Circular Impact Assessment, (4) Circular Business Models, (5) Circular User Engagement, (6) Circular Economy Collaboration, and (7) Circular Economy Communication. These were derived from small-scale studies with designers working in the Netherlands. We set out to assess to what extent this set of seven competencies is recognized by an international group of designers and to evaluate whether any competencies are missing. We used an online survey to collect data from 128 respondents from 25 countries working on circular economy projects. The survey results showed that respondents use and have expertise in all seven competencies and they stressed the practical importance of two new competencies: Circular Systems Thinking and Circular Materials and Manufacturing. The resulting set of nine key competencies is the first internationally verified, coherent set of key circular economy competencies for design. This set will strengthen the pedagogical base of design for a circular economy and will guide the development of circular design methodology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Education for Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4671 KiB  
Article
Teaching Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Sustainability Factors Applied to Road Projects
by Gabriela Paredes and Rodrigo F. Herrera
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 8930; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218930 - 27 Oct 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2983
Abstract
Currently, there is a need for civil engineering programs to train their students in subjects associated with sustainability. Additionally, civil engineers in their work must constantly make decisions, so their training is necessary. Therefore, the goal of this research is to present a [...] Read more.
Currently, there is a need for civil engineering programs to train their students in subjects associated with sustainability. Additionally, civil engineers in their work must constantly make decisions, so their training is necessary. Therefore, the goal of this research is to present a methodology for teaching multi-criteria decision-making methods in the context of civil engineering and road infrastructure projects using sustainable factors. To achieve the objective of this study, a decision-making simulation activity has been designed based on a five-step research process: (1) definition and contextualization of the case study; (2) design and planning of the simulation activity; (3) implementation of this activity; (4) evaluation of indicators; and (5) statistical analysis of metrics. The teaching methodology used is of a practical-theoretical type and allows for the step-by-step teaching of three multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods that, according to the literature review, are widely used in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. This teaching activity is intended for undergraduate students and professionals in the AEC industry who require a decision-making tool that promotes transparency in problem-solving and who have no knowledge of MCDM. The results obtained in this research show that the method perceived by the group of students with the least difficulty was the weighting rating and calculating (WRC), because of its previous familiarity and use in academic environments. It is recommended that MCDM methods be taught in semester courses to students in training so that they can develop a deep understanding of these tools and can demonstrate their usefulness for decision making where there are many variables to consider, where there are many decision-makers, and for the incorporation of sustainable factors for project evaluation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Education for Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5922 KiB  
Article
Integration of Environmental Sustainability Issues into the “Game Design Theory and Practice” Design Course
by Hsiu Ching Laura Hsieh
Sustainability 2020, 12(16), 6334; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166334 - 6 Aug 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3985
Abstract
International and Taiwanese research has suggested that education for sustainable development (ESD) requires interdisciplinary research and teaching. There is a lack of sustainable art and design courses in the field of humanities. We have learned that design students have neither a concern for [...] Read more.
International and Taiwanese research has suggested that education for sustainable development (ESD) requires interdisciplinary research and teaching. There is a lack of sustainable art and design courses in the field of humanities. We have learned that design students have neither a concern for the surrounding environment nor the ability to resolve social issues when teaching design. This study is intended to integrate sustainable development issues into design courses and apply design to resolve issues so that students can develop the ability to think creatively and solve environmental sustainability issues. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of integrating sustainable development issues into “Game Design Theory and Practice” design course and to construct a model of “design course on environmental sustainability.” This study applied the action research method and incorporated the PBL (problem-based learning) and ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation, evaluation) modes. Ultimately, based on the results of course planning and implementation, we proposed the model of “design course on environmental sustainability,” with priorities given to: (1) The introduction of environmental sustainability issues; (2) the introduction of design methods by teachers; (3) the promotion of students’ participation in design thinking and discussion; (4) students’ adjustments to the design according to players’ feedback; and (5) interaction and communication between different characters. The results demonstrated that the integration of sustainable development issues into the planning and implementation of the “Game Design Theory and Practice” design course had positive effects. Game design could be used as a method and tool to encourage students and players to assume sustainable citizenship and to generate a concern for sustainable development in interesting game contexts. These findings can contribute to the future development of design education at colleges and universities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design Education for Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop