sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Revitalizing Rural Communities: Pathways to Social, Economic, and Environmental Sustainability

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Urban and Rural Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 June 2026) | Viewed by 3334

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Miller School of Entrepreneurship, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
Interests: rural entrepreneurship; public policy; economic development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Recreation Sciences; Miller School of Entrepreneurship, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
Interests: rural development; tourism planning; community health; place-based policy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

A significant contribution to this discourse is the editorial by Barber III, Harris, and Jones (2021) from a Special Issue in the Journal of Small Business Strategy, which emphasizes the unique nature of rural entrepreneurship. They argue that traditional frameworks, often tailored for urban or high-growth contexts, may not effectively capture the nuances of rural entrepreneurial activities. Their report advocates for context-specific research methodologies that consider the distinct social, economic, and cultural landscapes of rural areas.

Building on the theme of tailored approaches, Zollet et al. (2024) delve into rural entrepreneurship education. Their research highlights the importance of experiential learning and the development of entrepreneurial self-efficacy among rural students. By analyzing various educational programs, they demonstrate how curricula designed with rural contexts in mind can better equip students to contribute to their communities' economic development.

This Special Issue also explores the integration of environmental sustainability into rural development. Articles could discuss the adoption of green development practices, emphasizing the need for sustainable agricultural methods and the conservation of natural resources. These studies would showcase successful initiatives where rural communities have implemented environmentally friendly practices that also bolster economic resilience.

Social sustainability is another potential critical focus. This Special Issue will examine how community engagement, cultural preservation, and inclusive governance contribute to the overall well-being of rural populations. Additionally, we welcome examples of community-based art, including visual and performing arts, that contribute to social sustainability. By fostering strong social networks and participatory decision-making processes, rural communities can enhance their capacity to adapt to changing circumstances and external pressures.

Collectively, the articles in this Special Issue will provide valuable insights into the complex interplay between social, economic, and environmental factors in rural settings, underscoring the necessity of holistic, context-aware strategies to promote sustainable development and resilience in rural communities worldwide.

The aim of this Special Issue of Sustainability, titled "Revitalizing Rural Communities: Pathways to Social, Economic, and Environmental Sustainability," is to explore and disseminate research that addresses the multifaceted challenges and opportunities inherent in rural community revitalization.

     1. Focus, Scope, and Purpose

  1. Focus: This Special Issue is centered on the intersection of social, economic, and environmental dimensions in the context of rural community sustainability. Our objective is to understand how integrated approaches can foster long-term viability in rural areas (Junping et al., 2023), given that recent studies illustrate that sustainable rural development must align with local contexts and community needs, which are often shaped by unique social and economic dynamics (Liu, 2024).
  2. Scope: This Issue encompasses a broad range of topics comprising (but not limited to) rural entrepreneurship, community-based resource management, social cohesion, environmental justice, and sustainable land use, including communities reclaiming the commons in direct response to absentee land ownership (Gonzalez, 2019). We welcome interdisciplinary research that offers both theoretical insights and practical solutions applicable to diverse rural settings on a global scale. The increasing focus on digital transformation in rural economies (Zollet et al., 2024), particularly its role in enhancing access to markets, is noteworthy, as it plays a pivotal role in revitalizing rural entrepreneurship (Criveanu, 2023). Additionally, researchers are encouraged to consider social sustainability aspects, such as community engagement and inclusive governance, which are crucial for successful rural revitalization (Mohai & Saha, 2015).
  3. Purpose: Our primary objective is to contribute to the academic, theoretical, and practical understanding of sustainable rural development. By compiling empirical studies, case analyses, and theoretical frameworks, the aim of this Special Issue is to inform policymakers, practitioners, and scholars about effective strategies for revitalizing rural communities sustainably (Christopher et al., 2022). Given that present research indicates that incorporating environmental justice perspectives can significantly enhance the effectiveness of revitalization strategies (Fanelli, 2021), our aim is to forge connections between theoretical frameworks and real-world applications, bridging the gap between research and practice (Gladkova, 2024).

This Special Issue can add to the existing literature in several meaningful ways, as follows:

  1. Integrative Frameworks for Rural Sustainability

While much prior research treats social, economic, and environmental dimensions of rural development in isolation, we explicitly seek interdisciplinary and integrative approaches. By examining how these dimensions intersect and influence each other, this Issue can advance holistic models of rural revitalization that are both theoretically robust and practically relevant.

  1. Grounding Research in Local Contexts

Recent research (e.g., Liu, 2024) stresses that sustainability strategies must be context-sensitive. This Issue’s emphasis on locally adapted strategies and inclusive governance can push the literature beyond generic frameworks to more place-based, community-informed insights—a critical step in making sustainable development truly viable for rural settings.

  1. Addressing Underexplored Topics

The inclusion of themes such as digital transformation in rural economies, environmental justice, and inclusive governance highlights emerging but underexplored areas. These topics are particularly timely as rural regions globally are navigating climate change, depopulation, and technological shifts. This Issue can therefore fill important empirical and theoretical gaps, especially in policy-relevant research.

  1. Bridging Theory and Practice

By calling for submissions that connect academic theory with practical strategies, this Issue could significantly contribute to translational research. It may help bridge the persistent gap between academic insights and on-the-ground policy implementation—an area where sustainability research often falls short.

  1. Global and Comparative Perspectives

This Issue’s openness to diverse global contexts encourages comparative studies and cross-regional learning. This could lead to a more nuanced understanding of how different governance structures, cultural settings, and resource constraints shape sustainable rural development—thus enhancing the generalizability and transferability of findings.

References:

Barber III, D., Harris, M. L., & Jones, J. (2021). An Overview of Rural Entrepreneurship and Future Directions. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 31(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.29468

Zollet, S., Monsen, E., Chen, W. D., & Barber III, D. (2024). Rural Entrepreneurship Education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274241235458

Sustainability | Special Issue: Green Development: Rural Communities, Resilience and Sustainability—Second Edition. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/special_issues/0J759IF770

Sustainability | Special Issue: Environmental and Social Sustainability in Rural Areas. https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/special_issues/environmental_social*

Dr. Dennis Barber III
Dr. Emily Yeager
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • rural development
  • sustainability
  • place-based research
  • small town entrepreneurship
  • rural entrepreneurship
  • community development
  • economic development

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 706 KB  
Article
Adaptive Linkage Mechanism for Enhancing Participation Resilience in Rural Public Cultural Spaces: A Social Sustainability Perspective
by Di Xie, Shiwei Xia and Rongjuan Li
Sustainability 2026, 18(14), 7435; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147435 - 21 Jul 2026
Viewed by 213
Abstract
Although rural public cultural spaces in China have expanded rapidly, many struggle to maintain stable and sustained public participation. Taking Sanchalu Village in Wuhan as a case, this study examines how multi-actor interactions transform fragmented and short-term participation into a resilient participatory structure. [...] Read more.
Although rural public cultural spaces in China have expanded rapidly, many struggle to maintain stable and sustained public participation. Taking Sanchalu Village in Wuhan as a case, this study examines how multi-actor interactions transform fragmented and short-term participation into a resilient participatory structure. Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, the study analyzed semi-structured interviews with 13 government officials, village cadres, enterprise representatives, and villagers, supplemented by participant observation and documentary materials. The findings identify an adaptive linkage process in which external resource embedding activates participation, village-level organizations promote the institutionalization of participation through incentive mechanisms and participation channels, internal and external resources are integrated through trust-based reciprocity, and multi-actor collaboration stabilizes governance arrangements. Accordingly, participation resilience develops through sustained participation, organizational mediation, and institutional safeguards rather than through infrastructure provision alone. This study clarifies how participation resilience supports the social sustainability of rural public cultural spaces and offers practical guidance for developing demand-responsive, locally embedded, and institutionally sustained participation mechanisms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 272 KB  
Article
Entrepreneurial Learning in Rural Contexts: A Qualitative Analysis of Student Reflections from the RISE29 Internship Program
by Emily Pauline Yeager, Dennis Barber III, Tristyn Daughtry and Michael Harris
Sustainability 2026, 18(14), 6959; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18146959 - 8 Jul 2026
Viewed by 201
Abstract
Rural communities face persistent economic challenges, and universities increasingly serve as catalysts for regional entrepreneurial development. This study evaluates the RISE29 program, a consulting-based internship initiative placing interdisciplinary undergraduate teams as paid interns with small businesses in economically distressed counties of Eastern North [...] Read more.
Rural communities face persistent economic challenges, and universities increasingly serve as catalysts for regional entrepreneurial development. This study evaluates the RISE29 program, a consulting-based internship initiative placing interdisciplinary undergraduate teams as paid interns with small businesses in economically distressed counties of Eastern North Carolina, examining what students across disciplines learned. Drawing on Cope’s entrepreneurial learning framework as a sensitizing theoretical lens, the study asks: (1) What themes characterize the entrepreneurial learning experiences described by RISE29 interns across cohorts and disciplines? (2) How do reflective depth, student agency, and program satisfaction vary across cohort periods, disciplinary affiliations, and program structures? A multi-layered qualitative analysis of 158 written reflection papers submitted across ten cohorts (Spring 2019–Summer 2022) was integrated with deductive qualitative analysis guided by Cope’s entrepreneurial learning framework, constructivist grounded theory coding, reflexive thematic analysis, reflective depth coding, sentiment and tone analysis, and cross-group comparison. Seven themes emerged: communication as the central axis of learning; collaborative identity development; leadership identity formation; encounter with Eastern North Carolina’s rural communities; professional identity and career clarity; real-world learning and classroom transfer; and program satisfaction with constructive critique. All four dimensions of Cope’s framework were present across disciplines, and non-Business students, in several cases, demonstrated a high degree of analytical depth warranting further investigation. Reflective depth increased in cohorts using an expanded prompt, though overlapping structural changes across the study period preclude single-factor attribution. Place-based, consulting-driven experiential programs generate substantive entrepreneurial learning across disciplinary lines, though findings reflect students’ perceived learning rather than verified competency acquisition. These results support investment in client vetting, structured reflection, cross-disciplinary teaming, and in-person community engagement. Full article
29 pages, 7354 KB  
Article
Assessment of the Quality of Digitalization Construction in Rural Development in the Yangtze River Delta from a Policy Perspective
by Yaqin Xing, Taozhen Huang and Junjun Niu
Sustainability 2026, 18(13), 6862; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136862 - 6 Jul 2026
Viewed by 219
Abstract
Digital rural construction is a key component of China’s agricultural and rural transformation, as well as a means to improve rural productivity and strengthen the coordinated development of urban and rural areas in the Yangtze River Delta, which requires the backing of an [...] Read more.
Digital rural construction is a key component of China’s agricultural and rural transformation, as well as a means to improve rural productivity and strengthen the coordinated development of urban and rural areas in the Yangtze River Delta, which requires the backing of an efficient policy framework. Based on this, the research object is the 145 digital village policies issued by the Yangtze River Delta, and 16 of them are selected for evaluation after content mining. The findings are as follows: (1) Sixteen policies have an average PMC index of 8.42; four policies are excellent, 12 are good, and the quality of policies is generally good. (2) At the administrative level, there is a characteristic that the quality of provincial policies is superior to that of municipal policies. Among regions, the policy quality advantages represented by Zhejiang are obvious, presenting a pattern of “Zhejiang leading, Jiangsu steady, Anhui catching up, and Shanghai waiting for improvement”. (3) Except for the “policy function”, although the absolute scores of some indicators (such as policy field, policy content, policy evaluation) are at a high level, there is still a significant gap compared to the outstanding performance of the policy function (0.98). Moreover, from the perspective of the requirement for comprehensive and coordinated development of policies, the attention and investment in these dimensions are slightly insufficient, resulting in policies not fully exerting their expected comprehensive effectiveness, which is the main reason restricting the overall quality of policies. (4) It is recommended to increase the regulatory and advisory nature of the policy; Expand the scope of policy audiences; Take into account the forward-looking and long-term nature of policy formulation; Refine the execution plan to ensure the implementation of policies; The content of the construction of fiscal taxation, laws and regulations will be increased to provide a scientific basis for the rural transformation; Encourage local exploration and innovation, combine with local conditions, and form replicable and promotable development models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 38627 KB  
Article
Research on Traditional Rural Finance, Digital Finance, and Agricultural Economic Resilience: Causal Inference Based on Double Machine Learning
by Su Li, Changjun Yang and Kexin Li
Sustainability 2026, 18(13), 6585; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136585 - 29 Jun 2026
Viewed by 384
Abstract
Agricultural economic resilience (AER) is not only a key pathway for promoting rural revitalization and ensuring food security, but also an important guarantee for sustainable agricultural development. Based on panel data for 1410 counties in China from 2014 to 2023, this study employs [...] Read more.
Agricultural economic resilience (AER) is not only a key pathway for promoting rural revitalization and ensuring food security, but also an important guarantee for sustainable agricultural development. Based on panel data for 1410 counties in China from 2014 to 2023, this study employs the entropy weight method, a double machine learning model (DML), an instrumental variable model, and a panel threshold model to systematically analyze the impact of traditional rural finance (TRF) on AER and its underlying mechanisms. It also examines the threshold effect of digital finance (DF) in the process through which TRF influences AER, and further explores the roles of DF and TRF in narrowing agricultural development disparities, with the aim of providing scientific evidence for rural revitalization and food security in China and other developing countries, and contributing to the sustainable development of agriculture. The results show that (1) TRF can significantly improve AER, with agricultural technological innovation (ATI) and agricultural socialized services (ASS) playing mediating roles; (2) DF and its dimensions, including coverage breadth, usage depth, and degree of digitalization, exhibit threshold effects in the impact of TRF on AER, and as the levels of DF and its dimensions increase, the positive effect of TRF shows a diminishing marginal trend, indicating a competitive crowding-out effect between the two; (3) the promoting effect of TRF on AER exhibits significant heterogeneity, being stronger in agricultural counties and in the eastern, central, and western regions, following a “Central > Eastern > Western” pattern, while it is not significant in the northeastern region; (4) TRF significantly reduces agricultural development disparities, whereas DF overall significantly exacerbates such disparities, although its different dimensions exhibit clear heterogeneity in their effects, with coverage breadth consistently and significantly widening regional agricultural development gaps. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 14212 KB  
Article
Study on the Evaluation of the Current Status of Traditional Village Protection and Cluster Protection Development Strategies in Southwest Hubei
by Wei Xu, Ji Wu and Zhenhua Zhu
Sustainability 2026, 18(11), 5592; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115592 - 2 Jun 2026
Viewed by 370
Abstract
To address the scattered protection efforts and uneven effectiveness of traditional villages in southwestern Hubei, this study focuses on 92 nationally recognized traditional villages in Enshi Prefecture. By integrating literature research, field investigation, and multi-source data fusion, we developed an innovative model that [...] Read more.
To address the scattered protection efforts and uneven effectiveness of traditional villages in southwestern Hubei, this study focuses on 92 nationally recognized traditional villages in Enshi Prefecture. By integrating literature research, field investigation, and multi-source data fusion, we developed an innovative model that combines the Analytic Network Process (ANP), entropy weight, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, thereby integrating subjective and objective weighting to improve evaluation accuracy. A quantitative evaluation was conducted across 13 criteria and 32 indicators, including traffic conditions, intangible cultural heritage resources, and industrial foundation. The results reveal that traditional villages in Enshi Prefecture exhibit a significant spatial pattern of “overall dispersion with local concentration,” accompanied by a high concentration index. Traffic conditions, intangible cultural heritage, and infrastructure emerge as the core factors affecting protection effectiveness, and a spatial differentiation pattern of “two cores and one corridor” is identified within the region. Based on the quantitative evaluation, we propose targeted cluster protection strategies, including a “dual-core multi-node” transportation network, “three-industry linkage” industrial collaboration, and a living heritage approach that integrates cultural relics with intangible cultural heritage. These strategies were validated in pilot villages such as Yejiaoyuan Village, resulting in significant increases in village satisfaction and tourist volume. The findings provide methodological support and practical paradigms for the systematic protection and sustainable development of traditional villages in southwestern ethnic minority areas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 5968 KB  
Article
Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Digital–Green Synergy Development in Rural China
by Xingcui Liu and Zhiheng Shi
Sustainability 2026, 18(8), 4135; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18084135 - 21 Apr 2026
Viewed by 435
Abstract
Digital–green synergy development is a critical pathway for promoting comprehensive rural revitalization and high-quality development. Using panel data from 31 Chinese provinces spanning 2012 to 2023, we employ the global entropy weight method, a coupling coordination degree model, kernel density estimation, and an [...] Read more.
Digital–green synergy development is a critical pathway for promoting comprehensive rural revitalization and high-quality development. Using panel data from 31 Chinese provinces spanning 2012 to 2023, we employ the global entropy weight method, a coupling coordination degree model, kernel density estimation, and an obstacle degree model to systematically analyze the spatiotemporal evolutionary characteristics and obstacle factors underlying this synergy, aiming to provide a scientific basis for regionally differentiated comprehensive rural revitalization. The findings reveal that: (1) Both digitalization and greenization have improved steadily, though the growth rate of greenization lags behind that of digitalization. The level of digital–green synergy development, although initially low, shows continuous growth. (2) Spatially, digital–green synergy development exhibits a pattern of eastern leadership, central catching-up, western transition, and northeastern stagnation. (3) Nationally, the absolute disparity in digital–green synergy development continues to widen, indicating growing polarization. Regionally, the eastern region exhibits multipolarization, the central region shows bipolarization, while the western and northeastern regions display no significant polarization trends. (4) Production digitalization and living greenization are the primary constraints hindering synergy. Based on these findings, we propose targeted policy recommendations to facilitate deeper integration between rural digitalization and greenization, supporting decision-makers in advancing digital–green synergy development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop