sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Food Security and Food Choices in Sustainable Development: Strategies and Applications

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Food".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2026 | Viewed by 2369

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business, Consumer Sciences and Quality Management, Faculty of Business and Tourism, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010404 Bucharest, Romania
Interests: food quality; food security; nutritional value; food consumption behavior; nutrient profiling; food labeling; sensory analysis; sustainable diets; sustainable food trends; alternative protein sources; food anthropology; ethnography; consumer culture theory

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business, Consumer Sciences and Quality Management, Faculty of Business and Tourism, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010404 Bucharest, Romania
Interests: supply chain management; logistics; sales; retailing; management operations; business coaching; consumer behaviour; food science; sustainable development
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business, Consumer Sciences and Quality Management, Faculty of Business and Tourism, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010404 Bucharest, Romania
Interests: consumer behavior; social networks; social media; e-commerce; management of informatic systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the global food landscape, where abundance and overconsumption—linked to the growing incidence of lifestyle-related diseases and increasing food waste—accompany food shortages that fuel deficiency-related diseases and poverty, sustainability has emerged as a recurring theme.

Within this framework, food security, responsible food choices, and sustainable development emerge as core interdependent dimensions that should define contemporary food systems.

Food security—conceptualized through the four interdependent pillars of availability, access, utilization, and stability—intersects with the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development, ensuring not only the steady provision and equitable distribution of resources, but also the responsible use of natural systems, facilitation of healthy living, and building of stable economic structures that sustain current and future generations. Therefore, food security emerges as both a prerequisite and a catalyst for strategies that promote human well-being, equity, and environmental resilience.

Food choices represent a key vector of transformation in this context, as they shape consumer demand while influencing the organization of production and distribution systems. When informed by principles of sustainability and responsibility, consumers' food choices can contribute to reducing environmental pressures, strengthening local economies, improving public health, and fostering social equity.

Building on the considerations outlined above, the purpose of this Special Issue is to enrich the existing literature by connecting sustainability studies with consumer-focused analyses, thus providing new insights into the complex relationship between food systems and sustainable development. Therefore, both conceptual and empirical papers addressing (but not limited to) the following topics are welcome:

  • Nutritional security and adequacy;
  • Eating preferences;
  • Nutritional choices;
  • Food consumption patterns;
  • Dietary habits;
  • Emerging trends in consumer behaviour and preferences;
  • Food access and availability;
  • Sustainable food supply;
  • Food system resilience;
  • Innovative food technologies;
  • New food business models.

By advancing knowledge that facilitates the integration of food security, consumer behaviour, and sustainability, this Special Issue seeks to foster coherent strategies that support the long-term resilience and responsible transformation of the global food system.

I look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Lelia Voinea
Dr. Mihaela Bucur
Dr. Razvan Dina
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • food sustainability
  • food security
  • nutritional adequacy
  • responsible food choices
  • consumer behaviour
  • food innovations
  • food system robustness
  • green food supply chain

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 331 KB  
Article
Understanding Farmers’ Adoption Intentions for Environmentally Friendly Intermediate Farming: A Typology-Based Analysis of Current Farming Systems in Japan
by Chunhong Wang, Mitsuho Nakagomi, Akari Oka and Kazuhiro Matsumoto
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4775; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104775 - 11 May 2026
Viewed by 255
Abstract
Reducing agrochemical inputs while maintaining productivity is essential for sustainable agriculture and food security. To bridge the gap between conventional and organic systems and inform evidence-based promotion strategies, this study examines how farmers with different existing farming systems perceive and respond to an [...] Read more.
Reducing agrochemical inputs while maintaining productivity is essential for sustainable agriculture and food security. To bridge the gap between conventional and organic systems and inform evidence-based promotion strategies, this study examines how farmers with different existing farming systems perceive and respond to an intermediate farming method characterized by minimal agrochemical use (≤1/8 of conventional levels) in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. A survey of 120 farmers was classified into organic (OA, 34.2%), reduced-input (RA, 28.3%), and conventional (CA, 37.5%) groups. Chi-square tests and binary logistic regression were employed to examine group differences and identify predictors of adoption intention. Adoption willingness varied significantly across groups (χ2 = 24.46, p < 0.001): RA farmers showed the highest willingness (88.2%), followed by CA farmers (68.9%), while OA farmers were least willing (34.1%). Logistic regression identified farmer type (OA vs. CA: OR = 0.148, p = 0.001) and adoption conditions including health safety assurance (OR = 3.687, p = 0.026) and higher profitability (OR = 3.897, p = 0.040) as significant predictors. These findings highlight the importance of tailored extension strategies and evidence-based policy support to facilitate adoption across diverse farmer groups. Full article
17 pages, 292 KB  
Article
Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Environmentally Friendly Intermediate Farming: A Grouping Approach Based on Consumers’ Purchase Preferences
by Chunhong Wang, Mitsuho Nakagomi, Akari Oka and Kazuhiro Matsumoto
Sustainability 2026, 18(4), 1712; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041712 - 7 Feb 2026
Viewed by 527
Abstract
Debates on sustainability have focused mainly on conventional and organic farming. However, little attention has been given to intermediate production approaches with potential benefits for environmental protection, food affordability, and food safety. This study investigated consumers’ acceptance of an intermediate farming method characterized [...] Read more.
Debates on sustainability have focused mainly on conventional and organic farming. However, little attention has been given to intermediate production approaches with potential benefits for environmental protection, food affordability, and food safety. This study investigated consumers’ acceptance of an intermediate farming method characterized by minimal use of agrochemicals. Using a preference-based grouping approach, 184 Japanese consumers were divided into organic-prone (OA-prone), conventional-prone (CA-prone), and balance-prone groups (χ2 test, p < 0.001). The results revealed clear differences in how these groups evaluated and responded to the produce from the intermediate farming method. OA-prone consumers tended to evaluate such produce against the standards associated with organic food and therefore showed more cautious acceptance. In contrast, CA- and balance-prone consumers demonstrated relatively higher acceptance when product safety and taste were assured, reflecting a more pragmatic evaluation based on functional attributes and affordability. These findings suggest that the promotion of environmentally friendly intermediate farming depends more on pragmatic CA- and balance-prone consumers rather than those value-driven organic consumers. By highlighting consumer heterogeneity in the evaluation of such farming systems, this study contributes to a broader understanding of sustainable food consumption and underscores the role of intermediate farming in bridging environmental sustainability and food security. Full article
22 pages, 988 KB  
Article
The Semi-Formalization of Wet Markets in Urban China: A Hybrid Social Infrastructure for Urban Resilience and Food Security
by Yuan Yuan, Zhenzhong Si and Taiyang Zhong
Sustainability 2026, 18(3), 1613; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031613 - 5 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1167
Abstract
Wet markets remain a cornerstone of fresh food retail in Chinese cities, continuously evolving alongside urbanization. However, the drivers and implications of their transformation at the city level remain underexplored. Drawing on government documents and survey data from Nanjing and Suzhou, this study [...] Read more.
Wet markets remain a cornerstone of fresh food retail in Chinese cities, continuously evolving alongside urbanization. However, the drivers and implications of their transformation at the city level remain underexplored. Drawing on government documents and survey data from Nanjing and Suzhou, this study reveals that China’s wet market evolution is characterized by incremental semi-formalization and upgrading, preserving their essential role in the food supply chain without displacing other retail formats. This transformation reflects shifting government attitudes, strategic urban planning for food security, and the effective integration of public and private interests. The hybrid governance model, which combines public oversight with private operation, has enhanced wet markets’ resilience, ensuring affordability, freshness, and social interaction. Their adaptability underscores a broader lesson: inclusive urban food systems require soft–hard infrastructure synergy, where physical upgrades coexist with social functions. In this paper, we argue that wet markets exemplify social infrastructure: they are not merely food hubs but spaces fostering civic life, cultural continuity, and equitable access. Their co-evolution with supermarkets and e-commerce challenges the “supermarketization” thesis, highlighting the importance of policy flexibility and localized governance. Our findings offer insights for Global South cities grappling with food system transitions, emphasizing the need to balance modernization with the preservation of informal economies’ social fabric. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop