sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

ESG, Sustainability and Competitiveness: A Serious Reflection

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2025) | Viewed by 6027

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods (DEMM), University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy
Interests: financing innovation; corporate venture capital; capital structure of SMEs; financial markets and calendar anomalies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of Management Sciences (PUMBA), Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
Interests: corporate finance; economics; sustainability
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the new competitive context, a holistic approach to sustainability (and, in particular, to environmental, social and governance criteria) can help to identify investment opportunities.

During the last few years, ESG has become a fundamental approach to pursuing a sustainable competitive advantage and, today, ESG is an important framework that helps external investors assess company performance and risk. Sustainability, on the other hand, is a framework that assists firms in making internal capital investments.

A number of scholars (Kivimaa, 2008; Khan, 2019) have highlighted the importance of ethical practices in the new competitive framework. As affirmed by Chouaibi et al. (2022), “Corporate environmental responsibilities have become an international trend. Moreover, environmental strategies have increasingly become a part of business practice and research”.

In recent decades, the literature on corporate value and corporate performance has been growing and, due to the multidisciplinary nature of the subject, new aspects pertaining to sustainability are increasingly being added (Battisti et al., 2019; Buallay et al., 2020).

On the one hand, ESG factors aid companies in fulfilling their strategic environmental objectives, gaining competitive advantage and attracting future prospective investors (Mardini 2022). On the other hand, Friedman (1970) argued that the implementation of corporate social responsibilities, and ensuring they perform as advertised, requires additional costs—in particular for shareholders—which may lead to improper assignment of a firm’s resources as well as to limiting the financial benefits of this approach.

Building from these statements, this Special Issue seeks to investigate the impact of sustainability factors—ESG in particular—on business models and the financial performance of firms. More specifically, this Special Issue aims to explore whether ESG factors have a positive or negative impact on competitive advantage and on a firm’s economic performance.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome and research areas may include, but not limited to:

  • ESG and competitiveness;
  • ESG and its impact on financial performance;
  • Sustainability and new business models;
  • The role of ESG in the new business context;
  • Sustainability, myth or truth?;
  • From CSR to ESG—new ways to sustain a business.

References

Battisti, E., Miglietta, N., Nirino, N. and Diaz, M.V. (2019), “Value creation, innovation practice, and competitive advantage”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 273-290.

Buallay, A., Kukreja, G., Aldhaen, E., Al Mubarak, M. and Hamdan, A.M. (2020), “Corporate social responsibility disclosure and firms’ performance in Mediterranean countries: a stakeholders’ perspective”, EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 361-375.

Chouaibi, S.; Rossi, M.; Siggia, D.; Chouaibi, J. Exploring the Moderating Role of Social and Ethical Practices in the Relationship between Environmental Disclosure and Financial Performance: Evidence from ESG Companies. Sustainability 2022, 14, 209. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su14010209.

Friedman, M. (1970), ‘The social responsibility of firms is to increase its profits’, New York Times, pp.122–126.

Khan, M. (2019), “Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 103-123.

Kivimaa, P. (2008), “Integrating environment for innovation: experiences from product development in paper and packaging”, Organization and Environment, Vol. 21, pp. 56-77.

Mardini, G.H. (2022) ‘ESG factors and corporate financial performance’, Int. J. Managerial and Financial Accounting, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.247–264.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Matteo Rossi
Dr. Ashutosh Kolte
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ESG
  • sustainability
  • competitiveness
  • financial performance
  • business models
  • CSR

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 703 KiB  
Article
The Impact of ESG Management Activities on the Organizational Performance of Manufacturing Companies in South Korea: The Moderating Effect of Job Position
by Soo-Cheol Jeong, Haeng-Nam Sung and Jae-Ik Shin
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5233; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125233 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 896
Abstract
This study aims to examine the impact of ESG management activities (independent variable) on organizational trust and organizational commitment (mediating variables), as well as organizational performance (dependent variable), among members of large manufacturing enterprises. Additionally, it investigates the moderating effect of job position [...] Read more.
This study aims to examine the impact of ESG management activities (independent variable) on organizational trust and organizational commitment (mediating variables), as well as organizational performance (dependent variable), among members of large manufacturing enterprises. Additionally, it investigates the moderating effect of job position on the relationship between ESG management activities and organizational performance. For the empirical analysis of this study, data were collected from 561 employees of three large manufacturing companies—Company L, Company H, and another Company H—all of which have implemented and are practicing ESG management. The data were analyzed using SPSS 29.0 and structural equation modeling (SEM: AMOS 29.0). The key findings from the empirical analysis are as follows: First of all, all three ESG factors—environmental (E), social (S), and governance (G)—had a positive effect on organizational trust. The environmental and governance factors had a positive effect on organizational commitment. However, the social factor exhibited a negative effect on organizational commitment. The environmental factor showed a negative effect on organizational performance. By contrast, the social and governance factors had a positive effect on organizational performance. Organizational trust was found to enhance organizational commitment significantly, confirming that employees who trust their organization are more likely to be committed to it. Fifth, a strong sense of trust in the organization was shown to contribute positively to organizational performance and competitiveness. Organizational commitment positively impacted organizational performance, reinforcing the idea that highly committed employees contribute to better outcomes. Finally, this study confirmed that job position moderated the relationship between ESG management activities and organizational performance, indicating that employees at different hierarchical levels perceive ESG management’s impact differently. This study expands the research scope of ESG management beyond marketing, HR, and service industries to focus on employees in large manufacturing enterprises. This provides new insights into how ESG initiatives influence internal organizational dynamics. This study is meaningful in that it provides a foundation for expanding future research into the field of finance or other areas of the manufacturing industry. From a practical standpoint, the findings highlight the necessity of strategic initiatives to ensure that employees fully understand and engage with ESG-related policies. To successfully implement ESG management, organizations must develop effective communication and integration strategies that foster employees’ recognition of ESG initiatives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ESG, Sustainability and Competitiveness: A Serious Reflection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 320 KiB  
Article
ESG Rating Divergence: Existence, Driving Factors, and Impact Effects
by Yong Shi and Tongsheng Yao
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4717; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104717 - 21 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2333
Abstract
In recent years, corporate ESG performance has been widely incorporated into investment decisions and capital allocation considerations, becoming a focal point and hot topic for research by governments and organizations worldwide. However, due to various reasons, significant discrepancies have emerged in ESG ratings [...] Read more.
In recent years, corporate ESG performance has been widely incorporated into investment decisions and capital allocation considerations, becoming a focal point and hot topic for research by governments and organizations worldwide. However, due to various reasons, significant discrepancies have emerged in ESG ratings for the same company across different institutions, and this growing divergence in ESG ratings has increasingly drawn the attention of scholars. Studying the differences in ESG (environmental, social, and corporate governance) ratings is of great significance. This not only helps to understand the root causes of differences, improve the objectivity, consistency, and comparability of ratings, but also helps users better understand the meaning and limitations of rating results. It is beneficial for investors to understand the focus of different ratings and develop more effective investment strategies. It can promote rated companies to improve the quality and transparency of ESG-related information disclosure. It can also provide a reference for regulatory agencies and policymakers, identify market failures and potential risks, and promote the development of more unified standards and frameworks. At the same time, this study can also promote the in-depth development of relevant academic research and theories. Based on this, this study systematically reviews the relevant literature on ESG rating divergence, focusing on its existence, causes, influencing factors, and impacts. The study finds that, in addition to the widespread existence of rating divergence in corporate ESG performance, scholars also disagree on the measurement and methods of this divergence. The reasons for rating divergence are mainly that ESG is a qualitative indicator; top-level design, intermediate calculations, and bottom-level data collection across multiple stages exacerbate divergence; and controversies in practice further deepen divergence, among others. The influencing factors and impact effects of ESG rating divergence are diverse. Given the existence of ESG rating divergence, all parties should treat ESG ratings with caution. This paper offers corresponding recommendations and looks forward to the future, providing a foundation for subsequent research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ESG, Sustainability and Competitiveness: A Serious Reflection)
21 pages, 307 KiB  
Article
Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance, Platform Governance, and Value Creation of Platform Enterprises
by Ruixin Su and Na Li
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7251; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177251 - 23 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2009
Abstract
Under the concepts of sustainable development and a sharing economy, the ESG performance of platform enterprises has played a significant role in measuring the operating status and responsible investment of platform enterprises. Platform enterprises have different typical characteristics from traditional enterprises. The mechanisms [...] Read more.
Under the concepts of sustainable development and a sharing economy, the ESG performance of platform enterprises has played a significant role in measuring the operating status and responsible investment of platform enterprises. Platform enterprises have different typical characteristics from traditional enterprises. The mechanisms of ESG and financial performance needs to be further explored. The empirical analysis finds that: (1) the ESG performance of platform enterprises and its S index and G index has a positive impact on corporate financial performance. (2) Media attention plays a positive moderating role between the ESG and ROA. (3) Platform data governance and platform reputation governance are two internal and external paths for platform enterprises’ ESG performance to improve financial performance. (4)There is heterogeneity in the relationship between ESG and ROA in terms of platform enterprise scale and platform type. Based on the above conclusions, this paper provides reference experience for the ESG governance and value creation of platform enterprises. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ESG, Sustainability and Competitiveness: A Serious Reflection)
Back to TopTop