Sustainability Reporting Standards for the Public Sector

A Special Issue of Standards (ISSN 2305-6703).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2027 | Viewed by 1221

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
Interests: process systems engineering; environmental engineering; sustainable development in chemical and process industries; ESG disclosure; sustainability reporting; process design; retrofit and optimization; energy integration; water and waste reduction; recycling; cleaner production; indicators of sustainable development; sustainable university; education for sustainable development; sustainable consumption; standardization: quantities and units, sustainability, education
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Within human development, human existence is endangered by humans themselves. Climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, waste disposal, and resource scarcity, to name just a few environmental concerns, are some of the drivers of global crises. Diminishing fundamental resources like clean water, fresh air, fertile land, and critical raw materials are examples of additional problems. Social crises result from neglecting human rights, food supplies, health, and elderly care, maintaining inequalities, unemployment, etc. Economic sustainability requires a balance between economic growth, resource efficiency, social equity, and financial stability; it involves renewable sources and their efficiency, zero waste and circular economy, innovations, quality management, and good corporate governance.

The United Nations accepted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015 to address the above problems. The International Organization for Standardization has accepted many ISO standards dealing with the SDGs. The United Nations Forum on Sustainability Standards (UNFSS) has published many Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSSs) that “guarantee that the products you buy do not hurt the environment and the people that make them”. The G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance are the international standard for corporate governance in shareholder rights, corporate disclosure and reporting, climate-related and other sustainability risks, and opportunities. The EU’s European Green Deal was realized in many directives on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D).

Several boards were recently established to develop and approve sustainability disclosure standards, e.g., the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) established by the IFRS Foundation, the Global Sustainability Standards Board (GSSB) that is responsible for proposing GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) standards, and EFRAG with European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). However, a lot of work still needs to be conducted in the future.

This Special Issue aims to present recent publications, plans, proposals, and needs for additional standards, which could ensure a better future for humanity. Some of the main topics include the following:

  • Air, water, and soil pollution.
  • Climate change caused by excessive greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere due to human activities.
  • The loss of biodiversity.
  • The overexploitation of natural resources, zero waste, and circular economy.
  • Economic models that involve unsustainable consumption.
  • Poverty and socioeconomic inequality.
  • Discrimination, prejudice, and social exclusion.
  • Lack of access to resources and critical raw materials.
  • Insecurity and conflict, locally, regionally, and globally.
  • Poor governance, which includes phenomena such as corruption and institutional inefficiency.
  • The responsible management of resources.
  • The capacity for efficiency and innovation of economic systems and enterprises.
  • Financial stability at the macro level.
  • State-level social innovation, that is, each country’s commitment to promoting policies, programs, and initiatives that address crucial social issues such as poverty, gender equality, access to education and health care, environmental sustainability, and other social issues.
  • International cooperation and partnerships between public administration and private enterprises.
  • The level of equity and social inclusion.
  • Corporate responsibility.

Prof. Dr. Peter Glavič
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Standards is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • standard
  • sustainability
  • environmental
  • social
  • economic
  • governance
  • reporting

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

31 pages, 626 KB  
Article
Toward a Public-Sector Resilience Reporting Standard for Low-Probability, High-Impact Systemic Risks: A Pre-Standard Architecture for Government Preparedness Under Deep Uncertainty
by Haris Alibašić
Standards 2026, 6(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards6030028 - 28 Jul 2026
Viewed by 352
Abstract
Public-sector sustainability and climate reporting increasingly address environmental exposure, governance, and financial effects, yet existing frameworks do not adequately disclose preparedness for low-probability, high-impact systemic risks whose probabilities, timing, thresholds, and transmission channels remain deeply uncertain. This article develops a Public-Sector Resilience Reporting [...] Read more.
Public-sector sustainability and climate reporting increasingly address environmental exposure, governance, and financial effects, yet existing frameworks do not adequately disclose preparedness for low-probability, high-impact systemic risks whose probabilities, timing, thresholds, and transmission channels remain deeply uncertain. This article develops a Public-Sector Resilience Reporting Standard (PSRRS) as a pre-standard architecture for government preparedness disclosure. The design has three bounded objectives: diagnose cross-framework disclosure gaps, translate these gaps into a theoretically grounded capability-to-disclosure architecture, and demonstrate its analytical use through an illustrative Florida application and two hazard-neutral stress tests. The documentary corpus includes international sustainability and public-sector reporting standards, ISO and UNDRR resilience and continuity instruments, three Florida resilience documents, and peer-reviewed literature on resilience governance, decision-making under deep uncertainty, critical infrastructure interdependency, catastrophic uncertainty, climate-risk disclosure, public finance, climate-risk pricing, local-government credit risk, investor attention, and ransomware service disruption. A structured interpretive coding protocol classifies each framework as explicit, partial, or not explicit across nine disclosure dimensions; a codebook appendix identifies the assessment criteria, the a priori and inductively refined dimensions, and the validation boundaries. Florida is not treated as a basis for statistical or jurisdictional generalization. Instead, it illustrates how a comparatively developed resilience architecture may disclose statutory continuity, critical-asset data, project ranking, and output metrics while leaving systemic dependencies, adaptive triggers, long-horizon fiscal exposure, residual service risk, distributional effects, and assurance mechanisms insufficiently visible in the reviewed reporting corpus. AMOC and case-grounded cyber-fiscal stress tests show how the PSRRS shifts reporting from hazard inventories and funded projects toward auditable evidence of institutional capacity, adaptive readiness, and public-value protection. The article specifies mandatory, recommended, and optional clauses, evidence requirements, indicator examples, a disclosure index, a sample report structure, and a three-tier pilot conformity model. The contribution is conceptual and operational, but not yet a validated formal standard; cross-jurisdictional piloting, inter-rater coding, cost testing, assurance testing, and stakeholder consultation are identified as the next stage of standardization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Reporting Standards for the Public Sector)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop