Acute and Chronic Effects of Strength Training on Neuromuscular Responses, Adaptations, and Sport Performance

A special issue of Sports (ISSN 2075-4663).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 July 2026 | Viewed by 2854

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre d’Expertise de la Performance, Faculté des Sciences du Sport (UFR Staps), Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
Interests: strength training; neuromuscular function; sensorimotor performance; exercise physiology; fatigue and motor control; biomechanics of movement; sport performance optimization

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Strength training plays a central role in enhancing sport performance through improvements in neuromuscular function, movement efficiency, and long-term physical development. Recent approaches such as velocity-based training, plyometric training, complex contrast training, local muscular endurance training, and local vibration training have expanded conventional resistance training paradigms, offering diverse ways to influence both acute neuromuscular responses and chronic adaptations. In parallel, growing attention to strength training in youth highlights the importance of individualized and age-appropriate development strategies. The aim of this Special Issue is to present current knowledge and recent advances examining how these training modalities impact neuromuscular adaptations, motor control, training load management, fatigue resistance, and performance outcomes across different sport populations. We welcome different types of manuscript submissions, including experimental studies, reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which provide evidence-based insights to support researchers, coaches, and practitioners in designing and optimizing strength training interventions for improved sport performance.

Strength training has long been recognized as a key component in developing sport performance through improvements in muscle strength, neuromuscular coordination, movement efficiency, and injury prevention. In recent years, new training paradigms such as velocity-based training, plyometric training, complex training, local muscular endurance training, and local vibration training have broadened traditional resistance training approaches. These methods allow the investigation of both immediate neuromuscular responses and long-term adaptations that support performance enhancement across diverse populations, including elite athletes, amateur athletes, and youth participants.

This Special Issue aims to consolidate and advance knowledge on the acute and chronic effects of strength training on neuromuscular responses, adaptations, and sport performance. The scope includes training practices applied to elite and amateur athletes, youth athletes, and general sport participants, with the goal of identifying evidence-based strategies for individualized and context-specific performance development.

Recent research has focused on real-time load monitoring, force–velocity profiling, motor control adjustments, fatigue regulation, and individualized training prescription. Emerging evidence highlights the importance of adapting training approaches to different athletic levels, from amateur to elite, as well as in youth development. The inclusion of novel modalities such as local vibration training and velocity-based feedback systems reflects continuing innovation within the field.

We invite original research articles, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews examining the effects of strength training on neuromuscular adaptations, acute and chronic responses, biomechanical and physiological mechanisms, training optimization, and performance outcomes. Submissions focusing on elite athletes, amateur athletes, and youth athletes, as well as studies comparing training modalities or offering applied insights for coaches and practitioners, are particularly encouraged.

Dr. Christos Paizis
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sports is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • strength training
  • strength training in youth
  • velocity-based training
  • plyometric training
  • complex training
  • local muscular endurance training
  • local vibration training
  • neuromuscular adaptations
  • acute effects
  • sport performance

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 1184 KB  
Article
Comparison of Velocity-Based Performance and Velocity Loss Between Traditional and Safety Squat Barbells During the Squat Exercise
by Miguel Alarcón-Rivera, Leonardo Poblete-Sánchez, Cristian Salazar-Orellana, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz, Exal Garcia-Carrillo, Pablo Luna-Villouta and Héctor Fuentes-Barría
Sports 2026, 14(4), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14040146 - 9 Apr 2026
Viewed by 634
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine differences between squat variations performed with a traditional barbell (TRAD) and a safety squat bar (SSB) in university athletes, focusing on mean propulsive velocity (MPV), peak velocity (PV), and velocity loss (VL). Nineteen university athletes [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study was to examine differences between squat variations performed with a traditional barbell (TRAD) and a safety squat bar (SSB) in university athletes, focusing on mean propulsive velocity (MPV), peak velocity (PV), and velocity loss (VL). Nineteen university athletes participated in a randomized crossover repeated-measures design. Participants performed squat exercises with both barbell types at 65% and 85% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) across multiple testing sessions. Neuromuscular performance indicators were assessed using a linear velocity transducer. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects of barbell type and load for MPV and PV (all p < 0.05). Higher MPV values were observed with the SSB at both loading intensities, whereas higher PV values were observed only at 85% 1RM. For VL, a significant main effect of barbell type was found (p = 0.013), with no significant effect of load (p = 0.155) or interaction (p = 0.507). In conclusion, the SSB elicited higher movement velocities compared with the traditional barbell. These findings suggest that barbell selection may influence velocity-based performance outcomes during squat exercise. However, due to the cross-sectional design, these results should be considered preliminary. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1044 KB  
Article
Acute Performance and Velocity-Based Fatigue Responses to Alternated and Grouped Exercise Orders in Full-Body Circuit Resistance Training
by Francisco Hermosilla-Perona, Adrián Martín-Castellanos, Marcos R. Pereira-Monteiro, Javier Iglesias García, Manuel Barba-Ruíz and Juan R. Heredia-Elvar
Sports 2026, 14(4), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14040141 - 3 Apr 2026
Viewed by 689
Abstract
Introduction: Circuit resistance training is widely used to enhance physical performance. However, the acute-performance- and fatigue-related effects of exercise order and volume in circuit training, particularly between upper and lower limbs, remain unclear. Objectives: This study examined acute velocity-based responses to different exercise [...] Read more.
Introduction: Circuit resistance training is widely used to enhance physical performance. However, the acute-performance- and fatigue-related effects of exercise order and volume in circuit training, particularly between upper and lower limbs, remain unclear. Objectives: This study examined acute velocity-based responses to different exercise orders and volumes during full-body circuit resistance training. Methods: Thirty resistance-trained adults completed four circuit protocols: alternating exercises with maximal repetitions per exercise (A1), grouped exercises with maximal repetitions per exercise (G1), alternating exercises with 50% of maximal repetitions in the first round (A2), and grouped exercises with 50% of maximal repetitions in the first round (G2). Mean propulsive velocity (MPV) in the bench press and squat at 60% 1RM was assessed before and after each circuit. Results: A significant main effect of Time was observed for both bench press and squat MPV (p < 0.001), with no Intervention × Time interactions. Alternating configurations showed larger effect sizes, indicating greater velocity loss. Under equal volume, upper limbs exhibited greater performance decline than lower limbs. Conclusions: Although exercise order did not result in statistically significant differences, alternating configurations induced a greater magnitude of fatigue-related performance decline than grouped configurations, particularly in upper-body exercises. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 964 KB  
Article
Relationships Between Dry-Land Load—Velocity Parameters and In-Water Bioenergetic Performance in Competitive Swimmers
by Sofiene Amara, Anissa Bouassida and Roland van den Tillaar
Sports 2026, 14(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14010011 - 3 Jan 2026
Viewed by 901
Abstract
Background: Neuromuscular determinants such as maximal force, maximal velocity, and upper-body power are recognized as key contributors to competitive swimming performance. However, despite the relevance of these dry-land qualities, their relationships with the physiological mechanisms underpinning in-water performance, particularly aerobic and anaerobic capacities, [...] Read more.
Background: Neuromuscular determinants such as maximal force, maximal velocity, and upper-body power are recognized as key contributors to competitive swimming performance. However, despite the relevance of these dry-land qualities, their relationships with the physiological mechanisms underpinning in-water performance, particularly aerobic and anaerobic capacities, remain insufficiently established. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationships between upper-body load–velocity profile parameters (theoretical maximal force: F0; theoretical maximal velocity: V0; and maximal power: Pmax), aerobic capacity expressed through critical velocity, and anaerobic capacity in trained swimmers. Methods: Thirty competitive male swimmers (age = 16.50 ± 0.31 years) completed an upper-body load–velocity profile test using the bench press exercise to determine F0, V0, and Pmax. Swimming performances in the 100, 200, and 400 m freestyle events were used to calculate critical velocity and anaerobic capacity based on a linear distance–time model. Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between variables. Results: Pmax (r = 0.493, p = 0.006) and V0 (r = 0.697, p < 0.001) showed moderate to strong correlations with critical velocity, whereas F0 showed no significant association (r = 0.152, p = 0.422). Conversely, anaerobic capacity was strongly correlated with F0 (r = 0.842, p < 0.001) but not with V0 (p = 0.119). Regression models indicated that F0 explained 71% of the variance in anaerobic capacity, while V0 explained 48% of the variance in critical velocity. Conclusion: The findings demonstrated distinct contributions of neuromuscular qualities: speed and power-oriented parameters are associated with critical velocity, whereas maximal strength strongly associated with anaerobic capacity. Monitoring the upper-body load–velocity profile appears to be a relevant tool for individualizing dry-land training according to the aerobic and anaerobic demands of swimmers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop