Advances in Environmental Policy/Politics and Sustainable Development Goals

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 March 2026 | Viewed by 285

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Guadalajara, Av. General Ramón Corona, Col. Nuevo México, Zapopan 45138, Jalisco, Mexico
Interests: environment; sports; gender; race; culture; media; political economy; ethnography; the Americas
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Social Sciences explores environmental research, activism, and policy, as well as how they connect to—or disconnect from—the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and various social movements. It addresses the urgent need for integrated, equitable, and actionable strategies to tackle interconnected challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, resource depletion, the denial of climate change, animal lives, and threats to research autonomy. Contributions might examine innovative policy frameworks, governance models, activism, the blockage of free research, and cross-sector collaborations. Potential topics include the role of digital technologies in SDGs, justice-centered approaches to decarbonization, animal rights, and the effectiveness of transnational agreements in addressing transboundary environmental risks.

By highlighting research articles and reviews from diverse geographic, research, theoretical, activist, and institutional contexts, this Special Issue seeks to engage policymakers, researchers, and practitioners. It will consider gaps in current policy paradigms, such as short-term, fragmented implementation, while advocating for systemic, inclusive transformation. This Special Issue aims to bridge theory and practice, fostering dialogue between environmental studies, sociology, communication studies, and politics, focusing on transformative environmental policies and emphasizing innovation and equity.

Original research articles and reviews are welcome. We encourage complementing the existing literature by prioritizing intersectional approaches. This Special Issue will encourage research that expands on critiques of neoliberal environmental governance by foregrounding justice and participatory decision-making. By integrating empirical analyses with normative frameworks, the hope is to advance interdisciplinary discourse and offer practical tools.

Possible topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  1. Environmental Governance and Social Equity: Policy frameworks for inclusive societal transitions.
  2. Social Justice in Environmental Decision-Making: Community resilience and policy innovation.
  3. Equity-Driven Environmental Policy: Addressing inequality through participatory governance.
  4. The Social Politics of Environmental Policy: Negotiating power, rights, and ecological futures.
  5. Environmental Policy in Transition: Societal transformations and institutional adaptation.
  6. The place of activism in our climate crisis.
  7. Sports/culture and environmental policy/politics.
  8. State/business/scholarship and climate change.
  9. Gender/class/race and the environment.

Prof. Dr. Toby Miller
Guest Editor

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, please click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use scholarly English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • environmental governance
  • environmental communication
  • climate resilience
  • policy innovation
  • circular economy
  • activism
  • transnational cooperation
  • equity
  • multilevel governance
  • justice

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 665 KB  
Article
Emotional Support and Opposition for National Environmental Policies in the UK
by Benedict Hignell, Zorzeta Bakaki and Elia Valentini
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(11), 649; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14110649 - 5 Nov 2025
Abstract
Understanding affective responses to the climate and ecological emergency is essential for developing and ensuring compliance with mitigation policies. Previous evidence indicates that individuals feeling negative emotions about the state of nature and the climate are more likely to show greater support for [...] Read more.
Understanding affective responses to the climate and ecological emergency is essential for developing and ensuring compliance with mitigation policies. Previous evidence indicates that individuals feeling negative emotions about the state of nature and the climate are more likely to show greater support for environmental policy. This study investigates which of twenty distinct emotions predict attitudes towards nationally relevant UK environmental policies, with specific hypotheses differentiating between unambiguous and ambiguous emotions. We conducted two cross-sectional online surveys with 651 UK residents, who rated their support for three policy sets: the Conservative Government’s manifesto, the Climate and Ecology Bill, and the Green New Deal Bill. By integrating theoretical expectations with exploratory analysis, we found that higher levels of worry and horror predicted greater policy support, whereas boredom predicted opposition. Our analytical strategy underscores the importance of integrating both a priori and explorative models to enhance statistical sensitivity, thereby capturing a broader spectrum of affective states that might otherwise be overlooked but may be crucial for designing targeted interventions. These findings suggest that policymakers can leverage specific emotions, such as worry, to foster support, while addressing boredom to mitigate resistance, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of environmental communication and interventions. Full article
Back to TopTop