The Intersection of Phenomenology and Religion

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2023) | Viewed by 12365

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Unification Theological Seminary, Barrytown, NY 12507, USA
Interests: Phenomenology; Hermeneutics; Philosophy of Religion; Social Epistemology; Meaning of Life
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue explores the intersection of phenomenology and religion. While a scholar’s primary subject of study may be religious phenomena, the way that scholar understands phenomenology affects their approach to religion. This Special Issue focuses on the question of the interplay of the two fields, phenomenology and religion, and explores a conceptual framework to bridge them.

In philosophy, while phenomenology generally takes the stance of disclosing phenomena as they present themselves, as expressed by Husserl’s “to the things themselves”, there is the question of how to faithfully disclose such phenomena. In the early stages of the development of phenomenology, where Husserl envisioned phenomenology as a “presuppositionless” science, Heidegger presented phenomenology as “Hermeneutic Phenomenology”. The Husserlian essentialist approach thus shows a contrast with Heidegger’s early hermeneutic–existential approach. Subsequent phenomenologists, such as Merleau-Ponty, Hans-Georg Gadamer, and Alfred Schutz, further explored the possibilities of phenomenology.

In phenomenological studies of religion, each scholar takes a different approach due to their view of phenomenology. For example, while some take a Husserlian essentialist approach, others incorporate Heideggerian hermeneutic–existential concepts/approach. Despite those variations in phenomenology, phenomenologists generally share a faithfulness to phenomena by avoiding the pitfalls of all forms of reductionism and crude presuppositions. Some scholars take a general phenomenological approach to the study of religion, without taking a specific position on phenomenology.

On the religious studies side, scholars consider criteria for characterizing and demarcating religious phenomena. Such criteria are a part of one’s conceptual framework and guide an author’s classification schema and typology of religious phenomena. For example, while some scholars use criteria primarily from a particular religion, such as the Judeo–Christian tradition, others draw on criteria from broader spiritual practices. One’s conceptual framework may be rooted in one’s own conviction, experience, or cultural background. Not all scholars in religious studies, however, articulate a meta-philosophical background for the formation of their conceptual framework in their studies.

We are pleased to invite articles that can shed light on the space where phenomenology and religion intersect. While we are open to a variety of positions and approaches, we expect each author to articulate their approach including their stance in phenomenology, any assumptions they hold, and their conceptual framework in studying religion.

Articles can focus on a reflective analysis of one’s approach itself or other authors’ approaches; a case study of how one’s approach works in specific cases; or specific components of religion, such as rituals, experiences, community building, belief systems, and institutionalization. This Special Issue welcomes the submission diverse papers, as far as they clearly articulate and contribute to our collective understanding of the intersection between phenomenology and religion, as described above. 

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Keisuke Noda
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • phenomenology
  • hermeneutics
  • phenomenology of religion
  • religious phenomena

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 315 KiB  
Article
Miracle in Myth: Nietzsche on Wunder
by Hannah Lyn Venable
Religions 2023, 14(8), 1071; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081071 - 21 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1747
Abstract
This paper considers the experience of miracle through the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche. Although he is often considered an anti-religious thinker, I argue that Nietzsche actually puts forth a positive conception of miracle because of its indispensable role in the creation of myth. [...] Read more.
This paper considers the experience of miracle through the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche. Although he is often considered an anti-religious thinker, I argue that Nietzsche actually puts forth a positive conception of miracle because of its indispensable role in the creation of myth. I walk through Nietzsche’s texts to describe his account of miracle (Wunder) and to demonstrate how it reveals a phenomenological perspective on miracle by placing it and rooting it in human life. Despite his rejection of traditional religion, Nietzsche reminds us that miracles are not an anomaly to human experience, but rather they are the way in which humans are able to embrace and affirm life through participation in myth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Intersection of Phenomenology and Religion)
12 pages, 292 KiB  
Article
Interreligious Dialogue: A Challenge for Phenomenology
by Veronica Cibotaru
Religions 2023, 14(3), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030302 - 23 Feb 2023
Viewed by 2580
Abstract
This article assesses the possible role and scope of phenomenology for the emerging field of interreligious studies while at the same time bringing forth a critical reflection on the practice of phenomenology itself, and more particularly of phenomenology of religion. It contends that [...] Read more.
This article assesses the possible role and scope of phenomenology for the emerging field of interreligious studies while at the same time bringing forth a critical reflection on the practice of phenomenology itself, and more particularly of phenomenology of religion. It contends that phenomenology can be used as a descriptive method in order to understand the structures of experience which are at stake in interreligious dialogue, thus complementing the current approaches in interreligious studies towards this question which are mainly normative. Moreover, it can offer a comprehension of the paradoxical dimension of interreligious dialogue which is marked by a tension between openness and closedness, by drawing on Husserl’s phenomenology of the world, and its dynamic opposition between homeworld and foreign world. This analysis is structured around four argumentative moments: (1) an overview of the main features of the history of the phenomenology of religion and its problematic relationship towards the interreligious space; (2) an assessment of the main advantages of the phenomenological method for the study of religious and especially interreligious studies; (3) a sketch of a possible phenomenology of dialogue, grounding mainly on Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology; (4) a sketch of a possible phenomenology of interreligious dialogue, drawing on Husserl’s phenomenology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Intersection of Phenomenology and Religion)
17 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
Evil, Excess and Transcendence
by Juan Pablo Martínez
Religions 2023, 14(2), 148; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020148 - 26 Jan 2023
Viewed by 2311
Abstract
This article aims to overcome the prevailing philosophical views that understand evil from an ontological or metaphysical perspective through the reconciliation of being or God with the presence of evil in the world. In this sense, the phenomenological approach offers an adequate and [...] Read more.
This article aims to overcome the prevailing philosophical views that understand evil from an ontological or metaphysical perspective through the reconciliation of being or God with the presence of evil in the world. In this sense, the phenomenological approach offers an adequate and renewed process to rethink the phenomenon of evil. To this end, I will show how the ontological treatment of evil as a deprivation of good corresponds neither to the way evil appears in experience nor to the recognition of the evidence of evil as a positive and effective reality that empirically rules and distorts relations within the world. This ontological consideration also fails to account for the transcendence of evil in its excessive condition, since this excess constitutes it as a phenomenon of radical exteriority to consciousness. Moreover, the overbearing and surprising presence of evil in the world demands from conscience a special spiritual penetration that does not justify evil, but rather exposes and condemns it. This can only be carried out in the disposition of the living to resist evil and to remain in the sphere of ethical difference, which consists of living in the good and for the good through the eradication of evil. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Intersection of Phenomenology and Religion)
8 pages, 250 KiB  
Article
The Phenomenology of Prayer and the Relationship between Phenomenology and Theology
by Nicolae Turcan
Religions 2023, 14(1), 104; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010104 - 11 Jan 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2359
Abstract
The present article analyzes the relationship between phenomenology and theology, starting from some examples of the phenomenology of prayer. First, the article presents the phenomenology of prayer in the writings of phenomenologists such as Jean-Luc Marion, Jean-Yves Lacoste, Christina Gschwandtner and Natalie Depraz, [...] Read more.
The present article analyzes the relationship between phenomenology and theology, starting from some examples of the phenomenology of prayer. First, the article presents the phenomenology of prayer in the writings of phenomenologists such as Jean-Luc Marion, Jean-Yves Lacoste, Christina Gschwandtner and Natalie Depraz, indicating that the type of phenomenology and its relationship with theology influence the way in which they approach the theme of prayer. Second, the paper proposes a systematization of prayer, starting from the personal pronouns uttered when praying: I, you (thou) and he. “I” sees oneself as being called by God to a transfiguration which is impossible through one’s own powers and visible in the experience of the plenitude and joy of prayer; “You” provides the predicative dimension of the discourse and reveals communion either with God or, in the case of liturgy, with others; “He”, used less frequently in prayer, can constitute a source for a later theoretical discourse, being recognized as a “mysterious presence”. Following these analyses, the article concludes that there are two major relationships between phenomenology and theology: that of partial overlap, called theo-phenomenology, and that of rigorous delimitation. Regardless of the preferred model, the use of phenomenology for theology proves to be fruitful. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Intersection of Phenomenology and Religion)
16 pages, 345 KiB  
Article
Apocalyptic Phenomenology: The Culmination of the Phenomenological Movement
by Balázs M. Mezei
Religions 2022, 13(11), 1077; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13111077 - 9 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2096
Abstract
In this article, I delineate a notion of phenomenology, which differs in many ways from earlier approaches. I term this understanding apocalyptic in the sense that this phenomenology discloses not only the essences of particular things, logical entities, ideas, and transcendental processes, but [...] Read more.
In this article, I delineate a notion of phenomenology, which differs in many ways from earlier approaches. I term this understanding apocalyptic in the sense that this phenomenology discloses not only the essences of particular things, logical entities, ideas, and transcendental processes, but beyond them, it reveals reality in its essential openness to newness. The term apocalupsis refers not simply to the unveiling of something unknown earlier, but more importantly to the central determinant of reality in that it discloses irreducible newness. I show that the phenomenon of self-disclosure or revelation was at the center of the work of the first phenomenologists, such as Franz Brentano and Edmund Husserl; I emphasize the notion of phenomenological revelation in the thought of Max Scheler and Martin Heidegger. In this context, I offer an interpretation of the phenomenologies of Emmanuel Lévinas, Michel Henry, and Jean-Luc Marion. I argue that the notion of nouveauté novatrice of Miklos Vetö is a phenomenologically inspired insight into the nature of the essence of phenomenology. I claim that newness is the core of reality engendering a new conception of phenomenology as a philosophy of reality–a phenomenology aptly termed neology, a development of what is known as “the phenomenological movement”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Intersection of Phenomenology and Religion)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop