Shared Religious Education

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 June 2024) | Viewed by 6531

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1LN, Northern Ireland, UK
Interests: the role of religion in education; the possibilities for sharing education in divided societies

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1JA, UK
Interests: philosophical reflection on teacher education; ethical deliberation and teaching; religious education and its pedagogy; values education/moral education in schooling

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Fachrichtung Evangelische Theologie, Universität des Saarlandes, 66123 Saarbruecken, Germany
Interests: interreligious learning; confirmation classes

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The concept of "shared education" has been employed in a range of international settings, including Macedonia, Israel, and the USA (Gallagher 2016), though it is generally acknowledged to have emerged within the context of Northern Ireland, where the education system remains largely separated by religious identity (Gallagher et al. 2022; Hughes & Loader 2015). Shared education in these contexts has been understood as sustained curriculum-based contact of pupils from different schools, with the purpose of building reconciliation and enhancing educational opportunities.

Shared religious education has not received particular attention in the wider shared education literature; however, it is proposed here as concept that can highlight a range of existing pedagogical strategies and approaches to religious education that exist in multiple contexts and across a wide age range of learners. Indeed, both single-identity settings (such as faith schools or religious communities) and plural-identity settings (such as public schools) can offer shared learning experiences (Nelson 2018). This can take many forms, from joint projects where learners from different settings work together towards a common goal (such as in Wegerif et al. 2017) to plural religious education where students with different worldviews learn about religions and beliefs together in a public school classroom (such as in Meyer 2021, Boehme 2023). A shared approach to religious education is not exclusive to any one setting. It may also be adopted as part of Initial Teacher Education or Teacher Professional Learning activities (e.g., Kienstra et al. 2019; Williams et al. 2019). The editors interpret the term broadly but also believe there are some general characteristics that can help define shared religious education, for example, teaching and learning in religions and beliefs, which involves learners studying and working together for short or long periods of time with a view to deepening their understanding of each other’s belief perspectives and may include working on common tasks or goals. Furthermore, shared religious education is likely to have some or all of the following: a curriculum that makes space for diverse knowledge; a pedagogy that values dialogue; and teachers who adopt an outward-oriented, intercultural perspective and who seek creative ways to work with and through boundaries. Shared religious education may emerge from top-down policies, like a common curriculum, or it can develop from "bottom-up" approaches where educators initiate shared learning in response to a recent event that has caused conflict or a historical legacy of separation between religious communities.

The academic treatment of religious education often distinguishes between contrasting approaches, like confessional/non-confessional, denominational/non-denominational, insider/outsider, or exclusive/inclusive. However, in practice, religious education can challenge or even defy these categories (Cush 2007). This Special Issue seeks to provide a space where researchers can share findings and perspectives on shared religious education from a wide range of approaches. The editors are interested in receiving papers that provide academic insights into shared religious education understood in a broad way. Papers may include those of an empirical or theoretical kind. Contributions from under-studied regions or contexts are particularly welcomed.

Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • Evaluations of pedagogical interventions employing shared projects or shared activities within religious education classrooms or as extracurricular activities;
  • Theoretical papers on concepts related to sharing, cooperation, and collaboration in religious education;
  • Investigations of possibilities for shared religious education in societies or communities where people are divided by religion;
  • Research into initiatives in Initial Teacher Education or teacher professional learning that involve an element of shared religious education;
  • Exploration of how shared spaces and/or shared experiences might contribute to encounter and dialogue between students or teachers.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200-300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editors, Dr. James Nelson ([email protected]), Dr. Janet Orchard ([email protected]), and Prof. Dr. Karlo Meyer ([email protected]), or to the Assistant Editor of Religions, Ms. Margaret Liu ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blinded peer review.

Regarding the word length, the minimum is 4000 words; normally, papers are 60008000 words; and anything above 8000 words must be agreed on by the editors.

Deadline for abstract submission: 31 March 2024
Deadline for response to abstracts: 30 April 2024
Deadline for full manuscript submission: 20 June 2024

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

References

Boehme, K. (2023). Interreligiöses Begegnungslernen. Grundlegung einer fächerkooperierenden Didaktik von Weltsichten. Herder

Cush, D. (2007). Should religious studies be part of the compulsory state school curriculum? British Journal of Religious Education, 29(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200701479471

Kienstra, N., van Dijk-Groeneboer, M., & Boelens, O. (2019). Training for Interreligious Classroom Teaching: An Empirical Study. Religious Education, 114(5), 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2019.1652878

Gallagher, T. (2016). Shared education in Northern Ireland: school collaboration in divided societies. Oxford Review of Education, 42(3), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1184868

Gallagher, T., Duffy, G., & Robinson, G. (2022). Turning Research into Policy. In Activist Pedagogy and Shared Education in Divided Societies (pp. 93–105). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004512740_007

Hughes, J., & Loader, R. (2015). ‘Plugging the gap’: shared education and the promotion of community relations through schools in Northern Ireland. 41(6), 1142–1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3206

Meyer, K. (2021). Religion, Interreligious Learning and Education. Peter Lang

Nelson, J. (2018). The Case for Dialogical Learning as a Signature Pedagogy of Religious Education. In J. Astley, L. J. Francis, & D. Lankshear (Eds.), Values, Human Rights and Religious Education (pp. 91–108). Peter Lang.

Wegerif, R., Doney, J., Richards, A., Mansour, N., Larkin, S., & Jamison, I. (2017). Exploring the ontological dimension of dialogic education through an evaluation of the impact of Internet mediated dialogue across cultural difference. Learning, Culture and Social Interactionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.003

Williams, A., McKeown, S., Orchard, J., & Wright, K. (2019). Promoting positive community relations: what can RE learn from social psychology and the shared space project? Journal of Beliefs and Values, 40(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2019.1596582

Dr. James Nelson
Dr. Janet Orchard
Prof. Dr. Karlo Meyer
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religious education
  • shared education
  • inter-religious learning
  • worldviews education
  • interfaith dialogue

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 233 KiB  
Article
Creative Shared Religious Education with Film-Making and History
by John Wolffe, John Maiden, Stefanie Sinclair and Katelin Teller
Religions 2024, 15(11), 1337; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111337 - 1 Nov 2024
Viewed by 809
Abstract
This paper discusses the development of an innovative methodology for engaging young people with issues of religious diversity and toleration, through combining engagement with historical and contemporary sources with the production of short documentary films reflecting on their own experience. We report on [...] Read more.
This paper discusses the development of an innovative methodology for engaging young people with issues of religious diversity and toleration, through combining engagement with historical and contemporary sources with the production of short documentary films reflecting on their own experience. We report on pilot workshops held in contrasting locations—London, Belfast, Skopje (North Macedonia), Durrës (Albania), and Amman (Jordan). In some of the workshops, participants worked directly with young people from other religious traditions; in others, participants themselves were drawn from a single religious tradition, but sought actively to engage with others, for example Orthodox Christians in North Macedonia spoke to Muslims and filmed inside a mosque; Muslims in Jordan similarly visited local Christians and their churches; Catholics and Protestants in Belfast were eager to understand and interact with the other community. In the light of overwhelmingly positive feedback from participants, the analysis applies contact theory to argue that the methodology facilitates deep learning and teambuilding, enhancing respect and understanding between different religious groups. It also demonstrates the value of religious education for enhancing young people’s understanding of other subjects, notably history and citizenship. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Religious Education)
17 pages, 299 KiB  
Article
Transforming Post-Apartheid South Africa Through Shared Religious Education
by Nuraan Davids
Religions 2024, 15(11), 1330; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111330 - 30 Oct 2024
Viewed by 650
Abstract
Ideas about shared religious education are in need of further exploration in post-apartheid South Africa. This is necessary, considering the contributions from faith communities in their shared resistance to apartheid. While some sectors of the Christian community, and particularly the Dutch Reformed Church [...] Read more.
Ideas about shared religious education are in need of further exploration in post-apartheid South Africa. This is necessary, considering the contributions from faith communities in their shared resistance to apartheid. While some sectors of the Christian community, and particularly the Dutch Reformed Church provided a religious justification for apartheid, other denominations, together with Muslim, Jewish, and Hindu communities struggled against this white supremacist ideology. In other ways, the neglect of the potential of shared religious education provides an apt commentary on how some within-faith communities responded to a democracy by retreating into faith identities, as made explicit in the proliferation of faith-based schools. It follows, however, that if religious communities can mobilise together to resist the apartheid state, then it should be possible for these same communities to unite to work towards the kind of transformed society envisioned in their struggle against apartheid. Hence, the interest of this article: if faith-based schools are an inevitable manifestation of democratic and pluralistic societies, then what can these schools share in terms of content and ethos towards advancing democratic values? How might a shared religious education facilitate and sustain the reform measures, necessary for social transformation in South Africa? Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Religious Education)
11 pages, 925 KiB  
Article
Hospitable Education—Interreligious Education Revisited
by Ina ter Avest
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091101 - 12 Sep 2024
Viewed by 654
Abstract
In the past, the Netherlands took on the form of a pillarized society, with three ‘pillars’ (Catholic, Protestant and liberal) ‘living apart together’. Each pillar came with its own education system, health care, and newspapers. In the 1980s, a fourth ‘pillar’ was added: [...] Read more.
In the past, the Netherlands took on the form of a pillarized society, with three ‘pillars’ (Catholic, Protestant and liberal) ‘living apart together’. Each pillar came with its own education system, health care, and newspapers. In the 1980s, a fourth ‘pillar’ was added: the Islamic pillar. During the same period at the end of the 20th century, a model was developed at one of the country’s primary schools—the Juliana van Stolberg school—for the inclusive interreligious education of all pupils, irrespective of the (religious or secular) life orientation of their parents. This innovative educational process became the object of research. Literature reviews on (inter)religious education were complemented by qualitative interviews with the school’s principal and supplemented with historical research of the school’s filing cabinet kept in the city archives. I conclude that by revisiting the process and the developed model of inclusive interreligious education, its implementation in all schools is possible, provided that the latest insights are taken into account about leadership, biblical and qur’anic hermeneutics and the position of parents in the pedagogic civil society. For such an adapted model, I introduce the concept of hospitable education—hospitality as a competence, which connects knowledge, affective attitudes and skills. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Religious Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1511 KiB  
Article
“Sharing Worldviews: Learning in Encounter for Common Values in Diversity” in School and Teacher Education—Contexts in Germany and Europe
by Katja Boehme
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1077; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091077 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 606
Abstract
Challenges and tensions that arise in a pluralistic society with differing worldviews among its citizens must be addressed from the outset in school education. To enable social cohesion within a heterogeneous society, students must learn to harmonize their own worldviews with other interpretations [...] Read more.
Challenges and tensions that arise in a pluralistic society with differing worldviews among its citizens must be addressed from the outset in school education. To enable social cohesion within a heterogeneous society, students must learn to harmonize their own worldviews with other interpretations of the world in a spirit of “reciprocal inclusivity” (Reinhold Bernhardt). This article argues that this task particularly falls within the responsibility of subjects in schools that address the existential “problems of constitutive rationality” (Jürgen Baumert), specifically religious education, ethics, and philosophy. In Germany and Austria, multiple subjects within denominational religious education, as well as ethics and philosophy, are offered in schools. When these subjects collaborate on projects, students learn to engage in dialogue with the various religious and secular, individual, and collective interpretations, perspectives, and worldviews they encounter. Since 2002/03, and in teacher training since 2011, such a didactically guided Sharing Worldviews approach has been implemented in school projects in Southern Germany through a four-phase concept. This concept can be flexibly applied to the local conditions of the school, contributes to internationalisation and digitalisation, and does not require additional teaching hours. By incorporating secular worldviews, Sharing Worldviews goes beyond interreligious learning and has also been realised digitally in other European countries. The following article begins by considering the educational requirements in a heterogeneous society (1), describes the prerequisites needed to positively influence students’ attitudes (2), outlines common foundational concepts for interreligious and inter-worldview dialogue (3), and recommends “Mutual Hospitality” as the basis for such dialogue in schools (4). The article then explains how “Mutual Hospitality” can be practically implemented in a four-phase concept of Sharing Worldviews both in schools and in teacher training (5 and 6) by tracing the origins of this concept (7). The Sharing Worldviews concept has been both internationalised and digitalised in schools and teacher education (8), aligns with the educational principles of the OECD (9), and demonstrates significant benefits in empirical studies (10). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Religious Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 254 KiB  
Article
Shared Religious Education through Christian–Islamic Team Teaching
by Agnes Gmoser, Michael Kramer, Mevlida Mešanović, Wolfgang Weirer, Eva Wenig and Şenol Yağdı
Religions 2024, 15(9), 1068; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091068 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 585
Abstract
The article, which is written by an interreligious team, provides comprehensive insights into the conception, implementation and accompanying research of a project on Christian–Islamic religious education in team teaching. The aim of the project is to expand the denominational religious education lessons anchored [...] Read more.
The article, which is written by an interreligious team, provides comprehensive insights into the conception, implementation and accompanying research of a project on Christian–Islamic religious education in team teaching. The aim of the project is to expand the denominational religious education lessons anchored in Austrian schools through religious-cooperative units taught jointly by a Christian and an Islamic teacher. The analysis of the teaching units is carried out in the format of design-based research and thus encompasses numerous aspects of interreligious educational processes, which are examined in this article. Firstly, the design of the project is described and the legal framework associated with it is explained in the context of the Austrian school system. Subsequently, learning requirements on the part of Christian and Muslim pupils are presented, with a particular focus on their preconceptions and attitudes towards religion in general as well as other religions. Special attention is paid to the specific framework conditions of Islamic religious education teachers, which differ in many aspects from those of Catholic religious education teachers. Furthermore, interreligious competences they consider necessary are described. Specific insights into the teaching units and the complementary research provide information about the opportunities and challenges of interreligious education in team teaching by two teachers. After this focus on the teachers, an outline of the students’ perspectives on the teaching units completes the presentation of the research results. In the concluding summary, the local theories developed from the overall project are presented and discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Religious Education)
22 pages, 4526 KiB  
Article
From Shared RE to a Shared Digital RE Strategy: Navigating the Post-Digital Transformation of RE Organizations—Results of a Swiss Participatory Research Project
by Jasmine Suhner
Religions 2024, 15(8), 1000; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15081000 - 17 Aug 2024
Viewed by 864
Abstract
Religious adult education, characterized as non-formal religious education (RE) that has often been established over many decades, is frequently marked by patterns of institutional separation, local conditions and denominational divisions. This is also the case in Switzerland, where in each canton various church [...] Read more.
Religious adult education, characterized as non-formal religious education (RE) that has often been established over many decades, is frequently marked by patterns of institutional separation, local conditions and denominational divisions. This is also the case in Switzerland, where in each canton various church academies and RE organizations generally offer their respective programs along both denominational and cantonal lines. The increasing digitalization of society, and consequently of education, alters the original situation for these actors, both on an individual and organizational level. This article discusses the challenges of religious adult education in navigating the post-digital pivot. It addresses the issues of changing forms of teaching and learning, dealing with shifts in authority, and the growing need for collaboration and shared strategies among RE organizations in post-digital society. A participatory research project involving nearly 60 Swiss RE organizations investigated how these organizations are dealing with digitalization, analyzing the perspectives of the organizational leaders, the teachers, and learners through mixed methods. The findings provide insights into factors influencing the intent to offer or use digital RE courses, as well as factors contributing to the readiness to cooperate in the digital educational field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Religious Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3435 KiB  
Article
Setting a Pedagogical Course: Four Modes Clarifying the Dynamics of Shared Religious Education
by Karlo Meyer
Religions 2024, 15(8), 992; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080992 - 16 Aug 2024
Viewed by 722
Abstract
On the level of fundamental didactic decisions and hermeneutic clarifications, this article examines the possible orientations of Shared Religious Education. The prerequisite for this is the assumption that in such lessons, the opportunity should be used to empower children and young people to [...] Read more.
On the level of fundamental didactic decisions and hermeneutic clarifications, this article examines the possible orientations of Shared Religious Education. The prerequisite for this is the assumption that in such lessons, the opportunity should be used to empower children and young people to become personally and creatively involved in teaching and learning when different denominations, religions, and worldviews come together in education. Against this background, four modes of possible activation are proposed as a structuring aid for didactic decisions: Pupils can (a) plan appropriate forms of encounter themselves and develop ways of dealing with mutually experienced foreignness and with bridges and gaps between traditions; (b) they can be activated to engage in existential discussions about ultimate questions, (c) they can carry out small-scale “research” projects into each other’s religious practices and concepts; and (d) they can get involved in joint (ethical, ecological, neighbourly) projects that have an impact on the region around the school that may also have global applications. The model of these four modes can be represented graphically and this helps to analyse and locate existing concepts and approaches to RE. The article concludes with a closer look at the underlying concept of religion and current research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Religious Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 222 KiB  
Article
“Religious Education for All 2.0”: The Hamburg Approach of Shared Religious Education
by Jochen Bauer
Religions 2024, 15(8), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080916 - 29 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 801
Abstract
Hamburg’s “Religious Education for All” (RUfa 2.0) is a confessional multifaith approach to shared religious education and a new and unique concept in Germany and Europe. All large religious communities in Hamburg collaborate their legal responsibility for its content. RUfa 2.0 [...] Read more.
Hamburg’s “Religious Education for All” (RUfa 2.0) is a confessional multifaith approach to shared religious education and a new and unique concept in Germany and Europe. All large religious communities in Hamburg collaborate their legal responsibility for its content. RUfa 2.0 is neither grounded in neutral religious studies nor in pluralistic theology of religion but relies on differentiated learning arrangements. They enable students to learn about their own religion, to learn about other religions and to develop their religious identity through dialogue. This article outlines development, legal and organizational frameworks, goals and competences, didactical principles, teacher roles and teacher training and places them in a European perspective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Religious Education)
Back to TopTop