The Creative Death of God

A special issue of Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2024) | Viewed by 10948

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy, California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA 90747, USA
Interests: modern religious thought; modern philosophy and theology; political theology; history of ideas

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The “death of God” motif blazes a transformative path through the modern history of ideas in radically differential keys—from Spinoza to Schelling and Hegel, Stirner and Mainländer, Bakunin and Nietzsche, Freud, Heidegger, and Whitehead, to cite only a few brightly burning lights. New domains of thought were wrested into play as normative apprehensions of God’s essential nature were transformed, eclipsed, or displaced. The “death” metaphor applied to the monotheistic deity of Western traditions has surfaced in diverse, polyvalent, radical, often elusive registers, as has been delineated by critical observers such as Löwith, Blumenberg, J. Taubes and S. Taubes, Derrida, Baudrillard, Gauchet, and scores of others.

New values and jolting implications were consequential to the waves of serial godlessnesses: Luther’s abyssal hidden God, Spinoza’s purported “atheism,” Hegel’s unhappy consciousness, Stirner’s ecstatic egotism, Simone Weil’s absent God, and so on. Albert Camus remarked, “the history of metaphysical rebellion cannot be confused with that of atheism” (in J. Kripal, Superhumanisms, U. of Chicago Press, 2022, 76). Neither, certainly, can the “death of God” metaphor be confused with atheism, though all too often it has been.

Scholarly treatments tend to accent the negative valence of this “death,” emphasizing what is lost or rendered past rather than appreciating the novel potentialities—the ultimate adventure in ideas—opened up by epochal transformations of “God.” To achieve a more serious and sympathetic take, the
intent of this Special Issue is to plumb the creativity of the death of God motif as an “edge” driving modern thought that merits in-depth historical-critical assessment.

The proposal is to lay out as probingly as possible how the “death of God” has functioned as a creative catalyst for thought historically. Novel lines of thinking gained potency as traditional understandings of God ceded to innovative new atheisms, last gods, new gods, new idols, ideals, and superhumanities. Is modernity truly “post-theistic” or has it simply reinvented and reconstituted deity in sundry camouflaged and disseminated forms? Is the death of God a farewell or is it ironically a dimension of the persistent life of God, still claiming an apocalyptic and prophetic voice?

This Special Issue seeks probing historical-philosophical reflections on the constructive valence of the death of God, contextualized within a long-term historical-hermeneutic backdrop. Each contributor is invited to think freely, to work out an essay from the distinctive historical expertise she or he has
developed through a career-long trajectory. The desideratum is that a more creative heuristic will emerge from this journal Issue as a whole (as the 1975 Special Issue Daedalus 104.2, for example, spurred fuller cognizance of the “Axial revolution”). Constructive historical thinking has not, to date,
achieved this sort of hermeneutic probity and synoptic crystallization with respect to the death of God. It is a humanistic task inherently worthy of aspiration.

Dr. Lissa McCullough
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Philosophies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • death of God
  • godlessness
  • post-theism
  • atheism
  • nihilism
  • modern theology
  • Stirner
  • Mainländer
  • Nietzsche
  • Heidegger

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 261 KiB  
Article
“Humbled onto Death”: Kenosis and Tsimtsum as the Two Models of Divine Self-Negation
by Agata Bielik-Robson
Philosophies 2024, 9(5), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9050134 - 28 Aug 2024
Viewed by 793
Abstract
This essay reflects on the concept of the death of God as part and parcel of modern philosophical theology: a genre of thinking that came into existence with Hegel’s announcement of the “speculative Good Friday” as the most natural expression of die Religion [...] Read more.
This essay reflects on the concept of the death of God as part and parcel of modern philosophical theology: a genre of thinking that came into existence with Hegel’s announcement of the “speculative Good Friday” as the most natural expression of die Religion der neuen Zeiten, “the religion of modern times”. In my interpretation, the death of God not only does not spell the end of the era of atheism but, on the contrary, inaugurates a new era of characteristically modern theism that steers away from theological absolutism. The new theos is no longer conceived as the eternal omnipotent Absolute but as the Derridean diminished Infinite: contracted and self-negated—even “unto death”. Such God, however, although coming to the foremost visibly in modernity, is not completely new to the monotheistic religions, which from the beginning are engaged in the heated debate concerning the status of the divine power: is it absolute and unlimited or rather self-restricted and conditioned? I will enter this debate by conducting a comparison between the two traditional models of divine self-restriction—Christian kenosis and Jewish-kabbalistic tsimtsum—and then present their modernised philosophical variants, most of all in the thought of Hegel. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
15 pages, 273 KiB  
Article
Beyond the “Death of God”: The New Indestructible Humanity without a Model by Sarah Kofman
by Federica Negri
Philosophies 2024, 9(4), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9040117 - 5 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1051
Abstract
For many 20th century philosophers, the “death of God” became an opportunity to rethink the limits of the human, eliminating its claims to a transcendent foundation in order to start again, more modestly, “from below”. The new humanity, freed from the burdens of [...] Read more.
For many 20th century philosophers, the “death of God” became an opportunity to rethink the limits of the human, eliminating its claims to a transcendent foundation in order to start again, more modestly, “from below”. The new humanity, freed from the burdens of the old metaphysics, becomes able to reappropriate responsibility, rediscovering in the other an irreducible presence. The human and philosophical story of Sarah Kofman offers the possibility of following an original development in this sense, starting from the unspeakable event of the Shoah towards a new possibility for human kind. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
14 pages, 274 KiB  
Article
“God Has Not Died, He Became Government”: Use-of-Oneself and Immanence in Giorgio Agamben’s Work
by Benjamim Brum Neto
Philosophies 2024, 9(4), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9040112 - 27 Jul 2024
Viewed by 903
Abstract
This article delves into the theme of the death of God in Giorgio Agamben’s work from a political perspective, seeking to interpret the notion of “God” in Agamben through the concepts of “government” and “transcendence”. Although Agamben does not extensively address the theme [...] Read more.
This article delves into the theme of the death of God in Giorgio Agamben’s work from a political perspective, seeking to interpret the notion of “God” in Agamben through the concepts of “government” and “transcendence”. Although Agamben does not extensively address the theme of the death of God, my hypothesis is that by continually dealing with the ethical and political legacy of Western theology, it is possible to conceive the death of God as an unconsummated political horizon, but that it is yet to come. In this sense, the first two sections of the text provide a review of the theme of governance of men and governance of oneself in Agamben’s work, engaging in dialogue with Schmitt, Peterson, Heidegger, Foucault, and Plato, as well as the concepts of transcendence oikonomia, technology, and care. The last two sections of the text explore Agamben’s response to this diagnosis. Agamben’s philosophical proposal is presented through a dialogue with Spinoza and Stoicism, with the central concept being the idea of use of oneself, which is linked to the notions of immanence, Ungovernable, and anarchy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
13 pages, 206 KiB  
Article
The Necessity of the Death of God in Nietzsche and Heidegger
by Duane Armitage
Philosophies 2024, 9(4), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9040103 - 11 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1129
Abstract
This paper explores the philosophical perspectives of Nietzsche and Heidegger, tracing their analyses of the death of God and its aftermath. My aim is to clarify the diagnosis of this nihilism and its underlying causes, as well as evaluate the proposed remedies put [...] Read more.
This paper explores the philosophical perspectives of Nietzsche and Heidegger, tracing their analyses of the death of God and its aftermath. My aim is to clarify the diagnosis of this nihilism and its underlying causes, as well as evaluate the proposed remedies put forth by Nietzsche and Heidegger. Ultimately, I argue that the seemingly ambiguous consequences of the death of God are not only hopeful, but necessary, if human beings are to rise above and transmute a meaningless, resentment-laced existence, however, not by jettisoning Judeo-Christianity and its values, but rather by reinterpreting them. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
19 pages, 542 KiB  
Article
Is God Sustainable?
by Eugene Halton
Philosophies 2024, 9(4), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9040093 - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1877
Abstract
This essay approaches the “God is dead” theme by offering a new philosophical history addressing what would make belief in divinity, in God, sustainable and unsustainable. I claim that the death of nature and the death of God in the modern era are [...] Read more.
This essay approaches the “God is dead” theme by offering a new philosophical history addressing what would make belief in divinity, in God, sustainable and unsustainable. I claim that the death of nature and the death of God in the modern era are manifestations of a progressive distancing from a religious philosophy of the Earth that guided human development until the beginnings of civilization. I outline within the space limitations here a new way of looking at the rise of civilization and the modern era by re-evaluating large-scale epochal beliefs and assumptions of progress within a context of sustainable ends and what I have termed sustainable wisdom. From an original evolved outlook I call animate mind, rooted in a religious philosophy of the living Earth, succeeding contractions of anthropocentric mind and machine-centric mind have regressively disconnected from the community of life. This trajectory courses the disconnect from the livingness of things as defining cosmos, to that of machine-centric mind in the modern era, a devolutionary elevation of the feelingless machine, of deadness, of what Erich Fromm described as cultural necrophilia. I propose rebalancing these later contractions of anthropocentric and machine-centric mind with that deeper reality of animate mind, forged as the human evolutionary legacy still present in the human body-mind today. The renewed legacy of animate mind provides a key to what a sustainable God might mean. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 275 KiB  
Article
Rethinking the Death of God through Kenotic Thought (with Hegel’s Help)
by Paolo Diego Bubbio
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030086 - 14 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1198
Abstract
This paper explores the death of God narrative through the lens of kenosis, drawing insights from thinkers such as Marcel, Heidegger, Vattimo, and Girard. It investigates the implications of kenotic thought for contemporary religious and philosophical discourse, exploring various interpretations of kenosis, ranging [...] Read more.
This paper explores the death of God narrative through the lens of kenosis, drawing insights from thinkers such as Marcel, Heidegger, Vattimo, and Girard. It investigates the implications of kenotic thought for contemporary religious and philosophical discourse, exploring various interpretations of kenosis, ranging from Altizer and Žižek’s apocalyptic views to Vattimo’s more hopeful perspective. Through critical engagement with these viewpoints, this paper advocates for a nuanced understanding of kenosis inspired by Hegel, one that bypasses both radical theology and excessive optimism. Methodologically, this study adopts a hermeneutic approach, analyzing key texts and engaging in philosophical dialogue. This paper concludes that rethinking kenotic thought could provide a robust framework for grappling with the death of God in the contemporary context, offering avenues for ethical reflection, social critique, and speculative renewal. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
13 pages, 254 KiB  
Article
Quid Sit Deus? Heidegger on Nietzsche and the Question of God
by José Daniel Parra
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030066 - 8 May 2024
Viewed by 1620
Abstract
This article develops a hermeneutic study of Heidegger’s text The Word of Nietzsche: “God is Dead”. We attempt to read Heidegger’s remarks in the context of the “period of transition” that, according to Nietzsche, is occurring in the history of western thought and [...] Read more.
This article develops a hermeneutic study of Heidegger’s text The Word of Nietzsche: “God is Dead”. We attempt to read Heidegger’s remarks in the context of the “period of transition” that, according to Nietzsche, is occurring in the history of western thought and culture. This essay unfolds in the following manner: beginning with Heidegger’s contention that Nietzsche’s philosophy is the “fulfilment” of Platonism, we go over the problem of nihilism in relation to the metaphysics of the will to power, which for Heidegger requires revising Cartesian subjectivity in search of a new ontology. Heidegger’s critique of modernity encompasses a narrative that goes from “Plato” to “Nietzsche”, leading to a reconsideration of the notions of art and truth. Finally, we attempt to interpret the meaning of the “madman’s lament” voicing the passing of God. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
14 pages, 245 KiB  
Article
The Death of God as Source of the Creativity of Humans
by Franke William
Philosophies 2024, 9(3), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9030055 - 25 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1252
Abstract
Although declarations of the death of God seem to be provocations announcing the end of the era of theology, this announcement is actually central to the Christian revelation in its most classic forms, as well as to its reworkings in contemporary religious thought. [...] Read more.
Although declarations of the death of God seem to be provocations announcing the end of the era of theology, this announcement is actually central to the Christian revelation in its most classic forms, as well as to its reworkings in contemporary religious thought. Indeed provocative new possibilities for thinking theologically open up precisely in the wake of the death of God. Already Hegel envisaged a revolutionary new realization of divinity emerging in and with the secular world through its establishment of a total order of immanence. However, in postmodern times this comprehensive order aspired to by modern secularism implodes or cracks open towards the wholly Other. A hitherto repressed demand for the absolute difference of the religious, or for “transcendence”, returns with a vengeance. This difference is what could not be stated in terms of the Hegelian System, for reasons that poststructuralist writers particularly have insisted on: all representations of God are indeed dead. Yet this does not mean that they cannot still be powerful, but only that they cannot assign God any stable identity. Nietzsche’s sense of foreboding concerning the death of God is coupled with his intimations of the demise of representation and “grammar” as epistemologically bankrupt, but also with his vision of a positive potential for creating value in the wake of this collapse of all linguistically articulated culture. He points the way towards the emergence of a post-secular religious thinking of what exceeds thought and representation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Creative Death of God)
Back to TopTop