Feature Review Papers in Cardiovascular Clinical Research

A special issue of Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease (ISSN 2308-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiovascular Clinical Research".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 3441

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Interests: transfemoral aortic valve implantation; stroke; cerebral embolic protection; coronary artery disease; structural heart disease; mitral regurgitation; patent foramen ovale; left atrial appendage
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We invite researchers and clinicians in the field of cardiovascular clinical research to contribute to our *Feature Review* Special Issue. This edition aims to showcase comprehensive and innovative reviews on key clinical topics in cardiovascular medicine. We welcome detailed reviews that address clinically relevant advancements, including novel approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Submissions may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Critical analyses of patient-level or study-level data to inform best practices and future research directions.
  • Reviews that explore emerging trends in interventional therapies, including cutting-edge techniques in peripheral, cerebral, and coronary artery interventions, as well as structural heart interventions.
  • Insights into rehabilitation strategies, post-interventional care, and long-term management of cardiovascular patients.

We encourage innovative perspectives that highlight the integration of new technologies, evolving clinical guidelines, and multi-disciplinary approaches. By bringing together diverse topics, this Special Issue aims to provide a comprehensive resource for advancing cardiovascular clinical research.

Prof. Dr. Jochen Wöhrle
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • interventional therapy
  • drugs
  • medication
  • prognosis
  • rehabilitation
  • acute cardiovascular care
  • Intensive cardiovascular care

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

Jump to: Other

9 pages, 800 KiB  
Review
Comprehensive Self-Management of Heart Failure
by Shunsuke Kiuchi, Shigeto Tsukamoto, Rie Sato, Keisuke Hosono, Jun Okuda, Makoto Natsumeda, Mitsuharu Kawamura, Hideaki Tachibana, Takashi Okada, Takuro Takagi, Yasushi Taniguchi, Jiro Ando, Yutaka Koyama, Toshiro Shinke and Takanori Ikeda
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12(3), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12030107 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 304
Abstract
In response to the heart failure (HF) pandemic, it is important to introduce appropriate pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for HF patients. In addition, self-management of HF, including the continuation of appropriate pharmacological treatment, is also important. There have been many reports on self-management [...] Read more.
In response to the heart failure (HF) pandemic, it is important to introduce appropriate pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for HF patients. In addition, self-management of HF, including the continuation of appropriate pharmacological treatment, is also important. There have been many reports on self-management of HF. However, the effectiveness of patient education of HF is not consistent. One of the reasons may be whether the tools used are common or not. Moreover, unified systems of HF patient education and disease management in metropolitan areas are rare. We began joint HF patient education and disease management in the Tokyo southern medical district (JONAN Heart Failure Medical Collaboration: JHFeC). Patients undergo a multidisciplinary HF education program at JHFeC member hospitals to ensure that they are able to adequately record information on the self-management sheet. After discharge, the continuity of self-management will be evaluated, and further education will be provided if necessary. HF patient education is important even in severe HF requiring a left ventricular assist device, and such patient education needs to be provided appropriately in all manner of HF patients with stage A to D. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review Papers in Cardiovascular Clinical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 6590 KiB  
Review
Not All SAVR Are Created Equal: All the Approaches Available for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
by Francesco Cabrucci, Serge Sicouri, Massimo Baudo, Dimitrios E. Magouliotis, Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Beatrice Bacchi, Dario Petrone, Beman Wasef, Aleksander Dokollari, Massimo Bonacchi and Basel Ramlawi
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12(3), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12030084 - 24 Feb 2025
Viewed by 962
Abstract
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) is still one of the pillars of cardiac surgery practice, and its role is evolving into a more complex operation. The competition with structural valve therapies and the urgent demand for less invasive solutions have unleashed surgeons’ creativity [...] Read more.
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) is still one of the pillars of cardiac surgery practice, and its role is evolving into a more complex operation. The competition with structural valve therapies and the urgent demand for less invasive solutions have unleashed surgeons’ creativity in adapting to these new challenges. All the possible ways to surgically replace the aortic valve are analyzed in this review. Surgical techniques, advantages and disadvantages, and key differences are listed, helping surgeons navigate the available options. Sternotomy SAVR is the benchmark, but that is becoming obsolete and, in some cases, no longer performed for teaching purposes. Mini sternotomy is the easiest way to achieve minimal invasiveness in all anatomic situations, while right anterior thoracotomy is an elegant solution mastered by fewer surgeons. Endoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques are shaping the future of SAVR, yet they still lack wide adoption. The choice of approach is mainly dictated by the anatomic features of the patient and the surgeon’s skills. A flow diagram to overcome the learning curve and advance toward more complex surgery is provided here. Mastering as many techniques as possible is paramount when offering a patient-tailored approach and performing a safe and less invasive operation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review Papers in Cardiovascular Clinical Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Other

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 883 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review of Renal Perfusion in Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Open Repair
by Diletta Loschi, Enrico Rinaldi, Annarita Santoro, Nicola Favia, Nicola Galati and Germano Melissano
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(11), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11110341 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1186
Abstract
Introduction: This systematic review aims to analyze the current literature regarding 30-day mortality and postoperative acute kidney disease (AKI) in complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs), which included juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (JAA), suprarenal aortic aneurysm (SRAA), and type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open [...] Read more.
Introduction: This systematic review aims to analyze the current literature regarding 30-day mortality and postoperative acute kidney disease (AKI) in complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs), which included juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (JAA), suprarenal aortic aneurysm (SRAA), and type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open surgery (OS), to evaluate the impact of renal perfusion on AKI and to try to define which is the best way to perform it. Methods: A literature search in PubMed and Cochrane Library was performed, and articles published from January 1986 to January 2024 reporting on JAA, SRAA, and TAAA type IV open surgery management were identified. Multicenter studies, single-center series, and case series with ≥10 patients were considered eligible. Comparisons of outcomes of patients who underwent OS for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs) with or without perfusion of the renal arteries were analyzed when available. The titles, abstracts, and full texts were evaluated by two authors independently. The primary outcomes included AKI and 30-day mortality rates. The new-onset dialysis rate was considered a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 295 articles were evaluated, and 21 were included, totaling 5708 patients treated for cAAAs with OS. The male patients totaled 4094 (71.7%), with a mean age of 70.35 ± 8.01 and a mean renal ischemia time of 32.14 ± 12.89 min. Data were collected and analyzed, at first in the entire cohort and then divided into two groups (no perfusion of the renal arteries—group A vs. selective perfusion—group B), with 2516 patients (44.08%) who underwent cAAAs OS without perfusion of the renal arteries and 3192 patients (55.92%) with perfusion. In group B, four types of renal perfusion were reported. Among the 21 studies included, 10 reported on selective renal perfusion in cAAA OS, with several types of fluids described: (1) “enriched” Ringer’s solution, (2) “Custodiol” (Istidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate or Custodiol HTKsolution), (3) other cold (4 °C) solutions (i.e., several combinations of 4 °C isotonic heparinized balanced salt solution containing mannitol, sodium bicarbonate, and methylprednisolone), and (4) warm blood. Thirty-day mortality for patients in group A was 4.25% (107/2516) vs. 4.29% (137/3192) in group B. The reported incidence of AKI and new onset of dialysis was, respectively, 22.14% (557/2516) and 5.45% (137/2516) for group A and 22.49% (718/3192) and 4.32% (138/3192) for group B. A total of 579 patients presented with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at admission across all studies, which included 350 (13.91%) in group A vs. 229 (7.17%) in group B. Acute kidney injury, 30-day mortality, and new-onset dialysis rate were reported in four subgroups: (1) In the “Ringer” group, 30-day mortality was 2.52% (3/113), AKI affected 27.73% (33/119) of patients, and the new-onset dialysis rate was 2.52% (3/113). (2) In the “Custodiol” group, 30-day mortality was 3.70% (3/81), AKI affected 20.17% (24/81) of patients, and the new-onset dialysis rate was 2.46% (2/81). (3) In the “cold solutions” group (i.e., NaCl and mannitol), 30-day mortality was 4.38% (130/2966), AKI affected 21.81% (647/2966) of patients, and the new-onset dialysis rate was 4.48% (133/2966). (4) In the “Warm blood” group, 30-day mortality was 3.85% (1/26), AKI affected 53.84% (14/26) of patients, and the new-onset dialysis rate was 0% (0/26). Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the lack of standard definitions for AKI, CKD, and the type of renal perfusion. Despite similar results in terms of AKI and 30-day mortality, renal perfusion seems to be protective of the new-onset hemodialysis rate. Moreover, Custodiol appears to have lower rates of AKI and hemodialysis than the other perfusion types. A prospective randomized controlled trial to perform further subgroup analysis and research the various types of renal perfusion may be necessary to identify possible benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review Papers in Cardiovascular Clinical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop