You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess.
Feature Papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. Feature Papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and undergo peer review prior to publication.
The Feature Paper can be either an original research article, a substantial novel research study that often involves several techniques or approaches, or a comprehensive review paper with concise and precise updates on the latest progress in the field that systematically reviews the most exciting advances in scientific literature. This type of paper provides an outlook on future directions of research or possible applications.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
On 11 September, BBC News reported some findings published in the Insects journal. These findings belong to the Speical Issue “The Citizen Science Approach for Expanding the Research on Insects”. Citizen science projects are most effective when it comes to raising awareness of some of the threats the nation's trees are facing. However, these schemes are less productive for delivering meaningful data for scientific scrutiny. These findings come from a study that assessed the ability of the UK public to become involved in a tree health survey, co-ordinated by Opal.
The original news can be found at: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54106793