ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Preventing Exercise and Sport Related Injury: Can We Be Doing Better?

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Exercise and Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2024) | Viewed by 2381

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, Otago Polytechnic, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
Interests: strength and conditioning; musculoskeletal injury and exercise rehabilitation and return to play/activity; rugby injury and return to play experiences of professional athletes; professional competence of exercise professionals; concussion management; exercise prescription as a sustainable practice

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The burden of exercise and sports injuries has been well documented, with physical, emotional, and social consequences occurring both proximal and distal to an injury event. Significant research effort and resources have been committed to the complex challenge of preventing injury, seemingly with limited success. Arguably, more attention could be paid to other elements of injury prevention such as attitudes to pain and injury, the ‘cultures' in which injuries occur, how injury recovery and return to activity are managed, and methods for reducing reinjury and recurrent injury. This Special Issue of the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) seeks to examine these aspects of the sequence of injury prevention. Papers addressing these considerations from a diverse range of methodological perspectives are invited for this Special Issue, especially those with high academic rigour that can offer interdisciplinary and practical foci. New research manuscripts, reviews, case reports, short communications, and commentaries are welcomed.

Dr. Phil Handcock
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • reinjury
  • sociology of pain
  • sporting ethic
  • return to activity
  • prevention

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

9 pages, 828 KiB  
Article
Quadriceps Electromyographic Activity in Closed and Open Kinetic-Chain Exercises with Hip-Adductor Co-Contraction in Sedentary Women
by Parinyathip Thongduang, Uraiwan Chatchawan, Rungthip Puntumetakul, Junichiro Yamauchi and Punnee Peungsuwan
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12929; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912929 - 09 Oct 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2043
Abstract
Background: Different closed and open kinetic-chain exercises with hip-adductor co-contraction have different effects on quadriceps activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in quadriceps activity during the squat (SQ) and knee extension (KE) and straight leg raise (SLR) exercises [...] Read more.
Background: Different closed and open kinetic-chain exercises with hip-adductor co-contraction have different effects on quadriceps activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in quadriceps activity during the squat (SQ) and knee extension (KE) and straight leg raise (SLR) exercises with and without hip adduction in sedentary women. Methods: Twenty-eight sedentary women aged 44.5 ± 8.5 years were recruited. They performed three exercises with and without hip adduction. Surface electromyography (sEMG) activity was measured on the rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis oblique (VMO) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles. The levels of sEMG activities of the three muscles were compared among the six exercises using a repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: The findings showed that RF activity was lowest during the SQ alone and highest during the SLR exercise (p < 0.05 to 0.001). The VMO activity was significantly greater in the SQH than in the five types of exercises (p < 0.05 to 0.001), which led to a significant VMO/VL ratio as well. VL activity increased while the squat with hip adduction and knee extension with hip adduction exercise compared with SQ alone. Conclusion: This study indicates that a closed-chain squat with hip co-contraction can produce the VMO and VMO/VL ratio activity, while an open chain of SLR better activates the RF activity. The findings support the understanding of quadriceps activity in different exercises to be an alternative home-based exercise for physical therapy in women facing muscle weakness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preventing Exercise and Sport Related Injury: Can We Be Doing Better?)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop