ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Return to Work after Injury or Illness

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Occupational Safety and Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 March 2023) | Viewed by 3746

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
2. Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Interests: chronic disease care; psychological resilience; health communication

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Work and Organization Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Brussels, Belgium
Interests: work motivation; return to work

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the coming years, we will be facing an ageing workforce. The older we become, the higher the risk of a chronic health condition that leads to functional disability and even absence from work. Relatively young employees are also not immune to this issue. Long-term work disability is already a significant problem and will presumably pose major difficulties in the future. Work disablement often leads to unemployment and exit from the labor market, causing financial strains and psychosocial problems among individuals, and high costs for the workplace and society. Return to work should be promoted, but it is difficult to achieve. There is research indicating that diagnostic factors only explain 10% of the variation in work disability. Hence, biological parameters alone are not sufficient to explain who will return to work. Instead, return to work is influenced by a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors. This complexity calls for research into success factors of return to work, such as coordination between the stakeholders involved (social security and insurance, employers, occupational safety, public health), communication towards the work disabled, the motivation of the work disabled to return to work, early risk identification and workplace interventions, and/or interventions targeting specific-needs populations. Papers addressing these topics are invited to contribute to this Special Issue, in particular high-quality theoretical or empirical papers.

Prof. Dr. Emelien Lauwerier
Prof. Dr. Anja Van den Broeck
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • return to work
  • chronic illness
  • mental disorder
  • bio-psycho-social approach
  • workplace interventions
  • coordinated approach
  • behavioral approach
  • motivation
  • communication
  • early risk

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 2019 KiB  
Article
Absenteeism at Two Occupational Health Services in Belgium from 2014 to 2021
by Ilse Moerland, Nouchka Vervaet, Lode Godderis, Mathieu Versée and Marc Du Bois
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 3660; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043660 - 18 Feb 2023
Viewed by 1547
Abstract
Medical certification is often needed for absences of longer than one workday. The literature remains unclear as to whether this changes absenteeism. Earlier research found that the merging of two firms can augment or diminish short-term absenteeism. This study was conducted to examine [...] Read more.
Medical certification is often needed for absences of longer than one workday. The literature remains unclear as to whether this changes absenteeism. Earlier research found that the merging of two firms can augment or diminish short-term absenteeism. This study was conducted to examine whether prolonging self-certification or merging increases short-term absenteeism. Data from January 2014 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected from HR absenteeism files at two occupational health services in Belgium. Sickness periods of longer than 4 weeks were excluded. Company 1 started a merger in 2014, and company 2 prolonged of the self-certification period in 2018. The total full-time equivalents (FTEs) of company 1 increased by 6%, while company 2 had an increase of 28%. At company 1, there was a decline in absenteeism, while company 2 had an increase. The ARIMA (1, 0, 1) model provided a statistically significant local moving average (company 1: 0.123; company 2: 0.086) but no statistically significant parameters for the intervention (company 1: 0.007, p = 0.672; company 2: 0.000, p = 0.970). Prolonging the self-certification period by up to 5 days without medical certification or merging was not found to increase short-term absenteeism. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Return to Work after Injury or Illness)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 526 KiB  
Article
Predicting Return to Work Following Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study
by Weizhe Sun, Leila Gholizadeh, Lin Perry and Kyoungrim Kang
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(13), 8032; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138032 - 30 Jun 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1751
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients who returned to work within three months post-myocardial infarction and the factors that predicted return to work. A total of 136 participants with myocardial infarction completed the study questionnaires at baseline and three months [...] Read more.
This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients who returned to work within three months post-myocardial infarction and the factors that predicted return to work. A total of 136 participants with myocardial infarction completed the study questionnaires at baseline and three months post-discharge between August 2015 and February 2016. At the three-month follow-up, 87.5% (n = 49) of the participants who were working pre-infarction had resumed work. Age, gender, education, smoking, readmission after discharge, number of comorbidities, diabetes, social support, anxiety, and depression were significantly associated with returning to work at three months post-discharge. Age, gender, smoking, anxiety, and depression significantly predicted those patients with myocardial infarction that returned to work, using binary logistic regression. The majority of patients in work who experience myocardial infarction have the capacity to achieve a work resumption by three months post-discharge. Interventions that facilitate returning to work should focus on modifiable risk factors, such as improving these patients’ mental health, comorbid conditions, risk of readmission, smoking, and social support. Healthcare providers should work in partnership with patients’ family members, friends, and employers in developing and implementing interventions to address these modifiable factors to facilitate patients’ return to work. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Return to Work after Injury or Illness)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop