Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.
ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimisation

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Global Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2026) | Viewed by 4368

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW 2135, Australia
Interests: intimate partner violence; online dating; dating violence; narcissism; dark triad; attachment; child maltreatment

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
Interests: partner and family violence; intimate partner violence against perinatal women; safe housing and service access for women escaping intimate partner violence

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Intimate partner violence is a significant public health issue, with global estimates indicating that 40% of women and 20% of men will be subjected to intimate partner violence in their lifetime. Given the significant adverse outcomes associated with IPV victimisation at the individual level (e.g., PTSD, depression, suicidality, and homelessness) and the community level (e.g., health system, emergency services, and housing), there is an urgent need to comprehensively understand the factors associated with intimate partner violence perpetration and victimisation in order to inform intimate partner violence prevention and intervention efforts.

In this Special Issue of the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH), we are particularly interested in original or review articles exploring factors associated with intimate partner violence perpetration and/or victimisation. We strongly encourage articles with a particular focus on the following areas:

  • Psychological and childhood-related variables (e.g., child maltreatment and adverse childhood experiences) associated with intimate partner violence perpetration;
  • Factors associated with outcomes for victims–survivors of intimate partner violence (e.g., resilience, safe housing, and family violence service provision and accessibility);
  • Intimate partner violence victimisation of perinatal women, men, or diverse sexual and gender identities;
  • Socio-ecological factors associated with intimate partner violence perpetration and/or victimisation.

We intend to achieve an updated and comprehensive picture of the factors that predict intimate partner violence perpetration and influence outcomes for victims–survivors that will guide prevention and intervention efforts to reduce the prevalence of intimate partner violence and improve outcomes for victims–survivors.

Dr. Megan L. Willis
Dr. Rebecca O’Reilly
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • intimate partner violence
  • domestic violence
  • family violence
  • risk factors
  • intimate relationships
  • dating violence
  • psychological abuse
  • perpetrator
  • victim–survivor

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 756 KB  
Article
Meeting Prevention Beyond Awareness: A Qualitative Study Exploring Attitudes and Beliefs Towards Dating Violence and Prevention Among Emerging Adults
by Ana Cristina Saial, Liliana Faria, Alda Portugal, Élvio Rubio Gouveia, Miguel Campos and Ana Paula Relvas
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(3), 294; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23030294 - 27 Feb 2026
Viewed by 379
Abstract
Dating violence (DV) is an increasingly prevalent phenomenon among emerging adults (aged 18–25 years), and the relationship between awareness and behavior remains poorly understood. This study explores emerging adults’ attitudes and beliefs toward DV and summarizes recommendations for designing prevention programs. A qualitative [...] Read more.
Dating violence (DV) is an increasingly prevalent phenomenon among emerging adults (aged 18–25 years), and the relationship between awareness and behavior remains poorly understood. This study explores emerging adults’ attitudes and beliefs toward DV and summarizes recommendations for designing prevention programs. A qualitative study using three focus groups (n = 16 emerging adults aged 18–25; 56% female) was conducted. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Three main themes emerged: (1) gender roles, (2) healthy intimate relationships, and (3) dating violence. Participants demonstrated high awareness of DV types, severity, and prevalence. However, they also exhibited an attitude–behavior inconsistency, reflected in the normalization and excusing of violence, and difficulty recognizing violent situations in their own relationships. Myths of romantic love and cognitive dissonance between general knowledge and personal experience create barriers to recognizing abuse—particularly psychological abuse, which is often confused with concern. Participants suggested integrating prevention strategies into schools and communities, with interventions tailored to their interests and realities (e.g., mobile applications, games and social media awareness campaigns). This study reveals that awareness and knowledge alone are insufficient for prevention. Efforts should shift from a knowledge-focused to a behavior-change approach, promoting emotional regulation, interpersonal skills, and addressing social and gender norms. Relevant implications for practice and preventive intervention design are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 374 KB  
Article
Domains of Housing Instability and Intimate Partner Violence Risk Among U.S. Tenants
by Anairany Zapata, Leila G. Wood, Annalynn M. Galvin, Wenyaw Chan, Timothy A. Thomas, Jack Tsai, Heather K. Way, Elizabeth J. Mueller and Daphne C. Hernandez
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(8), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081212 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1471
Abstract
While IPV is often studied as a predictor of housing insecurity, few U.S. studies explore how different forms of housing instability may contribute to intimate partner violence (IPV) risk. Using a mixed-methods approach and a cross-sectional design, this study examined the association between [...] Read more.
While IPV is often studied as a predictor of housing insecurity, few U.S. studies explore how different forms of housing instability may contribute to intimate partner violence (IPV) risk. Using a mixed-methods approach and a cross-sectional design, this study examined the association between four housing instability domains and IPV among a sample of tenants that had either experienced eviction or were at high risk for eviction. Tenants in Harris and Travis counties (Texas, USA) completed an online survey (n = 1085; March–July 2024). Housing instability was assessed across four domains: homelessness, lease violations, utility hardship, and poor housing quality. IPV was measured using the Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream Screener. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression models suggest indicators within the four housing instability domains were associated with IPV risk. Within the homelessness domain, experiences with lifetime homelessness (AOR = 1.92, 95%CI 1.61–2.28), in the past 12 months living in unconventional spaces (AOR = 2.10, 95%CI 1.92–2.29), and moving in with others (AOR = 1.20, 95%CI 1.06–1.36) were associated with IPV. Within the lease violations domain, missed rent payments (AOR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.68–1.71) and non-payment lease violations (AOR = 2.50, 95%CI 2.29–2.73) in the past 12 months were associated with IPV. Utility shutoffs (AOR = 1.62, 95%CI 1.37–1.91) and unsafe housing (AOR = 1.65, 95%CI 1.31–2.09) in the past 12 months were associated with IPV. Homelessness, housing-related economic hardships and substandard living conditions predict an elevated risk of IPV. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 280 KB  
Article
Turning Points as a Catalyst for Escaping Partner Violence: A Shelter-Based Phenomenological Study Examining South African Women’s Experiences of Leaving Abusive Relationships
by Annah Mabunda, Mathildah Mpata Mokgatle and Sphiwe Madiba
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(6), 880; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060880 - 31 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1910
Abstract
Even though South Africa is a signatory to international declarations that aim to eliminate violence against women, intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a significant problem. While many women eventually leave IPV relationships after enduring violence for a long period, the matter of why [...] Read more.
Even though South Africa is a signatory to international declarations that aim to eliminate violence against women, intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a significant problem. While many women eventually leave IPV relationships after enduring violence for a long period, the matter of why women leave IPV relationships is not adequately researched in South Africa. This study explored the turning points that trigger the decision to leave IPV relationships and examined the process of leaving in a sample of women who left their abusive partners. In-depth interviews with 11 women living in shelters of safety for women in Gauteng Province, South Africa, were analyzed using Giorgi’s phenomenological analysis method. Leaving IPV relationships was a complex process that involved multiple decisions and actions over time; thus, most women endured many years of abuse. Leaving was triggered by various turning points, resulting in the leaving process being either planned or unplanned. For some of the women, the turning point was a specific violent event, while, for others, it was a culmination of violent events. Severe or escalating violence and the desire to protect their children from the impact of violence were key turning points for most of the women, such that they feared for their lives and that of their children. Overall, turning points played a crucial role in the decisions to leave abusive partners, and the leaving process for women was characterized to a great extent by fear. Understanding the complexities of the process of leaving and the relevance of turning points is essential to informing the development of appropriate interventions to respond more appropriately to women experiencing IPV. Full article
Back to TopTop