Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
7.3
Journals
IJERPH
Special Issues
Investigating Urban Gardening as a Public Health Strategy
ijerph-logo
Submit to IJERPH Review for IJERPH Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Investigating Urban Gardening as a Public Health Strategy

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 April 2021) | Viewed by 38146

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Jonathan Kingsley

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia
Interests: public health; qualitative research; aboriginal health; ecosystem approaches to health; community gardening

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In 2018, the special report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change declared that we have a decade left to address the risks associated with "unprecedented changes in all aspects of society”. The report emphasised that “rapid and far-reaching” adaptation was required in cities to address sustainable development. Andersson et al. (2014: 451) contended that urbanisation, specifically around engagement in green spaces, may offer policy solutions because “cities could become laboratories where management strategies and governance structures for ecosystem stewardship are tested and evaluated”. One of these strategies is urban gardening activities (such as communities, alotments, schools, hospitals, and home gardens), which provide a way of re-imagining cities. For instance, community gardening is associated with revitalising and transforming urban areas by increasing green spaces; increasing safety; enhancing environmental sustainability, community pride, and social connectedness; and empowering individuals. Although there are potential public health implications of urban gardening activities, these have not been translated into significant political and practical change. Therefore, the aim of this Special Issue is to highlight the social, economic, cultural, political, health, and wellbeing implications, impacts, and outcomes of urban gardening activities. By highlighting these outcomes, this Special Issue will be used to shine a light on the significance of urban gardening activities/settings to inform and influence policy and practice globally. This Special Issue invites researchers of any discipline that focus on urban gardening, including but not exlusive to urban planning/agriculture, social science, public health, and environmental science. 

Dr. Jonathan Kingsley
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Urban agriculture
  • Urban gardening
  • Urban farming
  • Public health
  • Planetary health
  • Social determinants of health
  • Environmental determinants of health
  • Wellbeing.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 2491 KiB  
Article
Participatory Action Research on the Impact of Community Gardening in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Investigating the Seeding Plan in Shanghai, China
by Huaiyun Kou, Sichu Zhang, Wenjia Li and Yuelai Liu
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(12), 6243; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126243 - 9 Jun 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3598
Abstract
This study aims to examine the impacts of community gardening on the daily life of residents and the management organisation of pandemic prevention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, a major public health scourge in 2020. The research team applied a participatory [...] Read more.
This study aims to examine the impacts of community gardening on the daily life of residents and the management organisation of pandemic prevention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, a major public health scourge in 2020. The research team applied a participatory action research approach to work with residents to design and implement the Seeding Plan, a contactless community gardening program. The authors carried out a study to compare the everyday conditions reflecting residents’ mental health of the three subject groups during the pandemic: the participants of the Seeding Plan (Group A), the non-participants living in the same communities that had implemented the Seeding Plan (Group B), and the non-participants in other communities (Group C). According to the results, group A showed the best mental health among the three; Group B, positively influenced by seeding activities, was better than Group C. The interview results also confirmed that the community connections established through gardening activities have a significant impact on maintaining a positive social mentality under extraordinary circumstances. From this, the study concluded that gardening activities can improve people’s mental health, effectively resist negative impacts, and it is a convenient tool with spreading influence on the entire community, so as to support the collective response to public health emergencies in a bottom-up direction by the community. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigating Urban Gardening as a Public Health Strategy)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 255 KiB  
Communication
Healthy Garden Plots? Harvesting Stories of Social Connectedness from Community Gardens
by Troy D. Glover
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(11), 5747; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115747 - 27 May 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3549
Abstract
Because of their profound effects on health and wellbeing, particularly their sense of social connectedness, community garden stories warrant the close attention of public health professionals. Efforts to tell these stories, if and when told, often smooth over, intentionally ignore or fail to [...] Read more.
Because of their profound effects on health and wellbeing, particularly their sense of social connectedness, community garden stories warrant the close attention of public health professionals. Efforts to tell these stories, if and when told, often smooth over, intentionally ignore or fail to appreciate vital subplots of social experiences that deserve our collective consideration. Put simply, this article advocates for public health to pay greater attention to the subplots—those secondary strands of the main plotline—of community garden stories. To demonstrate, the plot and subplots associated with the Queen Anne Memorial Garden, a community garden located in a diverse urban neighborhood in a Midwestern American city, are examined. The resultant narrative provides a more complex understanding of the social relationships that formed in and around the community garden under examination. Ultimately, the article shows how sublots weave together alternative interpretations of a story based on different constituents’ experiences silenced by main plotlines and encourage audiences to critically reflect upon their own behaviours. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigating Urban Gardening as a Public Health Strategy)
13 pages, 2220 KiB  
Article
How Does Urban Farming Benefit Participants’ Health? A Case Study of Allotments and Experience Farms in Tokyo
by Kentaro Harada, Kimihiro Hino, Akiko Iida, Takahiro Yamazaki, Hiroyuki Usui, Yasushi Asami and Makoto Yokohari
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(2), 542; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020542 - 11 Jan 2021
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 9462
Abstract
In Japan, the world’s most rapidly aging country, urban farming is attracting attention as an infrastructure for health activities. In Tokyo, urban residents generally participate in two types of farming programs: allotments and experience farms. The availability of regular interaction among participants distinguishes [...] Read more.
In Japan, the world’s most rapidly aging country, urban farming is attracting attention as an infrastructure for health activities. In Tokyo, urban residents generally participate in two types of farming programs: allotments and experience farms. The availability of regular interaction among participants distinguishes these two programs. We quantitatively examined the difference in changes in self-reported health status between participants in these two types of urban farming. We obtained retrospective cross-sectional data from questionnaire surveys of 783 urban farming participants and 1254 nonparticipants and analyzed the data using ordinal logistic regressions. As a result, compared with nonparticipants, participants in both types of urban farming reported significantly improved self-rated health (SRH) and mental health (MH). After controlling for changes in their physical activity (PA), although participants in allotments did not report significant improvement in SRH and MH, those in experience farms did, suggesting that their health improvement was not only caused by an increase in PA but also by social interaction among participants. From the perspective of health promotion, public support is needed not only for the municipality’s allotments but also for the experience farms operated by the farmers themselves. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigating Urban Gardening as a Public Health Strategy)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4176 KiB  
Article
Trust, Connection and Equity: Can Understanding Context Help to Establish Successful Campus Community Gardens?
by Pauline Marsh, Suzanne Mallick, Emily Flies, Penelope Jones, Sue Pearson, Iain Koolhof, Jason Byrne and Dave Kendal
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(20), 7476; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207476 - 14 Oct 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5248
Abstract
Campus community gardens (CCGs) can potentially improve student health and wellbeing, mitigate social and ecological problems, and nurture university-community relationships. However, CCGs are located in complex socio-political and ecological settings and many community gardens struggle or fail. However, few studies have assessed the [...] Read more.
Campus community gardens (CCGs) can potentially improve student health and wellbeing, mitigate social and ecological problems, and nurture university-community relationships. However, CCGs are located in complex socio-political and ecological settings and many community gardens struggle or fail. However, few studies have assessed the socio-political/ecological context of a garden setting prior to its development to understand the potential barriers and enablers of success. Our study assessed the socio-spatial context of a proposed CCG at a student university accommodation site. We engaged diverse university and community stakeholders through interviews, focus groups and a survey to explore their perceptions of the space generally and the proposed garden specifically. Visual observations and public life surveying were used to determine patterns of behavior. Results confirmed known problems associated with an underutilized site that provides little opportunity for lingering or contact with nature; and unknown barriers, including socially disconnected stakeholders and community distrust of the university. The research also uncovered positive enablers, such as stakeholder appreciation of the social, wellbeing and ecological benefits that a CCG could deliver. Our findings suggest that an in-depth exploration of a proposed garden context can be an important enabler of its success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigating Urban Gardening as a Public Health Strategy)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

8 pages, 320 KiB  
Protocol
A Systematic Review Protocol to Identify the Key Benefits and Associated Program Characteristics of Community Gardening for Vulnerable Populations
by Danielle Tracey, Tonia Gray, Joanna Sweeting, Jonathan Kingsley, Aisling Bailey and Philip Pettitt
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(6), 2029; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062029 - 19 Mar 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 6021
Abstract
Gardening has long been a popular pastime. There is a growing evidence base for the health and well-being benefits of gardening. Community gardening brings a social aspect to gardening, thereby increasing the potential benefits to include addressing social inclusion and poor community health [...] Read more.
Gardening has long been a popular pastime. There is a growing evidence base for the health and well-being benefits of gardening. Community gardening brings a social aspect to gardening, thereby increasing the potential benefits to include addressing social inclusion and poor community health through sharing of values, support of others, and building networks. This systematic review protocol aims to determine the characteristics of community gardening that could lead to beneficial outcomes such as connection with the community and development of new skills. Thirteen academic databases will be searched for studies looking at the benefits of community gardening, with a focus on vulnerable populations. Data will be extracted from all studies meeting the inclusion criteria and summarized to provide an overview of the current literature. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive investigation into community gardening, its benefits, and how they are achieved for the target population. By gathering and synthesizing this information, the review should allow policy makers and practitioners to work more effectively to address health and social inequities, by highlighting areas of need and enabling optimization of future interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigating Urban Gardening as a Public Health Strategy)
12 pages, 322 KiB  
Protocol
A Systematic Review Protocol Investigating Community Gardening Impact Measures
by Jonathan Kingsley, Aisling Bailey, Nooshin Torabi, Pauline Zardo, Suzanne Mavoa, Tonia Gray, Danielle Tracey, Philip Pettitt, Nicholas Zajac and Emily Foenander
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(18), 3430; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183430 - 16 Sep 2019
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 8046
Abstract
Existing community gardening research has tended to be exploratory and descriptive, utilising qualitative or mixed methodologies to explore and understand community garden participation. While research on community gardening attracts growing interest, the empirical rigour of measurement scales and embedded indicators has received comparatively [...] Read more.
Existing community gardening research has tended to be exploratory and descriptive, utilising qualitative or mixed methodologies to explore and understand community garden participation. While research on community gardening attracts growing interest, the empirical rigour of measurement scales and embedded indicators has received comparatively less attention. Despite the extensive body of community gardening literature, a coherent narrative on valid, high quality approaches to the measurement of outcomes and impact across different cultural contexts is lacking and yet to be comprehensively examined. This is essential as cities are becoming hubs for cultural diversity. Systematic literature reviews that explore the multiple benefits of community gardening and other urban agriculture activities have been undertaken, however, a systematic review of the impact measures of community gardening is yet to be completed. This search protocol aims to address the following questions: (1) How are the health, wellbeing, social and environmental outcomes and impacts of community gardening measured? (2) What cultural diversity considerations have existing community garden measures taken into account? Demographic data will be collected along with clear domains/constructs of experiences, impacts and outcomes captured from previous literature to explore if evidence considers culturally heterogeneous and diverse populations. This will offer an understanding as to whether community gardening research is appropriately measuring this cross-cultural activity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigating Urban Gardening as a Public Health Strategy)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-6
Back to TopTop