ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The 2nd Edition of Assistive Technology: New Design and Low Cost. A Challenge to the Future

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Disabilities".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2023) | Viewed by 2130

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña, 15001 A Coruña, Spain
Interests: assistive technology; low-cost; outcome measures; health behavior, chronic disease and health promotion; innovation and creativity
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Community Inclusion (INICO), University of Salamanca, 37005 Salamanca, Spain
Interests: outcome measures; assistive technology; design for all people; inclusive education; autism
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Assistive technology (AT) refers to a group of resources (objects, instruments, devices, etc.) that provide support for individuals in diverse activities, and thus, they are environmental facilitators to promote autonomy. Despite its great contribution in promoting autonomy, some commercial AT does not always meet the specific needs of the final user. The high cost, lack of information, and lack of consideration of the user during the prescription process make it difficult for the user to access and gain beneficial use from the device. Consideration of the user and their family during the acquisition of any AT is fundamental for the product to be effectively incorporated into the user’s life. These individuals are the axis around which the products should be developed. We organized the first edition of this Special Issue (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/special_issues/Assistive_Technology) last year which attracted a lot of attention. 

Through this Special Issue, a broad perspective regarding the potential of a low-cost philosophy and a do-it-yourself movement in the provision of support will be given. We welcome research to improve the design and creation of customized AT so that such products effectively meet the needs of a person engaged in diverse activities and daily chores.

Additionally, in order to demonstrate the evidence emerging from this topic and to optimize the quality of services, several manuscripts will be focused on the application of outcome measures in the field of AT.

Dr. Thais Pousada
Prof. Dr. Emiliano Díez
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • assistive technology
  • disability
  • outcome measures
  • low cost

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 377 KiB  
Article
Cross-Cultural Validation of Quebec User Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 for Spanish Population (QUEST-2.0 ES)
by Joao Guerreiro, Estíbaliz Jiménez-Arberas, Patricia Porto Trillo, Olalla Vilar Figueira, Pedro Saénz-López Buñuel, Sandra Pais, José Tierra Orta and Thais Pousada García
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(15), 9349; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159349 - 30 Jul 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1683
Abstract
Background: Assistive technologies (ATs) are resources to promote the independence and participation of people with a disability. The use of standardized tools, based on outcome measures, is essential for guaranteeing high-quality rates. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with AT–2.0 (QUEST) is a [...] Read more.
Background: Assistive technologies (ATs) are resources to promote the independence and participation of people with a disability. The use of standardized tools, based on outcome measures, is essential for guaranteeing high-quality rates. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with AT–2.0 (QUEST) is a scale to assess the satisfaction of people using any AT. Objectives: To translate and culturally validate the QUEST–2.0 for the Spanish population (QUEST 2.0-ES). Methods: A validation cross-design and descriptive study. The test–retest reliability, validity, and internal consistency of QUEST 2.0-ES were studied. It was divided into two phases: Sample 1 was formed by 26 persons; in sample 2, 30 persons participated. The conditions included neurological conditions, amputations, rare diseases, and deafness. Results: Thirty-five men and 21 women participated in total. The majority of AT used were those for mobility. QUEST 2.0-ES analysis showed internal consistency values between the test (α = 0.87) and retest versions (α = 0.89). The internal consistency was high for AT (test, α = 0.83; retest, α = 0.87) and Service (test, α = 0.80; retest, α = 0.80). The temporal reliability (1–2 weeks) for test–retest was 0.88. Conclusion: QUEST 2.0-ES showed good psychometric properties in terms of validity and test–retest reliability, and it is a good tool to assess the user’s satisfaction with ATs and services. Full article
Back to TopTop