ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Social Equalities and Wellbeing in Community Health

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Global Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2026 | Viewed by 1775

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand
Interests: public health; māori psychology; māori psychology knowledge systems; community psychology; health and community services; programme evaluation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand
Interests: food insecurity; community psychology; lived experience of health inequities; disability; qualitative research

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Communities worldwide are navigating complex challenges shaped by climate change, migration, inequitable access to resources, and declining opportunities for healthcare and justice. These intersecting issues create profound implications for community wellbeing, highlighting the urgency of approaches that address systemic inequalities while fostering resilience and hope. This Special Issue on Social Equalities and Wellbeing in Community Health invites contributions that explore innovative, inclusive, and justice-oriented responses through the lens of community psychology.

This Special Issue aims to showcase scholarship and practice that critically engage with community health at the intersections of social inequalities and systemic transformation. We welcome articles that illuminate collaborative and multidisciplinary approaches, draw on Indigenous knowledges, and amplify local voices and lived experiences. Submissions may include theoretical, empirical, and practice-based contributions that demonstrate how community psychology can generate counterspaces of empowerment, reshape health policy and practice, and expand opportunities for communities to thrive.

By gathering diverse perspectives and exemplars, this Special Issue seeks to advance a collective vision of community health that is equitable, participatory, and deeply connected to the pursuit of social justice.

Further information on community psychology

Community psychology is an applied social science that focuses on how social and physical environments affect individuals and communities, and conversely, how individuals and groups affect their environments. It promotes social justice by examining community-level problems, such as oppression, stigma, and marginalization, and developing interventions through collaborative, multidisciplinary approaches that empower communities to enhance their wellbeing and address systemic issues.

Key Principles and Focus Areas

  • Ecological Perspective: Community psychologists view individuals within the context of their social settings and physical environments, recognizing the reciprocal relationship between people and their surroundings.
  • Social Justice: A core aim is to promote social justice and improve the wellbeing of oppressed, stigmatized, or marginalized groups within communities.
  • Systemic Change: Instead of focusing solely on individual change, community psychology emphasizes "second-order change" by altering the systems and structures that contribute to problems.
  • Community Collaboration: It values the active participation and collaboration of community members in the research and intervention processes, recognizing their experiential knowledge and expertise.
  • Interdisciplinary Approach: The field draws on sociology, education, policy sciences, and other disciplines, moving beyond traditional psychological boundaries.

How Community Psychology Works

  • Problem Identification: Community psychologists research and analyze problem situations within communities, such as environmental pollution, housing issues, or domestic violence.
  • Intervention Design: They develop and implement strategies aimed at fostering community wellness and empowering people to improve their circumstances.
  • Empowerment: A key goal is to empower individuals and communities by building their capacity to act, advocate, and create positive change.
  • Diverse Methodologies: Research often employs a range of methodologies, including both empirical and experiential approaches, to address complex issues within specific cultural contexts.

Examples of Community Psychology in Practice:

  • Developing policies to combat pollution and its effects on community health.
  • Creating and supporting “counterspaces” to provide support for individuals experiencing oppression.
  • Collaborating with non-profit organizations and government agencies to address issues like unemployment and access to education.
  • Working with communities to develop more just legal policies and improve access to safe housing and decent jobs.

Prof. Dr. Bridgette Masters-Awatere
Dr. Rebekah Graham
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • equity
  • community psychology
  • Māori
  • Indigenous
  • justice
  • health
  • wellbeing
  • disability
  • culture
  • migration
  • climate change
  • identity
  • policy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

20 pages, 346 KB  
Article
Austere and Burnt Offerings: Countering the Material and Symbolic Othering Within School Meals in Aotearoa New Zealand with a Community Psychology Lens
by Kimberly Mary Jackson
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(8), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23081011 - 2 Aug 2026
Viewed by 226
Abstract
Globally, school meals have formed a social safety net for improving children’s nutrition, health, and educational attainment. In Aotearoa New Zealand, government funded lunches for children attending schools in low-income neighbourhoods were introduced in 2020, amidst rising poverty levels and consequent household food [...] Read more.
Globally, school meals have formed a social safety net for improving children’s nutrition, health, and educational attainment. In Aotearoa New Zealand, government funded lunches for children attending schools in low-income neighbourhoods were introduced in 2020, amidst rising poverty levels and consequent household food insecurity. The aspirations encapsulated within the scheme’s indigenous Māori name, ‘Ka Ora, Ka Ako’ (‘to be well, healthy and safe; to be ready to learn’) have lost focus since reforms to the lunches in 2024 prioritised cost savings, resulting in widely publicised quality issues. This present study draws from a critical multi-level investigation into the issue of hungry children in New Zealand schools, prior to the introduction of ‘Ka Ora, Ka Ako’. Narrative analysis identified how food in schools has been conceptualised within the context of a settler colonial charity model and neoliberal austerity. Applying a critical community psychology lens highlights how burnt and meagre lunches offered to children from food insecure households are a concrete product of historically grounded, unequal relations between groups. A community psychology approach reimagines state-funded food in schools as a public good, arguing for equitable rights to nutrition, including recognition of Māori rights to food sovereignty. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Equalities and Wellbeing in Community Health)

Other

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 796 KB  
Systematic Review
Hybrid Leadership for Māori Health: A Systematic Review
by Bridgette Masters-Awatere, Rachel McClintock, Utiku Potaka, Luke Enoka, Stacey Ruru and Amohia Boulton
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(5), 559; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23050559 - 26 Apr 2026
Viewed by 920
Abstract
This systematic review synthesises the qualitative literature on Māori leadership to examine how leadership is conceptualised, enacted, and constrained, and what this implies for Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system. Across included studies, Māori leadership is grounded in whakapapa-based legitimacy, tikanga and mātauranga Māori, [...] Read more.
This systematic review synthesises the qualitative literature on Māori leadership to examine how leadership is conceptualised, enacted, and constrained, and what this implies for Aotearoa New Zealand’s health system. Across included studies, Māori leadership is grounded in whakapapa-based legitimacy, tikanga and mātauranga Māori, and collective responsibility for relational, cultural, and intergenerational wellbeing; these foundations persist across “traditional” and “contemporary” settings, with differences reflecting institutional conditions rather than shifts in core values. Interpreting the literature through a Māori cultural lens, the review shows that leadership is often exercised within Crown-dominated organisations where Māori authority is not the default, requiring leaders to navigate multiple accountabilities to iwi and communities, organisational mandates, and statutory obligations. Hybridity emerges as a structurally produced feature of practice, integrating Māori relational ethics with bureaucratic, professional, and governance requirements and ongoing translation work to make Māori priorities legible within institutional systems. Health-sector evidence illustrates how commissioning, funding, and accountability arrangements can limit Māori decision-making, increase leadership burden, and constrain sustainability and leadership pipelines. The review concludes that strengthening Māori leadership in health requires organisational and system change—such as clearer Māori decision rights, resourced Māori-led priority setting, and accountability mechanisms that operationalise equity and anti-racism—alongside targeted research on governance, commissioning, and system design. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Equalities and Wellbeing in Community Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop