Genealogy of Populism: Concepts, Ideas and Movements

A special issue of Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2022) | Viewed by 8970

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Political Sciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 20123 Milan, Italy
Interests: populism; democratic theory; crowd psychology; history of social and political sciences

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The word "populism" has enjoyed enormous success in the last two decades, and studies on populist movements and leaders have multiplied in the social sciences at an impressive rate. In spite of the term's success, there is no shared conception among scholars of "what" populism is, nor is there a common idea of what its constituent elements are. The difficulties in defining populism also arise from the genealogy of this concept and from the ways in which it was constructed in the last century. The roots of contemporary polysemy of the word are indeed the legacy of a rather complex historical course. Quite singularly, however, many scholars of populism seem unaware of this genealogy. Critical reflection on the genealogy of the contemporary concept of populism has not been adequately developed by specialized literature, and this absence contributes to consolidating an acritical use of the concept.

This Special Issue of Genealogy intends to contribute to “mapping” the genealogies of the concept of populism and of those elements—stylistic, ideological, organizational—that we can recognize in contemporary populism.

This Special Issue also invites papers that contribute to enriching research on the genealogy of populism, in relation both to the construction and re-elaboration of the concept as well as to the rhetorical, ideological and organizational tools that characterize contemporary populist movements.

In particular, this Special Issue invites papers focused on the following points:

  • The genealogy of the word "populism", with particular regard to the birth of the term in the United States of the nineteenth century;
  • The genealogy of "populism" in Russia, from the origins of the "Narodnichestvo" to the contemporary "populizm";
  • The use of the notion of "populism" in the social sciences of the twentieth century;
  • The meaning of the word "populism" in Latin America, from the 1950s to the present day (with reference also to economic policy programs);
  • The meaning of the word "populism" in Europe, from the beginning of the twentieth century until today;
  • The genealogy of the theories of "populism" (in particular in relation to the theories of Antonio Gramsci, Gino Germani, Margaret Canovan and Ernesto Laclau);
  • The connection between twentieth-century and contemporary populism and classical phenomena such as "demagogy", "oclocracy", "caesarism" and "boulangism";
  • The connection between the contemporary critique of populism and the classic images that depict the masses, the mob or the people as emotional, irrational, violent, etc.;
  • The connection between the contemporary concept of “populism” and classical theories on “totalitarianism” and “totalitarian democracy”;
  • The ideological and organizational links between the different generations of "populist" movements and leaders (especially in the USA, Europe and Latin America, but also in other examples of the “global populism”).

Prof. Dr. Damiano Palano
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genealogy is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • populism
  • anti-populism
  • anti-partitism
  • people
  • crowd
  • mass
  • demagogy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 364 KiB  
Article
Populism in the XXI Century in Brazil: A Dangerous Ambiguity
by Mayra Goulart Silva
Genealogy 2022, 6(2), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6020036 - 30 Apr 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3647
Abstract
In this paper, I hope to shed light on the social and institutional transformation processes in Brazil in the 21st century, contrasting what can be understood as two populist waves. The first is the one led by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, as [...] Read more.
In this paper, I hope to shed light on the social and institutional transformation processes in Brazil in the 21st century, contrasting what can be understood as two populist waves. The first is the one led by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, as a left-wing leader whose government has been internationally recognized for implementing distributive economic policies (inclusion of the poorest majority) and inclusive social policies (inclusion of racial and sexual minorities). The second is the right-wing wave led by Jair Bolsonaro, internationally recognized, but rather for embracing a discourse contrary to the inclusive practices adopted by their predecessor. Thus, the question I want to answer is: How can the same concept fit into such different phenomena? My hypothesis is that we are facing two patterns of representative relations. An inclusive one that aims to expand the number of groups that can be properly represented within the political collectivity, increasing its pluralism, and an exclusive one that aims to restrict them, shortening the plurality of groups and identities that forms the people. In both, the theme of racial and sexual minorities becomes a priority. Through this discussion, I want to emphasize the substantive and existential quality of the differences between these two representative patterns that are sometimes neglected or reduced by those who use the concept of populism to attribute some kind of symmetry or ideological convergence between them. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genealogy of Populism: Concepts, Ideas and Movements)
14 pages, 317 KiB  
Article
Inventing “Populism”: Notes for the Genealogy of a Paranoid Concept
by Damiano Palano
Genealogy 2022, 6(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy6010002 - 24 Dec 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3485
Abstract
This article proposes a “genealogical” rereading of the concept of “populism”. Following the idea of “genealogical” analysis that was suggested by Michel Foucault, the aim is to show the “political” logic of the reinvention of the concept of “populism”, which was carried out [...] Read more.
This article proposes a “genealogical” rereading of the concept of “populism”. Following the idea of “genealogical” analysis that was suggested by Michel Foucault, the aim is to show the “political” logic of the reinvention of the concept of “populism”, which was carried out between the 1950s and 1960s by the social sciences in the United States. First, this contribution reconstructs the history of the concept, identifying five different phases: (1) Russian populism of the late nineteenth century; (2) the Popular Party in the United States; (3) the Perón and Vargas regimes in Argentina and Brazil, respectively; (4) the reformulation carried out by the social sciences in the 1950s and 1960s; and (5) the subsequent extension of the concept to Western Europe. It is argued that the decisive turning point took place in the 1950s when the social sciences “grouped” the traits of heterogeneous movements into a single theoretical category. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genealogy of Populism: Concepts, Ideas and Movements)
Back to TopTop