Advances in Decision Support for Urban Fire Risk Management and Policy Formulation

A special issue of Fire (ISSN 2571-6255). This special issue belongs to the section "Fire Research at the Science–Policy–Practitioner Interface".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 December 2026 | Viewed by 3020

Special Issue Editors

School of Transportation, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China
Interests: fire safety management; evacuation; numerical simulation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
Interests: fire risk; fire safety; fire management; fire extinguishing; evacuation; building fire protection

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
Interests: safe evacuation of crowds; evacuation optimization; disaster and fire risk management; full-cycle safety management of chemical processes; accident prevention for new energy-green hydrogen; safety science and engineering

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Public Administration & Emergency Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Interests: urban public safety; emergency management; disaster and accident risk assessment and modeling; fire safety technology and management

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Urban fire disasters—ranging from residential structure fires to catastrophic high-rise and mixed-use building incidents—pose escalating threats to life, property, and the resilience of densely populated communities. As cities grow vertically and spatially, fire risks become increasingly complex, demanding evidence-based, data-driven approaches to fire prevention, emergency response, and regulatory governance. This Special Issue, “Advances in Decision Support for Urban Fire Risk Management and Policy Formulation”, focuses explicitly on fire challenges within urban and built environments, aiming to strengthen the interface between cutting-edge research and operational decision-making in municipal fire services, urban planning, fire management and public safety policy.

We seek original, interdisciplinary contributions that develop or apply decision support systems, analytical frameworks, and actionable tools to address urban-specific fire management issues. Topics of interest include—but are not limited to—the following:

  • The spatial and temporal modeling of urban fire risk at neighborhood or city scales;
  • The accessibility and equity analysis of fire emergency response;
  • The optimization of fire station siting and resource allocation;
  • Behavioral insights into public fire safety awareness, evacuation compliance, and community preparedness;
  • Governance innovations and regulatory frameworks for high-rise, informal settlements, and aging infrastructure;
  • Machine learning, agent-based modeling, or big data analytics for urban fire scenario simulation and policy evaluation.

All manuscripts must clearly articulate how their findings translate into concrete implications for fire management practice or policy development. Empirical rigor, methodological innovation, and real-world applicability are key evaluation criteria.

Dr. Dingli Liu
Prof. Dr. Zhisheng Xu
Prof. Dr. Jinghong Wang
Dr. Zongjia Zhang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Fire is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • fire risk assessment
  • emergency response accessibility
  • fire resource allocation
  • fire station location optimization
  • fire management policy
  • urban fire safety
  • high-rise building fire protection
  • public fire safety literacy
  • decision support systems
  • spatial analysis and modeling

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 1466 KB  
Article
Research on Community Emergency Corridor Systems in Urban Fire Risk Governance: An Empirical Study of 77 Chinese Communities
by Jialu Cao, Yibao Wang and Chong Li
Fire 2026, 9(5), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9050186 - 30 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1970
Abstract
Urban fires are highly destructive with high casualty rates, often causing significant casualties and property losses. The obstruction of the Community Emergency Corridor System is a critical factor exacerbating fire casualties, directly related to residents’ life safety and public security governance effectiveness. Currently, [...] Read more.
Urban fires are highly destructive with high casualty rates, often causing significant casualties and property losses. The obstruction of the Community Emergency Corridor System is a critical factor exacerbating fire casualties, directly related to residents’ life safety and public security governance effectiveness. Currently, community emergency corridors face severe systemic bottlenecks in the coordinated development of triadic space (physical, social, and information spaces), and the lag of information space has become a fatal shortcoming restricting emergency response efficiency, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive evaluation framework. However, existing studies mostly focus on a single spatial dimension, lacking a systematic framework for the coordinated patency of triadic space. Based on this, this study adopts the triadic space perspective, takes 77 typical communities in China as research objects, and uses the Entropy Weighted TOPSIS method to construct an evaluation index system for the accessibility of the Community Emergency Corridor System and systematically measure its level. The results show that the patency of triadic space is unbalanced overall; social space outperforms physical and information spaces (with the latter being the lowest), reflecting deficiencies in emergency information release and acquisition. Regionally, accessibility in Northeast China is significantly higher than in other regions (Northeast > West > Central > East), and eastern China has the lowest scores in physical and information spaces due to high urbanization, dense buildings, and land scarcity. Corresponding countermeasures are proposed to address regional disparities. The triadic space evaluation framework and methodological path provide a replicable analytical tool for urban fire-oriented community emergency management and references for fire resilience governance in other countries or high-density communities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 7722 KB  
Article
Characterizing Human-Caused Wildfire Based on the Fire Weather Index in South Korea
by Chan Jin Lim and Heemun Chae
Fire 2026, 9(4), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9040147 - 4 Apr 2026
Viewed by 634
Abstract
This study examines the effects of meteorological fire danger and human activity on wildfire ignition patterns in South Korea using records from 2004 to 2023. A percentile-based Fire Weather Index (FWI) classification, derived from negative binomial regression, identified critical daily fire frequency thresholds [...] Read more.
This study examines the effects of meteorological fire danger and human activity on wildfire ignition patterns in South Korea using records from 2004 to 2023. A percentile-based Fire Weather Index (FWI) classification, derived from negative binomial regression, identified critical daily fire frequency thresholds at FWI 4.39 (μ ≥ 1 fire/day) and FWI 6.84 (μ ≥ 2 fires/day). Bivariate LISA analysis revealed a spatial mismatch between resident population density and wildfire frequency: High–High (HH) clusters were concentrated in the Seoul metropolitan fringe, while Low–High (LH) clusters appeared in mountainous provinces where forest visitor ignitions and agricultural burning are the primary causes. In HH clusters, cigarette-related ignitions and structure-to-forest transitions were comparatively more frequent. Wildfire events were concentrated in age class 4–5 coniferous and broadleaf stands, and mean ignition-to-building distances in metropolitan areas frequently fell below 150 m. These findings suggest that prevention strategies should shift from uniform resident-oriented approaches toward spatially differentiated management targeting transient populations in LH areas and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) exposure in HH areas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop