Science Education Research and Practice

A Topical Collection in Encyclopedia (ISSN 2673-8392) belonging to the section "Social Sciences".

Viewed by 2701

Editors


E-Mail Website
Collection Editor
Faculté des Sciences de L’éducation, Département de Didactique, Université du Québec à Montréal, P.O. Box 8888, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada
Interests: conceptual conflict; physics education; geometrization of the structure of matter; history of science in education; integration of mathematics and physics; constructivist teaching strategies; computer technologies in education; universality of scientific representations

E-Mail Website
Collection Editor
Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
Interests: construction of scientific knowledge and activities that facilitate the understanding of science at all levels of schooling; teachers' training
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Topical Collection Information

Dear Colleagues,

Since Piaget's groundbreaking insights into how students make sense of physical phenomena and the influential ideas of Bachelard and Kuhn, a surge of exciting research has followed. Science educators now eagerly examine real classroom challenges at every level, from elementary school to university. Posner and Hewson, inspired by Kuhn, sparked a new discussion with their lively model of conceptual change, shedding light on why learners hang onto prescientific ideas. Researchers now use terms like 'alternative conceptions,' 'misconceptions,' 'representations' and 'intuitive theory' to describe these persistent beliefs. Alongside the conceptual change movement, multifaceted theories have emerged regarding the transition of students' thinking toward reasoning that is consistent and compatible with school scientific knowledge. Concepts such as modelling, argumentation, inquiry-based learning and teaching, narration, ... were the focus of research and practices.

According to this dynamic perspective, science learning is an active journey of conceptual shifts. Despite a treasure trove of studies, achieving consistently meaningful science learning remains elusive. To close this gap, many recent studies urge us to boldly connect research to vibrant classroom practice.

We invite authors to submit studies on the development of teaching strategies. Published authors can showcase innovative, research-driven approaches that combine student comprehension and conceptual change.

Submissions should clearly state potential applications or adaptations within science education. Highly recommend reading works that present a review of published research on the application of the conceptual change model in teaching science.

Prof. Dr. Abdeljalil Métioui
Prof. Dr. Konstantinos Ravanis
Collection Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the Topical Collection website. Review articles and Entry papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Encyclopedia is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • teachers' pedagogical knowledge in identifying students' alternative conceptions
  • teachers' scientific proficiency
  • instructional approaches based on the concept of conceptual conflict
  • instructional approaches centred on the idea of conceptual change
  • parallelism between students' current understanding and historical conceptions
  • hands-on labs and teaching activities that help transform alternative conceptions into knowledge that is consistent with what is taught in school
  • digital labs engineered to spark conceptual and/or cognitive conflict
  • incorporating the study of scientific history into science education

Published Papers (3 papers)

2026

23 pages, 1003 KB  
Review
From Emotional Exposure to Responsible Professional Agency: The INTEGRAL Framework Across Health Sciences and Engineering Education
by Maria Antuna-Casal, Marta Rios, Maria Rios-Antuna and Juan Carlos Rios-Fernandez
Encyclopedia 2026, 6(9), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6090203 - 15 Sep 2026
Viewed by 225
Abstract
Professional education asks learners to act under consequential uncertainty while judgment and professional identity are still developing. Scholarship on emotion, identity formation, reflection, psychological safety, ethics, and agency has expanded, yet these literatures seldom explain how affectively charged experience becomes accountable professional action. [...] Read more.
Professional education asks learners to act under consequential uncertainty while judgment and professional identity are still developing. Scholarship on emotion, identity formation, reflection, psychological safety, ethics, and agency has expanded, yet these literatures seldom explain how affectively charged experience becomes accountable professional action. This critical integrative review develops INTEGRAL (INTegrated Emotional Growth for Responsible Agency and Leadership), a cross-professional framework for health sciences and engineering education. A purposive, theory-led synthesis of 47 peer-reviewed sources was assembled through targeted searches, citation tracing, abductive construct comparison, negative-case analysis, and contrastive examination of two consequential professional fields; the retained corpus comprised 25 health-sciences sources, 13 engineering sources, and 9 cross-disciplinary, general-education, or methodological sources. Because the iterative search was not an exhaustive database export, no valid total-hit denominator was generated, and this reporting boundary is stated explicitly. INTEGRAL distinguishes event-in-context exposure (D1) from learner appraisal and identity-relevant processing (D2). Structured curricular scaffolding (D3) is specified as a multilevel configuration that shapes the exposure learners encounter, influences early processing, and moderates whether D2 becomes observable, reason-giving, accountable action under constraint (D4). Leadership and stewardship (D5) are repositioned as a conditional long-term extension rather than a mandatory stage. The framework is theoretical, identifies rival explanations and disconfirmation conditions, and derives testable propositions and multi-source indicators without treating adversity as inherently beneficial or emotional display as competence. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

26 pages, 384 KB  
Review
From Obstacle to Catalyst: A Narrative Review of Learning from Errors in Science Education
by Noëlle Fabre-Mitjans, Gregorio Jiménez-Valverde, Salvador Viciana and Ferran Crespo i Torres
Encyclopedia 2026, 6(9), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6090192 - 2 Sep 2026
Viewed by 521
Abstract
Learning from errors (LFE) constitutes a complex, multilevel process whose pedagogical value depends on how errors are elicited, interpreted, and corrected. This narrative review critically synthesizes research on LFE and its implications for science instruction in school and higher education. The reporting of [...] Read more.
Learning from errors (LFE) constitutes a complex, multilevel process whose pedagogical value depends on how errors are elicited, interpreted, and corrected. This narrative review critically synthesizes research on LFE and its implications for science instruction in school and higher education. The reporting of the purposive, non-exhaustive search was strengthened with reference to the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) criteria. The synthesis traces the historical transition from error avoidance to conditional error-as-resource perspectives and integrates five complementary lenses: error type, negative knowledge, cognitive load and prior knowledge, affective and self-regulatory processes, and the Generating Errors/Detecting and Correcting Errors model. It then evaluates instructional approaches including productive failure, erroneous examples, peer instruction, formative feedback, conceptual-change strategies, Predict–Observe–Explain, refutation texts, and gamification. Evidence is strongest when errors are embedded in structured cycles of manageable challenge, explanation, feedback, and revision; however, effects are heterogeneous and moderated by learner expertise, task demands, feedback design, classroom error climate, and safety constraints. Domain-specific evidence is most developed in physics, chemistry, biology, and health-professions simulation, whereas Earth and climate sciences and teacher professional development remain comparatively underexamined. The review concludes with an integrative framework and actionable design principles for science teacher education, while identifying methodological, cultural, and empirical gaps for future research. Full article
23 pages, 643 KB  
Review
Science Curriculum Research Through the Lens of Scientific Literacy: A Scoping Review
by Özden Şengül and Özge Can Aran
Encyclopedia 2026, 6(7), 157; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6070157 - 13 Jul 2026
Viewed by 954
Abstract
This article aims to inform the scholarly debate on curriculum research in science education through a systematic scoping review of 140 empirical articles from four leading science education journals. Scoping review methodology was selected to map the breadth, nature, and thematic landscape of [...] Read more.
This article aims to inform the scholarly debate on curriculum research in science education through a systematic scoping review of 140 empirical articles from four leading science education journals. Scoping review methodology was selected to map the breadth, nature, and thematic landscape of curriculum research rather than to evaluate intervention effectiveness or establish evidence hierarchies. Data were retrieved through database searches and thematic content analysis of articles published in 2009 through 2025. Based on formulations of scientific literacy framework, the analytic framework was used to conceptualize curriculum research. The review identified seven themes: nature of science and policy; inquiry-based learning; curriculum standards, materials and assessment; scientific practices; context-based and socioscientific issues education; teacher professional development; and equity and social justice. Categories focusing on standards, materials, and content leaned toward Vision I. Categories emphasizing practices, inquiry, and contexts tended to bridge Visions I and II. Categories focusing on social issues and equity tended to cross and link Vision II and III. While the category centered on teacher professional development uniquely encompassed all three visions, Vision II perspectives (science as related to society) remained dominant but increasingly aligned with Vision III frameworks, such as critical engagement, social and political engagement, and transformative education. The review emphasized the critical role of teacher pedagogical design capacity in addressing the implementation differences between intended and actual curricula. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop