Conservation and Ecology of Polymorphic Animal Populations

A special issue of Conservation (ISSN 2673-7159).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 January 2027 | Viewed by 3669

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Via Cà Fornacetta, 9I, 40064 Ozzano Emilia, Italy
Interests: comunity ecology; habitat selection; raptors conservation; foraging ecology; raptors biology and demography

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The conservation of polymorphic animal populations is an important topic and one that emphasizes that biodiversity is not only about species richness but also about protecting phenotypic diversity within species. Polymorphisms—variations in traits such as color, shape, size, or behavior within a single species—play a crucial role in enabling populations to adapt to changing environments and ecological pressures.

For instance, color polymorphism in certain lizard or moth species can offer camouflage in different habitats, enhancing survival against predators. Similarly, behavioral polymorphisms, such as differences in foraging strategies or social behavior, allow for more flexible responses to environmental variability and resource availability. These differences are not just curiosities—they contribute directly to the resilience and stability of populations over time.

Protecting this within-species variation is vital in ensuring the long-term health of ecosystems. The loss of polymorphism, often due to habitat destruction, climate change, or selective hunting, can lead to reduced adaptability and greater vulnerability to disease or environmental change. In some cases, human activities inadvertently select against certain morphs, narrowing the gene pool and undermining evolutionary potential.

Conservation efforts must therefore go beyond simply preventing species extinction. They should aim to preserve the ecological and evolutionary processes that generate and maintain polymorphism. This might include protecting diverse habitats, minimizing artificial selection pressures, and incorporating phenotypic monitoring into wildlife management strategies.

Ultimately, maintaining polymorphism enriches biodiversity in a deeper sense—it ensures that nature’s adaptive toolkit remains robust and flexible in the face of global environmental challenges. By recognizing the value of variation within species, conservation biology moves closer to a holistic understanding of biodiversity, one that reflects the full spectrum of life’s complexity and adaptability.

This Special Issue will explore how intraspecific phenotypic diversity affects ecological dynamics, evolutionary processes, species resilience in changing environments, and conservation strategies for polymorphic animals.

Prof. Dr. Luca Luiselli
Dr. Massimiliano Di Vittorio
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Conservation is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • polymorphism
  • phenotypic diversity
  • genetic variation
  • adaptation
  • conservation genetics
  • evolutionary ecology
  • intraspecific variation
  • anthropogenic impacts
  • habitat heterogeneity
  • behavioral polymorphism

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

16 pages, 3100 KB  
Article
Reproductive Ecology of the Freshwater Snail, Pila globosa, Considering Environmental Factors in a Tropical Freshwater Swamp Forest
by Suhel Das, Mohammad Amzad Hossain, Gourab Chowdhury, Monayem Hussain, Debasish Pandit, Mrityunjoy Kunda, Petra Schneider and Mohammed Mahbub Iqbal
Conservation 2025, 5(3), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation5030043 - 18 Aug 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2770
Abstract
The apple snail Pila globosa is a widely distributed mollusc in tropical freshwater ecosystems, where it plays a crucial ecological role. This study examined the morphometric features, condition indices, and reproductive traits of P. globosa to gain insights into its population structure in [...] Read more.
The apple snail Pila globosa is a widely distributed mollusc in tropical freshwater ecosystems, where it plays a crucial ecological role. This study examined the morphometric features, condition indices, and reproductive traits of P. globosa to gain insights into its population structure in the Ratargul Freshwater Swamp Forest, Bangladesh. Water quality parameters were recorded, and various morphometric measurements were analysed, including their correlations and seasonal variations. The mean values for shell length, shell weight, shell width, spiral length, base length, aperture length, aperture width, and soft tissue wet weight were 4.64 ± 0.97 cm, 38.29 ± 15.27 g, 3.56 ± 0.74 cm, 2.32 ± 0.51 cm, 3.33 ± 0.74 cm, 3.46 ± 0.64 cm, 2.01 ± 0.45 cm, and 18.05 ± 11.39 g, respectively. Linear regression analyses revealed strong correlations among length–length and length–weight parameters, indicating consistent growth patterns. Monthly frequency distributions showed distinct variations in shell size and form. The sex ratio was 1:1.23 (male–female), not significantly different from parity. Histological analysis during the rainy season revealed reproductive activity, including mature ova, previtellogenic and vitellogenic oocytes, and spermatogonia and spermatids. These findings enhance understanding of the species’ biology and its interaction with environmental conditions, offering valuable data for the conservation and management of freshwater mollusc populations in wetland ecosystems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conservation and Ecology of Polymorphic Animal Populations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

16 pages, 4577 KB  
Review
The Evolution and Scope of Invasive and Non-Invasive Sampling in Terrestrial Mammal Population Genetics: Implications for the Comparability of He, Ho and Fis: A Scientometric Review
by Jesús Gabriel Ramírez-García, Sandra Patricia Maciel-Torres, Martha Hernández-Rodríguez, Erika Nava-Reyna, Pablo Arenas Baez and Lorenzo Danilo Granados-Rivera
Conservation 2026, 6(2), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation6020053 - 29 Apr 2026
Viewed by 158
Abstract
This scientometric review examines the evolution and scope of invasive (blood and tissue) and non-invasive (faeces, hair, and saliva) sampling in terrestrial mammal population genetics, with particular emphasis on the comparability of observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), and the inbreeding coefficient (Fis) [...] Read more.
This scientometric review examines the evolution and scope of invasive (blood and tissue) and non-invasive (faeces, hair, and saliva) sampling in terrestrial mammal population genetics, with particular emphasis on the comparability of observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), and the inbreeding coefficient (Fis) between studies published from 1985 to 2026. Searches in Web of Science and Scopus, filtered under PRISMA/PRISMA-S criteria, yielded a compendium of articles analysed with Bibliometrix and VOSviewer 1.6.20 to quantify temporal production, keyword evolution, collaborative networks, and publication outlets. Searches in Web of Science and Scopus, filtered under PRISMA/PRISMA-S criteria, yielded a broad corpus of 145 articles for general scientometric analyses, of which 85 met the eligibility criteria for the focused analysis of Ho, He, and Fis. The field shows steady growth (annual rate ≈ 6.1%), substantial authorship and international collaboration, and increasing thematic diversity. Adoption of non-invasive sampling has accelerated, broadening spatial and taxonomic coverage, but also increasing exposure to DNA degradation and genotyping error when laboratory quality control is insufficient. Across the literature, reporting of quality control practices (e.g., extraction blanks, negative PCR controls, multi-tube replication, and error-rate estimation) has improved over time but remains inconsistent. Comparisons indicate that differences in Ho, He, and Fis between invasive and non-invasive sampling are generally modest once marker system and species are taken into account. These findings indicate that quality control and transparency in reporting, rather than invasiveness per se, are the main factors determining comparability among studies. The scientometric patterns also reveal a methodological transition from microsatellites to SNP-based and reduced representation approaches, with implications for synthesis across marker types. Overall, this review identifies geographic and taxonomic biases in research effort and highlights the need for standardised reporting of DNA quality indicators, inclusion thresholds, and validation protocols to strengthen genetic monitoring in mammalian conservation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conservation and Ecology of Polymorphic Animal Populations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop