Resilience and Youth Development

A Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X) belonging to the section "Educational Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2026 | Viewed by 2472

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA
Interests: youth development; adolescence; youth mentoring; community health interventions; culture and immigration

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
Interests: youth development; resilience; motivation and achievement; violence exposure; school safety; longitudinal methodology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences, devoted to the theme of “Resilience and Youth Development,” seeks to showcase research on processes that promote thriving among youth who are exposed to significant adversity or risk in their lives. The youth development perspective has evolved as a strengths-based approach that seeks to understand the dynamic processes between the skills and attitudes of young people and the contexts (e.g., family, peer group, neighborhood, school) in which they are developing. Although there are important differences between the youth development and resilience perspectives (See Lerner et al., 2023; Masten, 2014), resilience research shares a focus on the positive adaptation of individuals, particularly when faced with challenging conditions that threaten their well-being. The resilience perspective is increasingly being used in youth development research as a framework for understanding how some young people overcome risk exposure and for guiding the development of interventions that raise the likelihood of positive outcomes (Zimmerman et al., 2013).

For this Special Issue, we seek innovative investigations on internal assets, such as self-efficacy or emotion regulation, and external resources, such as supportive adult relationships, that serve as promotive factors leading to positive academic, behavioral, and socio-emotional outcomes among risk-exposed youth. Risks may include a range of adverse childhood experiences, including but not limited to chronic conditions of poverty, discrimination, and violence. We are open to a range of research methodologies, and are particularly interested in person- and variable-centered studies that employ longitudinal designs to identify critical promotive factors and elucidate mediating and/or moderating mechanisms. We welcome observational studies (e.g., examinations of the role of informal mentors in promoting mental health) and experimental or quasi-experimental evaluations of programs or setting-level interventions. We invite papers that investigate cultural variations and/or offer international perspectives on resilience and youth development processes.

References

Lerner, R. M., Chase, P. A., Dowling, E. M., Tirrell, J. M., Buckingham, M. H., Yu, D., Park, Y., Gonçalves, C., Gansert, P., & Lerner, J. V. (2023). Resilience and Positive Youth Development: A Dynamic, Relational Developmental Systems-Based Perspective. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of Resilience in Children (pp. 337–349). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14728-9_18

Masten, A. S. (2014). Invited Commentary: Resilience and Positive Youth Development Frameworks in Developmental Science. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(6), 1018–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0118-7

Zimmerman, M. A., Stoddard, S. A., Eisman, A. B., Caldwell, C. H., Aiyer, S. M., & Miller, A. (2013). Adolescent resilience: Promotive factors that inform prevention. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 215–220. http://ezproxy.gsu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2013-40236-004&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Abstract Deadline: 15 January 2026
Notification of Abstract Acceptance: 31 January 2026

Prof. Dr. Gabriel Kuperminc
Prof. Dr. Christopher C. Henrich
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • resilience
  • youth development
  • social and emotional learning
  • mental health
  • academic performance
  • social skills
  • prevention
  • longitudinal designs

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1827 KB  
Article
Factors Associated with Perceived Teacher-Related Change in Academic Resilience: Classroom Motivational Climate, Subjective Resilience, and Success Expectancies
by Mercedes Villasana Terradillos and Jesús Alonso-Tapia
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(9), 1526; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091526 - 29 Aug 2026
Viewed by 272
Abstract
Research on academic resilience has often focused on students’ personal resources, but less attention has been paid to those classroom conditions that may help students cope with academic setbacks. This study examined the extent to which students’ perceptions of a learning-oriented classroom motivational [...] Read more.
Research on academic resilience has often focused on students’ personal resources, but less attention has been paid to those classroom conditions that may help students cope with academic setbacks. This study examined the extent to which students’ perceptions of a learning-oriented classroom motivational climate (CMC) were associated with perceived teacher-related change in academic resilience after accounting for subjective resilience and success expectancies. A total of 749 students attending a school in France in secondary, upper-secondary, and vocational education completed measures of academic resilience, CMC, success expectancies, and perceived change in resilience attributed to their teacher’s work. Using cross-sectional data, a path analysis with latent variables (PALVs), followed by cross-validation, supported the proposed model. CMC showed the strongest direct association with perceived change in academic resilience, whereas subjective resilience showed only a small association and success expectancies were not directly associated with perceived change. However, success expectancies were related to students’ perceptions of CMC and have a small indirect effect on perceived change in resilience. These results contribute to research on classroom motivational climate by identifying an association between CMC and students’ perceived teacher-related change in academic resilience after accounting for subjective resilience and success expectancies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resilience and Youth Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 303 KB  
Article
Adolescents’ Responses to Peer Disclosure of Teen Dating Violence: Relationship Configuration, Response Intentions, and Protective Adult Support
by Francesco Sulla, Andreana Lavanga, Margherita Santamato, Nunzia Merafina, Salvatore Adam Leone, Giulia Fiorentino and Anna Sorrentino
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(7), 1043; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16071043 - 23 Jun 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 546
Abstract
Teen dating violence (TDV) is a relevant form of adolescent interpersonal violence, yet little is known about how adolescents intend to respond when a peer discloses victimization and whether these responses facilitate access to supportive adults and other protective resources. This study examined [...] Read more.
Teen dating violence (TDV) is a relevant form of adolescent interpersonal violence, yet little is known about how adolescents intend to respond when a peer discloses victimization and whether these responses facilitate access to supportive adults and other protective resources. This study examined adolescents’ intended responses following peer disclosure of TDV using a vignette-based design that extended prior work by including four relationship configurations: heterosexual male perpetrator/female victim, heterosexual female perpetrator/male victim, male same-sex couple, and female same-sex couple. Participants were 655 adolescents aged 12 to 18 years from secondary schools in Southern Italy. Descriptive findings showed that supportive and relational responses were most frequently endorsed, including listening to the friend, helping them decide what to do, reassuring them, and encouraging them to talk to trusted others, whereas institutional responses were endorsed less often. Stratified chi-square analyses indicated that condition effects were selective rather than pervasive and were concentrated mainly in responses involving escalation to adults or authorities. Across subgroups, the heterosexual female-perpetrator/male-victim condition was most consistently associated with lower intervention-oriented responding and/or greater uncertainty, whereas the heterosexual male-perpetrator/female-victim condition more often elicited active intervention. The findings suggest that adolescents’ responses to peer disclosures of violence are shaped not only by prosocial intentions but also by the social recognizability of the violent scenario, with implications for validation, access to supportive adults, and inclusive school-based prevention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resilience and Youth Development)
25 pages, 979 KB  
Article
The Role of Informal Mentors in Promoting Resilience of Latino/a Late Adolescents and Emerging Adults
by Gabriel P. Kuperminc, Maria Alejandra Arce, Roushanac Partovi and Kathleen M. Roche
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 910; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16060910 - 3 Jun 2026
Viewed by 553
Abstract
This study examined the compensatory and risk-protective roles of informal mentoring in the longitudinal associations between discrimination and behavioral health problems among Latino/a adolescents and emerging adults. The study addressed the limited research on mentoring among Latino/a youth, particularly with regard to behavioral [...] Read more.
This study examined the compensatory and risk-protective roles of informal mentoring in the longitudinal associations between discrimination and behavioral health problems among Latino/a adolescents and emerging adults. The study addressed the limited research on mentoring among Latino/a youth, particularly with regard to behavioral health, and considered both the presence of and relationship quality with mentors as well as gender differences (girls vs. boys). Latent growth curve analysis was used to investigate trajectories of internalizing and externalizing problems across 11 observations spanning 7 years. Mentor presence assessed at Wave 9 when youth (N = 544) were approximately 15–18 years old had an association with internalizing problems consistent with the compensatory model, in which a resilience factor offsets the harmful effects of a risk factor, for girls. Among girls with a mentor, relationship quality buffered associations between discrimination and internalizing problems, consistent with the risk protective model. Among boys who reported having a mentor, relationship quality had an association with internalizing problems consistent with the compensatory model. For both girls and boys with mentors, relationship quality buffered associations between discrimination and externalizing problems, consistent with the risk protective model. Whereas discrimination consistently shows harmful effects on Latino/a adolescents’ emotional and behavioral adjustment, a resilience perspective underscores the reality that, with adequate support, most youth are able to overcome those risks. The current study fills gaps in the literature by examining how informal mentoring can foster resilience to such harmful effects, and highlights directions for future research and practice aimed at enhancing the well-being of this large and fast-growing population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resilience and Youth Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop