Performance Evaluation of Lightweight LiDAR for UAV Applications

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Earth Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 January 2022) | Viewed by 2776

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Information Engineering, Electronics, and Telecommunications (DIET), “La Sapienza” University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy
Interests: remote sensing data processing and interpretation; object and feature detection; learning systems; sensors for remote sensing; embedded systems

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the last decade, small and lightweight LiDAR systems have evolved all the way from research prototypes to easy-to-use cost-effective integrated commercial systems, supported by powerful point-cloud analysis software.

The automotive market drives the technology development for the sensors used on UAVs. Rotating- and oscillating-mirror systems are challenged by the development of micromirror-based of fully-solid-state units, which still do not reach the same performance.

Critical components of a LiDAR system are attitude and heading reference systems (AHRS) and GNSS units. Together with Kalman filtering and position correction software, they contribute substantially to determining the precision and accuracy of the system and its cost.

The performance of UAV-based LiDAR systems needs to be characterized from several complementary points of view. Basic descriptors concerning the integrated sensor include accuracy and precision of points geo-localization, beam width, pulse frequency, and number of returns. Post-processing software contributes significantly to accuracy and precision improvement. From an application point of view, the operator needs to evaluate the productivity and cost-effectiveness of the system, by taking into account workload related to field survey and back-office post-processing tasks, as well as equipment cost. Comparison with alternative survey methods, the most significant being photogrammetry, is necessary, taking into account different capabilities, e.g., for ground detection under vegetation cover, or wire detection.

Navigation and obstacle avoidance tasks can also profit from such sensing systems, both as purpose-specific sensors or using real-time data being gathered for surveys.

Contributions are welcome focusing on documented performance evaluation of UAV-borne LiDARs, with an emphasis on establishing rigorous performance metrics and methodologies, also specific to relevant case studies and applications. Availability of data is considered an added value.

Dr. Marco Balsi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • LiDAR
  • UAV
  • accuracy
  • precision
  • performance metrics
  • AHRS
  • INS
  • post-processing algorithms
  • economic assessment

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 3363 KiB  
Article
Automated Accuracy Assessment of a Mobile Mapping System with Lightweight Laser Scanning and MEMS Sensors
by Kaleel Al-Durgham, Derek D. Lichti, Eunju Kwak and Ryan Dixon
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 1007; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031007 - 23 Jan 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2271
Abstract
The accuracy assessment of mobile mapping system (MMS) outputs is usually reliant on manual labor to inspect the quality of a vast amount of collected geospatial data. This paper presents an automated framework for the accuracy assessment and quality inspection of point cloud [...] Read more.
The accuracy assessment of mobile mapping system (MMS) outputs is usually reliant on manual labor to inspect the quality of a vast amount of collected geospatial data. This paper presents an automated framework for the accuracy assessment and quality inspection of point cloud data collected by MMSs operating with lightweight laser scanners and consumer-grade microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) sensors. A new, large-scale test facility has been established in a challenging navigation environment (downtown area) to support the analyses conducted in this research work. MMS point cloud data are divided into short time slices for comparison with the higher-accuracy, terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) point cloud of the test facility. MMS data quality is quantified by the results of registering the point cloud of each slice with the TLS datasets. Experiments on multiple land vehicle MMS point cloud datasets using a lightweight laser scanner and three different MEMS devices are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The mean accuracy of a consumer grade MEMS (<$100) was found to be 1.13 ± 0.47 m. The mean accuracy of two commercial MEMS (>$100) was in the range of 0.48 ± 0.23 m to 0.85 ± 0.52 m. The method presented here in can be straightforwardly implemented and adopted for the accuracy assessment of other MMSs types such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)s. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Performance Evaluation of Lightweight LiDAR for UAV Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop