applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Multiobjective Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Computing and Artificial Intelligence".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 September 2025 | Viewed by 3426

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Engineering Science, Department of Engineering Science, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau, China
2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
Interests: intelligent optimization; discrete even dynamic systems; sustainable manufacturing systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Control Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Interests: intelligent automation; big data and artificial intelligence; machine learning and engineering optimization

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Optimization is an indispensable tool in engineering, driving improvements in the performance, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of various systems in different disciplines. Multi-objective optimization (MOO) is frequently used for finding optimal solutions to complex problems in engineering domains when multiple objectives, especially efficiency and effectiveness maximization, are taken into account. Through the optimization of related objective functions, decision-makers are able to consider various trade-offs and make well-informed decisions that optimally align with their preferences. Multi-objective optimization is becoming an increasingly significant tool for tackling real-world problems following the algorithmic intelligence embodied in various models.

Though MOO has many applications and is highly significant, there are a number of theoretical, methodological, and practical issues associated with it. For example, it is difficult to handle stochasticity and variability in problem parameters, find Pareto-optimal solutions efficiently while balancing convergence and diversity, and lower computational costs without sacrificing the solutions’ optimality. Addressing these issues and enhancing MOO’s practical utility will require advancements in evolutionary algorithms, machine learning-assisted optimization, theoretical research, and hybrid approaches that integrate many techniques to ensure the best performance. Research is still being conducted on how to create advanced algorithms that can manage stochastic and uncertain issues in environments, as well as deal with the challenges related to large-scale, many-objective, constrained, and computation-expensive optimization problems. Hence, this Special Issue is expected to explore a wide range of topics related to multi-objective optimization, including the theoretical explanation and demonstration of MOO, advanced methods and AI technologies for MOO, and the application verification of MOO in real industrial scenarios.

Scope and Topics

The topics of this Special Issue include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Novel algorithms (e.g., mathematical programming methods, reinforcement learning methods, meta-learning, transfer learning, deep learning methods, and other optimizers) for solving multiobjective optimization problems;
  • Algorithms for solving special multiobjective optimization problems, e.g., sparse problems, constrained problems, expensive problems, dynamic problems, multimodal problems, multitask problems, and large-scale problems;
  • Algorithms for solving combinatorial multiobjective optimization problems, e.g., subset selection, vehicle routing, recommendation, scheduling, networking, blockchain, and hybrid encoding problems.;
  • Algorithms for solving real-world multiobjective optimization problems, e.g., machine learning, data mining, manufacturing, scheduling, electronics, economics, aeronautical and aerospace, communication, and control;
  • Special methods for handling conflicting objectives, e.g., dominance, gradient guidance, and generative models;
  • Performance evaluation, theoretical analysis, visualization and interpretation, and benchmarks of multiobjective optimization problems.

Prof. Dr. Mengchu Zhou
Prof. Dr. Qi Kang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • intelligent optimization
  • multiobjective optimization
  • engineering optimization problems
  • expensive optimization problems
  • machine leaning

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

22 pages, 21962 KiB  
Article
A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model for Addressing Efficient Flexible Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Automatic Guided Vehicles Consideration
by Dekun Wang, Hongxu Wu, Wengang Zheng, Yuhao Zhao, Guangdong Tian, Wenjie Wang and Dong Chen
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 3133; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063133 - 13 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 843
Abstract
With the development of Industry 4.0, discrete manufacturing systems are accelerating their transformation toward flexibility and intelligence to meet the market demand for various products and small-batch production. The flexible flow shop (FFS) paradigm enhances production flexibility, but existing studies often address FFS [...] Read more.
With the development of Industry 4.0, discrete manufacturing systems are accelerating their transformation toward flexibility and intelligence to meet the market demand for various products and small-batch production. The flexible flow shop (FFS) paradigm enhances production flexibility, but existing studies often address FFS scheduling and automated guided vehicle (AGV) path planning separately, resulting in resource competition conflicts, such as equipment idle time and AGV congestion, which prolong the manufacturing cycle time and reduce system energy efficiency. To solve this problem, this study proposes an integrated production–transportation scheduling framework (FFSP-AGV). By using the adjacent sequence modeling idea, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is established, which takes into account the constraints of the production process and AGV transportation task conflicts with the aim of minimizing the makespan and improving overall operational efficiency. Systematic evaluations are carried out on multiple test instances of different scales using the CPLEX solver. The results show that, for small-scale instances (job count ≤10), the MILP model can generate optimal scheduling solutions within a practical computation time (several minutes). Moreover, it is found that there is a significant marginal diminishing effect between AGV quantity and makespan reduction. Once the number of AGVs exceeds 60% of the parallel equipment capacity, their incremental contribution to cycle time reduction becomes much smaller. However, the computational complexity of the model increases exponentially with the number of jobs, making it slightly impractical for large-scale problems (job count > 20). This research highlights the importance of integrated production–transportation scheduling for reducing manufacturing cycle time and reveals a threshold effect in AGV resource allocation, providing a theoretical basis for collaborative optimization in smart factories. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiobjective Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3253 KiB  
Article
Enhanced Decision Support for Multi-Objective Factory Layout Optimization: Integrating Human Well-Being and System Performance Analysis
by Andreas Lind, Veeresh Elango, Sunith Bandaru, Lars Hanson and Dan Högberg
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10736; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210736 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 950
Abstract
This paper presents a decision support approach to enable decision-makers to identify no-preference solutions in multi-objective optimization for factory layout planning. Using a set of trade-off solutions for a battery production assembly station, a decision support method is introduced to select three solutions [...] Read more.
This paper presents a decision support approach to enable decision-makers to identify no-preference solutions in multi-objective optimization for factory layout planning. Using a set of trade-off solutions for a battery production assembly station, a decision support method is introduced to select three solutions that balance all conflicting objectives, namely, the solution closest to the ideal point, the solution furthest from the nadir point, and the one that is best performing along the ideal nadir vector. To further support decision-making, additional analyses of system performance and worker well-being metrics are integrated. This approach emphasizes balancing operational efficiency with human-centric design, aligning with human factors and ergonomics (HFE) principles and Industry 4.0–5.0. The findings demonstrate that objective decision support based on Pareto front analysis can effectively guide stakeholders in selecting optimal solutions that enhance both system performance and worker well-being. Future work could explore applying this framework with alternative multi-objective optimization algorithms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiobjective Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

31 pages, 1559 KiB  
Review
Advancing Optimization Strategies in the Food Industry: From Traditional Approaches to Multi-Objective and Technology-Integrated Solutions
by Esteban Arteaga-Cabrera, César Ramírez-Márquez, Eduardo Sánchez-Ramírez, Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández, Oswaldo Osorio-Mora and Julián Andrés Gómez-Salazar
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(7), 3846; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073846 - 1 Apr 2025
Viewed by 879
Abstract
Optimization has become an indispensable tool in the food industry, addressing critical challenges related to efficiency, sustainability, and product quality. Traditional approaches, such as one-factor-at-a-time analysis, have been supplanted by more advanced methodologies like response surface methodology (RSM), which models interactions between variables, [...] Read more.
Optimization has become an indispensable tool in the food industry, addressing critical challenges related to efficiency, sustainability, and product quality. Traditional approaches, such as one-factor-at-a-time analysis, have been supplanted by more advanced methodologies like response surface methodology (RSM), which models interactions between variables, identifies optimal operating conditions, and significantly reduces experimental requirements. However, the increasing complexity of modern food production systems has necessitated the adoption of multi-objective optimization techniques capable of balancing competing goals, such as minimizing production costs while maximizing energy efficiency and product quality. Advanced methods, including evolutionary algorithms and comprehensive modeling frameworks, enable the simultaneous optimization of multiple variables, offering robust solutions to complex challenges. In addition, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have transformed optimization practices by effectively modeling non-linear relationships within complex datasets and enhancing prediction accuracy and system adaptability. The integration of ANNs with Industry 4.0 technologies—such as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, and digital twins—has enabled real-time monitoring and optimization, further aligning production processes with sustainability and innovation goals. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the evolution of optimization methodologies in the food industry, tracing the transition from traditional univariate approaches to advanced, multi-objective techniques integrated with emerging technologies, and examining current challenges and future perspectives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiobjective Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop