applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advances in Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation in Sports and Physical Activity

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Applied Biosciences and Bioengineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 July 2025 | Viewed by 1726

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Comillas Pontifical University, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Interests: sports injuries; exercise testing; sports acience; injury prevention; athletic performance; physical activity; resistance training
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue aims to present studies on injury prevention and rehabilitation in sport and physical activity. Injury prevention and rehabilitation are two fundamental pillars for the health and performance of athletes, as well as for those who practice physical activity on a regular basis. Prevention aims to reduce the risk of injury, while rehabilitation focuses on the recovery of injuries that have already occurred. Prevention and rehabilitation are essential to maintain physical well-being and optimize sport performance, minimizing risks and facilitating an efficient and safe recovery.

For this Special Issue, we are particularly interested in original and review articles exploring new/under-studied aspects of injury prevention, rehabilitation, and the association between them. We welcome conceptual and practical insights that can inform injury prevention interventions.

Dr. Pablo Abián
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • injury prevention
  • rehabilitation
  • athletes
  • physical activity, prevention and treatment of injuries

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 1554 KiB  
Article
Dynamometer Resistance Pad Position Influences Knee Strength and Hamstring/Quadriceps Ratio in Professional Basketball Players: Retrospective Observational Study
by Raúl Coto Martín, María Jesús Martínez Beltrán, Néstor Pérez Mallada, Lucía Cuéllar Marín, Oscar Otín Arroyo, Pablo José Borrás Luján and Juan Manuel Arribas-Marín
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(7), 4000; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15074000 - 4 Apr 2025
Viewed by 205
Abstract
Some knee strength measuring devices have an anterior cushioning area but relies on a belt for the posterior pad adjustment, creating an uneven force distribution. This study analyzed whether the distal pad position affects knee strength measurements. Eleven professional basketball players participated in [...] Read more.
Some knee strength measuring devices have an anterior cushioning area but relies on a belt for the posterior pad adjustment, creating an uneven force distribution. This study analyzed whether the distal pad position affects knee strength measurements. Eleven professional basketball players participated in this study, with a total of 22 knees evaluated. Knee flexion and extension dynamometric measurements were performed at different angular velocities: 30°/s, 120°/s, and 240°/s. For each angular velocity, two measurements were performed with varying positions of the measuring tool pad at the anterior and posterior aspects (AA and PA). The hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio was calculated by dividing the hamstring musculature’s maximum peak strength by the quadricep musculature’s maximum peak strength at each measurement. The knee work was extracted from the device after finishing the measurements. Significant differences were found between measurement positions in the knee flexion force at 30°/s (p < 0.001) and 120°/s (p = 0.027). No differences were found for the extension forces. As for the H/Q ratio, significant differences were found between positions at 30°/s (p < 0.001). Furthermore, significant differences between positions were found for the knee work at 120°/s (p = 0.019). These findings suggest that the positioning of the pad on the leg directly influences knee flexor strength measurements, which in turn impacts critical parameters, such as the H/Q ratio and knee work. Given the importance of these variables in injury prevention, particularly for conditions such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, ensuring precise and reliable measurement methods is essential. We recommend using the PA position because it increases knee flexion strength values, potentially leading to more accurate assessments of the muscle function and balance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 959 KiB  
Article
Influence of Thoracolumbar Mobility on Running Performance: A Comparative Study
by Kübra Sarıoğlu and Volga Bayrakcı Tunay
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 2777; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052777 - 5 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1672
Abstract
Background: Running, a fundamental motor skill, evolves with experience, significantly influencing coordination and thoracic mobility. Our study aims to investigate whether prolonged engagement in running could result in distinct variations in thoracolumbar mobility and kinematic efficiency among individuals with varying levels of running [...] Read more.
Background: Running, a fundamental motor skill, evolves with experience, significantly influencing coordination and thoracic mobility. Our study aims to investigate whether prolonged engagement in running could result in distinct variations in thoracolumbar mobility and kinematic efficiency among individuals with varying levels of running experience. Methods: This study examined thoracic mobility among sedentary individuals and runners who have been running for the last six months and the last two years. Measurements included latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle tone, elasticity, stiffness, trunk flexibility and range of motion (ROM), lumbar extensor shortness, thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) length, and the modified Schober test. Results: LD tone was lower in six-month runners, while sedentary individuals had the greatest LD elasticity and stiffness. The modified Schober test results indicated that the six-month runners scored the highest. Two-year runners had significantly greater dominant-side lateral flexion than sedentary individuals and six-month runners. TLF length was highest in running for two-year runners. Two-year runners exhibited the greatest dominant-side lateral flexion, while six-month runners showed more flexion and two-year runners more extension. Conclusions: Prolonged running experience may enhance thoracolumbar mobility and muscle tone. Furthermore, the observed stiffness and reduced elasticity in sedentary individuals highlight the detrimental effects of inactivity on spinal and muscular health. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop