Main Welfare Concerns in Pig Farming: How to Meet Society’s and Farmer’s Request

A special issue of Animals (ISSN 2076-2615). This special issue belongs to the section "Pigs".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2022) | Viewed by 5648

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milano, Via dell’Università 6, 26900 Lodi, Italy
Interests: animal nutrition; pig welfare; oxidative stress; feed additives; botanicals; meat quality

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milano, Via dell’Università 6, 26900 Lodi, Italy
Interests: animal welfare; pig behavior; welfare indicators

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Legislation on animal welfare and the concerns of civil society require addressing welfare problems related to the housing environment and the management system, commonly associated with intensive pig farming.

As a consequence of those housing and management systems, the behavioral needs of the pigs may not be met, leading to damaging behaviors, such as tail biting, or impaired natural behavior, such as maternal abilities.

To reduce the incidence of tail-biting behavior, tail docking has been used in the pig industry. However, it is a painful procedure which is not allowed to be performed routinely. Tail biting has a multifactorial origin generated from simultaneous environmental, nutritional, and management-based risk factors still to be investigated.

Confinement in a cage is a welfare issue as it reduces exercise and restricts important natural behaviors. The legal requirement for keeping gestating sows in groups four weeks after service seems to expose animals to prolonged physical and emotional limitation, bearing in mind that the majority of sows are still tethered in the farrowing sector.

High piglet mortality represents, as well as an important economic loss for the farmer, a welfare and ethical problem. Genetic selection, which previously aimed to increase litter size, should now be focused on breeding for better survival and more robust sows in order to reduce the mortality.

The surgical castration of male pigs is a common practice among producers with the main aim of improving meat quality by preventing boar taint. Options for pain mitigation or transitioning away from surgical castration should be explored, such as dietary integration in males able to reduce the concentration of the main compounds responsible for boar taint, immune castration, or sex-sorted semen.

Our challenge is to provide scientific evidence regarding the adoption of effective, practicable, and ethically and economically viable strategies for farmed pig. Contributions on any related topics, including, nutrition, management, technical and legislative aspects, in the form of original research papers and literature reviews are welcome in this Special Issue.

Prof. Dr. Grazia Pastorelli
Prof. Dr. Sara Barbieri
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Animals is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pig
  • castration
  • tail docking
  • loose housing system
  • dietary strategies
  • additives
  • piglet mortality
  • hyperprolific sow
  • sow
  • welfare legislation
  • health
  • meat quality

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 1487 KiB  
Article
Tranquillizing Effect of Passiflora incarnata Extract: Outcome on Behavioral and Physiological Indicators in Weaning Pigs with Intact Tails
by Grazia Pastorelli, Valentina Serra, Lauretta Turin, Veronica Redaelli, Fabio Luzi and Sara Barbieri
Animals 2022, 12(2), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020203 - 15 Jan 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2383
Abstract
Tail docking has been used in the pig industry to decrease the occurrence of tail biting behavior. This abnormal behavior has a multifactorial origin since it is a response to simultaneous environmental, nutritional and management changes. Given the calming properties of Passiflora incarnata [...] Read more.
Tail docking has been used in the pig industry to decrease the occurrence of tail biting behavior. This abnormal behavior has a multifactorial origin since it is a response to simultaneous environmental, nutritional and management changes. Given the calming properties of Passiflora incarnata, we hypothesized that dietary supplementation with the extract in weaned pigs could result in a modification of behavior and physiologic indicators linked to stress. Weaned piglets (n = 120, mean body weight 9.07 ± 2.30 kg) were randomly allocated to one of two dietary treatments: control diet (CON) and CON supplemented with 1 kg/t of P. incarnata (PAS). The trial was 28 days long. The presence of skin lesions was assessed at d-1, d-10, d-19, and d-28, and saliva samples were collected for IgA and cortisol determinations at the same sampling times. Results showed the PAS group was characterized by equal growth performance as the CON group, fewer ear lesions (p < 0.05), less aggressive behavior (p < 0.001), higher enrichment exploration (p < 0.001) and lower cortisol levels (p < 0.01). Time effect was observed for tail lesions (p < 0.001) and behavioral observations (p < 0.001). Additional research is required to determine the effect of P. incarnata extract using a larger number of animals and longer period of supplementation when risks associated with tail biting are uncontrolled. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2361 KiB  
Article
“Mothers Should Have Freedom of Movement”—Citizens’ Attitudes Regarding Farrowing Housing Systems for Sows and Their Piglets
by Bianca Vandresen and Maria José Hötzel
Animals 2021, 11(12), 3439; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123439 - 02 Dec 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2482
Abstract
Farrowing crates are the most common housing for lactating sows throughout the world, despite known public opposition to housing systems that deprive animals’ freedom to move. This study aimed to investigate Brazilian citizens’ attitudes towards three farrowing housing systems (crates, loose pens, and [...] Read more.
Farrowing crates are the most common housing for lactating sows throughout the world, despite known public opposition to housing systems that deprive animals’ freedom to move. This study aimed to investigate Brazilian citizens’ attitudes towards three farrowing housing systems (crates, loose pens, and outdoors). Data were obtained via an online questionnaire containing open- and close-ended questions. Participants’ (n = 1171) attitudes were most negative towards the crates and most positive towards outdoor farrowing, and positively correlated with perceived sows’ quality of life. Participants overwhelmingly rejected the use of farrowing crates, and most supported a proposal to move from farrowing crates to loose pens, even when informed that this entailed an increased risk of piglets’ mortality. Participants’ views were underpinned by concerns about sows’ freedom of movement, behavioral freedom and naturalness, and the belief that it is possible to develop and manage housing that prevents piglet crushing that does not involve confining the sow. Furthermore, loose farrowing pens may not fully address all concerns expressed by participants regarding farrowing housing, which included the possibility of allowing sows to socialize and express maternal behaviors. We conclude that maintaining farrowing crates may erode the pig industry’s social license. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop