Sustainable Development and Project Stakeholder Management

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 March 2019) | Viewed by 20271

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Business and Management Department, Webster Vienna Private University, Praterstr. 23, AT-1020 Vienna, Austria
Interests: project stakeholder management/engagement; sustainability efforts; green certifications; strategy execution; leadership; change within decentralized organizations

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Marketing & Management, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
Interests: governance of projects; the project-based organisation; organisational project management; project management

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the past decade, a growing number of scholars have investigated the nexus between project management and the issue of sustainability (e.g., Bal, Bryde, Fearon, & Ochieng, 2013; Eskerod & Huemann, 2013; Huemann, Eskerod, & Ringhofer, 2016; Aarseth, Ahola, Aaltonen, Økland, & Andersen, 2017).  This coincided with a growing interest in sustainable development as such. However, there has been only limited consideration of sustainable development principles for project management and, similarly, for the governance of projects by permanent organizations (Eskerod & Huemann, 2013; Haavaldsen, Lædre, Volden, & Lohne, 2014; Aarseth et al., 2017). In addition, there seems to be a big difference between the requirements for global sustainable development and current organizational behavior (Marshall & Toffel, 2005).

Generic definitions of sustainable development support the notion, that social, economic and environmental factors should be balanced (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987). Yet they make no straight forward and explicitly link to stakeholder management. Sustainable development is a value-based concept (Bond et al., 2011) including values such as transparency and fairness. Consequently, different stakeholder approaches are to a greater or lesser extent suited for sustainable development as some values are not equally emphasized in all stakeholder approaches.

The Special Issue will focus on the operational aspects of the topic. The overall aim is to enhance the knowledge on HOW project stakeholder management is/has been/can be/should be undertaken in order to achieve sustainable development. Its scope encompasses studies from both the perspectives of the single projects and the permanent organization.

Papers presenting theoretical and empirical research, and covering projects within all sectors of private enterprise, public organizations, NGOs, and partnerships among more organizations, are welcome.

References

Bal, M., Bryde, D., Fearon, D., & Ochieng, E. (2013). Stakeholder Engagement: Achieving Sustainability in the Construction Sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 5(2), 695–710. http://doi.org/10.3390/su5020695

Bond, A. J., Dockerty, T., Lovett, A., Riche, A. B., Haughton, A. J., Bohan, D. A., … Karp, A. (2011). Learning how to deal with values, frames and governance in Sustainability Appraisal. Regional Studies, 45(8), 1157–1170. http://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.485181

Eskerod, P., & Huemann, M. (2013). Sustainable Development and Project Stakeholder Management : What Standards Say. International Journal of Project Management, 6(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291017

Haavaldsen, T., Lædre, O., Volden, G. H., & Lohne, J. (2014). On the concept of sustainability - assessing the sustainability of large public infrastructure investment projects. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 7(1), 2–12. http://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2013.811557

Huemann, M., Eskerod, P., & Ringhofer, C. (2016). RETHINK! Project Stakeholder Management, New Square, PA, USA: PMI. https://www.pmi.org/learning/academic-research/rethink-project-stakeholder-management

Marshall, J. D., & Toffel, M. W. (2005). Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: A sustainability hierarchy. Environmental Science and Technology, 39(3), 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1021/es040394k

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Aarseth, W., Ahola, T., Aaltonen, K., Økland, A., & Andersen, B. (2017). Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006

Prof. Dr. Pernille Eskerod
Dr. Eva Riis
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Sustainability
  • Stakeholder management
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Governance of projects
  • Sustainability strategies
  • Sustainable development

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 1882 KiB  
Article
Planning Project Stakeholder Engagement from a Sustainable Development Perspective
by Gilbert Silvius and Ron Schipper
Adm. Sci. 2019, 9(2), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9020046 - 24 Jun 2019
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 15401
Abstract
Sustainability is one of the most important challenges of our time. As the role that projects play in sustainable development is still developing, the integration of the concepts of sustainability into project management is an important trend in project management today. However, despite [...] Read more.
Sustainability is one of the most important challenges of our time. As the role that projects play in sustainable development is still developing, the integration of the concepts of sustainability into project management is an important trend in project management today. However, despite the conceptual understanding of this integration, the literature still provides little practical guidance on how to apply sustainability to project management. This article aims to contribute to the integration of sustainable development and project stakeholder management by developing practical tools and frameworks that enable project managers to identify stakeholders, assess stakeholders, and plan stakeholder engagement activities with a consideration of sustainable development. The study takes a pragmatic design science approach in developing these tools and frameworks. The resulting frameworks build upon the concepts of sustainable development and form an elaboration of the documented practices of project stakeholder management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development and Project Stakeholder Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 786 KiB  
Article
A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability
by Francesco Di Maddaloni and Roya Derakhshan
Adm. Sci. 2019, 9(2), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9020041 - 7 Jun 2019
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4163
Abstract
Departing from the normative formulation of stakeholder theory and building upon the current body of knowledge, this study aims to advance understandings on the benefits and challenges towards a more holistic approach to stakeholder management at the local level of major public infrastructure [...] Read more.
Departing from the normative formulation of stakeholder theory and building upon the current body of knowledge, this study aims to advance understandings on the benefits and challenges towards a more holistic approach to stakeholder management at the local level of major public infrastructure and construction projects (MPIC). Major construction projects, project managers, and the local community stakeholder are deemed to operate within a ‘negative bond’. This interaction is elucidated through the attribution theory lens, which shape the conceptual framework of the study. This paper illustrates that a broader inclusiveness of stakeholder views into managerial decisions can initiate to break this negative bond and shift it towards positive relationships. An organization’s conscious approach towards transparent communication with the local community stakeholder might help to shape a long-term perspective for better project benefits realization either at the national, regional, or local level. By ‘exceeding stakeholders needs and expectations’, project managers and local communities can better collaborate in order to achieve sustainable development over time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development and Project Stakeholder Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop