Towards a New Research of Public Service Motivation

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 February 2024) | Viewed by 616

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy
Interests: public management; human resource management; organizational innovation and change; performance management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, Mercatorum University, 00186 Rome, Italy
Interests: organizational behavior; human resources; organizational innovation; change management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The topic of work motivation in the private sector has been largely studied, whereas the literature on motivation in the public sector has been often criticized to be theoretically and empirically less developed. Nevertheless, Public Service Motivation (PSM), is a construct proposed specifically in the field of public organization studies and is conceptualized as a particular type of prosocial motivation. It has been almost 40 years since the term was coined by Hal Rainey (1982), and 30 years since it was formally conceptualized by Perry and Wise (1990); today, it remains a thriving and vibrant concept in this field (Ritz et al., 2016). Since its first appearance, numerous studies have been conducted on PSM (Vandenabeele et al., 2014; Ritz et al., 2016). A growing research community has responded to Perry and Wise’s (1990) call for the advancement of theory and measurement scales. Research on the antecedents and outcomes of PSM has also been intensive (Ritz et al., 2016). Although the research front is expanding in terms of international diffusion, methodological developments, and theoretical linkages being investigated, several important shortcomings remain. Scholars, in fact, must think critically about the PSM concept to ensure a fruitful future for research on the topic: there is the need for an improved understanding of what attracts individuals to work in the public sector, and what motivates them to serve others and advance the public weal (Vogel, 2020).

This Special Issue is meant to address both individual characteristics and structural, institutional and organizational factors that help develop our understanding of in what context—where, when and how—PSM finds favorable ground to be recognized and developed in order that it can actually “make a difference”. Meanwhile, the discussion and research on this topic aim to contribute to making a connection between PSM and other motivational constructs, as well as to broaden the scope of investigation of work motivation in the public sector by relying on more recent approaches in the OB field and by deepening the role not only of dispositional but also contextual variables. Additionally, the study of incentive regimes is of interest to a wide range of audiences including, but not restricted to, scholars in the fields of management, economics, law, psychology and public administration. Furthermore, some scholars have underlined that little effort has been made to investigate the relevance and the role of motivation in the recent mainstream attempts to innovate public organizations that have been suggested by the various legislative reforms undertaken in recent decades (Homberg et al., 2019).

We invite scholars to contribute to the development of this interdisciplinary research agenda to investigate work motivation in public organizations in different social, cultural, political and economic contexts. Hence, the Special Issue will also seek to explore the extent to which research has deepened the relationship between work motivation and innovation processes within the public sector. Drawing on these premises, this Special Issue aims to highlight:

  1. How the study of work motivation in the public sector has evolved and what constructs have been of focus;
  2. Empirical evidence concerning the outcomes of work motivation in the public sector with respect to the private sector;
  3. Whether and how employing people driven by PSM may enhance both the scope and the quality of public services’ ability to deliver, innovate and, more generally, perform;
  4. The set of institutional, contextual and organizational factors that may influence the development or the inhibition of PSM;
  5. The way PSM relates to other facets of work motivation, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and other concepts related to the area of organizational behavior;
  6. Differences and similarities when employing people driven by PSM in different countries, contexts and organizational levels.

This Special Issue welcomes papers from scholars with diverse backgrounds eager to contribute to the development of an inter-disciplinary research agenda to investigate work motivation in public organizations in different social, cultural, political and economic contexts (Forte et al., 2022, Vandenabeele et al., 2018).

References

Forte, T., Santinha, G., Oliveira, M., & Patrão, M. (2022). The High Note of Meaning: A Case Study of Public Service Motivation of Local Government Officials. Social Sciences, 11: 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11090411

Homberg, F., Vogel, R., & Weiherl, J. (2019). Public service motivation and continuous organizational change: Taking charge behaviour at police services. Public Administration, 97(1): 28-47.

Perry, J., & Wise, L. 1990. The motivational bases of public service. American Society for Public Administration, 50: 367–73.

Rainey, H.G. (1982). Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Public Service Ethic, American Review of Public Administration, 16,(4): 288–302.

Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review 76: 414–26.

Vandenabeele, W., Brewer, G.A., & Ritz, A. (2014). Past, present, and future of Public Service Motivation research. Public Administration, 92(4): 779–789.

Vandenabeele, W. (2014). Explaining Public Service Motivation: The Role of Leadership and Basic Needs Satisfaction, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2): 79–82.

Vandenabeele, W., Ritz, A. & Neumann, O. (2018). Public service motivation: State of the art and conceptual cleanup, in E. Ongaro, S. Van Thiel (Eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Vogel, M. (2020). When service calls: Public service motivation and calling as complementary concepts for public service. International Public Management Journal, 25: 620–38. 

Prof. Dr. Danila Scarozza
Prof. Dr. Isabella Bonacci
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • work motivation
  • public service motivation
  • public service job
  • work outcomes
  • individual and organizational performance

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 555 KiB  
Article
Effects of Public Service Motivation on R&D Project-Based Team Learning Where Psychological Safety Is a Mediator and Project Management Style Is a Moderator
by Jintana Pattanatornchai, Youji Kohda, Amna Javed, Kalaya Udomvitid and Pisal Yenradee
Adm. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14050093 - 01 May 2024
Viewed by 262
Abstract
While public service motivation (PSM) and teamwork are widely recognized as crucial drivers for effective public service delivery, researchers primarily analyze these factors independently and at a personal level. The existing literature rarely explores the interplay between PSM, the project team learning process [...] Read more.
While public service motivation (PSM) and teamwork are widely recognized as crucial drivers for effective public service delivery, researchers primarily analyze these factors independently and at a personal level. The existing literature rarely explores the interplay between PSM, the project team learning process (PTLP), and psychological safety (PS) within research and development (R&D) project teams, particularly in national R&D organizations. This study addresses this gap by proposing a theoretical model that examines the combined effect of individual motivation and team collaboration, mediated by PS, on R&D PTLP. Additionally, it investigates the moderating influence of project management (PM) styles—fully agile and partially agile—on these relationships. The proposed method utilizes partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) for quantitative data analysis. Our findings revealed a positive relationship between PSM, PS, and R&D PTLP, with PS acting as a significant mediator. Notably, the relationship between PSM and R&D PTLP was stronger under fully agile project management compared to partially agile settings. These findings suggest that both project teams and organizations should prioritize promoting PS and consider the moderating effects of project management styles to foster a sustainable R&D team learning process, particularly within national R&D institutions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards a New Research of Public Service Motivation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop