Building Resilient and Agile SMEs: Strategic Responses to Digital Disruption and Transformation

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2026 | Viewed by 10148

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
SBS Swiss Business School, 8302 Kloten-Zurich, Switzerland
Interests: digitalization; SMEs competitiveness; SMEs strategies; international business; business strategies; financial analysis; financial markets
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Department of Business Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Interests: decision making; technology management; technology forecasting; R&D management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Telfer School of Management, Ottawa University, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
Interests: economic policy; inclusive economic development; gender equality; policy design and delivery; social innovation; public sector innovation; policy innovation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and amidst rapid digital disruption, small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face urgent pressure to digitally transform. While digital transformation (DT) offers clear benefits—such as automation and process optimization (Saáry et al., 2022), market expansion and new relationships (Matalamäki & Joensuu-Salo, 2022), enhanced collaboration (Browder et al., 2024; Garzoni et al., 2020; Rossato & Castellani, 2020), access to financial services (Kutlu & Özturan, 2008; Vide et al., 2022), knowledge sharing and innovation (Fauzi & Sheng, 2022; Khin & Ho, 2019; Quinton et al., 2018; Santos & Neumeyer, 2023), workforce development (Radicic & Petković, 2023), customer experience enhancement (Kalidas et al., 2020; Rossato & Castellani, 2020), brand strengthening (Alonso-Almeida et al., 2015), and business model innovation (Moeuf et al., 2018)—many SMEs still struggle to navigate the transition.

Challenges include limited financial resources (Amankwah-Amoah et al., 2021; Amaral et al., 2019; Costa & Castro, 2021; Dörr et al., 2023; Hasyim & Bakri, 2024; Moeuf et al., 2018; Pfister & Lehmann, 2023; Schönberger, 2023; Teltz, 2020), cybersecurity and data protection concerns (Vide et al., 2022), employee resistance to change (Pfister & Lehmann, 2023), skill gaps (Moeuf et al., 2018; Pfister & Lehmann, 2023; Schönberger, 2023; Solberg et al., 2020), lack of awareness and integration strategy (Hasyim & Bakri, 2024; Pfister & Lehmann, 2023; Sousa-Zomer et al., 2020; Vide et al., 2022), infrastructure deficits (Amankwah-Amoah et al., 2021; Kahveci, 2024; Neumeyer et al., 2021), and strategic challenges and resistance (Pfister & Lehmann, 2023; Radicic & Petković, 2023).

This Special Issue explores how SMEs can respond to digital disruption through resilience, agility, and innovation, turning constraints into strategic opportunities. We welcome interdisciplinary contributions addressing strategic, technological, operational, and financial enablers of SME transformation.

Topics of interest include the following:

  • Strategic agility and dynamic capabilities;
  • Leadership and organizational change in digitalization;
  • Innovation-driven recovery and business model renewal;
  • Policy and financial support for SME transformation;
  • Post-COVID resilience strategies;
  • Digital ecosystems and networks;
  • Case studies of successful SME transitions.

We encourage submissions that offer both conceptual insights and practical relevance. Authors are invited to submit an abstract to the Guest Editors or the Administrative Sciences editorial office prior to full manuscript submission. All papers will undergo double-blind peer review.

References:

  1. Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., Bremser, K., & Llach, J. (2015). Proactive and reactive strategies deployed by restaurants in times of crisis: Effects on capabilities, organization and competitive advantage. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(7), 1641–1661. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2014-0117
  2. Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., & Knight, G. (2021). COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research, 136, 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011
  3. Amaral, A., Jorge, D., & Peças, P. (2019). Small Medium Enterprises and Industry 4.0: Current Models’ Ineptitude and The Proposal of A Methodology To Successfully Implement Industry 4.0 In Small Medium Enterprises. Procedia Manufacturing, 41, 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.10.039
  4. Browder, R. E., Dwyer, S. M., & Koch, H. (2024). Upgrading adaptation: How digital transformation promotes organizational resilience. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 18(1), 128–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1483
  5. Costa, J., & Castro, R. (2021). SMEs Must Go Online—E-Commerce as an Escape Hatch for Resilience and Survivability. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 3043–3062. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070166
  6. Dörr, L., Fliege, K., Lehmann, C., Kanbach, D. K., & Kraus, S. (2023). A Taxonomy on Influencing Factors Towards Digital Transformation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.66283
  7. Fauzi, A. A., & Sheng, M. L. (2022). The digitalization of micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs): An institutional theory perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 60(6), 1288–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1745536
  8. Garzoni, A., De Turi, I., Secundo, G., & Del Vecchio, P. (2020). Fostering digital transformation of SMEs: A four levels approach. Management Decision, 58(8), 1543–1562. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2019-0939
  9. Hasyim, H., & Bakri, M. (2024). Challenges and Strategies for Small Business Survival. The Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.55098/tjbmr.v6i2.660
  10. Kahveci, E. (2024). Digitalization, and digital transformation in MSMEs in Turkey. International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises and Business Sustainability, 8(2), 18–31. Available online: https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/ijsmebs/article/view/20175.
  11. Kahveci, E., Akgul, A. K., Daim, T., & Meissner, D. (2024a). The critical mediator role of process management for effective industry 4.0 implementation in SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 72, 4–17.
  12. Kahveci, E., Avunduk, Z. B., Daim, T., & Zaim, S. (2024b). The role of flexibility, digitalization, and crisis response strategy for SMEs: Case of COVID-19. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–38.
  13. Kahveci, E. (2025). Digital Transformation in SMEs: Enablers, Interconnections, and a Framework for Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Administrative Sciences, 15(3), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15030107
  14. Kalidas, S., Magwentshu, N., & Rajagopaul, A. (2020, July). South African SMEs post COVID-19 | McKinsey. How South African SMEs Can Survive and Thrive Post COVID-19. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/middle-east-and-africa/how-south-african-smes-can-survive-and-thrive-post-covid-19
  15. Khin, S., & Ho, T. C. (2019). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083
  16. Kutlu, B., & Özturan, M. (2008). The usage and adoption of IT among SMEs in Turkey: An exploratory and longitudinal study. Journal of Information Technology Management, XIX(1), 12–24.
  17. Matalamäki, M. J., & Joensuu-Salo, S. (2022). Digitalization and strategic flexibility—a recipe for business growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(3), 380–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2020-0384
  18. Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(3), 1118–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647
  19. Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., & Morris, M. H. (2021). Overcoming Barriers to Technology Adoption When Fostering Entrepreneurship Among the Poor: The Role of Technology and Digital Literacy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(6), 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2989740
  20. Pfister, P., & Lehmann, C. (2023). Measuring the Success of Digital Transformation in German SMEs. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.39679
  21. Quinton, S., Canhoto, A., Molinillo, S., Pera, R., & Budhathoki, T. (2018). Conceptualising a digital orientation: Antecedents of supporting SME performance in the digital economy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(5), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2016.1258004
  22. Radicic, D., & Petković, S. (2023). Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122474
  23. Rossato, C., & Castellani, P. (2020). The contribution of digitalisation to business longevity from a competitiveness perspective. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2020-0032
  24. Saáry, R., Kárpáti-Daróczi, J., & Tick, A. (2022). Profit or less waste?: Digitainability in SMEs: A comparison of Hungarian and Slovakian SMEs. Serbian Journal of Management, 17(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm17-36437
  25. Santos, S. C., & Neumeyer, X. (2023). The Technologization of Entrepreneurial Processes: A Poverty Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(3), 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3195485
  26. Schönberger, M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence For Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises: Identifying Key Applications And Challenges. Journal of Business Management, 21, 89–112. https://doi.org/10.32025/JBM23004
  27. Solberg, E., Traavik, L. E. M., & Wong, S. I. (2020). Digital Mindsets: Recognizing and Leveraging Individual Beliefs for Digital Transformation. California Management Review, 62(4), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620931839
  28. Sousa-Zomer, T. T., Neely, A., & Martinez, V. (2020). Digital transforming capability and performance: A microfoundational perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(7/8), 1095–1128. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2019-0444
  29. Teltz, A.-K. (2020). The Impact of Internationalization, Strategic Innovation And Managerial Digitalization on The Business Success of Fintech Enterprises [Doctoral Thesis, University of Latvia]. https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/53368/298-79360-Teltz_Ann-Kathrin_at20111.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  30. Vide, R. K., Hunjet, A., & Kozina, G. (2022). Enhancing Sustainable Business by SMEs’ Digitalization. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v17i1.5013

Dr. Eyup Kahveci
Dr. Dana Bakry
Dr. Chokri Kooli
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • digital transformation
  • SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises)
  • e-commerce adoption
  • strategic agility
  • dynamic capabilities
  • competitive advantage
  • organizational transformation
  • digital skills
  • innovation
  • post-COVID resilience
  • digital strategy
  • financial implications
  • sustainability and digitalization
  • digital leadership
  • business model innovation
  • financial resilience

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

17 pages, 661 KB  
Article
Assessing Operational Performance of Manufacturing Companies in the Context of Environmental Dynamism, and Competitive Strategy
by Arzu Karaman Akgül
Adm. Sci. 2026, 16(4), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16040179 - 8 Apr 2026
Viewed by 302
Abstract
Today’s global and competitive environment forces companies to revise their competitive strategies and assess their operations’ performance. Customers are demanding new products and services, and organizations should adapt to the changing requirements of the customers. Companies may achieve excellence in their operations with [...] Read more.
Today’s global and competitive environment forces companies to revise their competitive strategies and assess their operations’ performance. Customers are demanding new products and services, and organizations should adapt to the changing requirements of the customers. Companies may achieve excellence in their operations with cost reduction, by reducing time-to-market, and through improvements in delivery and quality. The main contribution of this study is assessing the linkages among operational performance (OP), environmental dynamism (ED), and competitive strategy (CS) in an emerging economy, Turkey. This study also aims to define the dimensions used to assess the operational performance, which are called the competitive manufacturing priorities in the operations management literature. To test the linkages between environmental dynamism, operational performance, and competitive strategy, a structural model is proposed. Analyses are conducted in SPSS 28.0 and AMOS 24.0 programs using the data gathered from Turkish manufacturing companies. Since 99.8% of firms operating in Türkiye are SMEs, most of the companies participating in this study (124 of 211) are also SMEs, and another contribution of this study is understanding the dimensions affecting the operational performance of SMEs According to the results, environmental dynamism has a significant relation to operational performance, and operational performance has a positive linkage with competitive strategy as well. The results also indicate that the most important dimensions used in assessing operational performance are customer satisfaction and supplier performance, as expected for manufacturing companies. Furthermore, the results of this study are expected to support organizations in developing and implementing effective strategies that integrate new capabilities and environmental considerations into their competitive strategy. As expected in SMEs, the most used competitive strategy is found to be “cost leadership,” because they can achieve operational performance by efficiently using resources, and by minimizing the production and transaction costs, they can enhance their competitiveness in the market. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 1326 KB  
Article
Assessing Digital Maturity in the Textile Sector: An Integrated MEREC and OCRA Approach
by Eyup Kahveci, Biset Toprak, Emine Elif Nebati and Selim Zaim
Adm. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16030135 - 10 Mar 2026
Viewed by 578
Abstract
The digital transformation of the textile industry poses unique challenges due to its labor-intensive processes, complex global supply chains, and coexistence of traditional methods and emerging technologies. Despite the urgency of this transition, existing digital maturity models lack sector-specific frameworks and often fail [...] Read more.
The digital transformation of the textile industry poses unique challenges due to its labor-intensive processes, complex global supply chains, and coexistence of traditional methods and emerging technologies. Despite the urgency of this transition, existing digital maturity models lack sector-specific frameworks and often fail to integrate multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies for quantitative performance assessment. This study addresses these gaps by proposing a novel digital maturity model tailored specifically to the textile sector. The research employs an integrated decision-making framework using the Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC) to determine objective criterion weights and the Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) method to rank firm-level digital maturity performance. The findings indicate that Strategy is the most influential dimension, whereas Technology receives the lowest weight. At the sub-criterion level, Management Support, Market Analysis, and Vision and Strategic Awareness are the most critical factors, while Technology Usage Competency is less influential. The performance evaluation shows that Company A3 achieves the highest level of digital maturity, whereas Company A2 ranks lowest. The robustness of the proposed framework is comprehensively validated through a scenario-based sensitivity analysis and a comparative evaluation using the Additive Ratio Assessment System (ARAS) method. Overall, the results suggest that successful digital transformation in the textile sector depends primarily on strategic vision and managerial support rather than on technological infrastructure alone. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1749 KB  
Article
Institutional Governance and Entrepreneurship: A Multi-Branch Perspective on Policy Mixes in Emerging Economies
by Mohammad Ali Moradi and Mohammad Jahanbakht
Adm. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16020097 - 12 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 637
Abstract
Institutions play a central role in shaping entrepreneurial behavior, yet much of the existing literature, even with the foundational insights of institutional economists such as Veblen, Mitchell, Commons, Coase, Ostrom, Williamson, and North, continues to view institutions as monolithic entities rather than as [...] Read more.
Institutions play a central role in shaping entrepreneurial behavior, yet much of the existing literature, even with the foundational insights of institutional economists such as Veblen, Mitchell, Commons, Coase, Ostrom, Williamson, and North, continues to view institutions as monolithic entities rather than as differentiated governance systems. This study addresses this gap by reconceptualizing institutions as multi-branch governance architectures in which legislative, executive, and judicial mechanisms interact to shape entrepreneurial outcomes, particularly in volatile emerging economies. The research asks how these disaggregated governance branches, mediated by institutional quality and external shocks, jointly influence entrepreneurial activity. Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) microdata for Iran over the period 2008–2020, merged with governance indicators and shock variables including sanctions and COVID-19, we employ pooled logistic regression to estimate the effects of governance functions and their policy mix interactions on Total Entrepreneurial Activity. The results show that executive policy quality has the strongest positive association with entrepreneurship, legislative coherence strengthens opportunity-driven activity, and judicial inefficiencies suppress entrepreneurial engagement by increasing uncertainty. Interaction effects further reveal that misalignment among governance branches weakens entrepreneurial activity, while coherent policy mixes mitigate the negative impact of external shocks. By integrating conceptual synthesis with empirical evidence, the study advances institutional theory, clarifies deficiencies in prevailing models, and demonstrates that entrepreneurial dynamism depends on the configuration and coordination of governance branches rather than on aggregate institutional scores. These insights provide policymakers with actionable guidance for designing coherent, adaptive, and resilient entrepreneurship-supporting ecosystems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 789 KB  
Article
Remote Work and Employee Attitudes: The Role of Reward Allocation in European SMEs
by Daniel Mandel Gandrita, Ana Gandrita and David Pascoal Rosado
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(12), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15120467 - 28 Nov 2025
Viewed by 2000
Abstract
Digital transformation and remote work continue to reshape the nature of work, yet the implications for salaries and promotions in SMEs continue to be poorly understood. This study investigates how reward allocation mediates the relationship between remote work and employee attitudes, addressing the [...] Read more.
Digital transformation and remote work continue to reshape the nature of work, yet the implications for salaries and promotions in SMEs continue to be poorly understood. This study investigates how reward allocation mediates the relationship between remote work and employee attitudes, addressing the organizational challenges of aligning human resource practices with digitalization work models in the European context based on the social exchange theory and data collected from n = 615 participants, primarily from SMEs, which were analyzed using PLS-SEM software and WarpPLS 7.0. The findings reveal that remote work not only strengthens workers’ engagement and satisfaction but also channels their efforts toward achieving outcomes and reward allocation, reducing the reliance on physical presence and visibility. Digital transformation enables SMEs to adopt more flexible and fairer HR practices, with remote work also contributing to organizational resilience, employee agility, and competitiveness. This research advances the theoretical understanding of HRM in the context of digital transformation, offering SMEs a guide to building a suitable reward system that promotes both individual well-being and sustainability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

37 pages, 2891 KB  
Systematic Review
Cybersecurity Threats and Defensive Strategies for Small and Medium Firms: A Systematic Mapping Study
by Mujtaba Awan and Abu Alam
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(12), 481; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15120481 - 10 Dec 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4769
Abstract
Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) play a crucial role in the global economy, accounting for approximately two-thirds of global employment and contributing significantly to the GDP of developed countries. Despite the availability of various cybersecurity standards and frameworks, SMEs remain highly vulnerable to [...] Read more.
Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) play a crucial role in the global economy, accounting for approximately two-thirds of global employment and contributing significantly to the GDP of developed countries. Despite the availability of various cybersecurity standards and frameworks, SMEs remain highly vulnerable to cyber threats. Limited resources and a lack of expertise in cybersecurity make them frequent targets for cyberattacks. It is essential to identify the challenges faced by SMEs and explore effective defensive strategies to enhance the implementation of cybersecurity measures. The study aims to bridge the gap and help these organizations in implementing cost-effective and practical cybersecurity approaches through a systematic mapping study (SMS) conducted, where 73 articles were thoroughly reviewed. This research will shed light on the current cybersecurity approaches (practices) posture for different SMEs, along with the threats they are facing, which have stopped them from deciding, planning, and implementing cybersecurity measures. The study identified a wide range of cybersecurity threats, including phishing, social engineering, insider threats, ransomware, malware, denial of services attacks, and weak password practices, which are the most prevalent for SMEs. This study identified defensive practices, such as cybersecurity awareness and training, endpoint protection tools, incident response planning, network segmentation, access control, multi-factor authentication (MFA), access controls, privilege management, email authentication and encryption, enforcing strong password policies, cloud security, secure backup solutions, supply chain visibility, and automated patch management tools, as key measures. The study provides valuable insights into the specific gaps and challenges faced by SMEs, as well as their preferred methods of seeking and consuming cybersecurity assistance. The findings can guide the development of targeted defensive practices and policies to enhance the cybersecurity posture of SMEs for successful software development. This SMS will also provide a foundation for future research and practical guidelines for SMEs to improve the process of secure software development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop