Next Article in Journal
Air Pollution and Extended Hospital Burden: A Proxy Approach to Health and Economic Strain in the Greater Athens Area, Greece
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating NWCSAF Nowcasting Tools into the Regional Cloud Seeding Program: A Case Study on 1 November 2023 in Saudi Arabia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Air Quality Benefits of Ship Electrification: A Modeling Case Study for Saronic Gulf, Greece †

by
Natalia Liora
1,*,
Anastasia Poupkou
1,
Serafim Kontos
1,
Kyriaki-Maria Fameli
2,
Georgios Remoundos
2,
Achilleas Grigoriadis
3,
Evangelia Fragkou
3,
Vasiliki Assimakopoulos
4,
Aikaterini Bougiatioti
4,
Georgios Grivas
4,
Anna Kotrikla
2,
Nikolaos Mihalopoulos
4,
Leonidas Ntziachristos
3,
Athena Progiou
1,
Stavros Solomos
1 and
Christos Zerefos
1
1
Research Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, 10680 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Shipping, Trade and Transport, University of the Aegean, 82132 Chios, Greece
3
Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics, School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
4
Institute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 17th International Conference on Meteorology, Climatology, and Atmospheric Physics—COMECAP 2025, Nicosia, Cyprus, 29 September–1 October 2025.
Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2025, 35(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025035012
Published: 10 September 2025

Abstract

Maritime transport significantly contributes to air pollution, especially in coastal areas. This study evaluates air quality improvements from replacing conventional ferries with hybrids on the Perama–Paloukia line (Greece). Using WRF-CAMx modeling and bottom-up shipping emissions data for the Perama–Paloukia line (a busy line/high-frequency line) for January and July 2019, we simulated full electrification atmospheric impacts. The results revealed up to 9.2% and 7.9% reductions in NO2 and PM2.5 mean monthly levels, respectively, during summer. These findings highlight the benefits of ferry electrification, offering actionable insights for policymakers to reduce pollution, enhance public health, and support sustainable maritime practices in densely populated coastal zones.

1. Introduction

Maritime transport is a significant contributor to air pollution, emitting large amounts of nitrogen oxide (NOX) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) [1,2], which pose serious risks to human health and the environment and contribute to climate change [3,4]. NOX emissions play a role in ozone formation while PM2.5 can alter atmospheric radiation balance and cloud formation, contributing to both environmental degradation and adverse health outcomes such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [5].
These impacts are particularly severe in coastal and port areas [6,7], where shipping activities are concentrated. The shipping sector accounts for approximately 15% of global anthropogenic NOX and 5–8% of sulfur oxide (SOX) emissions and emits nearly 1–2 million tons of particulate matter annually [3]. In response to these impacts, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the European Union have adopted stringent emission control strategies, including the implementation of Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs), and energy efficiency regulations such as the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI). Among emerging solutions, ship electrification—particularly on short, high-frequency routes—offers an immediate pathway to reduce in-port and near-coast emissions [8,9]. More particularly, electrification eliminates combustion-related emissions during ship operation, thereby reducing local pollutant levels. Prior studies have shown that switching to cleaner fuels or electrification can reduce NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations by up to 30% and 3%, respectively, in port areas, significantly improving air quality and public health [10].
This study assesses the potential air quality benefits of replacing conventional vessels with hybrid ones (conventional combustion engine and a rechargeable battery) along the Perama–Paloukia line in Saronic Gulf (Greece). To simulate the atmospheric impact of replacing conventional ferries with hybrid electric vessels, this study employed the WRF-CAMx regional air quality modeling system. Anthropogenic emissions were obtained from the CAMS-REG European emissions database, incorporating shipping emissions from the STEAM model. Additionally, a bottom-up methodology was applied to estimate local emissions from ferry operations along the Perama–Paloukia line, enabling precise quantification of their contribution to total maritime emissions in the study area.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Modeling System

The air quality modeling approach employed in this study integrates the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model [11] for meteorological fields with the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) [12] for simulating chemical processes. Simulations were conducted over two nested spatial domains: a coarse 18 km resolution domain encompassing Europe and North Africa, and a finer 6 km resolution domain focusing on the Eastern Mediterranean. Modeling was performed for two representative months in 2019—January and July—capturing winter and summer atmospheric conditions, respectively. The year 2019 was selected as the reference period due to the unavailability of more recent CAMS emissions data (e.g., for 2023) and to avoid the atypical COVID-19 years (2020–2022), which were marked by reduced transport activity. Additionally, choosing a pre-2020 period excludes the influence of recent fuel sulfur regulations (i.e., IMO regulations), allowing for an independent assessment of the electrification impact (i.e., without confounding reductions in sulfate levels from low-sulfur fuel policies).
Meteorological boundary conditions were provided by the ERA5 reanalysis dataset. For chemical species, the CAMx model was initialized and constrained at the boundaries using outputs from the global CAMS Integrated Forecasting System (CAMS-IFS).
Natural emissions considered in the simulations included sea salt aerosols, windblown dust, and biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) from vegetation. These were estimated using the Natural Emissions Model (NEMO) [13], which is driven by WRF meteorology.
Anthropogenic emissions for carbon monoxide (CO), ammonia (NH3), NOx, SO2, Non-methane Volatile Organic Compounds (NMVOCs), PM10 and PM2.5 were obtained from the CAMS-REGv6.1 inventory [14], which provides spatially and sectoral resolved data across Europe while shipping emissions, both international and domestic, are derived from the Ship Traffic Emission Assessment Model (STEAM) [15]. The aforementioned emissions database was spatially, chemically (for NMVOCs and PM) and temporally (on a monthly, weekly and hourly basis) analyzed over the study domains using split factors provided by the CAMS-REG database. The monthly profiles for the shipping sector were based on the CAMS-GLOB-SHIPv2.1 database for the year 2019.
WRF-NEMO-CAMx air quality modeling system has been widely applied and validated in previous research for both regional-scale and urban-scale air quality assessments [16].

2.2. Shipping Emissions on Perama–Paloukia Line

A bottom-up methodology was applied to estimate the local emissions from shipping on the Perama–Paloukia line, allowing for an accurate quantification of their contribution to the total shipping emissions in the study area. It was based on the Flexible Emission Inventory for GREece and the Greater Athens Area (FEI-GREGAA) [17], which includes detailed vessel activity data, including ship types, engine characteristics, operational patterns, and trip frequencies. The methodology for emissions calculation was based on the EMEP/EEA Guidebook (Tier 3). Moreover, the use of updated load-dependent emission factors was investigated in order to study their impact on emissions calculations.
The percentage contribution of shipping emissions from the Perama–Paloukia line to the total maritime (both domestic and international) air pollutant and particulate emissions within a corresponding 6 km grid cell, as derived from the CAMS-REG database (see Figure 1), has been estimated. It should be noted that this grid cell also partially includes the commercial port of Piraeus, which further contributes to shipping emissions. Therefore, the estimated share attributed to the ferry line may be conservative. Thus, shipping emissions from the Perama–Paloukia ferry route accounted for approximately 30% of total NOX emissions and 45% of total PM2.5 emissions as reported in the CAMS-REG-AP shipping sector. These local emissions were set to zero in the modeling scenario to simulate the effects of full electrification along the route.

2.3. Simulation Scenarios

WRF-NEMO-CAMx modeling runs were carried out for two emission scenarios: (1) a baseline scenario (BCASE), which included all emission sources, and (2) an electrification scenario (ECASE), in which shipping emissions from the Perama–Paloukia ferry line were removed to simulate the effects of full electrification. The simulated concentration differences in absolute and percentage values on a daily and monthly basis between the base scenario (BCASE) and the electrification scenario (ECASE) are presented in the following section.

3. Results and Discussion

In July 2019, mean monthly NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations decreased by up to −9.2% and −7.9%, respectively. As for the winter study period, reductions were relatively more modest, with NOX levels dropping by −8.8% and PM2.5 by −2.3% on average.
Figure 2 presents the daily percentage difference in PM2.5 levels on an indicative day in July 2019. For instance, on July 7, at the grid cell positioned along the Perama–Paloukia route, PM2.5 decreased by approximately –12%. On absolute values, the corresponding daily reductions reach up to around 2 μg/m3.
Also, on 7 July, the electrification scenario led to the maximum daily NO2 reduction within the entire model domain reaching 8.3% (approximately 6 µg/m3), observed at the 6 × 6 km2 grid cell covering the Perama–Paloukia route. In fact, peak daily decreases during summer can approach 15% for both NO2 and PM2.5.
The aforementioned improvements were found on the ferry corridor, yet also influenced nearby parts of the Saronic Gulf and the adjacent densely populated coastal areas (Figure 2).

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that electrifying a high-frequency route such as the Perama–Paloukia delivers tangible air quality improvements in the local area. By comparing baseline and electrification scenarios using the WRF–CAMx model, notable reductions in NO2 and PM2.5 levels were observed, especially during the summer, while winter gains remained modest but meaningful. These improvements were concentrated along the ferry route which extended across the Saronic Gulf and into nearby coastal zones, demonstrating that notable air quality improvements are achievable through ship electrification and providing valuable insights for policymakers aiming to improve air quality in coastal regions. Given that the ferry accounts for a significant share of local shipping emission, electrification of this route emerges as a powerful and effective measure to enhance regional air quality. Finally, as part of future work, the ambient profiles of aerosol and greenhouse gas emissions along the Perama-Paloukia ferry line and in the surrounding area will be assessed through mobile monitoring campaigns. These measurements will aim to map spatial concentration patterns and validate the model results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.L., A.P. (Anastasia Poupkou), S.K., K.-M.F., G.R., A.G., E.F., V.A., A.B., G.G., A.K., N.M., L.N., A.P. (Athena Progiou), S.S. and C.Z.; methodology, N.L., A.P. (Anastasia Poupkou), S.K., K.-M.F., G.R., A.G., E.F., V.A., G.G., A.K., N.M., L.N. and C.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, N.L.; writing—review and editing, N.L., A.P. (Anastasia Poupkou), S.K., K.-M.F., G.R., A.G., E.F., V.A., A.B., G.G., A.K., N.M., L.N., A.P. (Athena Progiou), S.S. and C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU—National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP)—Greece 2.0. Project “NAVGREEN—Green Shipping of Zero Carbon Footprint” (Project Code: TAEDR-0534767).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the ECCAD database (Emissions of atmospheric Compounds and Compilation of Ancillary Data, https://eccad.aeris-data.fr, accessed on 1 September 2024) for providing access to the CAMS-REG dataset used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Di Natale, F.; Carotenuto, C.; Cajora, A.; Sippula, O.; Gregory, D. Short-Sea Shipping Contributions to Particle Concentration in Coastal Areas: Impact and Mitigation. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2022, 109, 103342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jonson, J.E.; Gauss, M.; Schulz, M.; Jalkanen, J.-P.; Fagerli, H. Effects of Global Ship Emissions on European Air Pollution Levels. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 11399–11422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Grigoriadis, A.; Mamarikas, S.; Ntziachristos, L. Quantitative Impact of Decarbonization Options on Air Pollutants from Different Ship Types. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2024, 133, 104316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Li, R.; Fu, S.; Shi, M.; Han, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J. Driving Factors of Ship-Induced Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations over Coastal Seas of China: Implications for Ship Emission Management. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 373, 123894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roy, A.; Chakraborty, M. A Review of Ship Emissions Impacts on Environmental, Health, Societal Impacts and IMO’s Mitigation Policies. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2025, 81, 103964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tokaya, J.P.; Kranenburg, R.; Timmermans, R.M.A.; Coenen, P.W.H.G.; Kelly, B.; Hullegie, J.S.; Megaritis, T.; Valastro, G. The Impact of Shipping on the Air Quality in European Port Cities with a Detailed Analysis for Rotterdam. Atmos. Environ. X 2024, 23, 100278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Viana, M.; Hammingh, P.; Colette, A.; Querol, X.; Degraeuwe, B.; Vlieger, I.D.; Van Aardenne, J. Impact of Maritime Transport Emissions on Coastal Air Quality in Europe. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 90, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Z.; Liao, P.; Long, F.; Wang, Z.; Ji, Y.; Han, F. Maritime Electrification Pathways for Sustainable Shipping: Technological Advances, Environmental Drivers, Challenges, and Prospects. eTransportation 2025, 26, 100462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vakili, S.; Insel, M.; Singh, S.; Ölçer, A. Decarbonizing Domestic and Short-Sea Shipping: A Systematic Review and Transdisciplinary Pathway for Emerging Maritime Regions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramacher, M.O.P.; Tang, L.; Moldanová, J.; Matthias, V.; Karl, M.; Fridell, E.; Johansson, L. The Impact of Ship Emissions on Air Quality and Human Health in the Gothenburg Area—Part II: Scenarios for 2040. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 10667–10686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Skamarock, W.; Klemp, J.; Dudhia, J.; Gill, D.; Barker, D.; Wang, W.; Huang, X.-Y.; Duda, M. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3; UCAR/NCAR: Boulder, CO, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramboll. CAMx User’s Guide Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions; Ramboll: Novato, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liora, N.; Markakis, K.; Poupkou, A.; Giannaros, T.M.; Melas, D. The Natural Emissions Model (NEMO): Description, Application and Model Evaluation. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 122, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kuenen, J.; Dellaert, S.; Visschedijk, A.; Jalkanen, J.-P.; Super, I.; Denier Van Der Gon, H. CAMS-REG-v4: A State-of-the-Art High-Resolution European Emission Inventory for Air Quality Modelling. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 491–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Johansson, L.; Jalkanen, J.-P.; Kukkonen, J. Global Assessment of Shipping Emissions in 2015 on a High Spatial and Temporal Resolution. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 167, 403–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liora, N.; Kontos, S.; Parliari, D.; Akritidis, D.; Poupkou, A.; Papanastasiou, D.K.; Melas, D. “On-Line” Heating Emissions Based on WRF Meteorology—Application and Evaluation of a Modeling System over Greece. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fameli, K.-M.; Assimakopoulos, V.D. The New Open Flexible Emission Inventory for Greece and the Greater Athens Area (FEI-GREGAA): Account of Pollutant Sources and Their Importance from 2006 to 2012. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 137, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the study area showing the location of the Perama–Paloukia line within the corresponding 6 km grid cell (highlighted in red).
Figure 1. Map of the study area showing the location of the Perama–Paloukia line within the corresponding 6 km grid cell (highlighted in red).
Eesp 35 00012 g001
Figure 2. Percentage differences (%) in daily PM2.5 simulated concentrations on 7 July 2019, over Saronic Gulf area.
Figure 2. Percentage differences (%) in daily PM2.5 simulated concentrations on 7 July 2019, over Saronic Gulf area.
Eesp 35 00012 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liora, N.; Poupkou, A.; Kontos, S.; Fameli, K.-M.; Remoundos, G.; Grigoriadis, A.; Fragkou, E.; Assimakopoulos, V.; Bougiatioti, A.; Grivas, G.; et al. Air Quality Benefits of Ship Electrification: A Modeling Case Study for Saronic Gulf, Greece. Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2025, 35, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025035012

AMA Style

Liora N, Poupkou A, Kontos S, Fameli K-M, Remoundos G, Grigoriadis A, Fragkou E, Assimakopoulos V, Bougiatioti A, Grivas G, et al. Air Quality Benefits of Ship Electrification: A Modeling Case Study for Saronic Gulf, Greece. Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings. 2025; 35(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025035012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liora, Natalia, Anastasia Poupkou, Serafim Kontos, Kyriaki-Maria Fameli, Georgios Remoundos, Achilleas Grigoriadis, Evangelia Fragkou, Vasiliki Assimakopoulos, Aikaterini Bougiatioti, Georgios Grivas, and et al. 2025. "Air Quality Benefits of Ship Electrification: A Modeling Case Study for Saronic Gulf, Greece" Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings 35, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025035012

APA Style

Liora, N., Poupkou, A., Kontos, S., Fameli, K.-M., Remoundos, G., Grigoriadis, A., Fragkou, E., Assimakopoulos, V., Bougiatioti, A., Grivas, G., Kotrikla, A., Mihalopoulos, N., Ntziachristos, L., Progiou, A., Solomos, S., & Zerefos, C. (2025). Air Quality Benefits of Ship Electrification: A Modeling Case Study for Saronic Gulf, Greece. Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings, 35(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025035012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop