Next Article in Journal
Characterising Ultrasint PP Nat 01 Polypropylene to Examine Its Feasibility in Powder Bed Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructural Evolution of a Pre-Alloyed Duplex Stainless Steel 2205 with Boron Addition Prepared by Powder Metallurgy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Water-Based Spray Drying of WC-Co Powders: A Sustainable Route to Environmentally Safer Granulation Without Compromising Performance

by
Horea-Florin Chicinaș
1,2
1
Gühring SRL, Constructorilor Street 32, 407035 Apahida, Romania
2
Materials Science and Engineering Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Avenue, 400641 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Powders 2025, 4(3), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4030025
Submission received: 15 May 2025 / Revised: 6 July 2025 / Accepted: 20 August 2025 / Published: 17 September 2025

Abstract

The spray drying of hard metal (WC-Co) powders is a critical step in the production of high-performance cutting and wear-resistant tools. Traditionally, organic solvents such as ethanol or acetone are employed in this process, despite posing substantial health, safety, and environmental risks. This study investigates a sustainable alternative by replacing organic solvents with water in the spray-drying process. We present a comparative analysis of granule morphology, flowability, and final mechanical properties between solvent-based and water-based routes. The water-based approach achieved a d50 of 99 µm, flow time of 27.8 s, and apparent density of 3.18 g/cm3, closely matching the solvent-based values (d50 = 93 µm, flow = 28.4 s, and ρ = 3.14 g/cm3). Hardness (HV30 ≈ 1650) and microstructure were equivalent across both routes, confirming that the substitution does not compromise performance. The water-based process also offers an estimated reduction of over 50% in CO2 emissions compared to traditional methods. These findings support the feasibility of water-based granulation as a viable, scalable, and safer route for WC-Co powder production, in alignment with dematerialization, circular material use, and the broader goals of sustainable development.

1. Introduction

Cemented carbides, commonly known as hard metals (HM), are advanced composite materials consisting of hard tungsten carbide (WC) particles embedded within a ductile metallic binder, typically cobalt (Co) [1,2,3]. HMs are renowned for their exceptional hardness and wear resistance. These are indispensable in metal machining, cutting tools, and wear applications. Their unique combination of hardness and toughness is primarily governed by the ratio of carbide to the binder and the particle size of the WC phase, typically ranging from the submicron level to several micrometers [4,5,6]. Cemented carbide manufacturing primarily involves powder metallurgy, which involves powder dispersion, forming, and sintering at high temperatures close to the eutectic point (~1320 °C) [7,8,9].
A critical stage in the production process is the dispersion of WC and binder powders, traditionally achieved through wet milling in organic solvents such as alcohols or alkanes [10,11,12]. These solvents not only prevent overheating and oxidation but also enhance the homogeneity of the powder mixture. However, the reliance on organic solvents presents significant challenges, including their high flammability, toxicity, and environmental impact. Organic solvent usage in the hard metal industry contributes up to 8% of total processing CO2 emissions [13], with acetone and ethanol alone accounting for an estimated 2.5 tons of VOCs annually per production line. Organic solvents can account for up to 15% of consumable costs in WC-Co powder preparation, with disposal and recovery costs further increasing the operational burden [14]. As a result, water-based processing has emerged as an eco-friendly alternative, addressing safety and environmental concerns [15,16,17]. Despite its potential, aqueous processing faces issues such as powder oxidation and the formation of hard agglomerates, which require careful optimization of suspension stability through pH adjustment or dispersant addition [12,18].
Spray drying is another critical step in HM production, transforming the liquid suspension into granulated powders ready for pressing and sintering. Traditionally, this process relies on organic solvent-based suspensions, amplifying the associated environmental and safety concerns. Replacing organic solvents with water in spray drying presents a promising path toward sustainable manufacturing, reducing carbon emissions, improving workplace safety, and compliance with stricter environmental regulations. However, this shift necessitates a thorough evaluation of process scalability and energy efficiency, mainly when applied across different spray-dryer configurations, such as the lab-scale equipment [19] (1 m diameter) and production equipment (2/12 m diameter) [20]. Larger spray dryers demand higher energy inputs for evaporation and offer significantly higher evaporation capacities, enabling greater productivity [3,15]. This enhanced capability makes them more suitable for industrial-scale operations, as they can process larger volumes of suspension within shorter time frames. However, their operational efficiency remains critical in determining the feasibility of adopting water-based spray drying at such scales, balancing the trade-offs between energy consumption, production throughput, and environmental impact. In our previous studies, we have highlighted the challenges of water milling of WC-Co, as well as all of our approaches on tackling these risks [3,8,12]. In this study, we turn our attention to highlighting the aspects regarding the environmental, safety, and energy implications of substituting organic solvents with water in spray drying across three spray-dryer setups. The goal of this study was to highlight that the use of water-based spray drying results in properties that are effectively identical to those achieved with conventional solvent-based processing. By analyzing carbon emissions, energy consumption, and process performance, this work highlights the potential for sustainable advancements in HM production. Our findings contribute to ongoing efforts to minimize the environmental footprint of industrial manufacturing processes and align with global sustainability goals.

2. Materials and Methods

Commercially available doped WC (<1 wt.% Cr2C3, VC) (FSSS 0.7 µm) and Co (FSSS 1.52 µm) were used to prepare a 10 wt.% Co WC-Co mixture as the base material for bulk WC-Co production. The materials were attrition milled using WC-Co milling balls (Ø5 mm) and a WC-Co-coated shaft to minimize contamination from the milling media. The ball-to-powder weight ratio was 10:1. Milling was conducted for three hours in an aqueous medium containing 5% amines as a corrosion inhibitor, a wax emulsion as a pressing aid, and an alkyl polyalkylene glycol ether as a defoamer, according to our previous experience [3,12]. The suspension had a solid content of 60%. Following milling, the suspension was dried using a GEA spray dryer to produce granules. Key operating parameters included a two-fluid nozzle with a 0.7 mm orifice diameter, an inlet air temperature of 180 °C, an outlet temperature maintained around 85 °C, atomization air pressure set at 3 bar, feed rate controlled at 5 mL/min, and an airflow rate of 0.6 m3/min. These granules were compacted using a Gasbarre Simac Monostatic press at a compaction pressure of 200 MPa and subsequently sintered in a PVA furnace at 1350 °C/30 min. The debinding stage employed a hydrogen atmosphere with slight overpressure to facilitate material transport, followed by vacuum heating. During the liquid-phase sintering stage, an argon pressure of 50 bar was applied to ensure complete densification. The morphology of the spray-dried powders was analyzed using a Gemini Zeiss scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an EDAX spectroscopy sensor to examine the homogeneity of the composite powder. Particle size distribution was determined with an Anton Paar 1090 L instrument, while bulk density and flowability were assessed using a Scott Volumeter, following ISO 3923-1 standard [3,21]. The residual humidity of the spray-dried powder was evaluated using a Mettler Toledo HC103 thermobalance. After sintering, the magnetic properties, including magnetic saturation and coercive force, were measured with a KOERZIMAT 1.097 magnetometer. Hardness (HV30) and indentation toughness (KC) were assessed using a Struers Duramin M1 hardness tester. Hardness measurements were performed at five different locations on each of three independently prepared samples, and the average values were reported. Sample preparation followed standard metallographic procedures in accordance with ASTM E384. The surfaces were ground starting with 500 µm grit, followed by progressively finer abrasives, and then polished using a 3 µm diamond suspension, finishing with a 1 µm diamond polish to ensure a smooth, scratch-free surface suitable for accurate indentation measurements. Indentation toughness was calculated via the Palmqvist method by analyzing the crack patterns generated during hardness testing. This method is known to be sensitive to the accuracy of crack-length measurements. Variability in crack length can arise from factors such as operator measurement uncertainty and the presence of polishing-induced surface defects that may influence crack propagation. These factors introduce some uncertainty in the absolute values reported. To mitigate this, consistent sample preparation and careful crack measurement protocols were employed. Microstructural characterization was conducted on polished and chemically etched samples using Murakami reagent.

3. Results and Discussions

The first part of this study offers a theoretical evaluation of different spray-dryer capacities and different industrially used suspensions. Critical insights into their environmental impact and productivity in the spray-drying processes can be gathered by evaluating spray dryers with lab-scale dimensions and production installations. Figure 1 highlights the evaporation rates based on each solvent required inlet temperature [3,19,20].
As can be seen, and as expected, higher inlet temperatures result in increased productivity due to faster and more efficient evaporation rates, enabling greater throughput in a given time [22]. However, the inlet temperature plays a critical role in productivity and determining the quality of the final product. Excessively high inlet temperatures can lead to improper drying dynamics, potentially affecting residual humidity levels and compromising particle morphology [3,18]. Maintaining the correct balance is essential to ensure that the powders exhibit desirable characteristics, such as optimal flowability, uniform particle size, and minimal agglomeration, which are crucial for downstream processes such as pressing and sintering [10,11,23].
Starting from these values, the energy required to heat solvents, evaporation rates, and equivalent CO2 emissions per kilogram of hard metal (HM) powder produced are analyzed. The calculus was performed considering a 60% solids content in the suspension.
The energy required to heat each kilogram of solvent is a critical factor in the sustainability of the spray-drying process. The heat energy, Q, required can be approximated as follows:
Q = m · c · T
where m is the mass of the solvent, c denotes the specific heat capacity, and ΔT stands for temperature increase (inlet temperature minus ambient). Water has a specific heat capacity of approximately 4.18 kJ/kg·°C [24]. In contrast, for organic solvents like ethanol and acetone, with lower specific heat capacities (~2.4 kJ/kg·°C), the energy required is proportionally lower, but the environmental costs (e.g., CO2 emissions) remain significantly higher due to their combustion profiles [24]. The comparison of energy consumption and CO2 emissions across different spray-dryer sizes and solvents reveals key insights into the environmental efficiency and sustainability of the spray-drying process for hard metal (HM) powders. Water-based spray drying consistently demonstrates superior environmental performance to organic solvents like methylene chloride, acetone, and ethanol, with differences becoming even more pronounced as the dryer size increases.
The comparative evaluation of water and industrial solvents such as ethanol and acetone in spray-drying processes highlights environmental-impact and productivity insights. While water-based spray drying generally requires more energy for evaporation, it ultimately proves to be more environmentally friendly, particularly when considering CO2 emissions and long-term sustainability, especially in larger spray dryers. Ethanol and acetone, commonly used in industrial processes [18], display significantly higher environmental costs regarding CO2 emissions, though they require less energy for evaporation than water. Water-based spray-drying demands more energy across all spray-dryer sizes, with the lowest (1 m diameter) requirement of approximately 0.5 kWh per kilogram of HM powder at 120 °C. In comparison, ethanol and acetone require half the energy for evaporation due to their lower evaporation temperature (acetone consuming 0.33 kWh per kilogram of powder at 60 °C and ethanol using 0.2 kWh per kilogram at 80 °C). As dryer size increases, these differences in energy consumption become less pronounced, particularly in the larger 12.5 m diameter dryer, where the system’s efficiency increases, and energy consumption per unit of HM powder decreases. For example, water requires 0.53 kWh per kilogram of HM powder in this larger dryer, while acetone requires 0.44 kWh per kilogram. Despite water’s higher energy demand, the difference becomes smaller with increased evaporation capacity, which enhances the thermal efficiency of larger dryers.
However, when comparing the CO2 emissions associated with the solvents, water shows a clear advantage regarding environmental impact. For instance, water evaporation at 200 °C in the 1 m diameter dryer produces only 0.32 kg CO2 per kilogram of HM powder, whereas acetone generates 1.1 kg CO2 and ethanol 0.6 kg CO2 under similar conditions. In the 12.5 m diameter dryer, water’s CO2 emissions drop to 0.25 kg per kilogram of HM powder, while acetone and ethanol still exhibit significantly higher emissions—11 kg CO2 and 25 kg CO2 per kilogram of powder, respectively. This demonstrates that, while ethanol and acetone may offer slightly lower energy requirements, their higher CO2 emissions make them less sustainable than water, especially in larger systems with higher productivity.
From the perspective of the working hypothesis, the results confirm that water-based spray drying is a viable alternative to organic solvents, mainly when employed in larger dryers. These findings extend the current understanding of solvent use in powder metallurgy by demonstrating the scalability of water-based systems without compromising productivity [7]. Furthermore, this study supports the hypothesis that larger dryers offer operational benefits and reduced environmental costs, making them suitable for meeting increasing industrial demands while adhering to sustainability standards. The wider consequences of these findings extend beyond the hard metal industry. The demonstrated efficiency gains with larger dryers and water-based processing apply to other sectors where spray drying is utilized, such as pharmaceuticals and food processing. The reduced reliance on organic solvents not only decreases CO2 emissions but also addresses growing regulatory pressures to minimize the use of hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
The evaluation of SEM images in Figure 2 of the spray-dried WC-Co granules from water- and solvent-based processes reveals a striking similarity in their morphology, underscoring the effectiveness of optimizing spray-drying parameters.
Both granules, produced under carefully controlled conditions, exhibit comparable spherical shapes and sizes, highlighting that the difference in solvent type does not inherently dictate granule quality when appropriate drying temperatures and conditions are employed. The spherical morphology, a critical feature for ensuring proper flowability, packing density, and uniform sintering behavior in cemented carbide manufacturing, was successfully achieved in both cases [3,18,23]. This finding challenges the traditional notion that solvent-based processes yield superior granule quality. Instead, it demonstrates that achieving similar outcomes with water-based spray drying is feasible, provided the inlet temperature and other drying parameters are precisely tuned. For example, by using higher inlet temperatures for the water-based process to compensate for its higher latent heat of evaporation, the resultant granules achieved the same shrinkage uniformity and particle cohesion level as those obtained from solvent-based methods. This similarity suggests that the challenges typically associated with water-based drying, such as the potential for hard agglomerates and irregular particle formation due to its higher surface tension, can be mitigated by carefully tailoring the drying conditions.
Furthermore, this equivalence in granule morphology has significant implications for industrial practice. It indicates that water-based spray drying can produce granules of comparable quality to solvent-based methods, thus eliminating the necessity for organic solvents in many cases. This shift can lead to reduced safety hazards; lower environmental impact; and a significant decrease in operational costs related to solvent handling, storage, and recovery. Figure 3 presents the particle size distributions of the water- and solvent-based granules.
Ultimately, these findings emphasize that the choice of solvent becomes less critical when drying conditions are carefully optimized. This opens the door for broader adoption of water-based spray drying in cemented carbide manufacturing and potentially other fields where spherical, uniform granules are required, thereby contributing to greener and more sustainable production practices [11,15]. The comparison of SEM images and particle size distributions (PSDs) of spray-dried WC-Co granules from water-based and solvent-based processes demonstrates the feasibility of achieving comparable granule characteristics, irrespective of the solvent used when appropriate drying conditions are applied. Both granules exhibit d50 values around 93 µm and 99 µm, as can be noticed in Table 1, respectively, with similar spherical morphologies and smooth surfaces, as observed in the SEM images. These findings underscore the potential for water-based spray drying to produce granules of equal quality to solvent-based methods, provided that processing parameters are optimized. The similarity in PSDs indicates that the granule formation mechanisms are consistent across both processes. The narrow distribution and similar median sizes reflect well-controlled atomization and drying, essential for uniform granule behavior during subsequent pressing and sintering steps. The slight difference in d50 values (approximately 6%) is negligible from a practical perspective, suggesting that solvent minimally influences granule size when processing conditions are appropriately managed. The SEM images corroborate the PSD results, showing granules with smooth, defect-free surfaces and spherical shapes. Such features are crucial for achieving high packing density and minimizing voids during pressing, ensuring optimal mechanical properties in the final sintered product. The similar morphologies of the granules further support the hypothesis that the type of solvent used—whether water or an organic solvent—does not inherently determine granule quality. Achieving these results in the water-based process required careful optimization of spray-drying parameters, particularly the inlet temperature. The drying process effectively minimized differences between the two methods by tailoring the temperature to account for water’s higher latent heat of evaporation and surface tension. This finding is significant, as it demonstrates that the historical reliance on organic solvents for spray drying WC-Co powders is not necessarily justified by superior granule quality but rather by historical processing preferences and perceptions.
From an industrial perspective, the results hold considerable promise for transitioning toward more sustainable production methods. Water-based spray drying reduces dependency on hazardous organic solvents, lowering health and safety risks, environmental impact, and costs associated with solvent handling and recovery systems. Additionally, the comparable PSDs and SEM morphologies suggest that water-based processes can seamlessly replace solvent-based ones without compromising product performance or quality. In conclusion, the analysis of SEM images and particle size distributions highlights that, with optimized spray-drying parameters, water-based processes can match solvent-based methods in producing high-quality WC-Co granules. This equivalence provides a strong argument for re-evaluating traditional solvent-based practices, supporting a shift toward more sustainable, water-based manufacturing processes in the hard metal industry.
The comparison of water-based and solvent-based WC-Co granules shows similar performance in key metrics, including flowability and apparent density. The solvent-based granules, with a d50 of 93 µm, exhibit a flow time of 28.4 s and an apparent density of 3.14 g/cm3, while the water-based granules, with a slightly larger d50 of 99 µm, achieve a faster flow time of 27.8 s and a higher density of 3.18 g/cm3. These minor differences highlight that, with optimized spray-drying conditions, the water-based process can produce granules that match or even surpass those made with solvents. The slightly higher density and comparable flowability of water-based granules suggest improved packing efficiency, offering potential benefits in the final sintered product. These results and water-based processes’ environmental and safety advantages underscore their suitability as a sustainable alternative to traditional solvent-based methods. In Figure 4 are given the TG curves corresponding to the two types of powders, highlighting that their debinding takes place in the 200–350-degree temperature range and that the plasticizer content after spraying is around 2%, a typical value for the granules in this field [3,16].
The 200–350 temperature range is typical for paraffin-based systems, with the decomposition temperature dictated by the molecular mass’s length [17,25]. High-molecular-mass paraffin wax decomposes in the 200–300 temperature range, whereas the low-molecular-mass paraffin decomposes at more significant temperatures, up to 350 [26]. The slight shift in the thermal decomposition behavior can be dictated by the particle size distribution, as well as by the presence of emulsifiers.
The powder granules described above were directly pressed into cylindrical shapes and sintered using an industrially relevant sintering cycle, which included a H2 overpressure during the debinding stage. This specific sintering approach ensures optimal binder removal and prevents oxidation, maintaining the integrity of the WC-Co composition. The results, presented in Table 2, provide insights into the sintered samples’ densification, microstructure, and mechanical properties. These outcomes further validate the efficacy of the spray-dried powders, particularly those from water-based processes, in meeting the stringent performance criteria required for industrial applications.
As can be seen, the properties of the obtained samples are similar, and no noticeable difference between the two types of processing can be observed. The saturation magnetization values are consistent with the two-phase region of the WC-Co system, while the HV30 hardness and fracture toughness indicate a submicronic microstructure [8]. The microstructures given in Figure 5, obtained by optical microscopy, highlight the similarities between the two powders, which contain a homogeneous distribution of the two elements, without any cobalt pooling or porosity.

4. Conclusions

This study compares water-based and solvent-based spray-drying processes for producing WC-Co powders, focusing on environmental impact, productivity, and powder properties. The key findings are as follows:
  • Water-based spray drying offers significant environmental advantages over solvent-based processes like acetone and methylene chloride. While water requires higher energy input for evaporation, it results in much lower CO2 emissions per kilogram of HM powder produced. This supports the growing shift toward sustainable manufacturing practices in industry, where water is a safer and more eco-friendly option despite its higher energy requirements.
  • Larger spray dryers, such as the 12.5 m diameter unit, demonstrate improved energy efficiency and higher productivity than smaller units. The larger dryers consume more energy but produce more HM powder, resulting in a lower CO2 emission per kilogram of product. This highlights the benefits of scaling up spray-drying processes to enhance output and environmental performance.
  • Inlet temperature plays a crucial role in controlling powder properties, with higher temperatures increasing productivity and affecting residual humidity and particle morphology. Balancing temperature is essential to maintain high-quality powders with minimal defects during sintering.
  • SEM analysis showed that powders from both water-based and solvent-based spray-drying processes were similar in size and spherical shape, with d50 values around 93–99 microns. This indicates that water can effectively replace organic solvents without compromising powder characteristics, provided the right process conditions are applied.
In conclusion, water-based spray drying, when optimized, offers a viable and more sustainable alternative to solvent-based methods, providing similar or superior powder quality while reducing environmental impact.

Funding

The infrastructure available from the European Development Fund and the Romanian Government through the Competitiveness Operational Program 2014–2020, project ID P 34 466, MySMIS code 121349, contract no.5/05.06.2018, is highly acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. García, J.; Collado Ciprés, V.; Blomqvist, A.; Kaplan, B. Cemented carbide microstructures: A review. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2019, 80, 40–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sarin, V. Hardmetals. In Comprehensive Hard Materials; Mari, D., Miguel, L., Nebel, C., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 1, ISBN 978-0-08-096528-4. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chicinaș, H.F.; Márton, L.E.; Jucan, O.D. Granulated WC-Co obtained by spray drying from aqueous suspensions. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2023, 114, 106250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Upadhyaya, G.S. Cemented Tungsten Carbide, 1—Introduction; William Andrew Publishing: Westwood, NJ, USA, 1998; pp. 1–6. ISBN 978-0-8155-1417-6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kurlov, A.S.; Gusev, A.I. Tungsten Carbides; Springer Series in Materials Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2013; Volume 184, pp. 34–36. [Google Scholar]
  6. von Spalden, M.; Pötschke, J.; Michaelis, A. Novel Alternative Ni-Based Binder Systems for Hardmetals. Crystals 2024, 14, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chicinaş, H.F.; Marinca, T.F.; Mesaroş, A.; Götze, P.; Eckert, A.; Stoian, G.; Leoştean, C.; Pană, O.; Lupu, N.; Popa, C.O. Preparation and characterisation of WC-10Co powders obtained by aqueous milling. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 22935–22942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chicinas, H.F.; Marinca, T.F.; Götze, P.; Eckert, A.; Popa, C.O. Influence of aqueous milling duration on the sintered WC-10Co hard metal powders. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 53, 2901–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Laarz, E.; Bergström, L. Dispersing WC–Co powders in aqueous media with polyethylenimine. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2000, 18, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stunda-Zujeva, A.; Irbe, Z.; Berzina-Cimdina, L. Controlling the morphology of ceramic and composite powders obtained via spray drying–A review. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 11543–11551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ramavath, P.; Papitha, R.; Ramesh, M.; Babu, P.S.; Johnson, R. Effect of primary particle size on spray formation, morphology and internal structure of alumina granules and elucidation of flowability and compaction behaviour. Process. Appl. Ceram. 2014, 8, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chicinaş, H.F.; Jucan, D.O.; Gădălean, R.V.; Conțiu, G.; Marinca, T.F.; Götze, P.; Eckert, A.; Popa, C.O. Influence of milling media on the properties of some hard metal powders. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2021, 96, 105470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mehrotra, P.K. Strategies to reduce environmental impact of hardmetal production. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2015, 49, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chicinaş, H.F. Research on the Replacement of Traditional Milling Media for the Manufacturing of WC-Co Tools. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, D.J.; Jung, J.Y. Granule performance of zirconia/alumina composite powders spray-dried using polyvinyl pyrrolidone binder. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 3177–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andersson, K.M.; Bergström, L. Friction and adhesion of single spray-dried granules containing a hygroscopic polymeric binder. Powder Technol. 2005, 155, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chicinaş, H.F.; Jucan, D.O.; Marinca, T.F.; Neamțu, B.V.; Conțiu, G.; Götze, P.; Eckert, A.; Popa, C.O. Influence of milling media on the structure and agglomeration behaviour of some hardmetal powder. Powder Metall. 2018, 61, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lukasiewicz, S.J. Spray-Drying Ceramic Powders. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1989, 72, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. G. P. E. A/S. MOBILE MINOR® R&D Spray Dryer|GEA Spray Dryers. Available online: https://www.gea.com/en/products/dryers-particle-processing/spray-dryers/pilot-small-scale-spray-dryers/mobile-minor/ (accessed on 3 December 2024).
  20. G. P. E. A/S. VERSATILE-SD® and VERSATILE FSD®|GEA Spray Dryers. Available online: https://www.gea.com/en/products/dryers-particle-processing/versatile-sd-spray-dryer/ (accessed on 3 December 2024).
  21. Svarovsky, L. Powder Testing Guide: Methods of Measuring the Physical Properties of Bulk Powders; Elsevier Applied Science: London, UK, 1987; ISBN 1851661379. [Google Scholar]
  22. Reed, J.S. Principles of ceramics processing. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1995, 83, 658. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nandiyanto, A.B.D.; Okuyama, K. Progress in developing spray-drying methods for the production of controlled morphology particles: From the nanometer to submicrometer size ranges. Adv. Powder Technol. 2011, 22, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. NIST Chemistry WebBook. Available online: https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/ (accessed on 3 December 2024).
  25. Gestrich, T.; Kaiser, A.; Pötschke, J.; Meinl, J.; Höhn, S. Thermal behaviour of cermets and hardmetals during debinding and sintering. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2018, 73, 210–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Leitner, G.; Gestrich, T.; Jaenicke-Rossler, K. SINTERING OF HARDMETALS- THERMOANALYTICAL SIMULATION. Powder Metall. Prog. 2004, 4, 179–191. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Calculated evaporation rates of different solvents based on their specific inlet temperatures for lab-scale, small production and production-scale spray dryers.
Figure 1. Calculated evaporation rates of different solvents based on their specific inlet temperatures for lab-scale, small production and production-scale spray dryers.
Powders 04 00025 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of granules sprayed using solvent/water at low and high magnification level.
Figure 2. SEM images of granules sprayed using solvent/water at low and high magnification level.
Powders 04 00025 g002
Figure 3. Particle size distributions of the water- and solvent-based granules.
Figure 3. Particle size distributions of the water- and solvent-based granules.
Powders 04 00025 g003
Figure 4. TG Curves for the water- and solvent-based spray-dried granules.
Figure 4. TG Curves for the water- and solvent-based spray-dried granules.
Powders 04 00025 g004
Figure 5. Optical micrographs of the WC-10Co samples obtained by solvent- and water-based spray drying after subsequent debinding and sintering.
Figure 5. Optical micrographs of the WC-10Co samples obtained by solvent- and water-based spray drying after subsequent debinding and sintering.
Powders 04 00025 g005
Table 1. Main granule properties obtained after spraying.
Table 1. Main granule properties obtained after spraying.
Type of GranuleD50 (µm)Flow (s/50 g)SD (g/cm3)
Solvent-based9328.43.14
Water-based9927.83.18
Table 2. Main properties obtained after sintering.
Table 2. Main properties obtained after sintering.
Type of PowderMs
(µT×m3/kg)
Hc
(kA/m)
Hardness
(HV30)
Kc
(MPa √m)
Solvent-based1621.91643 ± 1311.4 ± 0.01
Water-based15.921.91654 ± 1111.0 ± 0.01
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chicinaș, H.-F. Water-Based Spray Drying of WC-Co Powders: A Sustainable Route to Environmentally Safer Granulation Without Compromising Performance. Powders 2025, 4, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4030025

AMA Style

Chicinaș H-F. Water-Based Spray Drying of WC-Co Powders: A Sustainable Route to Environmentally Safer Granulation Without Compromising Performance. Powders. 2025; 4(3):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4030025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chicinaș, Horea-Florin. 2025. "Water-Based Spray Drying of WC-Co Powders: A Sustainable Route to Environmentally Safer Granulation Without Compromising Performance" Powders 4, no. 3: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4030025

APA Style

Chicinaș, H.-F. (2025). Water-Based Spray Drying of WC-Co Powders: A Sustainable Route to Environmentally Safer Granulation Without Compromising Performance. Powders, 4(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/powders4030025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop