Social Media Ethics: Balancing Transparency, AI Marketing, and Misinformation
Definition
1. Introduction
- Misinformation and disinformation—How viral falsehoods undermine trust.
- Algorithmic bias and AI ethics—How automated systems reinforce inequality.
- Democratic integrity—How social media both empowers and destabilizes governance.
2. The Significance of Ethical Considerations on Social Media
2.1. The Dual-Edged Sword of Social Media
2.2. The Role of Ethics in Maintaining Public Trust
3. Ethical Dilemmas in Social Media Information Dissemination
3.1. The Spread of Misinformation and Disinformation
3.2. Privacy Concerns and Algorithmic Bias
3.3. The Ethics of Content Moderation and the Role of Artificial Intelligence
4. The Scientific Impact of Ethical Social Media Use
The Role of Social Media in Scientific Communication
5. The Societal Impact of Ethical Social Media Use
5.1. Promoting Social Justice and Equity
5.2. The Impact on Mental Health and Well-Being
5.3. Ethical Design of Social Media Platforms
5.4. The Role of Social Media in Democracy and Governance
6. Opportunities for Ethical Social Media Use
6.1. Promoting Digital Literacy and Critical Thinking
6.2. Fostering Inclusive and Diverse Communities
6.3. Fostering Ethical Cultures
6.4. Leveraging Technology for Ethics
7. Conclusions
Limitations and Future Research
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
COVID-19 | Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
SNSs | Social Networking Sites |
References
- Fouad, K.M.; Sabbeh, S.F.; Medhat, W. Arabic fake news detection using deep learning. Comput. Mater. Contin./Comput. Mater. Contin. Print 2021, 71, 3647–3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pennington, N. Quitting social media: A qualitative exploration of communication outcomes. Qual. Res. Rep. Commun. 2020, 22, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masoed, E.S.; Omar, R.A.E.A.T.; Magd, A.N.A.E. Social media addiction among adolescents: Its relationship to sleep quality and life satisfaction. Int. J. Res. Paediatr. Nurs. 2021, 3, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, K.A.; Abdulbaqi, S.S.; Aliagan, I.Z. Corruption in the media: Implications for ethical and socially responsible journalism. J. Pengaj. Media. Malays. 2020, 22, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett-Maitland, N.; Lynch, J. Social Media, Ethics and the Privacy Paradox; Kalloniatis, C., Travieso-Gonzalez, C., Eds.; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, C.; Lee, T. Journalistic interventions matter: Understanding how Americans perceive fact-checking labels. Harv. Kennedy Sch. Misinformation Rev. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goel, L.; Donaldson, J. Social media exploration and exploitation by small and medium enterprises for business continuity. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 2021, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castillo, A.; Benitez, J.; Liorens, J. Impact of social media on the firm’s knowledge exploration and knowledge exploitation: The role of Business Analytics Talent. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2021, 22, 1472–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pansanella, V.; Rossetti, G.; Milli, L. Modeling algorithmic bias: Simplicial complexes and evolving network topologies. Appl. Netw. Sci. 2022, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, E.A.S.; Osman, M.E.; Mohamed, B.A. The impact of artificial intelligence on social media content. J. Soc. Sci. 2024, 20, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swart, J. Experiencing Algorithms: How young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection on social media. Soc. Media.+ Soc. 2021, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vera, V. Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and content moderation on TikTok. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 1164–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, A. Artifical Intelligence and Bias: Challenges, implications, and remedies. J. Soc. Res. 2023, 2, 3808–3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbert, S.; Shilton, K.; Vitak, J. When research is the context: Cross-platform user expectations for social media data reuse. Big. Data. Soc. 2023, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zannettou, S. “I Won the Election!”: An Empirical Analysis of Soft Moderation Interventions on Twitter. Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 2021, 15, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samory, M. On positive moderation decisions. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Virtual, 7–10 June 2021; AAAI Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2021; Volume 15, pp. 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, A.; Dang, B.; Lease, M. Fast, accurate, and healthier: Interactive blurring helps moderators reduce exposure to harmful content. Proc. AAAI Conf. Hum. Comput. Crowdsourcing. 2020, 8, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorwa, R.; Binns, R.; Katzenbach, C. Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data Soc. 2020, 7, 205395171989794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Sun, L.; Feng, X.; He, P.; Zhang, Y. Social media communication of the scientific and technological literature in emergency under COVID-19. Libr. Hi Tech 2021, 39, 796–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y. Social media for palliative and end-of-life care research: A systematic review. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2024, 14, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flood-Grady, E.; Solberg, L.B.; Baralt, C.; Meyer, M.; Stevens, J.; Krieger, J.L. Engaging institutional stakeholders to develop and implement guidelines for recruiting participants in research studies using social media: Mixed Methods, Multi-Phase Process. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e23312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A.; Chung, T.L.D. Transparency in corporate social responsibility communication on social media. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2023, 51, 590–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enjolras, B.; Salway, A. Homophily and polarization on political twitter during the 2017 Norwegian election. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2022, 13, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinyor, M.; Williams, M.; Zaheer, R.; Loureiro, R.; Pirkis, J.; Heisel, M.J.; Schaffer, A.; Redelmeier, D.A.; Cheung, A.H.; Niederkrotenthaler, T. The Association between Twitter Content and Suicide. Aust. New Zealand J. Psychiatry 2021, 55, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bilderback, S. I will see you in the summer: Assessing the cognitive impact of social media on employee engagement. Strateg. HR Rev. 2024, 23, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.Y.; Jamieson, J.P.; Reis, H.T.; Beevers, C.G.; Josephs, R.A.; Mullarkey, M.C.; O’Brien, J.M.; Yeager, D.S. Getting fewer “Likes” than others on social media elicits emotional distress among victimized adolescents. Child Dev. 2020, 91, 2141–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brough, M.; Literat, I.; Ikin, A. “Good social media?”: Underrepresented youth perspectives on the ethical and equitable design of social media platforms. Soc. Media + Soc. 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, X. Social Support and the Social Media Engagement about the Young Users. Commun. Humanit. Res. 2024, 30, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omotayo, F.; Folorunso, M.B. Use of social media for political participation by youths. JeDEM—Ejournal Edemocracy Open Gov. 2020, 12, 132–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, S.U.; Shurong, Z. Military Organization’s Use of Social Media and Its Relationship with Politics: Evidence from Pakistan. SAGE Open. 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nwozor, A.; Ajakaiye, O.O.; Okidu, O.; Olanrewaju, A.; Afolabi, O. Social media in politics: Interrogating electorate-driven hate speech in nigeria’s 2019 presidential campaigns. JEDEM eJ. eDemocr. Open Gov. 2022, 14, 104–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okon, P.E.; Ekpang, J.E., II. The 2019 Nigerian presidential elections and the resurgence of the magic bullet theory of media effect. Int. J. Commun. Soc. 2021, 3, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, A.Y.S.; Staccini, P. Social media, research, and ethics: Does participant willingness matter? Yearb. Med. Inform. 2020, 29, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doyan, A.; Gunawan, G.; Susilawati, S.; Khasanah, B.U.; Hakim, S. Quantum Phenomenon learning media used in Think Pair share models of learning for critical thinking skills. In Proceedings of the 4th Asian Education Symposium (AES 2019), Manado, Indonesia, 14–15 August 2019; Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasâ, M.; Hufad, A.; Komariah, S. The comprehension of social media ethics by rina hasanah vocational school students. Jupiis J. Pendidik. Ilmu-Ilmu Sos. 2023, 15, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavus, N.; Sani, A.S.; Haruna, Y.; Lawan, A.A. Efficacy of Social Networking Sites for Sustainable Education in the Era of COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Sustain. 2021, 13, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitri, A.Z. The Effect of Critical Thinking on Social Media Use, tolerance, and Self-Assessment of Adolescents in Tulungagung, Indonesia. Tech. Soc. Sci. J. 2021, 26, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pomichal, V. Hoaxes in social media: Can game-based learning beat them? In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Social Media-ECSM 2024, Brighton, UK, 30–31 May 2024; Academic Conferences International Limited: Reading, UK, 2024; Volume 11, pp. 326–334. [Google Scholar]
- Fazil, A.W.; Hakimi, M.; Akrami, K.; Akrami, M.; Akrami, F. Exploring the role of social media in bridging gaps and facilitating global communication. Stud. Media J. Commun. 2024, 2, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gjerazi, B. Media and communication Strategies for conflict Prevention and resolution. Interdiscip. J. Res. Dev. 2023, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, D.; Meadows, M.; Wong, D.; Xia, S. Understanding consumers’ social media engagement behaviour: An examination of the moderation effect of social media context. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 122, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madden, S.; Alt, R.A. Know her name: Open dialogue on social media as a form of innovative justice. Soc. Media + Soc. 2021, 7, 2056305120984447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, J.; Singh, S. Unraveling the impact of social media on interpersonal communication and relationship. Int. J. Res. Publ. Rev. 2023, 4, 1622–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granic, I.; Morita, H.; Scholten, H. Beyond Screen Time: Identity Development in the Digital Age. Psychol. Inq. 2020, 31, 195–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khangpiboon, K.; Nimtaluong, P.; Jundai, R. Ethics responsibility: Using social media of social work practice in Thailand. Asean Soc. Work. J. 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, T.E.; Bongato, J.M.; Bungabong, G.K.; Dalapo, S.; Mumar, A.A.; Petersdorf, C.; Sevilla, E.J.; Oracion, X.V.; Manhilot, C.; Roslinda, G. Knowledge, Attitudes, And Practices on the Use of social media for Academic Requirements Among Nursing Students of the University of Bohol. ACADEME Univ. Bohol Grad. Sch. Prof. Stud. 2022, 20, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashir, I.; Malik, A.; Mahmood, K. Measuring personal and academic differences in students’ perceived social media credibility. Digit. Libr. Perspect. 2021, 38, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wall, R.; Evers, J.; Haydock, D. An international systematic review concerning the effect of social media exposure on public compliance with infection prevention and control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Infect. Prev. 2023, 24, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chatterjee, S.; Chaudhuri, R.; Vrontis, D.; Ajith Kumar, V.V. Adoption of blockchain technology in organizations: From morality, ethics and sustainability perspectives. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 2024, 22, 38–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, I.; Nangpiire, C.; Detoh, W.M.; Fataw, Y. The effect of blockchain technology in enhancing ethical sourcing and supply chain transparency: Evidence from the cocoa and agricultural sectors in ghana. Afr. J. Empir. Res. 2024, 5, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, T.M.; Salo, J. Ethical Marketing in the Blockchain-Based Sharing Economy: Theoretical integration and guiding insights. J. Bus. Ethics. 2021, 183, 1113–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hisseine, M.A.; Chen, D.; Yang, X. The Application of Blockchain in Social Media: A Systematic Literature Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahiya, A.; Gupta, B.B.; Alhalabi, W.; Ulrichd, K. A comprehensive analysis of blockchain and its applications in intelligent systems based on IoT, cloud and social media. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2022, 37, 11037–11077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Skandali, D. Social Media Ethics: Balancing Transparency, AI Marketing, and Misinformation. Encyclopedia 2025, 5, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030086
Skandali D. Social Media Ethics: Balancing Transparency, AI Marketing, and Misinformation. Encyclopedia. 2025; 5(3):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030086
Chicago/Turabian StyleSkandali, Dimitra. 2025. "Social Media Ethics: Balancing Transparency, AI Marketing, and Misinformation" Encyclopedia 5, no. 3: 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030086
APA StyleSkandali, D. (2025). Social Media Ethics: Balancing Transparency, AI Marketing, and Misinformation. Encyclopedia, 5(3), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030086