Next Article in Journal
Seismic Assessment of Informally Designed 2-Floor RC Houses: Lessons from the 2020 Southern Puerto Rico Earthquake Sequence
Previous Article in Journal
Cauchy Operator Boosted Artificial Rabbits Optimization for Solving Power System Problems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating Gasification into Conventional Wastewater Treatment Plants: Plant Performance Simulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CO2 Emissions and Scenario Analysis of Transportation Sector Based on STIRPAT Model: A Case Study of Xuzhou in Northern Jiangsu

by
Jinxian He
1,2,*,
Meng Wu
3,4,
Wenjie Cao
5,6,
Wenqiang Wang
3,4,
Peilin Sun
1,2,
Bin Luo
3,4,
Xuejuan Song
7,
Zhiwei Peng
3,4 and
Xiaoli Zhang
1,2
1
Key Laboratory of Coaled Methane Resource and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, Xuzhou 221008, China
2
School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
3
Jiangsu Mineral Resources and Geological Design and Research Institute (Testing Center of China National Administration of Coal Geology), Xuzhou 221006, China
4
Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Mineral Resources, China National Administration of Coal Geology, Xuzhou 221006, China
5
Huai’an Geological and Mineral Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Huai’an 223001, China
6
Huai’an Geological and Mineral Exploration Institute, Huai’an 223001, China
7
School of Civil Engineering, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eng 2025, 6(8), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6080175
Submission received: 28 May 2025 / Revised: 16 July 2025 / Accepted: 24 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Decarbonisation Technologies for Industrial Processes)

Abstract

To support carbon peaking and neutrality goals in the city transportation sector, this paper accounts for CO2 emissions from the transport sector in Xuzhou City, North Jiangsu Province, from 1995 to 2023. This study explores the relationship between transport-related carbon emissions and economic growth, using the TAPIO decoupling index. Meanwhile, a carbon emission prediction model based on the STIRPAT framework is constructed, with scenario analysis applied to forecast future emissions. Results show three decoupling stages: the first, dominated by weak and expansive negative decoupling, reflects extensive economic growth; the second features weak decoupling with expansive coupling, indicating a more environmentally coordinated phase; the third transitions from expansive negative decoupling and weak decoupling to strong decoupling and expansive coupling, suggesting a shift in development patterns. Under the baseline, low-carbon, and enhanced low-carbon scenarios, by 2030, the CO2 emissions of the transportation industry in Xuzhou will be 10,154,700 tons, 9,072,500 tons, and 8,835,000 tons, respectively, and the CO2 emissions under the low-carbon scenario and the enhanced low-carbon scenario will be reduced by 10.66% and 13.00%, respectively. Based on these findings, the study proposes carbon reduction strategies for Xuzhou’s transport sector, focusing on policy regulation, energy use, and structural adjustments.

The transportation sector, as a pillar industry underpinning economic and social development, also plays a crucial role in the domains of energy consumption and environmental protection [1,2,3]. According to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) 2019 annual report, carbon emissions from China’s transportation sector reached 901 million tons, accounting for 9.12% of the country’s total greenhouse gas emissions [4]. Faced with the dual pressures of tight carbon reduction targets and a fixed timeline for the national “dual carbon” strategy, in-depth examinations of the sector’s dynamic evolution and systematic explorations of its driving mechanisms have become core issues for advancing the green transformation of transportation. These efforts not only contribute to theoretical innovation in environmental economics but also provide a scientific basis for policymaking in emission reduction [5,6].
Current research on carbon emissions in the transportation sector primarily focuses on the influences of economic, social, industrial, and technological factors, as well as associated predictive-modeling approaches. Lin et al. [7], using a quantile regression model, analyzed the mechanisms through which energy structure, economic development level, carbon emission coefficients, and population size affect transport-related carbon emissions. Talbi [8] applied a vector autoregressive model and found that carbon emissions from the transportation sector are influenced by factors such as the energy intensity of road transport, total energy consumption, economic growth, urbanization, and fuel efficiency. Xu et al. [9] introduced a non-parametric additive regression model to demonstrate the nonlinear coupling between private car ownership, freight turnover, economic scale, and energy efficiency. Gao et al. [10], through an improved STIRPAT extended model, deconstructed the regulatory effects of variables such as population base, economic level, energy consumption intensity, infrastructure investment, urbanization rate, and private vehicle penetration on carbon emissions in the transportation sector. Wang et al. [11] employed the IPAT model to study the relationships between carbon emissions and factors such as economic level, population size, and industrial structure. Wang et al. [3], based on a double-leveled econometric model, identified the main influencing factors of carbon emissions in the transportation sector to be transport structure, economic development level, energy efficiency of transport equipment, quality of transport organization, and infrastructure density.
A review of the existing literature reveals that the influencing factors of carbon emissions in the transportation sector can generally be categorized into four dimensions: economic and social development, transport system characteristics, energy structure and consumption, and environmental regulation [12]. However, current studies largely focus on macro-level indicators, such as economic development, population, freight volume, and urbanization rate, with relatively limited quantitative analysis of the transport sector in resource-depleted cities [13]. Moreover, there remains a gap in research that effectively integrates factor analysis with modeling processes tailored to the transportation sector.
To provide a reliable and robust assessment and projection of CO2 emissions in the regional transportation sector, this paper accounts for data on CO2 emissions from Xuzhou City’s transport industry in Northern Jiangsu from 1995 to 2023 and applies a multidimensional modeling framework to reveal viable emission reduction pathways. First, the TAPIO decoupling index is employed to quantitatively assess the dynamic relationship between transport carbon emissions and economic growth in the region. Building on this, an extended STIRPAT model is constructed, incorporating eight key influencing variables across four dimensions: population (year-end total population, urbanization rate), economic development (GDP per capita, share of tertiary industry), technological level (energy structure, carbon intensity), and transport activity (passenger turnover, freight turnover). Finally, we simulated carbon emission trends from 2024 to 2030 under baseline, low-carbon, and enhanced low-carbon scenarios based on models. This study aims to provide tailored regulatory strategies and peaking programs for Xuzhou City’s transport industry, while also offering a theoretical reference for similar cities conducting carbon emission research.

1. Research Methodology and Data Sources

1.1. Research Methodology

1.1.1. Measurement of Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Carbon emissions from the transportation sector: CO2 emissions from the transportation sector refer to the total amount of carbon dioxide generated during the operation of various modes of transport [14]. In Xuzhou, transportation can be divided into external and internal categories. New energy vehicles are not included. External transportation mainly includes long-distance buses, railways, and air travel, while internal transportation primarily involves private cars, public buses, motorcycles, and similar vehicles. The CO2 emissions from external transportation are calculated using Equation (1):
T N CO 2 = i n T V i × E F i
where TNCO2 represents the CO2 emissions from external transportation (in 10,000 tons); TVi denotes the passenger turnover of the type-i external transport mode (in 10,000 person-kilometers); EFi refers to the CO2 emission conversion factor for the type-i external transport, in kg/(km·person). Specifically, the conversion factors are 0.028 (kg/(km·person)) for long-distance buses, 0.049 (kg/(km·person)) for railways, and 0.300 (kg/(km·person)) for air transport [15].
The CO2 emissions from internal transportation are calculated using Equation (2):
T W CO 2 = i n L i × E F i × D V i
where TWCO2 represents the CO2 emissions from internal transportation (in 10,000 tons); EFi refers to the CO2 emissions generated by the operation of the type-i vehicle for 1 km. That is, the CO2 emission conversion factor (kg/km); DVi is the annual mileage of the type-i vehicle (in 10,000 km); Li is the number of type-i vehicles. Specifically, the conversion factors are 0.820 (kg/km) for public buses, 0.200 (kg/km) for private cars, 0.070 (kg/km) for motorcycles, and 0.460 (kg/km) for light trucks [16].

1.1.2. Scope and Definition of Decoupling

In this study, “decoupling” is strictly defined at the prefecture-city scale (Xuzhou City’s transport sector, 1995–2023) and aims to quantify the annual decoupling status between CO2 emissions from the municipal transport sector and economic growth [17]. Economic growth is proxied by real GDP, while CO2 emissions refer solely to direct combustion-related emissions from fossil-energy use within the transport sector. Emissions attributable to electricity consumption by new-energy vehicles are explicitly excluded. The temporal dimension is framed by China’s sequential Five-Year Plan periods from the Ninth to the Fourteenth FYP, thereby enabling an assessment of how policy interventions shape decoupling trajectories. Following the decoupling model developed by Sun et al. [18], the specific formulation is presented as Equation (3):
W n + 1 = T n + 1 T n / T n GDP n + 1 GDP n / GDP n = % T C % GDP
where n represents the year; Wn+1 is the decoupling elasticity in year n + 1; Tn and Tn+1 are the CO2 emissions from the transportation sector in years n and n + 1, respectively; and GDPn and GDPn+1 are the city’s GDP values in years n and n+1, respectively.
Based on Equation (3), and following the decoupling classification standards proposed by Jie et al. [19], eight decoupling states are identified:
  • Strong decoupling (ΔTC < 0, ΔGDP > 0, W < 0);
  • Weak decoupling (ΔTC > 0, ΔGDP > 0, 0 ≤ W < 0.8);
  • Expansive coupling (ΔTC > 0, ΔGDP > 0, 0.8 ≤ W < 1.2);
  • Expansive negative decoupling (ΔTC > 0, ΔGDP > 0, W ≥ 1.2);
  • Strong negative decoupling (ΔTC > 0, ΔGDP < 0, W < 0);
  • Weak negative decoupling (ΔTC < 0, ΔGDP < 0, 0 ≤ W <0.8);
  • Recessive coupling (ΔTC < 0, ΔGDP<0, 0.8 ≤ W < 1.2);
  • Recessive decoupling (ΔTC < 0, ΔGDP < 0, W ≥ 1.2).

1.1.3. Establishment of STIRPAT Model

The IPAT model was initially proposed by Ehrlich et al. [20] in 1971 to analyze the relationships among population (P), affluence (A), technology (T), and environmental impact (I). To overcome the linear constraints of the original model, York et al. [21] introduced the stochastic STIRPAT model, with its multiplicative form as Equation (4) and log-linear form as Equation (5). This improved model introduces random error terms and elasticity coefficients, significantly enhancing the flexibility of empirical analysis.
I = a × Pb × Ac × Td × e
lnI = lna + b × lnP + c × lnA + d × lnT + lne
where a, b, c, and d are evaluation parameters; I, P, A, and T represent environmental impact, population, affluence, and technology factors, respectively; and e is a stochastic error term.
To enhance the explanatory power, this study extends the classical STIRPAT model using a multi-dimensional indicator decomposition method. Specifically, eight variables are selected across four dimensions:
  • Population dimension: Urbanization rate (C) and year-end total population (P) to represent population structure and scale;
  • Economic dimension: GDP per capita (R) for economic development and tertiary industry share (D) for industrial structure;
  • Technology dimension: Energy structure (Q) and carbon intensity (Z) to capture the impact of technological progress;
  • Transportation dimension: Passenger turnover (K) and freight turnover (H) to quantify transportation demand.
Accordingly, Equation (5) is extended to Equation (6):
TC = EXP (lna0 + a1 × lnC + a2 × lnP + a3 × lnR + a4 × lnD + a5 × lnQ + a6 × lnI + a7 × lnK + a8 × lnH)

1.1.4. Methodological Independence

The Tapio elasticity index and the STIRPAT specification are logically independent: the former functions as a diagnostic measure of past decoupling between CO2 emissions from the urban transport sector and economic development, whereas the latter operates as a causal-inference framework aimed at forecasting future sectoral CO2 emissions on the basis of their driving indicators. Crucially, the two models share no common parameters in their mathematical construction. Consequently, their parameter remain entirely unrelated.

1.2. Data Sources

Relevant parameters were extracted from the Xuzhou Statistical Yearbook (1995–2023). The carbon intensity (Z) is defined as the ratio of CO2 emissions from the transportation sector to the total economic output of the transportation sector, measured in tons per CNY 10,000. The energy structure (Q) is represented by the proportion of fossil energy consumption within the total energy consumption of the transportation sector, expressed as a percentage. GDP per capita (R) is calculated as the ratio of regional GDP to the year-end total population, measured in yuan per person. Population size (P) refers to the total permanent resident population at year-end, in ten thousand persons. The urbanization rate (C) is defined as the proportion of the non-agricultural registered population in the total population, expressed as a percentage. Passenger turnover (K) is measured as the total product of the number of passengers transported by various means of transport and the distance they are carried, in ten thousand person–kilometers. Freight turnover (H) refers to the total product of the weight of goods transported and the transport distance by all modes, in 100 million ton–kilometers. The share of the tertiary industry (D) is measured as the proportion of the value added by the tertiary sector in the regional GDP, expressed as a percentage. Gross domestic product (G) is directly taken from the annual GDP figures published in the statistical yearbooks, in CNY 100 million.
This paper focuses on calculating CO2 emissions from the perspective of transportation and does not account for emissions from water transport or the impact of clean energy sources (such as wind, hydro, solar, and nuclear power) on CO2 emissions.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Carbon Emissions from the Transportation Sector

From 1995 to 2023, the CO2 emissions from the transportation industry in Xuzhou increased from 755,100 tons in 1995 to 7,711,900 tons in 2023, exhibiting an overall upward trend. The annual growth rate ranged from −0.92% to 23.64%, with an average value of 8.79%. Specifically, during the period from 1995 to 2016 (the fluctuating emission increase stage), the growth rate exhibited significant volatility. In contrast, during the period from 2017 to 2023 (the stable emission increase stage), the fluctuations were relatively stable. This indicates that the transportation system has become more mature and stable (Figure 1).

2.2. Decoupling Status from the Transportation Sector

Based on series data on transport-related carbon emissions and GDP in Xuzhou from 1995 to 2023, a quantitative analysis using the TAPIO decoupling index reveals a four-phase dynamic evolution in the decoupling relationship between the two (Table 1). Specifically, the relationship can be categorized as strong decoupling (1 period, 3.57%); weak decoupling (15 periods, 53.57%); expansive coupling (4 periods, 14.28%); and expansive negative decoupling (8 periods, 28.57%). Among these, weak decoupling and expansive negative decoupling together account for 82.14%, representing the dominant modes during the study period. This indicates that Xuzhou’s transportation sector is still in a developmental stage where economic growth has not yet been fully decoupled from carbon emissions.
The decoupling relationship between Xuzhou’s transport-related carbon emissions and economic growth shows clearly staged characteristics:
  • Stage I (1995–2000): Dominated by weak decoupling and expansive negative decoupling, this stage reflects an extensive mode of economic development. Economic growth was driven by the expansion of high-energy-consuming industries, which led to a continuous surge in transportation-related carbon emissions. In particular, from 1996–1997 and 1998–2000, the growth rate of transportation-related emissions far overtook GDP expansion, manifesting atypical environmental pressure dynamics;
  • Stage II (2001–2012): Characterized by a mixed pattern of predominantly weak decoupling with some expansive coupling. Benefiting from the guidance of the “11th Five-Year Plan”, the industrial structure began shifting toward the tertiary sector. This stage achieved a model of relative decoupling, reflecting a more coordinated relationship between the environment and the economy;
  • Stage III (2013–2023): Mainly featured expansive negative decoupling and weak decoupling, followed by strong decoupling and expansive coupling. This stage represents a transitional development mode, marked by diverse patterns in the interaction between the transportation sector and economic growth, shifting from coordinated development to extensive development, then to high-quality growth, and eventually reverting again to extensive development. The phase-wise progression highlights ongoing reforms in the urban economic system. These trends align with China’s national “dual carbon” strategy and echo Jiangsu Province’s and Xuzhou City’s policies on building a green, low-carbon, and circular economy.
It is worth noting that, as a traditional resource-based hub city, Xuzhou is in a critical stage of transitioning between old and new growth drivers. Due to the cyclical nature of industrial restructuring, some high-emission and high-energy-consuming industries have yet to be fully phased out, resulting in fluctuations in the decoupling relationship between economic growth and environmental/resource pressures [22,23].

2.3. Carbon Emissions Forecasting Model for the Transportation Sector

Based on the STIRPAT model, the carbon emissions from the transportation sector in Xuzhou have eight key influencing factors, including urbanization rate (C), year-end population (P), GDP per capita (R), the share of the tertiary industry (D), energy structure (Q), carbon intensity (Z), passenger turnover (K), and freight turnover (H). In order to determine the relevant coefficients by ridge regression, the logarithmic data for each of the above coefficients are shown in Table 2.
The multicollinearity problem of the logarithmic values of the eight influencing factors can be solved by the ridge regression analysis method. The ridge regression analysis method is a kind of supplement to the least squares regression, which can effectively solve the multicollinearity problem and improve the accuracy, stability, and reliability of the model’s calculation. Therefore, this paper chooses the ridge regression analysis method to solve the multicollinearity problem and uses the ridge regression function of SPSS software (version 24.0) to fit Equation (5). The ridge regression coefficient K is in the interval of (0, 1) and takes the numeric value with a step size of 0.001. When K = 0.17, the change of the ridge plot was gradually smooth, in Figure 2. The specific ridge regression estimation results are shown in Table 3.
The coefficients of the ridge regression passed the 1% significance level test for all variables except for carbon emission intensity (Z) and social passenger turnover (K). The variance inflation factor of each variable is below 1.0, indicating that the multicollinearity is not serious. R2 is 0.985, which is a good overall fit, and the F-statistic also passes the 1% significance level test, implying that the eight factors of energy structure, carbon emission intensity, GDP per capita, population size, urbanization rate, social passenger turnover, freight turnover, and tertiary industry share can explain the change of 98.5% of CO2 emissions in the transport industry. This indicates the rationality of choosing the above eight factors.
Based on the results of the ridge regression analysis, the specific form of the STIRPAT extended model, considering eight influencing factors, is constructed as Equation (7):
lnTC = 1.765lnQ − 0.202lnZ + 0.161lnR + 2.136lnP + 0.299lnC − 0.128lnK + 0.198lnH + 0.863lnD − 23.546
Convert Equation (7) into exponential form as Equation (8):
TC = 5.84 × 10−11Q1.765Z−0.202R0.161P2.136C0.299K−0.128H0.198D0.863
Equations (7) and (8) show that energy structure, carbon intensity, GDP per capita, population size, urbanization rate, social passenger turnover, freight turnover, and the share of tertiary industry will directly affect the CO2 emissions of the transport industry. Through the fitting of the model to the historical data, the fitting effect is relatively significant, and the comparison between the fitted value and the real value of the model on carbon emissions is shown in Figure 3, which shows that the model can better simulate the growth and changing trend of carbon emissions in the transport industry in Xuzhou. In 1995~2008, the fitted values are basically close to the real value. In 2009~2023, the real value fluctuates up and down around the fitted value, and the error is large.
From the positive and negative effects reflected by the elasticity coefficients, the elasticity coefficients of energy structure, GDP per capita, population size, urbanization rate, freight turnover, and the share of tertiary industry are positive, indicating that there is a significant positive correlation between the above factors and CO2 emissions, and the changes in these six factors have driven the growth of carbon emissions in the Xuzhou transport industry. Meanwhile, the elasticity coefficients of carbon emission intensity and the social passenger turnover are negative, indicating that these two factors have a negative correlation with CO2 emissions, and the decline in energy structure and social passenger turnover can relatively inhibit the growth of carbon emissions. The results show that economic and social development drives the growth of demand in the transport industry, which leads to an increase in carbon emissions. However, the decline in energy structure and the proportion of fossil energy will reduce carbon emissions. If the transport sector accelerates the process of transforming its energy mix from fossil to non-fossil, it will strongly contribute to the reduction in carbon emissions. The peak of carbon emissions and the time to reach the peak will depend on the combined effect of these factors.

2.4. Scenario Parameter Settings

This study uses scenario analysis to construct the carbon emissions forecasting model for Xuzhou’s transportation sector. Based on national and Jiangsu Province’s social and economic development plans, the current status of Xuzhou’s transportation sector, the “dual carbon goals” policy, and the domestic and international literature, eight key influencing factors were identified [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Three forecasting scenarios, namely the baseline scenario (BEN), low-carbon scenario (LN), and enhanced low-carbon scenario (SL), were developed, with differentiated parameter settings for each scenario in 2024–2025 and 2026–2030 (Table 4).
(1)
Urbanization rate. In April 2021, the Xuzhou Municipal Government issued the Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of Xuzhou City and the Long-Range Objectives Through the Year 2035, which pointed out that, by 2025, the urbanization rate of Xuzhou will reach 73%, and the average annual growth rate of Xuzhou from 2022 to 2025 and 2026 to 2030 will be 2.0% and 1.5%, respectively [27]. Based on this, the growth rate of the urbanization rate in different periods is set at 2.0% in the period 2024–2025 and 1.5% in the period 2026–2030 under the baseline scenario, respectively, and the low-carbon and enhanced low-carbon scenarios are adjusted accordingly;
(2)
Population size. Li et al. found that the registered population of Xuzhou City in 2025, 2030, and 2035 will be 11.271 million, 11.843 million, and 12.4463 million, respectively [29]. Therefore, the growth rate of population size in the baseline scenario for different periods is set at 4.0% for the period 2024–2025 and 2.0% for the period 2026–2030, respectively;
(3)
GDP per capita. According to the “Xuzhou Sustainable Development Plan (2022–2030)”, the annual disposable income of urban residents in Xuzhou in 2030 will be CNY80,000. During the 14th Five-Year Plan, the 15th Five-Year Plan, and the 16th Five-Year Plan periods, the average annual GDP growth rate of key industries was about 5.5%, 5.0%, and 4.2%, respectively [30], and Wu Meng et al. pointed out that the average annual growth rate of Xuzhou’s per capita GDP in the two stages of 2022–2025 and 2026–2030 is 6.0% and 5.5% [27]. Therefore, the growth rate of per capita GDP in different periods is set at 6.0% in 2024–2025 and 5.5% in 2026–2030 under the baseline scenario, respectively, and the low-carbon and enhanced low-carbon scenarios are adjusted accordingly;
(4)
The proportion of the tertiary industry. According to the Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of Xuzhou City and the Long-Range Objectives Through the Year 2035, the output value of high-tech industries will account for 50% of the output value of industries above a designated size in 2025. Therefore, the growth rate of the proportion of the tertiary industry in different periods of the baseline scenario is set at 2.0% in the period 2024–2025 and 1.5% in the period 2026–2030, respectively, and the low-carbon and intensified low-carbon scenarios are adjusted accordingly;
(5)
Energy structure. The “14th Five-Year Plan” Comprehensive Work Plan for Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction and the Action Plan for Carbon Peaking Before 2030 put forward the goal of reducing energy consumption per unit of GDP by 13.5% by 2025 compared to 2020. At the same time, the Xuzhou Sustainable Development Plan (2022–2030) states that renewable energy will account for 25% of Xuzhou’s energy consumption by 2030. Therefore, the growth rate of the energy structure under the baseline scenario in different periods is set at −0.2% in the period 2024–2025 and −0.4% in the period 2026–2030, respectively, and the low-carbon and enhanced low-carbon scenarios are adjusted accordingly;
(6)
Carbon emission intensity. According to the white paper “China’s Policies and Actions to Address Climate Change”, China’s carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP will be reduced by more than 65% by 2030 compared with 2005. The “Xuzhou Sustainable Development Plan (2022–2030)” points out that carbon emissions per unit of GDP (t/CNY 10,000) will drop from 1.06 t/CNY 10,000 in 2021 to 0.5 t/CNY 10,000 in 2030. Therefore, the growth rate of the energy structure under the baseline scenario in different periods is set at −1.0% in the period 2024–2025 and −1.5% in the period 2026–2030, respectively, and the low-carbon and enhanced low-carbon scenarios are adjusted accordingly;
(7)
Passenger turnover and freight turnover. According to the 2023 Statistical Annual Report on National Economic and Social Development of Xuzhou City and the 2024 Statistical Annual Report on National Economic and Social Development of Xuzhou City, passenger turnover and freight turnover in 2024 will increase by 20.2% and 3.9%, respectively, compared to 2023. Therefore, the growth rates of passenger turnover and freight turnover in different periods are set at 13.5% and 2.4% in 2024–2025 and 4.0% and 1.5% in 2026–2030, respectively.

2.5. Scenario Analysis

Based on the STIRPAT model and the differentiated parameter settings for the baseline, low-carbon, and enhanced low-carbon scenarios, dynamic simulations were conducted to forecast the carbon emissions from Xuzhou’s transportation sector from 2024 to 2030. The results are shown in Figure 4.
From the forecast results, there are obvious differences in the peak years of carbon emissions under the three scenarios: the CO2 emissions of Xuzhou’s transportation industry will be 7,290,600 tons, 7,029,200 tons and 6,965,900 tons in 2025, and 10,154,700 tons, 9,072,500 tons and 8,835,000 tons in 2030, respectively, and the CO2 emissions under the low-carbon scenario and the enhanced low-carbon scenario will be reduced by 10.66% and 13.00%, respectively.
Overall, the Xuzhou transportation sector’s carbon emissions peak value varies significantly under different scenarios. It is important to note that, even when other variables remain stable, the carbon emissions peak will still show a marked upward trend as the population expands. According to Equation (7), the energy structure coefficient (1.765) is larger than the tertiary industry coefficient (0.863), indicating that the emissions reduction effect brought about by technological progress is greater than that resulting from adjustments in the industrial structure.
Currently, carbon emissions in Xuzhou’s transportation sector are a prominent issue, mainly due to the insufficient share of clean energy, low energy efficiency, and high empty load rates during transportation [24,25]. To address these issues, this paper proposes optimization suggestions from three dimensions:
  • Policy regulation: It is recommended that government departments formulate a phased low-carbon development roadmap, set net-zero emission targets for the transportation sector, and promote green travel modes. Additionally, energy consumption intensity and carbon emission indicators should be incorporated into the performance evaluation system of transportation management departments and enterprises [26]. It is also necessary to establish and improve carbon tax policies and carbon emissions trading mechanisms;
  • Energy consumption optimization: It is suggested to accelerate the application of clean energy, such as electricity and natural gas, in transportation vehicles, gradually replacing traditional oil-fueled vehicles. At the same time, increased investment in the research and development of new energy technologies in the transportation sector should be encouraged, along with the commercialization of research achievements [27,28];
  • Optimization of the freight transport structure: It is recommended to develop high-tech solutions such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) in transportation [31], promote green freight transport, integrate multiple channels, and push forward the “road-to-rail” strategy for bulk goods.

3. Conclusions

(1)
Xuzhou’s transportation sector’s CO2 emissions increased from 755,100 tons in 1995 to 7,711,900 tons in 2023, with an average annual growth rate of 8.39%. Among these, aviation and private cars are the primary sources of carbon emissions in Xuzhou’s transportation sector;
(2)
Factors such as population size, urbanization rate, GDP per capita, the share of the tertiary industry, energy structure, and carbon intensity have a significant positive effect on the carbon emissions of Xuzhou’s transportation sector. In contrast, passenger turnover and freight turnover show significant negative moderating effects;
(3)
The decoupling relationship between transport-related carbon emissions and economic development in Xuzhou can be divided into three distinct stages: the first stage is characterized by weak decoupling and expansive negative decoupling, reflecting an extensive mode of economic development; the second stage is dominated by weak decoupling, with expansive coupling as a secondary feature, representing a phase of environmentally-coordinated economic development; the third stage is marked primarily by expansive negative decoupling and weak decoupling, followed by strong decoupling and expansive coupling, indicating a transitional economic development model;
(4)
Under the baseline, low-carbon, and enhanced low-carbon scenarios, by 2030, the CO2 emissions of the transportation industry in Xuzhou will be 10,154,700 tons, 9,072,500 tons, and 8,835,000 tons, respectively, and the CO2 emissions under the low-carbon scenario and the enhanced low-carbon scenario will be reduced by 10.66% and 13.00%, respectively. Carbon emission reductions in the transportation sector can be effectively achieved through a combination of policy tools, structural optimization projects, and enhanced technological innovation, thereby advancing the dual strategic goals of high-quality economic development and improved eco-environmental quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H.; Methodology, J.H. and M.W.; Software, J.H., M.W., W.C. and W.W.; Validation, M.W.; Formal analysis, M.W.; Investigation, J.H., W.C., W.W. and P.S.; Resources, B.L.; Data curation, W.C., W.W. and B.L.; Writing—original draft, J.H. and M.W.; Writing—review & editing, W.C., W.W. and P.S.; Visualization, P.S.; Supervision, B.L. and X.S.; Project administration, X.S., Z.P. and X.Z.; Funding acquisition, J.H., M.W. and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Jiangsu Province Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality Technology Innovation Special Fund (BE2023855) and the Xuzhou Science and Technology Bureau’s Key Social Development Project (KC21147).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Meng Wu, Wenqiang Wang, Bin Luo, and Zhiwei Peng are employed by Jiangsu Mineral Resources and Geological Design and Research Institute (Testing Center of China National Administration of Coal Geology). Author Wenjie Cao is employed by Huai’an Geological and Mineral Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, H.R.; Feng, X.J.; Shen, J.X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.P. Prediction on peak value of carbon emission from the Jiangsu transportation industry based on SVR model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 35, 58–63. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Lu, Y.Q.; Fan, T.Z.; Zhang, J.N. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of China’s transport sector carbon emissions efficiency. Ecol. Econ. 2023, 39, 13–22. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, J.T.; Ma, X.M. Influencing factors of carbon emissions from transportation in China: Empirical analysis based on two-level econometrics method. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2021, 57, 1133–1142. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Tian, P.N.; Mao, B.H.; Tong, R.Y.; Zhang, H.X.; Zhou, Q. Analysis of carbon emission level and intensity of China’s transportation industry and different transportation modes. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 2023, 19, 347–356. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, J.H. Decomposition of carbon cap target at provincial level in China: A case study of Zhejiang. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2016, 26, 23–30. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Hu, X.W.; Guo, W. Measurement of spatial conflict of urban traffic ecosystem and an analysis of its influencing factors. Ecol. Econ. 2022, 38, 108–114. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Lin, B.; Benjamin, N.I. Influencing factors on carbon emissions in China transport industry: A new evidence from quantile regression analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 150, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Talbi, B. CO2 emissions reduction in road transport sector in Tunisia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, B.; Lin, B. Investigating the differences in CO2 emissions in the transport sector across Chinese provinces: Evidence from a quantile regression model. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, B.; Xu, Q.T.; Li, Y.B.; He, H. Calculation and driving factors analysis of carbon emissions from traffic and transportation energy consumption in Jilin province. Econ. Geogr. 2013, 33, 25–30. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, L.; Ouyang, H.; Ma, Y.H. Re-understanding of the impact of economic and social development on the environment: Analysis of urban carbon emissions based on the IPAT model. Macroeconomics 2017, 10, 161–168. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Lv, Q.; Gao, J.L. Analysis of traffic and transportation carbon emissions model and driving factors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 34, 31–36. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, L.X.; Li, Z.; He, J.C.; Ma, Q.Q. Influencing factors of transportation carbon emissions in Shaanxi province based on STIRPAT model. Transp. Res. 2022, 8, 98–107. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Hu, M.F.; Zheng, Y.B.; Li, Y.H. Forecasting of transport carbon emission peak in Hubei Province under multiple scenarios. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2022, 42, 464–472. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Chris, G. How to Live a Low-Carbon Live: The Individual’s Guide to Stopping Climate Change; Routledge: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, H.D.; Lu, W.; Wang, X.J. The calculation of carbon emissions and analysis on reduction strategies of Xuzhou city. For. Econ. 2012, 64–69, 78. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Yu, Y.; Jin, Z.X.; Li, J.Z.; Li, J. Low-carbon development path research on China’s power industry based on synergistic emission reduction between CO2 and air pollutants. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 123097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, R. Improvement and application of Tapio decoupling index measurement method. Technol. Econ. Manag. Res. 2014, 8, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jie, L.; Wang, Z.; Yu, R.X. Scenario simulation of carbon decoupling effect of China’s energy mining industry. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2020, 30, 47–56. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Ehrlich, P.R.; Holdren, J.P. Impact of Population Growth. Science 1971, 171, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. York, R.; Rosa, E.A.; Dietz, T. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 46, 351–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, Y.L.; Liu, Y.P. Study on influencing factors of industrial carbon emission in Jiangsu province based on LMDI model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 41, 278–284. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu, J.Q.; Gan, X.H. Temporal-spatial differentiation and emission reduction strategy of Jiangsu’s industrial carbon emission. Resour. Ind. 2022, 24, 150–156. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, Z.B.; Xie, J.P.; Ma, J.L. Development status and demand forecast of highway traffic in Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province. J. Jiangsu Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2016, 34, 51–54. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Wu, H. Influencing Mechanism of Traffic Development on Spatial Evolution of Xuzhou city. Master’s Thesis, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, China, 2017. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, C.S.; Qu, J.S.; Ge, Y.J.; Tang, J.X.; Gao, X.Y.; Liu, L.N. LSTM model-based prediction of carbon emissions from China’s transportation sector. China Environ. Sci. 2023, 43, 2574–2582. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu, M.; Qin, Y.H.; Wang, S.M.; Song, X.J.; Ma, P.; Cao, B.; Feng, L.L. Energy carbon emissions and scenario analysis of industrial enterprises above designated size: A case study of Xuzhou City in the Huaihai economic zone. Coal Geol. China 2023, 35, 59–64. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  28. Rong, W.W. Research of analysis and countermeasures of ecological civilization construction in Jiangsu province. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 31, 73–78. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, Z.P.; Ou, X.J.; Zhou, B.B.; Qian, J.L.; Ou, Y.G. Characteristics of Xuzhou population development and its projiction. J. Jiangsu Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2021, 39, 21–25. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. Yan, G.; Zheng, Y.X.; Wang, X.S.; Li, B.; He, J.; Shao, Z.Q.; Li, Y.L.; Wu, L.X.; Ding, Y.; Xu, W.; et al. Pathway for Caibon Dioxide Peaking in China Based on Sectoral Analysis. Res. Environ. Sci. 2022, 35, 309–319. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhou, H.X. Research on Traffic Information Collection and Processing Methods Internet of Vehicles. Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2013. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Carbon emission distribution and growth rate relationship of transportation industry in Xuzhou from 1995 to 2023.
Figure 1. Carbon emission distribution and growth rate relationship of transportation industry in Xuzhou from 1995 to 2023.
Eng 06 00175 g001
Figure 2. Ridge trace of parameter changes.
Figure 2. Ridge trace of parameter changes.
Eng 06 00175 g002
Figure 3. Comparison between the fitted value and real carbon emissions in the transportation sector.
Figure 3. Comparison between the fitted value and real carbon emissions in the transportation sector.
Eng 06 00175 g003
Figure 4. Trends in carbon emission prediction results under three scenarios.
Figure 4. Trends in carbon emission prediction results under three scenarios.
Eng 06 00175 g004
Table 1. Decoupling relationship between CO2 emissions from Xuzhou’s transportation sector and economic growth (1995–2021).
Table 1. Decoupling relationship between CO2 emissions from Xuzhou’s transportation sector and economic growth (1995–2021).
YearΔTC/%ΔGDPwDecoupling Relationship
1995–19963.69920.9640.176Weak decoupling
1996–19974.7513.3161.433Expansionary negative decoupling
1997–19982.9766.4530.461Weak decoupling
1998–199923.6437.5143.147Expansionary negative decoupling
1999–200012.4016.7931.826Expansionary negative decoupling
2000–20016.56110.5790.620Weak decoupling
2001–200211.2929.9561.134Expansionary connectivity
2002–20035.98713.7350.436Weak decoupling
2003–200414.44021.9710.657Weak decoupling
2004–200522.51518.9661.187Expansionary connectivity
2005–20062.38219.3650.123Weak decoupling
2006–200713.98119.4170.720Weak decoupling
2007–20088.50621.0440.404Weak decoupling
2008–200914.41713.0681.103Expansionary connectivity
2009–201012.19222.3390.546Weak decoupling
2010–20112.88320.7160.139Weak decoupling
2011–20123.08713.0900.236Weak decoupling
2012–20137.40012.5290.591Weak decoupling
2013–20146.5189.8250.663Weak decoupling
2014–20154.2617.1710.594Weak decoupling
2015–2016−0.9188.864−0.104Strong decoupling
2016–20179.3559.0141.038Expansionary connectivity
2017–201810.2075.9501.715Expansionary negative decoupling
2018–20199.2375.1111.807Expansionary negative decoupling
2019–20208.2883.7772.194Expansionary negative decoupling
2020–20217.23310.8970.664Weak decoupling
2021–202210.2063.6332.809Expansionary negative decoupling
2022–20238.6195.8021.486Expansionary negative decoupling
Table 2. The observations of variables used in the STIRPAT model.
Table 2. The observations of variables used in the STIRPAT model.
YearQZRPCKHDTC
19954.4590.9388.4686.7472.9864.7306.1163.3814.324
19964.4540.7378.6496.7563.0204.8336.0763.4204.361
19974.4670.7018.6736.7653.0454.7626.0443.4734.407
19984.4650.6178.7266.7753.0684.7226.0753.4924.436
19994.4910.7258.7926.7773.0914.6876.1193.5124.649
20004.4420.7448.8466.7983.2504.8246.2433.5484.765
20014.4730.7018.9336.8043.2854.8496.2783.5664.829
20024.4960.7319.0246.8073.3214.8836.2993.5624.936
20034.4920.7299.1496.8123.4444.8096.3403.5544.994
20044.4930.5639.3676.8213.4974.9666.4443.5435.129
20054.5110.5209.5456.8303.5294.5116.3053.5585.332
20064.4960.3519.7296.8403.5354.5886.6703.5625.356
20074.4980.3039.9126.8473.5384.7326.8243.5825.486
20084.4960.19610.1076.8533.5725.2447.0013.6065.568
20094.5050.25610.2326.8643.6765.3337.0303.6135.703
20104.5010.84310.4406.8803.8245.5317.9233.6985.818
20114.4670.72610.6336.8844.1595.3678.0743.7185.846
20124.4370.64310.7556.8984.2065.3727.3183.7165.877
20134.4370.58610.8706.9154.2715.1917.3873.7615.948
20144.5201.16510.9566.9314.2775.7317.3873.7996.011
20154.4500.62011.0176.9364.0595.2867.1733.8216.053
20164.4130.47411.0946.9484.0725.2727.5873.8586.044
20174.4100.52811.1696.9464.0845.2147.6403.8846.133
20184.4410.68711.2186.9524.1045.1817.7713.9136.230
20194.4440.78511.2646.9494.1145.1687.8873.9146.319
20204.4410.80411.2986.9454.1324.9707.9033.9156.398
20214.4330.90111.4016.9434.1374.6707.9023.8986.468
20224.5380.78111.3096.9394.1404.5057.9413.8936.565
20234.4420.71611.3676.9374.1465.0248.0483.9256.648
Table 3. The estimation results of STIRPAT model for transportation industry.
Table 3. The estimation results of STIRPAT model for transportation industry.
FactorsUnstandardized CoefficientStandard Errort-Statisticp-ValueVIF
Constant term−23.5462.865−8.2180.000 ***-
Q1.7650.5353.2970.004 ***0.080
Z−0.2020.083−2.4410.024 **−0.058
R0.1610.0116.0050.000 ***0.232
P2.1360.16712.7720.000 ***0.204
C0.2990.0417.2430.000 ***0.184
K−0.1280.059−2.1860.041 **−0.056
H0.1980.0286.9910.000 ***0.202
D0.8630.0939.3010.000 ***0.204
R20.985
FF(8, 20) = 160.703, p = 0.000
Note: *** represents p < 0.01, ** represents p < 0.05.
Table 4. Growth rate settings for various influencing factors under different scenarios.
Table 4. Growth rate settings for various influencing factors under different scenarios.
YearScenarioRate Setting of Various Influencing Factors/%
Urbanization RateTotal Population at the End of Each YearPer Capita GDPProportion of Tertiary IndustryEnergy Consumption StructureCarbon Emission IntensityPassenger TurnoverCargo Turnover
2024–2025BEN2.04.06.02.0−0.2−4.013.52.4
LN1.83.04.02.5−0.4−5.010.02.0
SL1.52.52.53.0−0.6−8.08.01.8
2026–2030BEN1.52.05.51.5−0.4−3.54.01.5
LN1.21.53.52.0−0.8−4.03.01.4
SL1.01.22.02.5−1.0−6.02.01.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, J.; Wu, M.; Cao, W.; Wang, W.; Sun, P.; Luo, B.; Song, X.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, X. CO2 Emissions and Scenario Analysis of Transportation Sector Based on STIRPAT Model: A Case Study of Xuzhou in Northern Jiangsu. Eng 2025, 6, 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6080175

AMA Style

He J, Wu M, Cao W, Wang W, Sun P, Luo B, Song X, Peng Z, Zhang X. CO2 Emissions and Scenario Analysis of Transportation Sector Based on STIRPAT Model: A Case Study of Xuzhou in Northern Jiangsu. Eng. 2025; 6(8):175. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6080175

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Jinxian, Meng Wu, Wenjie Cao, Wenqiang Wang, Peilin Sun, Bin Luo, Xuejuan Song, Zhiwei Peng, and Xiaoli Zhang. 2025. "CO2 Emissions and Scenario Analysis of Transportation Sector Based on STIRPAT Model: A Case Study of Xuzhou in Northern Jiangsu" Eng 6, no. 8: 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6080175

APA Style

He, J., Wu, M., Cao, W., Wang, W., Sun, P., Luo, B., Song, X., Peng, Z., & Zhang, X. (2025). CO2 Emissions and Scenario Analysis of Transportation Sector Based on STIRPAT Model: A Case Study of Xuzhou in Northern Jiangsu. Eng, 6(8), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6080175

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop