Previous Article in Journal
A Novel H∞/H2 Pole Placement LFC Controller with Measured Disturbance Feedforward Action for Disturbed Interconnected Power Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Machine Learning-Driven Best–Worst Method for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0

1
Faculty of Engineering and IT, British University in Dubai, Dubai 345015, United Arab Emirates
2
Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Automation 2025, 6(4), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/automation6040091
Submission received: 2 September 2025 / Revised: 1 November 2025 / Accepted: 4 December 2025 / Published: 8 December 2025

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of Industry 4.0 technologies has created an urgent need for intelligent and reliable predictive maintenance (PdM) systems. While multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) frameworks like the Best–Worst Method (BWM) offer structured approaches for prioritizing maintenance tasks, their traditional reliance on subjective expert opinion limits their scalability and adaptability in dynamic industrial settings. This study addresses these limitations by introducing a robust, data-driven framework that integrates machine learning (ML) with BWM. This study presents a framework integrating ML models with BWM, an MCDM technique. While prior work has explored ML for fault detection/classification and hybrid MCDM + ML approaches, our innovation lies in automating BWM weight calculation via ML-derived feature importances, transforming tacit expert knowledge (traditionally subjective) into explicit, data-driven criteria weights aligned with Knowledge Management (KM) principles. The proposed methodology moves beyond a single-model proof-of-concept to present a comprehensive validation blueprint for industrial deployment. The framework’s efficacy is demonstrated using the standard Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) dataset, where rigorous cross-validation and statistical significance testing identified the optimal model, offering a compelling balance of high stability and efficiency for adaptive systems. Furthermore, simulations demonstrated the framework’s real-time viability, with low processing latency, and its resilience to concept drift through an adaptive retraining strategy. By integrating the empirically validated model’s feature importances into the BWM, this work establishes an objective, data-driven, and adaptive system for prioritizing maintenance, thereby advancing the transition toward autonomous and self-optimizing industrial ecosystems.
Keywords: Industry 4.0; predictive maintenance; Best–Worst Method (BWM); Machine Learning (ML); bearing fault diagnosis Industry 4.0; predictive maintenance; Best–Worst Method (BWM); Machine Learning (ML); bearing fault diagnosis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Megdadi, E.; Mohamed, A.; Shaalan, K. Machine Learning-Driven Best–Worst Method for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. Automation 2025, 6, 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation6040091

AMA Style

Megdadi E, Mohamed A, Shaalan K. Machine Learning-Driven Best–Worst Method for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. Automation. 2025; 6(4):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation6040091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Megdadi, Eyad, Azza Mohamed, and Khaled Shaalan. 2025. "Machine Learning-Driven Best–Worst Method for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0" Automation 6, no. 4: 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation6040091

APA Style

Megdadi, E., Mohamed, A., & Shaalan, K. (2025). Machine Learning-Driven Best–Worst Method for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. Automation, 6(4), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation6040091

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop