This research utilizes machine learning (ML)-based malicious node detection techniques to effectively incorporate security and trustworthiness into fifth-generation (5G) and Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) systems, in contrast to traditional methods that do not employ modern techniques. VANET may be vulnerable due to
[...] Read more.
This research utilizes machine learning (ML)-based malicious node detection techniques to effectively incorporate security and trustworthiness into fifth-generation (5G) and Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) systems, in contrast to traditional methods that do not employ modern techniques. VANET may be vulnerable due to vehicle mobility, network openness, and the conventional network architecture. Therefore, security and trust management using modern methodologies, such as ML approaches, is essential for 5G-enabled VANET integration, which has become a paramount concern. And due to limitations imposed by traditional security methods, which are unable to identify malicious nodes in VANET completely, processing delays are longer. Therefore, this research utilizes the VANET malicious-node dataset designed for real-time malicious node/attack detection in VANET. The proposed ML methodology uses a Random Forest (RF) and an optimized ensemble ML classifier, such as XGBoost and LightGBM, which require a security and trustworthiness solution provided by the RF Trust Extended Authentication (TEA). We simulate vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) mobility, communication behaviors, and trust metrics to assess the accuracy of malicious-vehicular-node features for the identification and detection of attacks, including False Injection, Sybil, blackhole, and Denial-of-Service (DoS). The proposed ML methodology also identifies these attack patterns, providing a realistic dataset for Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) research. In contrast, traditional VANET methods do not. We compared the performance of the proposed ML method with other literature-standard ML and RF methods using metrics such as accuracy, confusion matrices, and precision, Recall, and F1-score to measure effectiveness. In our proposed machine learning (ML) method, we achieve 99% accuracy in classifying MVN and predicting both attack, including False Injection, Sybil, blackhole, and Denial-of-Service (DoS), and benign classes, with precision, recall, and F1-score of 100% each, and establish a trustworthiness score of 100%, Whilst the standard models, such as other VANET methods achieved an accuracy of only 95%, with precision, recall, and F1-score of 98%, without a confusion matrix to confirm the model’s performance.
Full article