Next Article in Journal
Influence of Nitrogen Doping on Vacancy-Engineered T-Graphene Fragments: Insights into Electronic and Optical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
A Practical Guide Paper on Bulk and PLD Thin-Film Metals Commonly Used as Photocathodes in RF and SRF Guns
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fluorinated Ethers of Cannabinol (CBN)

Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University-Pueblo, 2200 Bonforte Blvd, Pueblo, CO 81001, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemistry 2025, 7(4), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7040125
Submission received: 16 June 2025 / Revised: 26 July 2025 / Accepted: 28 July 2025 / Published: 30 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)

Abstract

The difluoromethoxy (OCF2H) and trifluoromethoxy (OCF3) fluorinated structural motifs are frequently seen as privileged functional groups in the field of medicinal chemistry and are regularly taken into account during the design and development processes of successful drugs. This paper presents the synthesis of four new fluorinated etheric derivatives of cannabinol (CBN) using fluorine chemistry. These reactions are straightforward in terms of operation and make use of easily obtainable reagents, making them suitable for the synthesis of various fluorinated CBN ethers with yields ranging from moderate to excellent. We successfully isolated all the products and characterized them in detail using spectroscopic methods. It is anticipated that they will increase the efficacy of drug candidates due to their ability to alter biological activities such as cellular membrane permeability and metabolic stability and improve their pharmacokinetic properties.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Medicinal cannabinoids are gaining popularity globally, with a notable rise in the use of innovative cannabis products within communities. Cannabinoids, also known as isoprenylated resorcinyl polyketides, are produced and stored in the glandular trichomes of flower bracts [1,2]. They primarily exist in their carboxylic acid forms. The neutral form of cannabinoids is not present in significant quantities within the plant biomass but can be obtained through decarboxylation processes, such as heat, light, or chemical methods, applied to the naturally occurring acidic cannabinoids. This decarboxylation process transforms raw acidic cannabinoids into their biologically active and stable forms, provided that they are stored properly in an appropriate solvent. These neutral cannabinoids interact with the endocannabinoid system (ECS), which comprises cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) located throughout the body, including the central and peripheral nervous systems [3]. As a result, a range of effects, from euphoria to relaxation, can be observed, influenced by the presence of several major and minor cannabinoids. Following thorough investigations into prominent cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC), the scientific community is now turning its attention to minor cannabinoids. While a number of these minor cannabinoids may exhibit significant biological effects, they have often been neglected due to their limited natural availability.
Cannabinol (CBN, 1, Figure 1) is a distinct minor phytocannabinoid that has garnered considerable attention within the scientific community globally due to its notable effects. While various plants and fungi have been identified to contain different phytocannabinoids, CBN is exclusively found in the cannabis plant. The biosynthesis of CBN and cannabinolic acid (CBNA) remains unclear [4,5]. Both CBNA and CBN are byproducts of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC) degradation, which occurs when air oxidation induces aromatization at the menthyl moiety [4]. Nonetheless, minute quantities of CBNA have been discovered in certain hemp samples, indicating that, under certain conditions, oxidative degradation might also advance to ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), the acidic precursor of ∆9-THC, as well as occur prior to decarboxylation.
Cannabinol (CBN) is a crucial compound due to its stability and strong chemical relationship with ∆9-THC, which serves as a marker for identifying narcotic cannabis in prehistoric plants [5,6,7]. CBN acts as a weak partial agonist at CB1 and CB2 and elicits varied responses from different receptor types. Compared to ∆9-THC, CBN has a 10-fold lower affinity for CB1 receptors and less effectively inhibits adenylyl cyclase’s CB1 receptor-mediated activity. However, CBN regulates various types of TRPs, acting as an agonist on channels such as TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV3, and TRPV4, leading to an influx of Ca2+ and initiating Cadependent signaling pathways within cells. Regarding other TRP variations, CBN functions as a potent antagonist to stop icilin from activating TRPM8 (also known as CMR1, or cold and menthol receptor 1). CBN’s analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties may help treat pain and glaucoma. It also helps reduce cell damage and has antioxidant properties along with antibacterial activity against resistant strains of bacteria. Furthermore, it can serve as an appetite-stimulating medication in circumstances where boosting hunger is beneficial, as well as hold promise in the treatment of epidermolysis bullosa [8]. Recent research has indicated that its key primary metabolite, 11-OH-CBN (1a, Figure 1), attained similarly elevated concentrations in the brain, indicating that it may be involved in the sedative properties of CBN [9]. When assessed for their impact on cannabinoid CB1 receptors linked to sleep regulation, CBN and its ultimate metabolite, 11-COOH-CBN (1b), showed minimal activity. In comparison, the primary metabolite 1a functioned as a partial agonist, showcasing potency and efficacy comparable to that of Δ9-THC in the membrane potential assay. Overall, CBN’s unique biological activities could open up new possibilities for research and treatment.
Researchers examining the systemic absorption and bioavailability of cannabinoids are growing increasingly intrigued each day [10,11,12]. Recent clinical studies in the pharmaceutical industry have concentrated on innovations in drug delivery, while the recreational market is also progressing towards better excipients and techniques aimed at enhancing absorption throughout the body. Despite progress in scientific research, certain inherent issues, such as low bioavailability and inconsistent pharmacokinetic profiles, hinder the clinical approval of cannabinoids. These challenges impact the use of cannabinoids in both disease treatment and preventive healthcare despite their wide-ranging therapeutic potential. It is also essential to consider oxidative degradation and potential interactions with other medications when combining drugs with cannabinoids. Phytocannabinoids demonstrate complex and poorly understood pharmacological properties, making it challenging to systematically analyze them alongside unapproved synthetic cannabinoids and unknown mixtures to minimize variability. Consequently, there is a demand for strategies that enhance bioavailability and mitigate the adverse effects linked to cannabinoid use. By strategically adding one or more fluorine atoms to the molecule, such as trifluoromethoxy (-OCF3) and difluoromethoxy (-OCF2H) groups, the drug’s dynamic properties and pharmacokinetics can be dramatically altered [13,14]. Some of the main advantages include the strong C–F bond dissociation energy (130 kcal mol−1) and the bond length, which is between the C–H and C–O bonds, albeit closer to the latter. The incorporation of fluorine substituents to block physiologically labile positions can tackle the low metabolic stability of pharmaceuticals. The electrostatic Cδ+–Fδ− component of the C–F bond makes it highly polarized and contributes to its stability. Because of their ability to mimic functional groups in biologically active compounds, medications and drugs featuring various fluorine groups are now commonly found on the market. Pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals often incorporate OCF3 and OCF2H groups to enhance the drug’s absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties. Following the recent exploration of oxidative fluorination on CBN, this report outlines the synthesis of four distinct fluorinated ether derivatives of CBN through simple aqueous base chemistry [15].

2. Results and Discussion

The -OCF2H group has unique and different properties, such as the highly polarized C–H bond, which can act as a more competent H-bond donor (hydrogen bond acidity, i.e., A > 0.05) than its methylated analogs (A < 0.001). Therefore, it is able to interact with the heteroatom in the host protein [16,17]. It is the most suitable bioisostere/isoelectronic functional group for alcohol (-OH), amine (-NH2), and thiol group (-SH) units in drug design, as is evident from its presence in several FDA drugs, herbicides, fungicides, and agrochemicals. Interestingly, the H bond acidity of ArOCF2H (A = 0.10) was found to be similar to that of thiophenol (A = 0.12) and aniline (A = 0.07). The isosteric relationship between the CF2 fragment and ethereal oxygen makes it distinguishable from other polyfluorinated motifs. Compared to ArOCF3, ArOCF2H compounds tend to have higher permeability and less lipophilicity (40.5% reduction in log D) in a set of lead-like drug structures studied that contain anisoles. Being the bulkier analog of OCF3, OCF2H is also a strong electron-withdrawing group, which could decrease the electron density of the potential drug. It is also capable of H donation, thereby improving the binding selectivity of a molecule. ArOCF2H compounds, in contrast to ArOCF3, have no orientational preference for either conformation (dihedral angle (θ) = 0–50°). Since they can adopt the conformation that provides the optimum binding to the target proteins, difluoromethyl ethers are more desirable in medicinal research.
The difluorination of CBN (1) started with difluoromethyltriflate (HCF2OTf) as the fluorinating reagent, which is a non-ozone-depleting liquid [18]. The HCF2OTf reagent can be easily made in high yield using readily available non-ozone-depleting reagents, TMSCF3 (Ruppert–Prakash reagent) and triflic acid with catalytic TiCl4 at room temperature. HCF2OTf has a good leaving triflate (-OTf) group and is an air-stable, easily handled liquid. The addition of HCF2OTf (1 equiv.) at room temperature (rt) to a CBN solution in a 1:1 combination of MeCN and aqueous KOH (6 M) did not lead to the full conversion of CBN. Increasing the concentration of HCF2OTf (3 equiv.) with CBN in a 1:1 combination of MeCN and aqueous KOH (6 M) solution at rt resulted in complete conversion in 4–5 h. Shorter times were insufficient to complete the CBN conversion. Despite seeing a single TLC spot, the 19F NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture indicated a singlet at −73.51 ppm and a doublet at −79.68 ppm in the ratio of 53:47 (shown by arrows in Figure 2b). Similarly, characterization data, including proton and carbon NMR and mass spectra, suggest an inseparable mixture of the difluoromethyl ether of cannabinol (2) and cannabinol triflate (3), as shown in Figure 2a.
To verify the triflate formation, a separate reaction on CBN resulted in the formation of cannabinol triflate (3). The CBN reaction with triflic anhydride in the presence of 5% (w/v) aqueous LiOH and toluene, at a temperature < 10 °C, gives an 84% isolated yield of 3 [19]. The singlet peak at −73.53 ppm in the 19F NMR spectrum of 3 also confirms the formation of cannabinol triflate in the earlier HCF2OTf reaction mixture. Afterward, the previously obtained inseparable mixture of 2 and 3 was subjected to a selective deprotection reaction. This was carried out by utilizing tetraethylammonium hydroxide (Et4NOH) in dioxane (2 mL) solvent at rt for 4 h [20]. As a result, the triflate group hydrolyzed back into CBN, without adversely impacting the difluoromethyl ether of cannabinol (2) present within the reaction mixture (Figure 2). The isolated yield of 2 gives a doublet peak at −79.68 ppm in the 19F NMR spectrum.
Following the successful installation of OCF2H, the OCF3 group was selected. The O-CF3 group in ArOCF3 is orthogonal to the aromatic plane, which is beneficial for providing additional binding affinity in drug–target complexes [21,22,23]. This unusual configuration results from the negative hyperconjugation (no → σ*C–F) and the steric interaction between the CF3 group and the ortho-hydrogen atoms of the aromatic ring. The OCF3 group is able to rotate freely and adopt a more stable conformation where the dihedral angle (θ) of the C=C–O–CF3 bond is close to 90°. This is because these interactions significantly weaken the tendency of the oxygen lone pair electrons to delocalize into the aromatic ring. The trifluoromethoxy group outperforms both the methoxy (-OCH3) and trifluoromethyl groups (-CF3), as measured by its ability to trigger a hydrogen/metal permutation at an ortho position. Even when it is situated in a more remote meta or even para position, OCF3 is able to have a long-range action (high electronegativity). The presence of the OCF3 group improves metabolic stability and increases lipophilicity, resulting in improved absorption and transport in biological systems [21,22]. The addition of the OCF3 group to organic molecules can enhance the disparity between their melting point and boiling point at normal pressure, while reducing their surface tension, dielectric constant, and pour point. This is also crucial for other fields, for example, the development of electro-optical materials, soluble organic semiconductors, and melt-processable fluoropolymers.
Moving to trifluorination on CBN, a silver triflate-mediated oxidative trifluoromethylation method by Liu et al. was applied [24]. This standard and straightforward approach uses nucleophilic CF3SiMe3 as the CF3 source in the presence of oxidants for the synthesis of trifluoromethyl ethers under mild reaction conditions. The usage of both Selectfluor and NFSI as oxidants is shown to be critical for the successful trifluoromethylation reaction, resulting in a low product yield (10%) (5). It is believed that the low yield of trifluoromethylated cannabinol (5) resulted from the highly reactive properties of cannabinol when exposed to a complex reactive mixture (see Figure 3). Furthermore, even the addition of 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol as an additive to prevent competitive trifluoromethylation of the phenyl rings with electrophilic CF3 radicals resulted in an inseparable reaction mixture.
With the intention of getting a better yield, the appealing approach of synthesis of aryltrifluoromethyl ethers (ArOCF3) by combining O-carboxydifluoromethylation and subsequent silver-catalyzed decarboxylative fluorination was chosen [25]. This process is similar to the Hunsdiecker-type exchange of the carboxylic group in aryloxydifluoroacetic acids with fluorine. The intermediate O-carboxydifluoromethylated cannabinol (4) was prepared using sodium hydride as the base and the more reactive sodium bromodifluoroacetate (BrCF2COONa) as a general carboxydifluoromethylation reagent (Figure 3). With a 94% yield, the novel product 4 was isolated and characterized. The “fluorodecarboxylation” process was then attempted using intermediate 4 and silver catalysis of AgNO3 with the electrophilic fluorination reagent (Selectfluor) at 80 °C for 12 h. Unfortunately, the step 2 (Figure 3) effort to obtain trifluoromethylated cannabinol (5) from compound 4 did not yield the expected success, as hypothesized in the literature [25]. Other procedures that could effectively produce 5 in a less complex reaction mixture are currently being considered.
Cannabinoids are highly reactive and non-polar compounds, making them susceptible to degradation, even at room temperature. This degradation can reduce their potency and possibly lead to the formation of other unknown or harmful compounds. Cannabinoids possess multiple active sites that play a crucial role in their interactions within the body and their potential therapeutic effects. For example, they exert their influence by binding to specific cannabinoid receptors, primarily CB1 and CB2, located on cell surfaces, or by interacting with other receptors and ion channels, contributing to their diverse effects. The unique structure of each cannabinoid, along with its active sites, determines its binding affinity and the resulting physiological responses. Therefore, functionalizing these compounds without altering their core structure presents significant challenges, and current transformations are showing regioselectivity in the production of etheric CBN derivatives.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Information

Unless otherwise noted, all chemicals/reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers—Sigma Aldrich/Merck and Thermo Fischer—and used without purification. All manipulations were conducted on the benchtop without any exclusion of air or moisture, unless otherwise noted. Reactions were conducted in 5 mL vials fitted with Teflon-lined screw caps, unless otherwise noted. HCF2OTf was prepared according to the published procedure [26]. BrCF2COONa was prepared similarly to BrCF2CO2K [27]. Reactions were monitored through thin-layer chromatography (TLC silica gel F254, glass plates) and analyzed using 254 nm UV light and iodine or ninhydrin stains; 1H NMR, 19F NMR, and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a 300 MHz Bruker Avance spectrometer (1H = 300; 19F = 282.5 and 13C = 75 MHz), as presented in the Supplementary Materials. Chemical shift values of 1H NMR spectra were recorded in parts per million (ppm, δ) relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS, 0.00 ppm). Multiplicities are indicated as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), m (multiplet), and coupling constants (J) were reported in Hertz (Hz) with integration value. Chemical shift values of 13C NMR spectra were recorded in parts per million (ppm, δ) and calibrated to the residual peak as an internal standard (CDCl3: δ = 77.0 ppm; DMSO: δ = 39.0 ppm). Chemical shift values of the 19F NMR spectra were recorded in parts per million (ppm, δ) relative to CFCl3, 0.00 ppm. Mass spectra were obtained using the APCI+ method on an Advion Expression/Plate Express TLC–mass spectrometer. IR peaks were observed on an infrared spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50 FTIR).

3.2. Difluorination of CBN to a Mixture of Difluoromethyl Ether of Cannabinol and Cannabinol Triflate

1-(difluoromethoxy)-6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-6H-benzo[c]chromene (2, 53% yield) and 6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-6H-benzo[c]chromen-1-yl trifluoromethanesulfonate (3, 47% yield). Cannabinol (1, 100 mg, 0.32 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), acetonitrile (2.0 mL), and 6 M aqueous KOH (1.0 mL) were placed into a 5 mL vial. The mixture was stirred rapidly at room temperature, and HCF2OTf (194 µL, 0.96 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) was added at once. Note: the reactions are exothermic. The mixture was stirred vigorously for 4–5 h. After the TLC indicated the total consumption of the starting material, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool at ambient temperature. On a 5 cm × 10 cm TLC plate (silica gel 60 F254) in a 5% diethyl ether: hexane solvent system, the reaction mixture showed only one spot at Rf = 0.63. The reaction was diluted with H2O (15 mL) and extracted with ether (2 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude compound (120 mg) was then purified using silica gel chromatography (silica gel, hexane/Et2O). Despite a single spot, all the characterization data (given below) indicated an inseparable mixture of difluoromethyl ether of cannabinol (2) and cannabinol triflate (3) in the ratio of 53:47 (as determined by the 19F NMR spectra).
Chemistry 07 00125 i001
1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ = 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.84 (s, 0.59H), 7.15–7.087 (m, 3H), 6.836–6.833 (m, 1H), 6.76 (s, 0.24H), 6.698–6.95 (m, 1H), 6.60 (s, 1H), 6.51 (s, 0.5H), 6.26 (s, 0.25H), 2.58–2.53 (m, 3H), 2.37 (s, 5H), 1.64–1.59 (m, 3H), 1.59 (s, 11H), 1.34–1.29 (m, 7H), 0.91–0.87 (m, 5H).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) δ = −73.51 (s, 3F), −79.68 (d, J = 73.3 Hz, 2F).
ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) calculated for 2, C22H27F2O2 [M + H]+: 361.1979; observed: 361.2. Unit resolution (APCI+) calculated for 3, C22H26F3O4S[M + H]+: 443.1504; observed: 443.1.
FT-IR (neat) νmax: 2958, 2927, 2852, 1618, 1419, 1215, 1119, 1046, 817, 600 cm−1.
13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ = 154.9, 154.7, 148.7 (t, J = 2.25 Hz, 1C), 146.0, 144.8, 144.8, 137.4, 137.3, 137.15, 137.12, 129.2, 128.4, 127.1, 126.8, 126.1, 125.1, 122.7, 122.6, 120.7, 118.0, 116.7 (t, J = 255.5 Hz, OCF2H), 116.4, 115.5, 115.4, 115.1, 112.9, 112.8, 78.2, 77.5, 35.6, 35.5, 31.4, 31.3, 30.4, 30.3, 27.1, 26.7, 22.5, 22.4, 21.4, 21.2, 14.0, 13.9. Note: according to the literature, a standard quartet of triflate molecule (~118 ppm with J = 320 Hz) is merged with other carbon peaks.

3.3. Deprotection Reaction on the Mixture of Difluoromethyl Ether of Cannabinol and Cannabinol Triflate to Yield the Difluoromethyl Ether of CBN

1-(difluoromethoxy)-6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-6H-benzo[c]chromene (2, 42 mg, 92% yield). The mixture of 2 and 3 (80 mg, 0.180 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and dioxane (2.0 mL) were placed into a 5 mL vial and stirred for 40 sec at room temperature. Et4NOH was added dropwise (54 µL, 0.36 mmol, 2.1 equiv.), and the mixture was stirred for 4 h at the same temperature. After the indicated time, TLC indicated the formation of CBN, giving Rf = 0.40 for it; the reaction mixture was diluted with CHCl3, washed with 1 M aq. HCl, water, and brine. The organic layer was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo. The crude compound (69 mg) was then purified by silica gel chromatography (silica gel, hexane/EtOAc), resulting in 42 mg of 2 and 37 mg of CBN (1).
Chemistry 07 00125 i002
1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ = 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.15–7.09 (m, 2H), 6.76–6.51 (m, 3H), 2.56 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 1.67–1.62 (m, 8H), 1.34–1.30 (m, 4H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) δ = −79.68 (d, J = 76.1 Hz, 2F).
ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) calculated for 2, C22H27F2O2 [M + H]+: 361.1979; observed: 361.3.
FT-IR (neat) νmax: 2962, 2928, 2859, 1625, 1384, 1157, 1125, 1050, 815 cm−1.
13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ = 154.6, 148.6, 144.7, 137.12, 137.11, 128.4, 127.1, 126.1, 122.6, 116.7 (t, J = 256.05 Hz, OCF2H), 115.4, 112.9, 112.8, 77.9, 35.6, 31.4, 30.4, 27.1, 22.5, 21.4, 14.0.

3.4. Cannabinol to Cannabinol Triflate Synthesis

6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-6H-benzo[c]chromen-1-yl trifluoromethanesulfonate (3, 600 mg (84%) yield). A biphasic mixture of toluene (5 mL), 5% (w/v) aqueous LiOH (5 mL), and CBN (500 mg, 1.61 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) were placed into a cool (0 °C) vial, and Tf2O (2.41 mmol) was added dropwise at a rate to maintain the reaction temperature < 10 °C. The reaction was allowed to warm at room temperature and stirred for 30 min. The organic toluene layer was separated and washed with water (15 mL). The organic layer was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo. The crude compound (702 mg, Rf = 0.63) was then purified using silica gel chromatography (silica gel, hexane/EtOAc), resulting in 600 mg of 3.
Chemistry 07 00125 i003
1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ = 7.84 (s, 1H), 7.17–7.11 (m, 2H), 6.83 (s, 1H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 2.58 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.66–1.59 (m, 8H), 1.37–1.32 (m, 4H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) δ = −73.53 (s, 3F).
ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) calculated for 3, C22H26F3O4S [M + H]+: 442.1426; observed: 443.2.
FT-IR (neat) νmax: 2958, 2928, 2861, 1629, 1425, 1208, 1139, 971, 819, 604 cm−1.
13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ = 154.9, 146.0, 144.8, 137.4, 137.3, 129.2, 126.8, 125.1, 122.7, 118.6 (q, J = 318.8 Hz, SOCF3), 118.0, 115.5, 115.2, 78.2, 35.5, 31.3, 30.3, 26.7, 22.4, 21.2, 13.9.

3.5. O-Carboxydifluoromethylated Cannabinol Ether Derivative Preparation

2,2-difluoro-2-((6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-6H-benzo[c]chromen-1-yl)oxy)acetic acid (4, 94.2% yield). Cannabinol and 1 (200 mg, 0.644 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) were added into a 10 mL oven-dried vial equipped with a stir bar under an N2 atmosphere; 1,4-dioxane (2.0 mL) was added to dissolve cannabinol. Then, NaH (60% purity) (21 mg, 0.708 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) and 1,4-dioxane (2 mL) were added while stirring at room temperature under N2. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 30 min; then, BrCF2COONa (140 mg, 0.708 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) and 1,4-dioxane (1 mL) were added. After the mixture was heated at 60 °C for 12 h (monitored by TLC), it was cooled down to room temperature and acidified with 3 M HCl (aq.) to pH = 1. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate 3 times. The combined organic phase was washed with saturated brine and dried over MgSO4. After the solution was filtered and the solvent was evaporated under vacuum, the crude product (250 mg) was purified using flash column chromatography with petroleum ether and ethyl acetate as eluents to give a 94.2% yield of O-difluoromethylated cannabinol derivative, 4.
Chemistry 07 00125 i004
1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ = 11.62 (s, 1H), 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.13–7.05 (m, 2H), 6.82 (s, 1H), 6.77 (s, 1H), 2.56 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 1.67–1.588 (m, 8H), 1.33–1.28 (m, 4H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) δ = −76.14 (s, 2F).
ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) calculated for 2, C23H27F2O4 [M + H]+: 404.1799; observed: 405.2.
FT-IR (neat) νmax: 2958, 2930, 2861, 1766, 1626, 1153, 1126, 1051, 1027, 819 cm−1.
13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ = 179.2 (EtOAc), 164.0 (t, J = 42.0 Hz, 1C), 154.3, 145.9, 144.4, 137.2, 137.0, 128.6, 127.4, 126.1, 122.4, 116.5, 116.0, 115.1, 113.8 (t, J = 270.75 Hz, 1C), 78.0, 61.9 (EtOAc), 35.6, 31.4, 30.4, 26.9, 22.5, 21.2, 14.0.

3.6. O-Trifluoromethylated Cannabinol Ether Derivative Preparation

6,6,9-trimethyl-3-pentyl-1-(trifluoromethoxy)-6H-benzo[c]chromene (5, 10% yield). To a reaction tube along with a stir bar, AgOTf (2.48 g, 9.66 mmol, 5.0 equiv.), Selectfluor (1.36 g, 3.86 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), NFSI (1.21 g, 3.86 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), CsF (1.76 g, 11.5 mmol, 6.0 equiv.), and CBN (1.93 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) were all added one after the other in a nitrogen-filled glovebox. Next, under an Ar environment, the addition of toluene (5 mL), benzotrifluoride (10.0 mL), 2-fluoropyridine (938.2 mg, 9.66 mmol, 5.0 equiv.), and CF3TMS (1.37 g, 9.66 mmol, 5.0 equiv.) was made. Stirring was carried out with the reaction mixture at room temperature. The reaction mixture was filtered through a silica plug that had been eluted with ethanol after 10 h. After the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo, column chromatography was used to purify the final product (Rf = 0.8 in a 5% diethyl ether: hexane solvent system).
Chemistry 07 00125 i005
1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ = 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.16–7.09 (m, 2H), 6.76 (s, 2H), 2.57 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 1.64–1.59 (m, 8H), 1.37–1.25 (m, 4H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) δ = −57.11 (s, 3F).
ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) calculated for 5, C22H26F3O2 [M + H]+: 379.1885; observed: 379.4.
FT-IR (neat) νmax: 2962, 2926, 2859, 1627, 1246, 1220, 1169, 1058, 815 cm−1.
13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) δ = 154.5, 145.9, 144.5, 137.2, 137.1, 128.6, 126.9, 126.0, 122.5, 120.6 (d, J = 255.7 Hz, 1C), 116.7, 115.1, 114.6, 77.7, 35.5, 31.3, 30.4, 26.9, 22.4, 21.4, 14.0.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed the synthesis of four different and novel fluorinated ethers from cannabinol (CBN), including the -OCF3, -OCF2COOH, -OCF2H, and -OSO2CF3 groups. These reactions are operationally simple and utilize readily accessible reagents, and thus are practical for the synthesis of different fluorinated CBN ethers in modest to excellent yields. All products were effectively isolated and fully characterized spectroscopically. Future plans are being developed for studies of the structure–activity relationships and biological properties of these compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/chemistry7040125/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) of the mixture of 2 and 3; Figure S2: 19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) of the mixture of 2 and 3; Figure S3: ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) data of the mixture of 2 and 3; Figure S4: FT-IR (neat) of mixture of 2 and 3; Figure S5: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) of the mixture of 2 and 3; Figure S6: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) of compound 2; Figure S7: 19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) of compound 2; Figure S8: ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) data of compound 2; Figure S9: FT-IR (neat) of compound 2; Figure S10: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) of compound 2; Figure S11: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) of compound 3; Figure S12: 19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) of compound 3; Figure S13: ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) data of compound 3; Figure S14: FT-IR (neat) of compound 3; Figure S15: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) of compound 3; Figure S16: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) of compound 4; Figure S17: 19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) of compound 4; Figure S18: ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) data of compound 4; Figure S19: FT-IR (neat) of compound 4; Figure S20: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) of compound 4; Figure S21: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) of compound 5; Figure S22: 19F NMR (CDCl3, 282.5 MHz) of compound 5; Figure S23: ADVION- Unit resolution (APCI+) data of compound 5; Figure S24: FT-IR (neat) of compound 5; Figure S25: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz) of compound 5.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U., M.D. and K.J.O.; methodology, U. and M.D.; investigation, U. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, U.; writing—review and editing, M.D.; funding acquisition, K.J.O. and M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant funded by the Institute of Cannabis Research (ICR-1100103/2021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author (M.D.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Desaulniers Brousseau, V.; Wu, B.S.; MacPherson, S.; Morello, V.; Lefsrud, M. Cannabinoids and terpenes: How production of photo-protectants can be manipulated to enhance Cannabis sativa L. phytochemistry. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 620021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Christelle, M.A.; Jean-Francois, H.; Gea, G. Cannabis sativa: The plant of the thousand and one molecules. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 19. [Google Scholar]
  3. Russo, E.B.; Marcu, J. Cannabis pharmacology: The usual suspects and a few promising leads. Adv. Pharmacol. 2017, 80, 67–134. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Walsh, K.B.; McKinney, A.E.; Holmes, A.E. Minor cannabinoids: Biosynthesis, molecular pharmacology and potential therapeutic uses. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 777804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maioli, C.; Mattoteia, D.; Amin, H.I.M.; Minassi, A.; Caprioglio, D. Cannabinol: History, syntheses, and biological profile of the greatest “minor” cannabinoid. Plants 2022, 11, 2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Patil, N.; Chandel, V.; Rana, A.; Jain, M.; Kaushik, P. Investigation of cannabis sativa phytochemicals as anti-alzheimer’s agents: An in silico study. Plants 2023, 12, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schwarz, A.M.; Kobeci, D.; Mancuso, J.; Moreno-Rodriguez, V.; Seekins, C.; Bui, T.; Welborn, A.; Carr, J.; Streicher, J.M. Select minor cannabinoids from cannabis sativa are cannabimimetic and antinociceptive in a mouse model of chronic neuropathic pain. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 2024, 391, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schräder, N.H.B.; Gorell, E.S.; Stewart, R.E.; Duipmans, J.C.; Harris, N.; Perez, V.A.; Tang, J.Y.; Wolff, A.P.; Bolling, M.C. Cannabinoid use and effects in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: An international cross-sectional survey study. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2021, 16, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arnold, J.C.; Hanbury-Brown, C.V.O.; Anderson, L.L.; Bedoya-Perez, M.A.; Udoh, M.; Sharman, L.A.; Raymond, J.S.; Doohan, P.T.; Ametovski, A.; McGregor, I.S. A sleepy cannabis constituent: Cannabinol and its active metabolite influence sleep architecture in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 2025, 50, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chayasirisobhon, S. Mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics of cannabis. Perm. J. 2020, 25, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lucas, C.J.; Galettis, P.; Schneider, J. The pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 2477–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bar-Hai, A.; Domb, A.J.; Hoffman, A. Strategies for enhancing the oral bioavailability of cannabinoids. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2022, 18, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gillis, E.P.; Eastman, K.J.; Hill, M.D.; Donnelly, D.J.; Meanwell, N.A. Applications of fluorine in medicinal chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 8315–8359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, J.W.; Lee, K.N.; Ngai, Y.M. Synthesis of tri- and difluoromethoxylated compounds by visible-light photoredox catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 11171–11181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Urvashi; Druelinger, M.; Hatfield, J.; Olejar, K.J. Electrophilic fluorination of cannabinol (CBN). Org. Biomol. Chem. 2025, 23, 4855–4859. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sap, J.B.I.; Meyer, C.F.; Straathof, N.J.W.; Iwumene, N.; am Ende, C.W.; Trabanco, A.A.; Gouverneur, V. Late-stage difluoromethylation: Concepts, developments and perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8214–8247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Geng, Y.; Zhu, M.; Liang, A.; Niu, C.; Li, J.; Zou, D.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y. O-difluorodeuteromethylation of phenols using difluorocarbene precursors and deuterium oxide. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 1807–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fier, P.S.; Hartwig, J.F. Synthesis of difluoromethyl ethers with difluoromethyltriflate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2092–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frantz, D.E.; Weaver, D.G.; Carey, J.P.; Kress, M.H.; Dolling, U.H. Practical synthesis of aryl triflates under aqueous conditions. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4717–4718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ohgiya, T.; Nishiyama, S.A. A simple deprotection of triflate esters of phenol derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6317–6320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Sorochinsky, A.E.; Butler, G.; Han, J.; Soloshonok, V.A. Advances in the development of trifluoromethoxylation reagents. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feng, P.; Lee, K.N.; Lee, J.W.; Zhanab, C.; Ngai, M.-Y. Access to a new class of synthetic building blocks via trifluoromethoxylation of pyridines and pyrimidines. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Castagnetti, E.; Schlosser, M. The trifluoromethoxy group: A long-range electron-withdrawing substituent. Chemistry 2002, 8, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, J.-B.; Chen, C.; Chu, L.; Chen, Z.-H.; Xu, X.-H.; Qing, F.-L. silver-mediated oxidative trifluoromethylation of phenols: Direct synthesis of aryl trifluoromethyl ethers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11839–11842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, M.; Ni, C.; He, Z.; Hu, J. O-trifluoromethylation of phenols: Access to aryl trifluoromethyl ethers by o-carboxydifluoromethylation and decarboxylative fluorination. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 3754–3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Levin, V.V.; Dilman, A.D.; Belyakov, P.A.; Struchkova, M.I.; Tartakovsky, V.A. Reaction of the Ruppert–Prakash reagent with perfluorosulfonic acids. J. Fluor. Chem. 2009, 130, 667–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zheng, J.; Cai, J.; Lin, J.H.; Guo, Y.; Xiao, J.-C. Synthesis and decarboxylative Wittig reaction of difluoromethylene phosphobetaine. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Overview of cannabinol (CBN, 1) and its metabolites (1a,1b).
Figure 1. Overview of cannabinol (CBN, 1) and its metabolites (1a,1b).
Chemistry 07 00125 g001
Figure 2. (a) Difluorination reaction on cannabinol (CBN, 1) yielding difluoromethylated cannabinol (2) and cannabinol triflate (3); (b) 19F NMR of the reaction mixture (2) and (3).
Figure 2. (a) Difluorination reaction on cannabinol (CBN, 1) yielding difluoromethylated cannabinol (2) and cannabinol triflate (3); (b) 19F NMR of the reaction mixture (2) and (3).
Chemistry 07 00125 g002
Figure 3. Difluorination and trifluorination reactions on CBN yielding carboxy-difluoromethylated (4) and trifluoromethylated cannabinol molecules (5).
Figure 3. Difluorination and trifluorination reactions on CBN yielding carboxy-difluoromethylated (4) and trifluoromethylated cannabinol molecules (5).
Chemistry 07 00125 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Urvashi; Druelinger, M.; Hatfield, J.; Olejar, K.J. Fluorinated Ethers of Cannabinol (CBN). Chemistry 2025, 7, 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7040125

AMA Style

Urvashi, Druelinger M, Hatfield J, Olejar KJ. Fluorinated Ethers of Cannabinol (CBN). Chemistry. 2025; 7(4):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7040125

Chicago/Turabian Style

Urvashi, Melvin Druelinger, John Hatfield, and Kenneth J. Olejar. 2025. "Fluorinated Ethers of Cannabinol (CBN)" Chemistry 7, no. 4: 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7040125

APA Style

Urvashi, Druelinger, M., Hatfield, J., & Olejar, K. J. (2025). Fluorinated Ethers of Cannabinol (CBN). Chemistry, 7(4), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7040125

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop