You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Julián Vera-Salgado,
  • Carolina Calderón-Chiu and
  • Montserrat Calderón-Santoyo
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Ivan M. Savic Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Minor remarks

Please, use the abbreviated terms that were previously defined in the manuscript. For instance, the defined abbreviated term for ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was not used everywhere, etc.

Latin words should be depicted in italics.

All minor remarks are highlighted in the document.

 

Major remarks

The topic and significance of the study should be retyped and better presented.

 

Please, consider presenting some results in the figure, maybe the schematic representation of your work.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

"Please see the attachment"

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

The selected raw material and green method of extraction are quite interesting. There are a few suggestions that I will expose in order to improve the quality of the paper. In the Abstract, you should exclude the explanation of IC50 since it is a common fact. Also, please reduce the number of keywords to 5. In section 2.3., when stating the solid/liquid ratio it is enough to put (w/v) if it is in g/mL.   

The paper is highly rated in terms of originality, significance of content and interest to the readers. However, I have to draw attention to inappropriate self-citations by authors.

Kind regards

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf