Next Article in Journal
Analytical Model and FE Implementation for FRCM-Retrofitted Flat Masonry Under Direct Shear Tests
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of Microwave Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Mg0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4/Polystyrene/Activated Carbon Composites with Core-Shell Structure
Previous Article in Journal
Water Absorption and Mechanical Durability of Ramie–Flax Fibre-Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Biomass-Reinforced PLA Composites for 3D Printing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lay-Up Optimization for Bicycle Frame Tubular Composite Structures Produced with Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT)

Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10(4), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040176
Submission received: 29 January 2026 / Revised: 12 March 2026 / Accepted: 19 March 2026 / Published: 25 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Journal of Composites Science in 2026)

Abstract

With Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT), fibers are reformatted into highly oriented epoxy prepreg tapes, enabling the structural reuse of recycled composite waste. The present study investigates whether discontinuous fiber laminates produced with AFFT can be characterized and optimized with the same finite-element workflows long established for continuous fiber composites and whether the resulting structures meet demanding stiffness targets. Initially, various manufacturing methods were adopted, including vacuum bagging, compression molding at 7 bar to simulate autoclave conditions, and compression molding at 90 bar, comprising the three most reasonable manufacturing processes for AFFT laminates. Experimentally measured orthotropic properties were introduced into a finite-element model representing an idealized bicycle top tube, which was chosen as a case study. A genetic algorithm screened candidate stacking sequences, minimizing the combined bending-and-torsion deflection. The best lay-ups reduced deformation by more than 30% compared to a quasi-isotropic baseline, showing that well-oriented short fibers can significantly contribute to the stiffness of composites. Tubes produced with the optimized lay-up were tested in three-point bending tests, and the measured stiffness matched simulations within 5%. These results confirm a key point for sustainable engineering: despite the absence of continuous fibers, conventional simulation strategies accurately predict the performance of AFFT laminates and can be used as the basis for effective genetic optimization. This validation is significant: it enables the design of stiff, high-performance structures from recycled materials using established, cost-effective methods. By proving that optimization strategies developed for traditional continuous fiber composites apply to AFFT, this study offers a trusted and accessible pathway to scale circular economy solutions in next-generation composite products.

1. Introduction

Carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRPs) have become indispensable in aerospace, wind energy and high-performance sporting goods thanks to their outstanding stiffness-to-weight ratio and fatigue resistance [1]. The global CFRC market is forecast to exceed $20 billion by 2028, expanding at more than 10% per year and outpacing the broader composite sector [2,3]. This growth raises two sustainability concerns. First, producing virgin carbon fiber is highly energy-intensive, consuming 200–600 MJ kg−1, which potentially releases up to 20 kg CO2 eq. per kilogram of fiber [4]. Second, end-of-life composites are still predominantly landfilled or incinerated, a trajectory that could generate more than 500 kt of CFRC waste annually by 2050 [5,6,7,8]. In response, the European waste management hierarchy emphasizes prevention, reuse and recycling before disposal [9].
Recovering fibers from thermoset composites through pyrolysis or solvolysis is technically feasible, yet the filaments emerge only a few millimeters long with degraded sizing [10]. When reincorporated through conventional short-fiber routes, such as mechanical grinding [11], melt compounding or non-woven mats, their mechanical performance is severely curtailed [12,13]. Realigning the discontinuous fibers is therefore a pivotal step. Yet for these recycled materials to be adopted in demanding structural applications, it is equally essential to demonstrate that their performance can be reliably predicted using established, computationally efficient design tools.
Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT), formerly known as HiPerDiF [14], disperses chopped fibers in water, sprays the suspension through a slot nozzle onto a moving belt and removes the liquid under vacuum [15]; more than 65% of fibers lie within ±3° of the tape axis [16]. After hot-press consolidation, the prepregs reach fiber-volume fractions close to 40% and, provided the fiber length exceeds the shear-lag critical length [17], retain 80–90% of the longitudinal modulus of continuous-fiber laminates [7]. These attributes make AFFT a compelling pathway for closed-loop recycling.
Carbon frames revolutionized bicycle design in the late 1980s, cutting mass by about 1 kg and enabling aerodynamic shaping, corrosion immunity and laminate tailoring for power transfer and ride comfort. Modern race frames exploit anisotropy to fine-tune stiffness, and aerodynamic optimization can increase average speed by roughly 0.5 km/h for the same rider effort [18]. Extending these benefits to recycled short-fiber composites would open a large, value-added outlet for reclaimed carbon.
To explore this potential, the present work applies Classical Laminate Theory within a finite-element framework to assess whether AFFT laminates can meet the stiffness requirements of a 25 mm diameter top tube for a balance bike, an application representative of real-world bending and torsion loads [19].
Three consolidation routes, vacuum bagging, compression molding at 7 bar (to simulate autoclave conditions) and at 90 bar, were adopted to represent real-world manufacturing techniques [20]. They are correlated with fiber-volume fraction, porosity and orthotropic properties. These properties populate a finite-element model in which Classical Laminate Theory supplies the laminate stiffness matrix; a genetic algorithm then searches the stacking-sequence space to minimize the combined bending-and-torsion deflection. Finally, tubes fabricated with the optimized lay-up are tested in three-point bending, providing the first validation of AFFT-based recycled composites for structural cycling applications.

2. Materials and Methods

To investigate the potential of AFFT in bicycle frame applications, a structured methodology was developed, encompassing laminate manufacturing, material characterization, computational optimization, and experimental validation on tubular specimens.

2.1. Materials

The composite feedstock employed in this study is an Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT) prepreg produced by Lineat Composites (Chepstow, UK) (Figure 1). The tape contains 4 mm reclaimed standard-modulus carbon fibers realigned within ±3° of the tape axis [16]. Fiber aerial weight is ( 33   ±   3 ) g m 2 , while an SHD VTC401 epoxy film provides ( 50   ±   10 ) g m 2 of matrix [21]. The tape is 100 mm wide, and is supplied frozen (−18 °C) to inhibit premature cross-linking.
Table 1 summarizes the consolidation routes endorsed by the supplier. In all cases the cure schedule used here followed the rapid cycle recommended for the SHD VTC401 epoxy by the manufacturer: heat at 3 °C min−1 to 100 °C, dwell 1 h, cool at 3 °C min−1 [22].
Each cured plate was water-jet cut into rectangular coupons for tensile tests with fibers oriented 0°, 90° and 10° to the loading axis. Table 2 lists the nominal coupon dimensions used throughout the study; these values reflect a compromise between standardized guidelines, literature recommendations and the 100 mm tape width. Given that the maximum panel size producible with the laboratory hot press was 210 × 160 mm, tensile specimens were proportionally scaled down from the nominal dimensions suggested by ISO 527-4 [23], preserving the same aspect ratios and gauge geometry. This adjustment ensured that all coupons could be cut from a single, defect-free region of each consolidated plate while maintaining comparability to standard specimens.
The higher width chosen for 90° coupons increases the net load capacity of matrix-dominated specimens, whereas the reduced width for 10° coupons maintains an aspect ratio > 12 to favor uniform shear deformation [24]. A total of 30 plies was sufficient to exceed the 1 mm thickness threshold for 0° and 10° tests even under CM90 compaction; transverse coupons used 40 plies to offset their lower fiber contribution to strength.
Figure 2 reports the cured ply thickness measured on laminates produced by the three consolidation routes (defined as total laminate thickness divided by ply count after cure). Raising the compaction pressure clearly densifies the tape stack: the cured ply thickness drops from 76 µm under vacuum bagging to 54 µm at 7 bar and 35 µm at 90 bar. The narrower error bars relative to the standard deviation of five samples for CM7 and CM90 reflect the uniform gap imposed by the mold’s flat plates, whereas the larger scatter under VB is attributed to local pressure variations and resin bleed. These cured-ply values were used as inputs for both the rule of mixtures corrections and the finite-element shell model.

Microscopic Assessment of Laminate Quality

To complement the macroscopic measurements of cured ply thickness, a Leica DM LM optical microscope (Leica Microsystem, Wetzlar, Germany) was employed to evaluate the internal quality of the laminates; the results are shown in Figure 3. Small coupons were embedded in epoxy resin, then sequentially wet-sanded using P600, P800, P1200 and P2400 SiC papers under water, followed by diamond cloth polishing with 6 µm, 3 µm and 1 µm pastes. Images were captured under reflected light at 50 × magnification in both directions parallel (‖) and perpendicular (⊥) to the fiber alignment.
The sequence VB → CM7 → CM90 clearly illustrates the progressive effect of pressure on laminate consolidation. Void content and resin-rich regions gradually diminish, while the overall laminate thickness decreases, reflecting enhanced fiber packing and resin wet-out. These microstructural features align with the quantitative trends reported in Figure 2, confirming that increasing compaction pressure yields a denser and more homogeneous microstructure, consistent with the measured cured ply thickness and fiber volume fraction.

2.2. Methods

The experimental campaign supplied the ply data required by Classical Laminate Theory, fed those data to a finite-element optimization loop, and finally verified the predicted performance on composite tubes.

2.2.1. Tensile Testing

Coupons were water-jet cut from the VB, CM7 and CM90 plates, end-tabbed and, where required, speckled for Digital Image Correlation (DIC). Testing was conducted on an Instron 1185R5800 Universal Testing Machine (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) equipped with a 100 kN Instron 2518 loadcell under displacement control. Longitudinal and 10° coupons were tested at a rate of 2 mm min−1 and monitored by DIC; for transverse coupons a rate of 1 mm min−1 was used and the strain was measured with a video extensometer. For every consolidation route five to eight valid repetitions were recorded. Fiber-volume fraction (burn-off at 500 °C in air) and density (Archimedean method in sunflower oil) were measured on three samples per laminate. Burn-off was used solely to remove the epoxy matrix; 500 °C is below the onset of appreciable oxidative mass loss for the carbon fibers, and no measurable fiber mass loss was detected within the dwell time (within balance resolution).

2.2.2. Optimization Framework and Setup

The balance bike top tube was idealized as a thin cylindrical shell, 25 mm in diameter and 225 mm long. Two elementary load cases were studied. A transverse force of 500 N applied at the free end produced a bending rotation α of the vertical face of the free end, as shown in Figure 4a; the same force acting through a 500 mm lever arm produced a torsional rotation β , as shown in Figure 4b. Because the laminate is supposed to remain in a linear-elastic regime, the response to any load combination is the sum of the individual responses.
The optimization algorithm presented in this work takes inspiration from and builds upon the optimization framework proposed by Kaveh et al. [25,26]. Finite element analyses were performed using Abaqus/Standard 2023 commercial code. The tube was meshed with reduced-integration shell elements (S4R, 3.0 mm average edge size chosen from convergence analysis); orthotropic ply properties from tensile tests were entered through a composite lay-up section, and Classical Laminate Theory provided the laminate stiffness matrix. One tube end was fully constrained; the bending or torsional moment was applied to the opposite end.
The laminate comprised thirty-two plies. Successive groups of four plies shared a common fiber angle, so the stacking sequence was described by eight integers. To limit the possible combinations while retaining sufficient accuracy and save computational time, each integer could take one of seven angles 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, or 90°; within a four-ply block the sign alternated ( + θ , θ , + θ , θ ) to keep the lay-up balanced. No mirror symmetry was imposed, because a tube that wraps continuously around itself is inherently symmetric about its axis.
A population of 120 random sequences was generated in MATLAB 2020. For every sequence, a Python script built the Abaqus model (using the Python 2.7 environment embedded in Abaqus 2023), launched two linear analyses (bending and torsion) and returned α and β to MATLAB; this workflow is shown in Figure 5. The fitness of a sequence was defined as
f = α + β α 0 + β 0
where α 0 and β 0 refer to a quasi-isotropic laminate. This objective function, although not strictly representative of the optimal fitting function for the design of a tubular bike frame, was chosen for its clarity and considered suitable for this proof-of-concept study. Selection preserving the best 40 solutions of each iteration, crossover of the remaining 80 and mutation of 20% of this part of the population are used for refinement until the best third of sequences showed no improvement for three consecutive generations. Convergence typically required fifteen to twenty generations, and the optimum lay-up reduced α + β by about 40% relative to the quasi-isotropic reference. That lay-up was adopted for tube manufacture and subsequent bending validation.

2.2.3. Tube Manufacturing and Three-Point Bending

Considering the available manufacturing resources, only VB tubes were manufactured, since manufacturing CM7 and CM90 tubes would require an ad hoc mold for the hot press. A total of 32 plies of AFFT tape were manually wrapped around a 25 mm aluminum mandrel in the sequence delivered by the optimization. A 3 min vacuum debulk followed every four plies. The cure cycle for tubes was identical to that of the flat plates (3 °C min−1 to 100 °C, dwell 1 h, cool 3 °C min−1). After cooling, differential thermal contraction released the tube from the mandrel. Three tubes were tested in three-point bending using the same Instron frame, with a span of 180 mm, a loading nose 33.15 mm in diameter, lower supports 15 mm in diameter, and a cross-head speed of 1 mm min−1. The linear slope of the resulting force–displacement curve was compared with the outcome of a finite-element simulation reproducing the experimental three-point bending setup, carried out using the Abaqus/Standard commercial code.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fiber Volume Fraction and Porosity

Burn-off and density analyses indicate that increasing the consolidation pressure enhances the fiber volume fraction while simultaneously reducing void content (Table 3). Microscopy of polished cross-sections (Figure 3) supports this observation, showing a progressive reduction of voids and resin-rich pockets as compaction pressure increases. Adequate pressure is therefore essential to achieve full wet-out and to realize the potential stiffness of highly aligned short-fiber tapes.
Porosity values in Table 3 were derived by comparing the experimental density ρ exp with the theoretical density ρ theo obtained from burn-off mass fractions, using ϕ = 1 ρ exp / ρ theo . This indirect approach is affected by the connectivity of the void network: surface-connected pores may allow partial fluid infiltration, whereas isolated closed pores remain undetected. As a result, density-based porosity tends to underestimate the true void content and should be interpreted as a non-conservative lower bound. Microscopy reveals a residual population of small voids even at 90 bar, suggesting that the actual porosity of CM90 laminates is higher than the nominal 1% reported in Table 3. Nevertheless, the relative trend is consistent across methods, confirming a steady reduction in void content with increasing consolidation pressure. The origin of this behavior is inherent to the AFFT manufacturing route (Figure 6). Fibers are first deposited dry on a moving belt and subsequently coated from above with an epoxy film; resin must therefore percolate downward to impregnate the lowest filaments. Under vacuum bagging, the 1 bar pressure differential is insufficient to force resin through the narrow inter-fiber channels before gelation, leading to entrapped air within the laminate. Compression molding improves impregnation by closing the channels, driving resin through the fiber network, and expelling trapped gas into the breather. Because voids act as compliant inclusions, their persistence in low-pressure laminates limits stiffness and matrix-dominated strengths.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

The present study focuses on validating an elastic–stiffness workflow for AFFT laminates. The finite-element model incorporates only the elastic constants E 1 , E 2 , G 12 and ν 12 , and the optimization targets the combined bending-torsion deflection in the linear regime. Accordingly, tensile tests were performed at 0°, 90°, and 10° off-axis. The 10° configuration provides sensitivity to in-plane shear and enables the determination of G 12 through standard off-axis compliance fitting. Strength and failure criteria, as well as compression and dedicated shear tests, are beyond the scope of this work and will be addressed in a follow-on study focused on failure modelling.
To assess the influence of compaction pressure on the elastic response of AFFT laminates, tensile tests were conducted on specimens processed under VB, CM7, and CM90 conditions. As shown in Figure 7a, increasing consolidation pressure and fiber content markedly enhances stiffness. The longitudinal modulus E 1 rises from approximately 44 GPa for VB laminates to over 79 GPa for CM90, highlighting the beneficial effect of porosity reduction and improved fiber packing on load transfer.
The transverse modulus E 2 (Figure 7b) and shear modulus G 12 (Figure 7c) also exhibit a strong dependence on pressure, both increasing by more than a factor of two from VB to CM90. Poisson’s ratio ν 12 (Figure 7d) remains relatively high (0.44–0.47) across all processing routes, consistent with previous DIC-based measurements on aligned short-fiber composites [24].
Overall, the data demonstrate that AFFT laminates exhibit a clear increase in elastic moduli with increasing consolidation pressure. Although AFFT laminates do not fully match the stiffness of continuous-fiber composites, the shortfall of roughly 15% is consistent with the presence of fiber discontinuities, minor misalignment, and possible surface degradation of reclaimed fibers. Nevertheless, the gap remains small enough for AFFT to represent a viable structural option; with further improvements in fiber reclamation and sizing treatments, AFFT materials could narrow the remaining performance gap, offering a more sustainable and formable alternative for structural applications [7,14,27].

3.3. Stacking-Sequence Optimization Results

A genetic algorithm (GA) coupled with Abaqus shell models searched the 32-ply design space to minimize the normalized deflection f = ( α + β ) / ( α 0 + β 0 ) , where α and β are the bending and torsion angles of a candidate lay-up and the subscript 0 refers to a quasi-isotropic baseline. Each chromosome contained eight genes, one angle every four plies, limited to multiples of 15°. A mesh convergence study on the reference laminate showed that a 3 mm element size keeps the error on α and β below one percent while maintaining reasonable run times, so this mesh was adopted throughout.
Figure 8 traces the population-mean objective function over generations for the three processing routes. All simulations converge to values below 0.70 , which corresponds to a stiffness increase of more than thirty percent relative to the quasi-isotropic lay-up.
The best sequences obtained are reported in Table 4:
Figure 9a–c plot the evolution of angle frequency for one representative run per condition. In VB a mixture of 0°, 15° and 30° survives to the last generation; CM7 shifts weight toward 15°; CM90 collapses on a single 15° orientation. The trend mirrors the decrease in ply thickness with pressure: thinner plies in CM90 even out the moment arms about the neutral axis, so a uniform 15° stack offers the best compromise between bending and torsion. In VB the thicker plies and higher porosity benefit from a small fraction of 0° layers to improve bending rigidity.
For reference the GA was also run on VB properties with the objective restricted to bending or torsion only. Pure bending converged to a full 0° lay-up, while pure torsion selected 45° throughout. Figure 10 shows the corresponding angle-frequency histories. The combined-loading solution sits between these extremes, confirming that the mixed objective steers the laminate toward a lamination sequence able to balance the performance in the two loading cases.
Overall, the GA reduces the combined bending-torsion deflection by more than 30% relative to the quasi-isotropic baseline across all processing routes. Low-angle plies dominate every optimum, with the balance among 0°, 15° and 30° shifting as ply thickness and stiffness vary with consolidation pressure. Convergence is achieved in fewer than forty generations with the chosen mesh and population size.

3.4. Validation of Bending Stiffness

Three tubular specimens (T1, T2, and T3) were manufactured via vacuum-bagging and tested under three-point bending (3PB) to validate the finite-element model’s flexural predictions. Although this small-scale campaign already reproduces the numerical response and suggests the approach is feasible, additional tests will be required to build a comprehensive picture of the system behavior. Each tube employed the stacking sequence derived from the VB lay-up optimization, and the model’s force-displacement outputs were compared with experimental results in the small-deformation regime. The 3PB rig consisted of two 15 mm-diameter lower rollers spaced 180 mm apart and a 33.15 mm loading nose; tests were run on an Instron 1185R5800 under displacement control at 1 mm min−1. The experimental setup and the corresponding numerical model in Abaqus are shown in Figure 11a and Figure 11b, respectively.
Figure 12 shows that finite-element predictions for T2 and T3 closely match the experimental curves up to approximately 1 mm displacement, confirming the model’s validity within the elastic range. In contrast, T1, the first specimen to be manufactured, deviates significantly from the expected behavior. The experimental results yield two main insights. First, the close match between the FEA and experimental stiffness of T2 and T3 supports the use of a CLT-derived stiffness matrix to model the flexural behavior of AFFT structures—even with their inherently discontinuous fibers. Second, the poor performance of T1, attributed to manufacturing inconsistencies and higher porosity, underscores the sensitivity of AFFT laminates to processing quality. Despite this sensitivity, the consistency between T2 and T3 suggests that AFFT-based composites can successfully achieve reliable performance through careful manufacturing.
As the finite-element model is linear elastic and does not capture indentation or damage mechanisms, comparisons are restricted to the first millimeter of cross-head travel, where the experiments remain within the elastic regime and therefore the comparison with the FE model is meaningful. Beyond this region, local indentation and progressive damage dominate, introducing nonlinearities not captured by the Finite Element model. Nonetheless, the agreement observed for T2 and T3 validates the finite-element approach for stiffness prediction within the elastic regime and confirms its effectiveness in guiding lay-up design for AFFT-based laminates.

4. Conclusions and Future Developments

This study demonstrated that Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT) can efficiently repurpose reclaimed short carbon fibers into high-performance composites suitable for structural applications such as a bicycle top tube. By comparing three manufacturing methods (VB, CM7, and CM90), it was shown that increased compaction pressure reduces porosity and significantly improves the mechanical response of AFFT laminates. The application of Classical Laminate Theory (CLT) within a finite-element framework, supported by a genetic algorithm (GA) for lay-up optimization, enabled the design of tailored laminates with enhanced stiffness under combined bending and torsion. Tube-scale validation confirmed the model’s ability to predict the flexural behavior of AFFT composites in the small-deformation regime, despite the intrinsic discontinuities of the fiber architecture.
Looking ahead, improvements in manufacturing consistency, adoption of more realistic load profiles, and the integration of failure criteria into the finite-element model could further enhance the reliability of stacking sequence optimizations. Extending the GA to penalize failure-prone configurations would enable a more balanced trade-off between stiffness and damage resistance. Moreover, a more precise objective function can be employed, tailored on the specific final application, without affecting the consistency of the optimization pipeline. Additionally, future research might exploit closed-loop recycling by reclaiming end-of-life carbon fiber bicycle frames and reprocessing them via AFFT, thereby contributing to enhanced sustainability. Through these refinements, AFFT-based composites can move closer to a truly circular life cycle while keeping mechanical properties at a level which is comparable to continuous-fiber systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L.L.; methodology, P.M. and F.O.; software, P.M.; validation, F.O.; formal analysis, T.V.; investigation, T.V. and P.M.; data curation, T.V.; writing—original draft preparation, T.V.; writing—review and editing, P.M., F.O., R.F. and M.L.L.; visualization, P.M. and F.O.; supervision, R.F. and M.L.L.; project administration, M.L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

M.L.L. reports a relationship with Lineat Composites that includes equity or stocks. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
3PBThree Point Bending
AFFTAligned Formable Fibre Technology
CFRCCarbon-Fiber-Reinforced Composites
CFRPCarbon-Fiber-Reinforced Plastics
CM7Compression Molding at 7 bar
CM90Compression Molding at 90 bar
CLTClassical Laminate Theory
DICDigital Image Correlation
FEAFinite Element Analysis
GAGenetic Algorithm
VBVacuum Bag

References

  1. IndustryArc. Composite Materials Market—Industry Analysis, Market Size, Share, Trends, Application Analysis, Growth And Forecast 2024–2030; Technical Report; IndustryArc: Hyderabad, India, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  2. Research and Markets. Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) Global Market Report 2024; Technical Report; Research and Markets: Dublin, Ireland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, J.; Chevali, V.S.; Wang, H.; Wang, C.H. Current status of carbon fibre and carbon fibre composites recycling. Compos. Part Eng. 2020, 193, 108053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meng, F.; Olivetti, E.A.; Zhao, Y.; Chang, J.C.; Pickering, S.J.; McKechnie, J. Comparing Life Cycle Energy and Global Warming Potential of Carbon Fiber Composite Recycling Technologies and Waste Management Options. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 9854–9865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lefeuvre, A.; Garnier, S.; Jacquemin, L.; Pillain, B.; Sonnemann, G. Anticipating in-use stocks of carbon fiber reinforced polymers and related waste flows generated by the commercial aeronautical sector until 2050. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 125, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borkar, A.; Hendlmeier, A.; Simon, Z.; Randall, J.D.; Stojcevski, F.; Henderson, L.C. A comparison of mechanical properties of recycled high-density polyethylene/waste carbon fiber via injection molding and 3D printing. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 2408–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hecker, M.D.; Longana, M.L.; Eloi, J.C.; Thomsen, O.; Hamerton, I. Recycling end-of-life sails by carbon fibre reclamation and composite remanufacture using the HiPerDiF fibre alignment technology. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2023, 173, 107651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aravindan, P.; Becagli, F.; Longana, M.L.; Blok, L.G.; Pozegic, T.R.; Huntley, S.J.; Rendall, T.; Hamerton, I. Remanufacturing of Woven Carbon Fibre Fabric Production Waste into High Performance Aligned Discontinuous Fibre Composites. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. EU. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Off. J. Eur. Union 2008, L312, 3–30. [Google Scholar]
  10. Oliveux, G.; Dandy, L.O.; Leeke, G.A. Current status of recycling of fibre reinforced polymers: Review of technologies, reuse and resulting properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 72, 61–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pickering, S. Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials-current status. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 1206–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khurshid, M.F.; Hengstermann, M.; Hasan, M.M.B.; Abdkader, A.; Cherif, C. Recent developments in the processing of waste carbon fibre for thermoplastic composites—A review. J. Compos. Mater. 2020, 54, 1925–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Heidarian, P.; Mokhtari, F.; Naebe, M.; Henderson, L.C.; Varley, R.J. Reclamation and reformatting of waste carbon fibers: A paradigm shift towards sustainable waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 203, 107465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lewis, C.; Ramakrishnan, K.R.; Longana, M.L.; Ward, C.; Meegan, J.; Alvarez-Borges, F.; Mavrogordato, M.; Hamerton, I. Characterization of Unidirectional Aligned Discontinuous Fiber Reinforced Composites Containing a Toughened Epoxy Resin Produced Using the HiPerDiF Process. Polym. Compos. 2025, 46, 16184–16199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lewis, C.; Yavuz, B.O.; Longana, M.L.; Belnoue, J.P.H.; Ramakrishnan, K.R.; Ward, C.; Hamerton, I. A Review on the Modelling of Aligned Discontinuous Fibre Composites. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, H.; Potter, K.; Wisnom, M. A novel manufacturing method for aligned discontinuous fibre composites (High Performance-Discontinuous Fibre method). Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 65, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fukuda, H.; Chou, T.W. A probabilistic theory of the strength of short-fibre composites with variable fibre length and orientation. J. Mater. Sci. 1982, 17, 1003–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malizia, F.; Blocken, B. Cyclist aerodynamics through time: Better, faster, stronger. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2021, 214, 104673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, T.J.C.; Wu, H.C. Fiber direction and stacking sequence design for bicycle frame made of carbon/epoxy composite laminate. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 1971–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mills, A. Carbon Fibre Composites Manufacturing Technology and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  21. Aligned Formable Fibre Technology. Technical Report LINEAT-MTC-TDS, Linear Composites; Aligned Formable Fibre Technology: Chepstow, UK, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  22. SHD Composites. VTC401 Epoxy Component Prepreg. In Technical Report SHD/MISC/945 Issue: 1; SHD Composites: Sleaford, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  23. ISO527-5:2021; Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 5: Test Conditions for Unidirectional Fibre-Reinforced Plastic Composites. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  24. Merzkirch, M.; Foecke, T. 10° off-axis testing of CFRP using DIC: A study on strength, strain and modulus. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 196, 108062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kaveh, A.; Dadras, A.; Geran Malek, N.; Ansari, R. An open-source computational framework for optimization of laminated composite plates. Acta Mech. 2020, 231, 2629–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kaveh, A.; Dadras, A.; Geran Malek, N.; Ansari, R. An Open-Source Code for the Design and Optimization of Laminated Composites. Available online: https://github.com/nimageran/laminated_composites (accessed on 12 October 2025).
  27. Such, M.; Ward, C.; Potter, K. Aligned Discontinuous Fibre Composites: A Short History. J. Multifunct. Compos. 2014, 3, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. AFFT prepreg tape made with highly oriented reclaimed carbon fibers.
Figure 1. AFFT prepreg tape made with highly oriented reclaimed carbon fibers.
Jcs 10 00176 g001
Figure 2. Cured ply thickness for each consolidation route.
Figure 2. Cured ply thickness for each consolidation route.
Jcs 10 00176 g002
Figure 3. Representative 50 × optical micrographs of AFFT laminate cross-sections. Yellow dotted lines delineate the sample boundaries. Each column corresponds to one processing route: vacuum bag/oven (VB), compression molding at 7 bar (CM7), and compression molding at 90 bar (CM90). The top row shows micrographs parallel to the fiber direction (‖), while the bottom row shows those perpendicular to it (⊥). The black zones within the sample correspond to voids and resin-rich pockets.
Figure 3. Representative 50 × optical micrographs of AFFT laminate cross-sections. Yellow dotted lines delineate the sample boundaries. Each column corresponds to one processing route: vacuum bag/oven (VB), compression molding at 7 bar (CM7), and compression molding at 90 bar (CM90). The top row shows micrographs parallel to the fiber direction (‖), while the bottom row shows those perpendicular to it (⊥). The black zones within the sample correspond to voids and resin-rich pockets.
Jcs 10 00176 g003
Figure 4. Definition of (a) bending angle α and (b) torsion angle β .
Figure 4. Definition of (a) bending angle α and (b) torsion angle β .
Jcs 10 00176 g004
Figure 5. MATLAB–Python–Abaqus workflow used in the optimization loop.
Figure 5. MATLAB–Python–Abaqus workflow used in the optimization loop.
Jcs 10 00176 g005
Figure 6. Schematic cross-section of uncured AFFT prepreg. Black dots represent fiber cross-sections; gray denotes resin. Full wet-out of the lower fibers requires a pressure-assisted process.
Figure 6. Schematic cross-section of uncured AFFT prepreg. Black dots represent fiber cross-sections; gray denotes resin. Full wet-out of the lower fibers requires a pressure-assisted process.
Jcs 10 00176 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of mechanical properties under different processing conditions: (a) Longitudinal modulus E 1 . (b) Transverse modulus E 2 . (c) Shear modulus G 12 . (d) Poisson’s ratio ν 12 .
Figure 7. Comparison of mechanical properties under different processing conditions: (a) Longitudinal modulus E 1 . (b) Transverse modulus E 2 . (c) Shear modulus G 12 . (d) Poisson’s ratio ν 12 .
Jcs 10 00176 g007
Figure 8. Population-mean objective function f = ( α + β ) / ( α 0 + β 0 ) for the three processing routes: (a) VB. (b) CM7. (c) CM90. Each curve is the average of four independent GA runs.
Figure 8. Population-mean objective function f = ( α + β ) / ( α 0 + β 0 ) for the three processing routes: (a) VB. (b) CM7. (c) CM90. Each curve is the average of four independent GA runs.
Jcs 10 00176 g008
Figure 9. Relative frequency of each fiber angle during the GA search: (a) VB. (b) CM7. (c) CM90. One run per processing condition is shown.
Figure 9. Relative frequency of each fiber angle during the GA search: (a) VB. (b) CM7. (c) CM90. One run per processing condition is shown.
Jcs 10 00176 g009
Figure 10. Angle-frequency evolution for single-mode optimizations using VB material properties: (a) Pure bending. (b) Pure torsion.
Figure 10. Angle-frequency evolution for single-mode optimizations using VB material properties: (a) Pure bending. (b) Pure torsion.
Jcs 10 00176 g010
Figure 11. Three-point bending test: (a) experimental setup and (b) corresponding finite-element model.
Figure 11. Three-point bending test: (a) experimental setup and (b) corresponding finite-element model.
Jcs 10 00176 g011
Figure 12. Force–displacement curves for experiment and Abaqus simulation, limited to 1 mm displacement.
Figure 12. Force–displacement curves for experiment and Abaqus simulation, limited to 1 mm displacement.
Jcs 10 00176 g012
Table 1. Processing windows for AFFT laminates.
Table 1. Processing windows for AFFT laminates.
Consolidation RoutePressureNotation
Vacuum bag/oven1 barVB
Compression mold— simulate autoclave7 barCM7
Compression mold—high-pressure press90 barCM90
Table 2. Coupon dimensions adopted for tensile testing.
Table 2. Coupon dimensions adopted for tensile testing.
Test OrientationLengthWidth
0° (longitudinal)160 mm16 mm
90° (transverse)90 mm25 mm
10° off-axis120 mm10 mm
Table 3. Fiber volume fraction and porosity obtained from burn-off and Archimedean analysis. Porosity values should be regarded as lower bounds.
Table 3. Fiber volume fraction and porosity obtained from burn-off and Archimedean analysis. Porosity values should be regarded as lower bounds.
Processing Condition V f Porosity
VB 0.28   ±   0.03 0.20   ±   0.02
CM 7 0.30   ±   0.02 0.04   ±   0.01
CM 90 0.39   ±   0.03 0.01   ±   0.01
Table 4. Best stacking sequences returned by the GA for each processing route.
Table 4. Best stacking sequences returned by the GA for each processing route.
RouteBest Stacking Sequence
VB[30 30 15 15 15 15 15 0]
CM7[30 15 15 15 15 15 15 15]
CM90[15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vitali, T.; Meda, P.; Olla, F.; Frassine, R.; Longana, M.L. Lay-Up Optimization for Bicycle Frame Tubular Composite Structures Produced with Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT). J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040176

AMA Style

Vitali T, Meda P, Olla F, Frassine R, Longana ML. Lay-Up Optimization for Bicycle Frame Tubular Composite Structures Produced with Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT). Journal of Composites Science. 2026; 10(4):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vitali, Tommaso, Paolo Meda, Federico Olla, Roberto Frassine, and Marco Luigi Longana. 2026. "Lay-Up Optimization for Bicycle Frame Tubular Composite Structures Produced with Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT)" Journal of Composites Science 10, no. 4: 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040176

APA Style

Vitali, T., Meda, P., Olla, F., Frassine, R., & Longana, M. L. (2026). Lay-Up Optimization for Bicycle Frame Tubular Composite Structures Produced with Aligned Formable Fibre Technology (AFFT). Journal of Composites Science, 10(4), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10040176

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop