Next Article in Journal
Mechanics and Phase–Microstructure Evolution of Silica Sand-Modified Oil-Well Cement Cured at 240 °C: From Single-Size Effects to Graded-Packing Design
Next Article in Special Issue
Combined Carbon-Based Materials Modification of Polyamide Waste Agglomerate for Designing Sustainable Polymer Composites with Enhanced Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Silica Particles on Moisture Resistance and Mechanical Performance in Flax/Epoxy RTM Composites: Matrix Modification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Valorization of Agri-Food Waste in Green Composites: Influence of Orange Peel Particulates on Mechanical, Thermal, and Antioxidant PLA Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Upcycled Silica-Rich Rice Husk Ash Reinforced Cellulose Acetate Composite Films for Light-Shielding Sustainable Packaging

by
Eduardo Gomes de Freitas
1,
Maurício Alves Ramos
2,
Silvia Helena Fuentes da Silva
3,
Nilson Edegar Antunes da Silva
3,
Carolina Duarte Bacchieri Falcão
3,
Lucas Minghini Gonçalves
4,
André Luiz Missio
3,
Everton Granemann Souza
5,*,
Chiara das Dores do Nascimento
3,6,
Neftalí Lenin Villarreal Carreño
3 and
Camila Monteiro Cholant
3,*
1
Undergraduate Program in Materials Engineering, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil
2
Undergraduate Program in Industrial Timber Engineering, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil
3
Graduate Program in Materials Science and Engineering (PPGCEM), Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil
4
Center for Embedded Devices and Research in Digital Agriculture (CEDRA), São Leopoldo 93025-753, RS, Brazil
5
Graduate Program in Electronics and Computer Engineering (MEEC), Catholic University of Pelotas (UCPel), Pelotas 96015-560, RS, Brazil
6
Graduate Program in Sciences and Technologies in Education (PPGCIMED), Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul (IFSul), Pelotas 96060-290, RS, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10(2), 102; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10020102
Submission received: 15 January 2026 / Revised: 12 February 2026 / Accepted: 12 February 2026 / Published: 15 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Polymer Composites: Waste Reutilization and Valorization)

Abstract

Silica-rich rice husk ash (RHA) was upcycled as an inorganic filler to engineer cellulose acetate (CA) films with tunable properties for higher-value sustainable packaging. Composite films were produced by solvent casting, varying RHA loading with and without glycerol plasticization. FTIRconfirmed the chemical integrity of CA and indicated an increase in hydroxyl interactions in glycerol-plasticized films. Optical microscopy showed that RHA progressively induces particle domains and aggregation, while glycerol improves dispersion and surface uniformity. These microstructural effects translated into controllable optical–mechanical trade-offs: neat CA remained highly transparent, whereas RHA reduced transmittance. Glycerol had a minor effect effect on transmittance, indicating that shielding is primarily governed by the ash-derived inorganic domains and tensile testing highlighted an optimal low-filler regime. A small RHA addition maximized strength and stiffness in non-plasticized films. Contact-angle measurements in neutral and alkaline media indicated pH-sensitive wetting, with faster deterioration under alkaline conditions. Thermogravimetric analysis confirmed increased char residue with RHA addition and that glycerol introduces an early mass-loss stage. Overall, the CA/RHA platform offers a simple and potentially scalable route to upcycled, silica-reinforced films, and the formulation of CA and 1.33 wt% RHA (without glycerol) stands out as a robust secondary layer with low transmittance in the UV-Vis range, making it suitable for high-value light-sensitive flexible healthcare packaging, such as protective overwraps or translucent pouches.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The accelerating transition toward sustainable packaging has driven intense research into biodegradable and bio-based materials that can reduce petroplastic waste while maintaining product quality during storage and distribution [1]. At the same time, the magnitude of plastic leakage to the environment has reinforced the urgency for scalable alternatives and better end-of-life strategies [2]. In parallel, interest in smart and active concepts has grown, as packaging is increasingly expected to go beyond containment by contributing to quality preservation and, in some cases, monitoring functions [3,4]. Achieving these goals at scale, however, requires formulations that remain cost-effective and compatible with circular-economy strategies based on valorizing low-value residues into higher-value materials [5].
Cellulose is the most abundant renewable polymer in nature, produced through well-established biosynthetic pathways in plants [6,7,8,9]. Its hierarchical microstructure and hydrogen-bonding network underpin high intrinsic stiffness and strength, making cellulose-derived platforms attractive for mechanically demanding applications [10,11]. In addition, cellulose-based and cellulose-derived materials have long been discussed as key building blocks for the broader shift from fossil-based plastics toward bio-based, higher-performance materials [12]. Among cellulose derivatives, cellulose acetate (CA) is an industrially available thermoplastic polymer with well-established film-forming ability [13,14].
A common route to enhance CA performance is the incorporation of silica-based fillers, which can increase stiffness and improve thermal and barrier-related characteristics relevant to packaging [15]. Recent CA composite films prepared with commercial nano-SiO2 have reported promising functional properties for packaging applications [16,17]. Nevertheless, the reliance on high-purity commercial nanofillers (or sol-gel precursors) may limit economic viability and weaken alignment with circularity when the target is scalable, low-cost, sustainable packaging [18]. More broadly, polymer/biopolymer packaging literature highlights that translating green materials into premium applications typically demands concurrent control of optics, mechanics, and stability under realistic exposure conditions [19].
In this context, agricultural residues are compelling alternative feedstocks for functional fillers in polymer composites [20]. Rice husk ash (RHA), in particular, is generated in large quantities and is typically silica-rich, making it a practical candidate for upcycling into inorganic reinforcements [21]. Beyond reinforcement, silica-based films and coatings have also been widely studied for functional effects (including photochemical activity and surface-related behaviors), underscoring the versatility of SiO2-containing systems [22]. However, waste-derived silica-rich fillers such as RHA are intrinsically more heterogeneous than commercial nano-SiO2, which can intensify particle-domain formation and aggregation, thereby reshaping optical scattering and mechanical reliability.
This challenge becomes even more nuanced when the CA matrix is plasticized. Glycerol and other plasticizers can increase chain mobility and modify filler dispersion, but often introduce strong optical and mechanical trade-offs and alter surface interactions with aqueous media [23]. In addition, chemical exposure remains an important screening dimension, since packaging materials may face moisture, mildly acidic formulations, and aggressive alkaline cleaning or disinfection scenarios [24,25].
Despite extensive work on CA/SiO2 films for packaging [26], a quantitative understanding remains limited regarding how a waste-derived, silica-rich filler (RHA) interacts with CA when the formulation is simultaneously modulated by a hydrophilic plasticizer such as glycerol. In particular, the combined role of RHA-driven microstructure (particle aggregation) and glycerol-driven dispersion in dictating the balance between reduced transmittance, desirable for light-sensitive products, and mechanical robustness is still insufficiently mapped for scalable, solvent-cast CA films.
The central question is how RHA-driven particle-domain formation and glycerol-driven dispersion during drying translate into an optical-mechanical trade-off that constrains light-protective yet mechanically reliable CA films. Here, we address this gap by upcycling silica-rich RHA as an inorganic filler to engineer CA films via solvent casting from acetic anhydride, systematically varying RHA loading with and without glycerol plasticization. We correlate microstructural observations with optical screening in the visible (including 400 and 633 nm), tensile response, time-resolved wettability in neutral/alkaline media, thermal stability by TGA in an inert atmosphere, and FTIR spectroscopy to verify chemical-structure retention and to assess interfacial interactions.
This integrated framework enables identifying low-filler regimes that preserve mechanical integrity while delivering controlled, application-relevant optical attenuation for premium secondary light-shielding flexible packaging for light-sensitive healthcare products (including photo-curable dental materials and diagnostic reagents) such as protective overwraps or outer layers in multilayer pouches.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Cellulose acetate (CA; reagent grade, ∼39.8 wt% acetyl content, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as the polymer matrix. Silica-rich rice husk ash (RHA) was supplied by Arrozeira Pelotas (Pelotas, RS, Brazil) and used as the inorganic filler (as received). The RHA was generated in an industrial boiler equipped with an inclined moving sliding-grate system operating at 780–840 °C. Reported values for comparable industrial RHA include SiO2 contents of ∼82–84 wt%, loss on ignition of ∼6 wt%, and BET specific surface areas of ∼27–33 m2/g [27]. Acetic anhydride (Sigma-Aldrich, ReagentPlus, Darmstadt, Germany, ≥99%) was used as the solvent for film casting. Glycerol (P.A., ≥99.5%, Synth) was used as plasticizer. Sodium hydroxide pellets (NaOH pellets, ≥97–98%, Synth; prepared as a 0.1 mol L 1 aqueous solution) were used in the wettability tests.

2.2. Film Preparation

CA films were prepared by the solvent casting method [28]. Briefly, 0.75 g of CA was gradually dissolved in 10 mL of acetic anhydride under constant magnetic stirring at 600 rpm at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C) for 1 h until complete homogenization and formation of a clear and homogeneous polymer solution.
After complete dissolution, RHA (used as received) first pre-dispersed in ∼2 mL of acetic anhydride and ultrasonicated (40 kHz, 150 W) for 15 min to reduce particle agglomeration and improve its distribution in the CA matrix. When used, glycerol (1.0 g) was incorporated after complete CA dissolution and before RHA addition, to promote prior interaction with the polymer chains. Then, the sonicated RHA suspension was slowly added to the CA solution while maintaining magnetic stirring at 600 rpm. After incorporating all components, the final dispersion was kept under stirring for an additional 60 min to promote system homogenization and subsequently degassed under vacuum (desiccator) for 10 min to remove entrapped air bubbles.
To minimize RHA sedimentation, the dispersion was cast immediately after the final mixing/degassing step (within 5 min). The resulting dispersions were poured into 100 mm-diameter glass Petri dishes placed on a leveled surface and dried in a forced-air oven at 45 °C for 24 h, allowing gradual solvent evaporation and uniform film formation with a rapid viscosity increase that further limited particle settling.
During transfer to the oven, dishes were transported carefully to avoid particle migration during handling. After drying, the films were carefully peeled off and stored in a desiccator until characterization. Table 1 summarizes all formulations investigated in this study.
The formulation matrix in Table 1 is a minimal, hypothesis-driven factorial screening set to separate the effects of RHA addition and glycerol plasticization within the same CA casting platform. The CA mass was fixed (0.75 g) and the same solvent volume and drying protocol were used for all casts, while the additive-to-polymer ratio (polymer basis) was varied to span low and high filler contents and to include a strongly plasticized condition.
RHA was tested at two levels to span two physically distinct regimes: a low-filler condition (0.01 g, ≈1.3 wt% relative to CA) aimed at reinforcement with moderate optical attenuation under plausible dispersion, and a high-filler condition (0.10 g, ≈13.3 wt% relative to CA) intended to promote particle-domain aggregation expected for heterogeneous ash, thereby stressing the optical–mechanical trade-off that motivates the study.
This low-vs.-high bracketing is aligned with the way silica-containing CA films are commonly explored in the literature, where low single-digit silica additions are used to tune surface and barrier-relevant properties before heterogeneity effects become dominant [29].
Glycerol (1.0 g) was introduced as a high-plasticizer condition (≈57 wt% of total CA+glycerol solids, or ≈133% relative to CA) to create a clearly plasticized baseline with a large, measurable mobility shift and to test whether increased chain mobility during drying can mitigate filler coalescence (improving dispersion at low RHA) vs. exacerbate wetting/softening trade-offs.

2.3. Morphological Analysis (Optical Microscopy and Image Analysis)

Digital optical microscopy was used to evaluate surface morphology and the dispersion state of the filler within the films. Micrographs were acquired using an Opticam 0500R (Opticom, Doral, FL, USA) optical microscope at 10× magnification, with image capture and processing performed in TCapture software v5.1. Images were recorded both with and without enhanced light-contrast settings to improve the visualization of surface features and particle domains. The micrographs include a 250 µm scale bar for calibration.
To complement the qualitative inspection, we performed an image analysis routine to quantify the apparent dispersion state of RHA-derived domains in the optical micrographs, converted to physical units using the scale bar (250 µm) for pixel-to-µm calibration.
Each panel in the optical microscopy was processed using a fixed workflow: (i) selection of the micrograph region (excluding edges), (ii) grayscale conversion and contrast normalization, (iii) automatic thresholding to segment dark particulate domains from the CA background, (iv) removal of small objects and noise by applying a minimum-area criterion, and (v) connected-component labeling to measure each segmented domain. For each detected domain, an equivalent circular diameter was computed as d eq = 2 A / π , where A is the segmented domain area.
The particle-domain size distribution is summarized by D 10 / D 50 / D 90 , while the mean size is reported as mean ± SD with the associated standard error (SEM) based on the number of detected domains (N). We stress that these values represent 2D apparent particle-domain sizes at the optical length scale (not primary particle size), and are therefore best interpreted as comparative dispersion metrics across formulations rather than absolute particle-size measurements.

2.4. UV–Vis Transmittance Spectroscopy

The optical properties of the films were assessed by UV–Vis transmittance spectroscopy. Transmittance spectra were recorded using an Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) Cary 100 spectrophotometer over the 300–800 nm wavelength range. Circular specimens were fixed in the transmission holder so that the incident beam probed the central region of each film.

2.5. Wettability

Static contact-angle measurements were conducted to assess the surface wettability of the films. Specimens were placed on a glass substrate and analyzed using an optical tensiometer (Theta Lite TL100, Biolin Scientific, Göteborg, Sweden). Sessile droplets (10 μL) of each probe liquid-deionized water, and 0.1 mol L 1 NaOH-were gently dispensed onto the film surface using a microsyringe. Immediately after deposition, the droplet profile was recorded with the instrument camera. Contact angles were calculated in OneAttension software by fitting the droplet shape and extracting the angle at the solid–liquid–vapor three-phase contact line. Time-resolved contact angles were collected at 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 s to capture wetting dynamics and possible surface/chemical changes during liquid exposure. Measurements were reported as mean values obtained from five different locations on the same specimen, following a protocol similar to that described by Souza et al. [30].

2.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out using a DTG-60 instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) to assess the thermal stability of the films. Samples were heated from 28 °C to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min 1 under an inert nitrogen atmosphere with a flow rate of 50 mL min 1 . The mass loss (TGA) and the derivative mass-loss curve (DTG) were obtained to compare degradation profiles and residual mass among formulations.

2.7. Tensile Mechanical Testing

Tensile properties were measured using a universal testing machine (EMIC DL-500, EMIC, EMIC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D882-18 [31] at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm min 1 using a 1000 N load cell. Rectangular film specimens were prepared with a width of 20 mm and a total length of 150 mm, using an initial grip separation of 100 mm. Young’s modulus, tensile strength, and crosshead displacement at rupture were determined. Prior to testing, specimens were conditioned at 23 °C and 60% relative humidity for 24 h and kept sealed until measurement. For each formulation, five independent specimens were tested ( n = 5 ), and results are reported as mean ± standard deviation. All tests were carried out at 23 °C (±2 °C) and 60% ( ± 5 % ) relative humidity.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

For tensile testing, pairwise differences among formulations were assessed independently for each tensile metric ( σ max , Δ L max , σ break , and E) using two tailed Welch’s t-test (unequal variances). To account for multiple pairwise comparisons within each metric, p values were adjusted using the Holm method. Statistical significance was defined at α = 0.05 . All statistical analyses were performed using OriginPro (student version) [32].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Morphology (Optical Microscopy)

Figure 1 shows optical micrographs of CA films containing different loadings of silica-rich RHA and prepared with/without glycerol plasticization.
The neat CA control (Figure 1a) exhibits a visually homogeneous and continuous surface, with no detectable particulate domains at this length scale, indicating uniform film formation by solvent casting. Upon incorporation of a low RHA loading (Figure 1b; CA-0.01RHA, 0.01 g), discrete particles and sporadic micrometric agglomerates become apparent, suggesting only partial filler dispersion and the emergence of potential sites for optical scattering and stress concentration.
Increasing the RHA content (Figure 1c; CA-0.1RHA) markedly raises both particle density and the extent of aggregation, producing more heterogeneous, coalesced domains consistent with stronger particle–particle interactions and reduced particle–matrix compatibility, which is expected to intensify transparency losses and increase property variability. Adding glycerol in the absence of RHA (Figure 1d; CA-G) preserves an overall uniform appearance without introducing particulate domains, although it is expected to modify matrix mobility and, consequently, the mechanical response. CA-G also exhibits faint contrast spots, most consistently attributed to normal casting and drying phenomena in plasticized films, such as localized glycerol-rich microdomains or small microvoids formed during solvent evaporation.
In the plasticized composites, the role of glycerol is most evident at low filler loading (Figure 1e; CA-G-0.01RHA), where the particle population appears finer and more evenly distributed than in the non-plasticized counterpart (Figure 1b), with fewer large agglomerates, indicating that glycerol favors dispersion and mitigates domain coalescence during drying.
At high filler loading (Figure 1f; CA-G-0.1RHA), heterogeneity remains pronounced and aggregation is still observed; however, the particulate domains appear less severely coalesced than in Figure 1c, suggesting that glycerol can attenuate, but not eliminate, aggregation under high-RHA conditions.
To complement the qualitative inspection, Table 2 summarizes the apparent dispersion state of RHA derived domains using 2D domain size descriptors obtained by image analysis.
When the RHA loading is increased in the non-plasticized series (CA-0.01RHA vs. CA-0.1RHA), the number of particle domains rises markedly and the areal fraction increases from 1.27% to 15.26%. In parallel, the size distribution broadens, with the standard deviation increasing from 12.1 to 17.5 μm and a pronounced high-size tail remaining at D 90 ≈ 67.8 μm, which is consistent with aggregation at higher filler contents.
At low RHA loading, adding glycerol (CA-0.01RHA vs. CA-G-0.01RHA) reduces the median domain size and narrows the distribution. Specifically, D 50 decreases from 36.8 to 29.4 μm and the standard deviation decreases from 12.1 to 9.3 μm, which is consistent with improved dispersion during drying.
At high RHA loading, glycerol (CA-0.1RHA vs. CA-G-0.1RHA) reduces the domain population and the areal fraction, with N decreasing from 133 to 39 and the areal fraction decreasing from 15.26% to 5.03%. However, the distribution remains broad and the high-size tail persists, with SD = 24.2 μm and D 90 ≈ 67.5 μm. This indicates that glycerol attenuates domain formation but does not eliminate it under high-RHA conditions.

3.2. FTIR Spectroscopy

Figure 2 presents the FTIR spectra of the CA-based films produced with and without glycerol and with different RHA loadings. Overall, all formulations exhibit the characteristic bands of cellulose acetate, indicating that the solvent-cast processing preserves the polymer chemical structure within the detection limits of FTIR.
The main features of CA are observed across the series, including the strong carbonyl stretching band of the acetate group at ∼1735 c m 1 . In the fingerprint region, CA also shows prominent bands at ∼1430 and ∼1368 c m 1 , attributed to CH2/CH3 deformation modes of acetylated segments, together with intense C–O/C–O–C stretching contributions in the ∼1200–1250 c m 1 window (marked here near ∼1210 c m 1 ) [33].
Two additional intense bands that are clearly evident in the present plot are located at ∼1030 c m 1 and in the ∼900–950 c m 1 region, both commonly associated with C–O/C–O–C and backbone-related vibrations of the polysaccharide-derived framework. Importantly, the overall CA spectral profile is retained after incorporating RHA and/or glycerol, and no new bands emerge in the carbonyl region, indicating that the formulation effects are dominated by physical mixing and interfacial interactions rather than the formation of new covalent bonds [34].
For the composite films, the main region where RHA-derived silica vibrations can overlap with CA absorptions is the same window where CA already has strong fingerprint bands. In the present spectra, this overlap is expressed most clearly around the intense CA band at ∼1032 c m 1 , where RHA-containing samples show a small but reproducible change in band shape/intensity balance relative to neat CA. Importantly, no distinct new bands or diagnostic shifts are observed, and therefore the subtle differences in this region are interpreted as spectral superposition (i.e., Si–O–Si/Si–O stretching contributions overlapping CA C–O/C–O–C vibrations), rather than evidence of new chemical bond formation [35].
Because CA absorbs strongly in this region, any silica-related contributions are expected to overlap with the CA fingerprint bands and are therefore discussed qualitatively as subtle line-shape changes rather than as distinct new peaks, consistent with previous reports on CA–silica composites [36]. A similar caution applies to the ∼900–950 c m 1 band. While this feature is compatible with CA backbone vibrations, in RHA-containing films it may also include contributions from silica-related modes in the same neighborhood, making band assignments inherently overlapped [29].
An additional low-wavenumber band is consistently observed near ∼599 c m 1 in all spectra, independent of RHA loading or glycerol plasticization. This band is commonly assigned to low-frequency deformation modes of the cellulose acetate backbone, including out-of-plane bending and collective skeletal vibrations involving C–O–C and ring-related motions of the glucopyranose units. Its persistence across all formulations and the absence of systematic intensity or position shifts indicate that this feature is intrinsic to the CA structure and is not associated with silica incorporation or plasticizer-specific interactions [33].
In contrast, glycerol plasticization yields a clear and chemically meaningful change in the hydroxyl stretching region. As highlighted in the inset of Figure 2, the plasticized film (CA-G) exhibits a broader and more intense O–H stretching envelope centered around ∼3350 c m 1 relative to neat CA. This response is consistent with the higher concentration of hydroxyl groups introduced by glycerol and with strengthened hydrogen-bond interactions in the plasticized matrix, which broaden the O–H band by creating a wider distribution of hydrogen-bond strengths. This FTIR evidence aligns with the cross-technique observations in this study showed in the next sections. Glycerol-containing films show enhanced water affinity in contact-angle kinetics (Section 3.4) and a distinct low-temperature mass-loss stage in TGA (Section 3.5), attributed primarily to glycerol volatilization (and associated moisture), confirming the presence and functional impact of the plasticizer in the CA matrix.

3.3. UV–Vis Transmittance and Optical Shielding

Figure 3 shows the UV–Vis transmittance spectra (300–800 nm) of the CA-based films, while Table 3 reports transmittance at two selected wavelengths (400 and 633 nm). These wavelengths were highlighted for two practical reasons: (i) 400 nm lies at the violet/near-UV boundary, where many light-sensitive active compounds (such as, pigments, fragrances, vitamins and cosmetic actives) are more prone to photo-oxidation, so attenuation at this edge is a useful proxy for blue/near-UV shielding; and (ii) 633 nm is a representative wavelength in the red visible region, where scattering losses are typically lower and the signal-to-noise is high, making it a convenient benchmark for overall visible transparency and for comparing films under consistent optical conditions.
Neat CA exhibits high transparency, reaching 86.18% at 633 nm and 85.19% at 400 nm (Table 3), with a nearly flat plateau across the visible range (Figure 3). The glycerol-plasticized CA film (CA-G) remains highly transparent at 633 nm (85.03%), but shows a pronounced reduction at 400 nm (73.91%), indicating stronger attenuation toward the blue/near-UV edge.
Incorporation of silica-rich RHA markedly decreases transmittance across the entire measured range, consistent with enhanced scattering and absorption from inorganic domains. At low RHA loading, CA-0.01RHA and CA-G-0.01RHA converge to similar visible transmittance values at 633 nm (36.85% and 37.04%, respectively), while their 400 nm transmittance remains lower (31.68% and 31.84%), evidencing increased shielding in the near-UV/blue region.
Increasing the RHA content further suppresses transparency, CA-0.1RHA decreases to 33.52% (633 nm) and 28.05% (400 nm), and the highest-loading plasticized composite (CA-G-0.1RHA) exhibits the lowest transmittance overall (28.66% at 633 nm and 23.53% at 400 nm).
These trends are consistent with the progressive formation of particle-rich domains and aggregation observed by optical microscopy, Section 3.1, which increases the density and characteristic size of scattering centers and thereby amplifies optical losses.
Overall, the spectra and point-wavelength data show that RHA tunes CA films from highly transparent layers (CA/CA-G) to low-transmittance, light-shielding films (CA-0.01RHA/CA-G-0.1RHA), and even the lowest RHA loading already converts CA into a protective translucent layer without requiring high filler contents. At this low loading, the plasticizer alters transmittance by less than ∼0.6% (relative) at both 400 and 633 nm (CA-0.01RHA vs. CA-G-0.01RHA).

3.4. Wettability

Figure 4 summarizes the time-dependent static contact angle of the CA-based films measured in deionized water (Figure 4a) and in an alkaline NaOH aqueous solution (Figure 4b).
In water, Figure 4a, the neat CA film (CA) shows the highest initial contact angle and the slowest decay over 60 s, indicating a comparatively lower surface affinity for water at short times. Incorporating a low loading of silica-rich rice RHA (CA-0.01RHA) reduces the initial angle and increases the decay rate, consistent with the introduction of polar sites and microstructural heterogeneities that facilitate wetting and capillary penetration [37].
As the RHA content increases (CA-0.1RHA), the contact angle decreases further and drops more rapidly, suggesting that higher filler contents (and the associated increase in particulate domains and aggregation) promote faster water uptake. The glycerol-plasticized films exhibit systematically lower contact angles than their non-plasticized counterparts, and a steeper time-dependent decrease, which is consistent with the hydrophilic character of glycerol and its tendency to increase chain mobility and water sorption [38]. This effect is amplified when glycerol is combined with RHA (CA-G-0.01RHA and CA-G-0.1RHA), yielding the lowest angles and fastest wetting.
This plasticizer-driven shift in surface and water affinity is consistent with reports on cellulose acetate systems, where glycerol and related plasticizers alter chain packing and free volume and, depending on formulation and processing, can measurably modify wetting behavior and water-related responses [39,40].
In the alkaline medium, Figure 4b, all formulations display lower contact angles and faster decreases compared with water, evidencing a stronger interaction between the films and NaOH. This behavior is expected because alkaline solutions can accelerate surface hydration and may promote partial deacetylation/hydrolytic processes in cellulose acetate, thereby increasing the density of hydrophilic functionalities at the interface and enhancing wetting over time [41].
Notably, CA and CA-0.01RHA maintain higher angles throughout the test relative to the glycerol-containing films, indicating a comparatively better short-time resistance to alkaline wetting. From an application standpoint, considering protective translucent overwrap or pouch layer for premium light-sensitive products, the recommended formulation is CA-0.01RHA, which preserves comparatively higher contact angles under alkaline exposure together with reduced visible-light transmittance, making it a strong candidate for the external protective layer in premium flexible packaging.

3.5. Thermal Stability (TGA/DTG)

Figure 5 and Table 4 summarize the thermogravimetric behavior of CA-based films reinforced with silica-rich RHA, prepared with and without glycerol, under inert atmosphere.
Overall, glycerol strongly modifies the degradation pathway: the non-plasticized films (CA, CA-0.01RHA, and CA-0.1RHA) are dominated by the main CA decomposition step in the ∼338–347 °C onset range, whereas the glycerol-plasticized films (CA-G, CA-G-0.01RHA, and CA-G-0.1RHA) exhibit a clear two-step mass-loss profile, with an early event at lower temperatures followed by CA backbone decomposition. A minor mass-loss below ∼120 °C, more noticeable in RHA-containing films, is attributed to desorption of physically adsorbed moisture and trace volatiles associated with the hydrophilic silica-rich ash surface.
For the glycerol-plasticized formulations, the first mass-loss step occurs between ∼137 and 206 °C (Table 4) and is attributed mainly to glycerol volatilization/dehydration (and possibly desorption of bound moisture), consistent with polyol behavior under heating ramps in inert flow [34,42]. The second step, spanning ∼333–381 °C, corresponds to the main thermal decomposition of the cellulose acetate matrix (deacetylation scission and subsequent pyrolysis) [43]. Accordingly, the DTG curves (Figure 5b) display an additional low-temperature peak for CA-G, CA-G-0.01RHA, and CA-G-0.1RHA that is absent in the non-plasticized set.
For the non-plasticized films, the neat CA control shows a single major degradation event ( T onset = 347.34 °C; T max = 365.17 °C). The RHA-containing films present slightly lower characteristic temperatures (CA-0.01RHA and CA-0.1RHA), with T onset and T max in the ∼338–344 °C and ∼354–361 °C ranges (Table 4), which can be rationalized by mineral species in ash-derived fillers that may mildly catalyze early scission reactions.
In addition, in the 550–650 °C region, the weak DTG is most clearly resolved for CA-0.01RHA ( T max ≈ 576 °C). For CA-0.1RHA it approaches the DTG baseline and is therefore only visible as a faint shoulder. In the glycerol-containing formulations CA-G-0.01RHA and CA-G-0.1RHA, this feature is not clearly distinguished, which may reflect masking by the additional plasticizer-related mass-loss profile and the lower amount of high-temperature residue available for slow devolatilization and minor ash-associated transformations. Accordingly, this interpretation is suggestive and supports a filler-associated event rather than a second decomposition step of the cellulose acetate backbone.
Importantly, these relatively small shifts in characteristic temperatures are accompanied by substantial changes in the high-temperature residue, indicating a stronger effect of RHA on thermal resistance (inorganic retention) than on the onset of decomposition. In the non-plasticized set, the residue at 800 °C increases from 14.67% (CA) to 15.74% (CA-0.01RHA) and reaches 25.20% (CA-0.1RHA), consistent with the contribution of a thermally stable inorganic fraction and/or enhanced char formation. In the plasticized set, the same trend is more pronounced. The residue rises from 1.36% (CA-G) to 4.50% (CA-G-0.01RHA) and 17.79% (CA-G-0.1RHA), up to ∼13.1× higher than the plasticized control, highlighting the role of RHA in increasing the final solid fraction.
In addition, the lower residue percentages in glycerol-containing films (CA-G, CA-G-0.01RHA, and CA-G-0.1RHA) should be interpreted considering that residue is reported on an initial-mass basis and that glycerol is largely volatilized at low temperatures. Thus, adding glycerol increases the starting mass but contributes negligibly to the stable solid fraction, which intrinsically reduces the residue fraction by a dilution effect. In addition, plasticizer-driven early mass loss can modify the apparent decomposition pathway and decrease the effective char yield of the CA matrix, further lowering the final solid fraction.
Similar behavior has been reported for plasticized cellulose acetate systems in TGA studies [44,45], while silica-containing cellulose acetate composite films consistently show increased high-temperature residue due to the thermally stable inorganic fraction [46].

3.6. Tensile Mechanical Properties

Table 5 summarize the tensile response of the CA-based films, reporting the maximum tensile stress ( σ max ), the maximum crosshead displacement ( Δ L max ), the stress at rupture ( σ break ), and Young’s modulus (E).
For the non-plasticized series (CA, CA-0.01RHA, and CA-0.1RHA), a low RHA loading (CA-0.01RHA) preserves tensile strength relative to neat CA, with no statistically significant difference in σ max between CA-0.01RHA, and CA-0.1RHA while markedly increasing stiffness, with E rising from 23.32 to 33.13 MPa, and this increase is statistically significant. This behavior is consistent with a reinforcement regime in which well-dispersed inorganic domains restrict chain mobility and improve load transfer at low filler contents.
This interpretation is aligned with prior reports on cellulose acetate–silica hybrid films, where modest silica additions can increase stiffness and strength when dispersion is adequate, whereas higher inorganic contents more often compromise performance as microstructural heterogeneity and defect-like domains become dominant [36].
At higher RHA content (CA-0.1RHA), σ max decreases to 21.78 MPa and this reduction is statistically significant relative to CA-0.01RHA and E drops relative to CA-0.01RHA; however, the CA-0.01RHA vs. CA-0.1RHA difference in E is not statistically significant, indicating a directional trend rather than a confirmed decrease, which is consistent with the formation of particle-rich domains/agglomerates acting as stress concentrators and reducing the reinforcement efficiency at higher loadings.
Glycerol plasticization (CA-G, CA-G-0.01RHA, and CA-G-0.1RHA) leads to the expected softening of the CA matrix, reducing both σ max and E for the plasticized control (CA-G) compared with CA, consistent with the lubricating effect of glycerol that increases free volume and chain mobility [40].
In this dataset, however, the lack of a clear increase in Δ L max for CA-G suggests that the plasticization response is not purely ductility-driven and may be constrained by casting and drying heterogeneities, as localized glycerol-rich microdomains or small microvoids, which can promote early failure.
Introducing RHA partially offsets the softening effect at low loading. In CA-G-0.01RHA, E increases to 29.13 MPa and this increase is statistically significant relative to CA and σ max increases to 14.48 MPa compared with CA-G, although this σ max difference is not statistically significant, while Δ L max decreases, indicating that stiffness recovery occurs alongside a reduced deformation capacity. At high loading (CA-G-0.1RHA), the mechanical performance deteriorates again, consistent with a defect-dominated regime in which heterogeneity and agglomerate-like domains limit load transfer and promote premature rupture.
We note that Δ L max in this dataset does not scale monotonically with the qualitative amount of agglomerates observed by optical microscopy, because elongation to failure is governed by multiple concurrent factors, including matrix cohesive strength, plasticizer-induced micro-heterogeneity, and defect sensitivity introduced during casting or drying [47]. In glycerol-containing films, localized glycerol-rich microdomains formed during solvent evaporation can act as early crack initiators [33]. This effect can limit Δ L max even when the apparent RHA domain dispersion is improved (CA-G-0.01RHA vs. CA-0.01RHA). Consistently, Δ L max for CA-G-0.01RHA is statistically lower than CA-0.01RHA.
Conversely, although CA-0.1RHA exhibits a higher area fraction (Table 2) of RHA-derived domains than CA-G-0.1RHA, CA-0.1RHA lacks plasticizer-related heterogeneities and retains a stronger CA matrix, so the presence of more domains does not necessarily translate into lower elongation. In fact, Δ L max is statistically higher for CA-0.1RHA than for CA-G-0.1RHA. The mechanical penalty is more strongly associated with defect-like large domains, interfacial weakness, and void-related premature rupture, which are amplified under the combined high-loading and plasticized condition (CA-G-0.1RHA).
From a product-oriented perspective targeting a translucent, mechanically robust, light-protective overwrap/pouch layer, CA-0.01RHA is the most attractive formulation within this set because it combines high tensile strength (25.11 MPa) with the highest stiffness (33.13 MPa), with E statistically higher than CA, while avoiding the softening penalty introduced by glycerol.

3.7. Cross-Technique Structure-Property Interpretation

The combined dataset supports a consistent cause–effect pathway linking dispersion state to performance. As RHA loading increases in the non-plasticized series, optical microscopy quantifies a marked rise in the population of apparent domains (Table 2), from N = 15 and 1.27% area fraction in CA-0.01RHA to N = 133 and 15.26% in CA-0.1RHA, with a persistent large-size tail ( D 90 ≈ 67.8 μm), indicating aggregation at higher filler contents. This structural change aligns with the progressive reduction in UV–Vis transmittance (Table 3), consistent with a higher density and characteristic size of scattering/attenuating centers along the optical path.
The same dispersion shift rationalizes the mechanical response (Table 5): the low-loading condition (CA-0.01RHA) shows the highest mean stiffness ( E = 33.13 MPa) while maintaining a high mean σ max ( 25.11 MPa), whereas the more heterogeneous, aggregation-prone condition (CA-0.1RHA) shows lower mean σ max ( 21.78 MPa) and lower mean modulus ( E = 27.17 MPa), consistent with agglomerate-driven stress concentration and reduced reinforcement efficiency.
In parallel, wettability kinetics (Figure 4) show faster wetting upon adding RHA and glycerol, consistent with increased surface heterogeneity and more hydrophilic/plasticized interfaces, while the stronger wetting in NaOH suggests a more reactive/hydrating interface under alkaline exposure [41]. Overall, these correlations explicitly link (i) RHA-derived domain formation and (ii) matrix plasticization to the observed optical shielding, wetting behavior, and mechanical trade-offs within the same formulation set.

3.8. Limitations and Future Work

We acknowledge that the present study has limitations. This study targets CA-RHA films as secondary, non product contact light shielding layers. Therefore, migration testing and regulatory qualification for direct product contact were not addressed. Any direct contact use would require extractables and leachables testing and a regulatory evaluation aligned with the specific product.
A further limitation is that all formulations were produced under a single, fixed casting and drying protocol to enable a fair comparison within the same processing platform. Therefore, the ductility response of glycerol-containing films should be interpreted as specific to this film-formation route. More tightly controlled drying conditions and post-drying conditioning are expected to help separate plasticizer redistribution effects from filler-related heterogeneity and may better express the expected plasticizing response in future work.
In addition, given that barrier performance is central to the intended packaging application, we recognize that this work does not provide a direct quantification of oxygen permeability. Oxygen transmission rate (OTR) measurements would be the most direct evidence to support oxygen barrier claims and will be prioritized in our follow up experiments, particularly for oxygen sensitive products. Also, DSC and DMA were not available within the timeframe of the study. These techniques should be addressed in future work to quantify thermal transitions, viscoelastic relaxation behavior, and component interactions in the presence of glycerol and RHA, providing complementary support for the interpretation discussed here.

4. Conclusions

Silica-rich RHA was upcycled as an inorganic filler to engineer CA films with tunable properties toward higher-value sustainable packaging. Using a single solvent-casting route, we varied RHA loading with and without glycerol plasticization to map how microstructure governs optical shielding, wetting behavior, and tensile performance.
FTIR confirmed the chemical integrity of CA across all formulations and indicated stronger hydroxyl interactions in glycerol-plasticized films, consistent with a plasticization mechanism driven by physical interactions. Optical microscopy showed that RHA progressively induces particle-domain formation and aggregation, while glycerol promotes improved dispersion and a more uniform surface appearance. These microstructural trends translated into a controllable optical–mechanical trade-off. Neat CA remained highly transparent, whereas RHA reduced transmittance across the UV–Vis range. Glycerol produced only a minor change in transmittance, indicating that shielding is primarily governed by ash-derived inorganic domains.
Tensile testing highlighted an optimal low-filler regime in the non-plasticized series. The formulation with 1.33 wt% RHA preserved strength while maximizing stiffness, whereas higher RHA loading increased heterogeneity and penalized mechanical performance. Contact-angle measurements in neutral and alkaline media indicated pH-sensitive wetting, with faster deterioration under alkaline exposure. Thermogravimetric analysis confirmed increased char residue with RHA addition and showed that glycerol introduces an early mass-loss stage.
The CA/RHA platform provides a simple and potentially scalable route to upcycled, silica-reinforced films. Within the evaluated set, the formulation containing CA and 1.33 wt% RHA without glycerol stands out as a robust secondary layer with low UV–Vis transmittance, supporting its use in high-value light-sensitive flexible healthcare packaging, such as protective overwraps or translucent pouches.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.G.d.F., C.d.D.d.N. and C.M.C.; methodology, E.G.d.F., E.G.d.F. and C.M.C.; software, E.G.d.F., C.M.C. and E.G.S.; validation, C.M.C., C.d.D.d.N. and E.G.S.; Formal analysis, E.G.d.F., E.G.S. and L.M.G.; investigation, E.G.d.F., M.A.R., S.H.F.d.S., N.E.A.d.S., C.D.B.F., A.L.M. and N.L.V.C.; resources, A.L.M., N.L.V.C. and C.M.C.; data curation, E.G.S., C.M.C. and E.G.d.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.C., E.G.d.F. and E.G.S.; writing—review and editing, C.d.D.d.N., C.M.C., A.L.M., M.A.R. and E.G.S.; visualization, N.L.V.C. and L.M.G.; supervision, C.M.C.; project administration, C.d.D.d.N. and C.M.C.; funding acquisition, N.L.V.C., A.L.M. and C.M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil (Finance Code 001), for financial support. The authors also acknowledge funding from FAPERGS/CNPq Call 07/2022-Program for Supporting the Fixation of Young Doctors in Brazil-under Grant Agreement (Termo de Outorga) No. 23/2551-0001907-8. This work was partially funded by the Agrosense project, supported by the Competence Center for Digital Agriculture Hardware, with financial resources from the PPI IoT/Manufatura 4.0/PPI HardwareBR program of the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI), Grant No. 056/2023, signed with EMBRAPII.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sun, Z.; Wang, X.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, Z.; Zhang, H. Smart Solutions for Sustainable Food Packaging: Functional Enhancements and Future Directions. Foods 2024, 13, 3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lau, W.Y.; Shiran, Y.; Bailey, R.M.; Cook, E.; Stuchtey, M.R.; Koskella, J.; Velis, C.A.; Godfrey, L.; Boucher, J.; Murphy, M.B.; et al. Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science 2020, 369, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alizadeh, S.M.; Azizi-Lalabadi, M.; Tavassoli, M.; Mohammadi, K.; McClements, D.J. Recent Advances in the Development of Smart and Active Biodegradable Packaging Materials. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yaradoddi, J.; Banapurmath, N.R.; Ganachari, S.V.; Soudagar, M.E.M.; Mubarak, N.M.; Hallad, S.; Hugar, S.; Fayaz, H. Biodegradable carboxymethyl cellulose based material for sustainable packaging application. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Castrillón, H.D.C.; Aguilar, C.M.G.; Álvarez, B.E.A. Circular Economy Strategies: Use of Corn Waste to Develop Biomaterials. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bosenbecker, M.W.; Silva, E.V.; Schmitt, P.O.; Zanon, T.T.M.; Rodrigues, D.D.S.; Souza, E.G.; do Nascimento, C.D.; Marini, J.; de Oliveira, A.D. Improved Thermal and Structural Performance of LDPE Reinforced With Bamboo Cellulose Nanocrystals via PE-g-MA Compatibilization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2025, 143, e58181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nunes, N.V.V.; Cordeiro, L.A.; Cholant, C.M.; Ribeiro, A.C.R.; Souza, E.G.; Nascimento, C.D.; Galio, A.F.; Oliveira, A.D.; Missio, A.L. Development and characterization of cellulose films incorporating vitamin A and E–loaded liposomes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2026, e70429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pedersen, J.N.; Blaschek, L.; Frandsen, K.E.H.; Noack, L.C.; Persson, S. Cellulose synthesis in land plants. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 206–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Juraniec, M.; Gajda, B. Cellulose biosynthesis in plants: The concerted action of CESA and non-CESA proteins. Biol. Plant. 2020, 64, 363–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jarvis, M.C. Hydrogen bonding and other non-covalent interactions at the surfaces of cellulose microfibrils. Cellulose 2023, 30, 667–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barhoum, A.; Rastogi, V.K.; Mahur, B.K.; Rastogi, A.; Abdel-Haleem, F.M.; Samyn, P. Nanocelluloses as new generation materials: Natural resources, structure-related properties, engineering nanostructures, and technical challenges. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 26, 101247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ragauskas, A.J.; Williams, C.K.; Davison, B.H.; Britovsek, G.; Cairney, J.; Eckert, C.A.; Frederick, W.J.; Hallett, J.P.; Leak, D.J.; Liotta, C.L.; et al. The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials. Science 2006, 311, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kramar, A.; Luxbacher, T.; Moshfeghi Far, N.; Gonzalez-Benito, J. Active Cellulose Acetate/Chitosan Composite Films Prepared Using Solution Blow Spinning: Structure and Electrokinetic Properties. Polymers 2023, 15, 3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cindradewi, A.W.; Bandi, R.; Park, C.W.; Park, J.S.; Lee, E.A.; Kim, J.K.; Kwon, G.J.; Han, S.Y.; Lee, S.H. Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Acetate Film Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibril. Polymers 2021, 13, 2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dong, G.; Yuan, Z.; Guo, X. Functional properties of nano-SiO2/pinewood-derived cellulose acetate composite film for packaging application. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 204, 117253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lettieri, R.; Caravella, A.; Quintarelli, G.; D’Ottavi, C.; Licoccia, S.; Gatto, E. Lignin-Containing Cellulose Acetate Films from Grapevine Waste: A Sustainable Path to Compostable Bioplastics. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Requena, X.M.; Pimentel, G.G.A.; Fanta, G.F.; Vieira, L.S.; dos Santos, E.P.; de Melo, E.A.; de Souza, A.G.; Maciel, V.B.V.; Yoshida, C.M.P. Enhanced Antibacterial Activity in Cellulose Acetate Films with MgO Nanoparticles for Sustainable Active Packaging Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 13385–13396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharma, C.; Kundu, S.; Singh, S.; Saxena, J.; Gautam, S.; Kumar, A.; Pathak, P. From concept to shelf: Engineering biopolymer-based food packaging for sustainability. RSC Sustain. 2025, 3, 4992–5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marsh, K.; Bugusu, B. Food Packaging—Roles, Materials, and Environmental Issues. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, R39–R55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Laftah, W.A.; Wan Abdul Rahman, W.A. Rice waste–based polymer composites for packaging applications: A review. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2021, 29, S1621–S1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liou, T.-H.; Wang, S.-Y.; Lin, Y.-T.; Yang, S. Sustainable utilization of rice husk waste for preparation of ordered nanostructured mesoporous silica and mesoporous carbon: Characterization and adsorption performance. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 636, 128150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Acosta-Silva, Y.D.J.; Toledano-Ayala, M.; Gallardo-Hernández, S.; Godínez, L.A.; Méndez-López, A. Investigation of TiO2 Deposit on SiO2 Films: Synthesis, Characterization, and Efficiency for the Photocatalytic Discoloration of Methylene Blue in Aqueous Solution. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fitriani, F.; Bilad, M.R.; Aprilia, S.; Arahman, N. Biodegradable Hybrid Polymer Film for Packaging: A Review. J. Nat. Fibers 2023, 20, 59606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Apisarnthanarak, A.; Ling, M.L.; Jaggi, N.; Ching, P.; Liang, L.; Zong, Z. APSIC guidelines for environmental hygiene: Surface cleaning air and water quality in hospitals: 2025 update. Antimicrob. Steward. Healthc. Epidemiol. 2026, 6, e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dewey, H.M.; Jones, J.; Keating, M.R.; Budhathoki-Uprety, J. Increased Use of Disinfectants During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Potential Impacts on Health and Safety. ACS Chem. Health Saf. 2022, 29, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, H.; Tong, H.; Lu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Qian, F.; Tao, Y.; Wang, H. Preparation of bio-based cellulose acetate/chitosan composite film with oxygen and water resistant properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 270, 118381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Camacho, A.L.D.; Santos, E.C.A.d.; Berwanger Filho, J.A.; Miranda, L.A.S.; Moraes, C.A.M. Evaluation of BTEX adsorption in industrial effluent through the percolation method using rice husk ash as adsorbent material. Rev. Eletron. Gestao. Educ. Tecnol. Ambient. 2020, 24, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kramar, A.; Rodríguez Ortega, I.; González-Gaitano, G.; González-Benito, J. Solution casting of cellulose acetate films: Influence of surface substrate and humidity on wettability, morphology and optical properties. Cellulose 2023, 30, 2037–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Madhu, J.; Santhanam, A.; Natarajan, M.; Velauthapillai, D. CO2 adsorption performance of template free zeolite A and X synthesized from rice husk ash as silicon source. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 23221–23239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Souza, E.G.; Nascimento, C.D.; Aguzzoli, C.; Santillán, E.S.B.; Cuevas-Suárez, C.E.; Nascente, P.d.S.; Piva, E.; Lund, R.G. Enhanced Antibacterial Properties of Titanium Surfaces through Diversified Ion Plating with Silver Atom Deposition. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. ASTM D882-18; Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
  32. OriginLab Corporation. OriginPro 2023 (Student Version); OriginLab Corporation: Northampton, MA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yuan, Z.; Dai, W.; Li, X.; Wu, Y.; Zang, K.; Zeng, J.; Jian, J.; Zhou, H. Improvement of the functional properties of cellulose acetate film by incorporating with glycerol and n-propanol. Cellulose 2022, 29, 7823–7836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Teixeira, S.C.; Silva, R.R.A.; de Oliveira, T.V.; Stringheta, P.C.; Pinto, M.R.M.R.; Soares, N.D.F.F. Glycerol and triethyl citrate plasticizer effects on molecular, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties of cellulose acetate films. Food Biosci. 2021, 43, 101202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mahtabani, A.; Rytöluoto, I.; Anyszka, R.; He, X.; Saarimäki, E.; Lahti, K.; Blume, A. On the Silica Surface Modification and Its Effect on Charge Transport in Composites. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 3148–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dobos, A.M.; Bargan, A.; Dunca, S.; Rimbu, C.M.; Filimon, A. Cellulose acetate/silica composites: Physicochemical and biological characterization. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2023, 144, 106002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mukherjee, A.; Panda, S.; Jeelani, P.G.; Mossa, A.T.; Chidambaram, R. Biodegradable polymers/silica nanocomposites: Applications in food packaging. In Nanotechnology Applications for Food Safety and Quality Monitoring; Sharma, A., Vijayakumar, P., Prabhakar, E.P.K., Kumar, R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; Volume 20, pp. 395–414. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tarique, J.; Sapuan, S.M.; Khalina, A. Effect of glycerol plasticizer loading on the physical, mechanical, thermal and barrier properties of arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) starch biopolymers. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. del Gaudio, I.; Hunter-Sellars, E.; Parkin, I.P.; Williams, D.; Da Ros, S.; Curran, K. Water sorption and diffusion in cellulose acetate: The effect of plasticisers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 267, 118185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gonçalves, S.M.; dos Santos, D.C.; Motta, J.F.G.; dos Santos, R.R.; de Medeiros, A.M. Structure and functional properties of cellulose acetate films incorporated with glycerol. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 209, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Khatri, Z.; Kim, I.S. Ultrasonic-assisted deacetylation of cellulose acetate nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Benitez, J.J.; Florido-Moreno, P.; Porras-Vázquez, J.M.; Tedeschi, G.; Athanassiou, A.; Heredia-Guerrero, J.A.; Guzman-Puyol, S. Transparent, plasticized cellulose-glycerol bioplastics for food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 273, 132956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Celuppi, L.C.M.; Capelezzo, A.P.; Cima, L.B.; Zeferino, R.C.F.; Carniel, T.A.; Fiori, M.A.; Riella, H.G. Microbiological, thermal and mechanical performance of cellulose acetate films with geranyl acetate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 228, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, L.; Gong, D.; Bratasz, L.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, C. Degradation markers and plasticizer loss of cellulose acetate films during ageing. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 168, 108952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bouftou, R.; Aghmih, K.; Lakhdar, F.; Abidi, N.; Gmouh, S.; Majid, S. Enhancing cellulose acetate film with green plasticizers for improved performance, biodegradability, and migration study into a food simulant. Meas. Food 2024, 100180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Reddy, J.P.; Varada Rajulu, A.; Rhim, J.W.; Seo, J. Mechanical, thermal, and water vapor barrier properties of regenerated cellulose/nano-SiO2 composite films. Cellulose 2018, 25, 7153–7165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Darekar, V.S.; Kulthe, M.G.; Goyal, A.; Goyal, R.K. Rice husk ash: Effective reinforcement for epoxy-based composites for electronic applications. J. Electron. Mater. 2024, 53, 1344–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Optical micrographs (10×; scale bar = 250 µm) of CA and CA/RHA composite films prepared with and without glycerol plasticization: (a) CA, (b) CA-0.01RHA, (c) CA-0.1RHA, (d) CA-G, (e) CA-G-0.01RHA, and (f) CA-G-0.1RHA.
Figure 1. Optical micrographs (10×; scale bar = 250 µm) of CA and CA/RHA composite films prepared with and without glycerol plasticization: (a) CA, (b) CA-0.01RHA, (c) CA-0.1RHA, (d) CA-G, (e) CA-G-0.01RHA, and (f) CA-G-0.1RHA.
Jcs 10 00102 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of CA and CA/RHA composite films prepared with and without glycerol plasticization: CA, CA-0.01RHA, CA-0.1RHA, CA-G, CA-G-0.01RHA, and CA-G-0.1RHA. Spectra are shown offset vertically for clarity. The inset highlights the O-H stretching region (3800–3000 c m 1 ), where glycerol-containing films show a more pronounced broad band centered around ∼3350 c m 1 compared with neat CA.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of CA and CA/RHA composite films prepared with and without glycerol plasticization: CA, CA-0.01RHA, CA-0.1RHA, CA-G, CA-G-0.01RHA, and CA-G-0.1RHA. Spectra are shown offset vertically for clarity. The inset highlights the O-H stretching region (3800–3000 c m 1 ), where glycerol-containing films show a more pronounced broad band centered around ∼3350 c m 1 compared with neat CA.
Jcs 10 00102 g002
Figure 3. UV–Vis transmittance spectra of CA films containing silica-rich RHA and prepared with/without glycerol. Vertical dashed lines mark 400 and 633 nm, used for comparative discussion of optical shielding in the near-UV/blue edge and in the visible red region, respectively.
Figure 3. UV–Vis transmittance spectra of CA films containing silica-rich RHA and prepared with/without glycerol. Vertical dashed lines mark 400 and 633 nm, used for comparative discussion of optical shielding in the near-UV/blue edge and in the visible red region, respectively.
Jcs 10 00102 g003
Figure 4. Time-dependent static contact angle of CA-based films measured over 60 s using (a) deionized water and (b) NaOH aqueous solution as probe liquids. Data points represent the mean of five measurements taken at different locations on each sample. The measurement variability did not exceed ± 2 ° for any condition.
Figure 4. Time-dependent static contact angle of CA-based films measured over 60 s using (a) deionized water and (b) NaOH aqueous solution as probe liquids. Data points represent the mean of five measurements taken at different locations on each sample. The measurement variability did not exceed ± 2 ° for any condition.
Jcs 10 00102 g004
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of cellulose acetate (CA) films containing silica-rich rice husk ash (RHA), prepared with and without glycerol plasticization: (a) TG (mass remaining) and (b) DTG.
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric (TG) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of cellulose acetate (CA) films containing silica-rich rice husk ash (RHA), prepared with and without glycerol plasticization: (a) TG (mass remaining) and (b) DTG.
Jcs 10 00102 g005
Table 1. Formulations of cellulose acetate (CA) films with silica-rich rice husk ash (RHA) and glycerol. Additive contents are also reported as wt% relative to CA mass (polymer basis).
Table 1. Formulations of cellulose acetate (CA) films with silica-rich rice husk ash (RHA) and glycerol. Additive contents are also reported as wt% relative to CA mass (polymer basis).
SampleCA (g)RHA (g)Glycerol (g)RHA (wt% a)Glycerol (wt% a)
CA0.750.000.00
CA-0.01RHA0.750.011.330.00
CA-0.1RHA0.750.1013.330.00
CA-G0.751.000.00133.33
CA-G-0.01RHA0.750.011.001.33133.33
CA-G-0.1RHA0.750.101.0013.33133.33
a wt% calculated relative to CA mass: wt% = 100 × m i / m C A (polymer basis).
Table 2. Quantitative dispersion metrics from optical micrographs (10×) obtained by image analysis. The reported size corresponds to the apparent particle-domain equivalent diameter ( d eq ). N is the number of detected domains; area fraction is the total detected domain area divided by the image area. Mean ± SD and SEM ( = SD / N ) are computed over the detected domains within each micrograph.
Table 2. Quantitative dispersion metrics from optical micrographs (10×) obtained by image analysis. The reported size corresponds to the apparent particle-domain equivalent diameter ( d eq ). N is the number of detected domains; area fraction is the total detected domain area divided by the image area. Mean ± SD and SEM ( = SD / N ) are computed over the detected domains within each micrograph.
SampleNArea Fraction (%) d eq Mean ± SD (μm)SEM (μm) D 10 / D 50 / D 90 (μm)
CA00.00
CA-0.01RHA151.2736.5 ± 12.13.123.8/36.8/51.7
CA-0.1RHA13315.2641.1 ± 17.51.525.4/35.8/67.8
CA-G20.0725.27 ± 1.050.724.7/25.3/25.9
CA-G-0.01RHA312.2334.2 ± 9.31.724.5/29.4/48.3
CA-G-0.1RHA395.0341.0 ± 24.23.823.8/32.4/67.5
Table 3. Transmittance values at selected wavelengths for CA-based films.
Table 3. Transmittance values at selected wavelengths for CA-based films.
FilmT (%) at λ = 633  nmT (%) at λ = 400  nm
CA86.1885.19
CA-0.01RHA36.8531.68
CA-0.1RHA33.5228.05
CA-G85.0373.91
CA-G-0.01RHA37.0431.84
CA-G-0.1RHA28.6623.53
Table 4. Thermogravimetric parameters for CA films containing silica-rich RHA, with and without glycerol, measured under N2. For samples exhibiting two mass-loss events, values are reported as Stage I/Stage II.
Table 4. Thermogravimetric parameters for CA films containing silica-rich RHA, with and without glycerol, measured under N2. For samples exhibiting two mass-loss events, values are reported as Stage I/Stage II.
Film T onset (°C) T max (°C) T endset (°C)Mass loss (%)Residue at 800 °C (%)
CA347.34365.17382.7374.7414.67
CA-0.01RHA338.10/639.21354.31/576.33373.33/683.7164.42/11.0415.74
CA-0.1RHA343.96361.27379.1071.9225.20
CA-G148.70/349.14173.60/363.60205.08/380.5139.84/45.081.36
CA-G-0.01RHA136.97/348.77170.66/361.56206.63/376.8845.73/38.724.50
CA-G-0.1RHA152.32/332.50164.39/347.71188.20/359.2638.25/39.5117.79
Table 5. Tensile properties of CA-based films: maximum tensile stress ( σ max ), maximum crosshead displacement ( Δ L max ), stress at rupture ( σ break ), and Young’s modulus (E). Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation.
Table 5. Tensile properties of CA-based films: maximum tensile stress ( σ max ), maximum crosshead displacement ( Δ L max ), stress at rupture ( σ break ), and Young’s modulus (E). Values are represented as mean ± standard deviation.
Film σ max (MPa) Δ L max (mm) σ break (MPa)E (MPa)
CA 25.62   a ± 1.54 2.01   a ± 0.24 9.51   d ± 0.76 23.32   b ± 2.33
CA-0.01RHA 25.11   a ± 1.71 1.46   b c ± 0.18 24.95   a ± 1.50 33.13   a ± 3.31
CA-0.1RHA 21.78   b ± 0.92 1.65   a b ± 0.20 21.30   b ± 1.49 27.17   a b ± 2.72
CA-G 11.22   c d ± 1.35 2.04   a b ± 0.41 0.73   f ± 0.18 8.49   d ± 1.27
CA-G-0.01RHA 14.48   c ± 1.97 0.55   d ± 0.14 14.21   c ± 1.71 29.13   a b ± 4.37
CA-G-0.1RHA 9.57   d ± 1.44 0.97   c d ± 0.24 2.26   e ± 0.45 15.21   c ± 2.28
Within each column, values sharing at least one superscript letter are not significantly different (two-tailed Welch’s t-test with Holm correction, α = 0.05 , n = 5 ).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Freitas, E.G.; Ramos, M.A.; da Silva, S.H.F.; da Silva, N.E.A.; Falcão, C.D.B.; Gonçalves, L.M.; Missio, A.L.; Souza, E.G.; do Nascimento, C.d.D.; Carreño, N.L.V.; et al. Upcycled Silica-Rich Rice Husk Ash Reinforced Cellulose Acetate Composite Films for Light-Shielding Sustainable Packaging. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10020102

AMA Style

de Freitas EG, Ramos MA, da Silva SHF, da Silva NEA, Falcão CDB, Gonçalves LM, Missio AL, Souza EG, do Nascimento CdD, Carreño NLV, et al. Upcycled Silica-Rich Rice Husk Ash Reinforced Cellulose Acetate Composite Films for Light-Shielding Sustainable Packaging. Journal of Composites Science. 2026; 10(2):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10020102

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Freitas, Eduardo Gomes, Maurício Alves Ramos, Silvia Helena Fuentes da Silva, Nilson Edegar Antunes da Silva, Carolina Duarte Bacchieri Falcão, Lucas Minghini Gonçalves, André Luiz Missio, Everton Granemann Souza, Chiara das Dores do Nascimento, Neftalí Lenin Villarreal Carreño, and et al. 2026. "Upcycled Silica-Rich Rice Husk Ash Reinforced Cellulose Acetate Composite Films for Light-Shielding Sustainable Packaging" Journal of Composites Science 10, no. 2: 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10020102

APA Style

de Freitas, E. G., Ramos, M. A., da Silva, S. H. F., da Silva, N. E. A., Falcão, C. D. B., Gonçalves, L. M., Missio, A. L., Souza, E. G., do Nascimento, C. d. D., Carreño, N. L. V., & Cholant, C. M. (2026). Upcycled Silica-Rich Rice Husk Ash Reinforced Cellulose Acetate Composite Films for Light-Shielding Sustainable Packaging. Journal of Composites Science, 10(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10020102

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop