Next Article in Journal
Effect of Metal-Oxide Phase on the Magnetic and Magnetocaloric Properties of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3-MO (MO=CuO, CoO, and NiO) Composite
Next Article in Special Issue
Single-Molecule Magnets Based on Heteroleptic Terbium(III) Trisphthalocyaninate in Solvent-Free and Solvent-Containing Forms
Previous Article in Journal
Molarity Effects of Fe and NaOH on Synthesis and Characterisation of Magnetite (Fe3O4) Nanoparticles for Potential Application in Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Investigation of Spin-Crossover Systems by Raman Spectroscopy: A Review
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Halogen Effect on the Magnetic Behaviour of Dimethylformamide Solvates in [Fe(halide-salEen)2]BPh4

Magnetochemistry 2022, 8(12), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8120162
by Rafaela T. Marques 1, Frederico F. Martins 2,†, Deniz F. Bekiş 2,‡, Ana I. Vicente 1, Liliana P. Ferreira 2,3, Clara S. B. Gomes 4,5,6, Sónia Barroso 5,6,§, Varun Kumar 7, Yann Garcia 7, Nuno A. G. Bandeira 2, Maria José Calhorda 2 and Paulo N. Martinho 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Magnetochemistry 2022, 8(12), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry8120162
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

A point-by-point respose to the reviewer's comments can be found in the word document attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors describe the synthesis, structure and magnetic properties of three new molecular complexes based on Fe(III) and Schiff bases. They report on the halogen effect on the magnetic behaviour of the new compounds. The authors also have performed DFT calculations and the experimental structures were reproduced finely. The article is written and organized appropriately.

There are small issues that should be clarified:

1. In case of chloro-derivative the Fe-O/N distances extracted from the structural data appear to be even shorter than the calculated ones, although compound 2 exists as a HS/LS mixture at RT. This discrepancy should be explained.

2. For each measurement the type of the sample used needs a clarification, namely if a powder or a single crystal sample was used. Is the transition in single crystals more abrupt (when compared magnetic and diffraction data)? Please comment on this in the manuscript.

3. Some crystallographic points:

- Please comment in the manuscript on very weak diffraction of 3_150K and why it is not the case of 3_296K.

- Please comment in the manuscript on the presence of a racemic twin for 1_296K but not in 1_150K.

4. Typos:

- r. 126, 438 – “χMT” needs to be designated properly.

- r. 421 – “At a first glance” instead of “At a fist glance”.

Regarding all mentioned above I recommend a minor revision of the manuscript before it can be published in Magnetochemistry.

Author Response

A point-by-point respose to the reviewer's comments can be found in the word document attached. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop