1. Introduction
Moringa oleifera Lam. (Moringaceae) is a perennial plant that can grow up to 9 m tall in a short time. Alternatively called ‘the horseradish tree’ or drumstick, it is native to the Himalayan region of Northwestern India. In 2016,
M. oleifera was mainly found in Middle Eastern and Asian countries. However, it has spread to other areas, especially tropical and subtropical lands affected by drought, due to its adaptability [
1]. The tree is characterized by a brittle stem and tuberous taproots, which taste like horseradish (hence its common name). The ‘horn of Africa’ countries, mostly located in the eastern part of the continent, as well as Nigeria and South Africa, also commonly use the plant for fencing their compounds. In terms of the impact of geographic biotic and edaphic factors, it is logical to say that one could envision variations in the morphology of
M. oleifera seeds. Such variation has been reported for
M. oleifera seeds from Mexico, using principal component analysis [
2]. We have mentioned in the past the pharmacological and other health benefits derivable from the use of
M. oleifera powdered seeds and seed oils, in addition to those meticulously reported by Pandey and co-workers [
3] in their review.
Qualitative phytochemical screening is important in plant-based therapy because it confirms the presence or otherwise of various groups of phytochemicals. Such compound families, often present in natural extracts, may exhibit potential activities in mitigating different disease conditions. The biological activities, including but not limited to antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antidiabetic activities, among others, often lead separation chemists to the isolation and purification of known or novel lead compounds that may be useful in the development of new drugs [
4]. The extracts are often subjected to chemical tests for individual phytochemical analysis, as described by Balamurugan and co-workers [
5]. The in vitro biological testing of medicinal plant extracts is a crucial step-in modern-day drug discovery. Several methods, including agar diffusion, well plate dilution, thin layer chromatography (TLC)–bioautography [
6], and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determined by the broth microdilution method, carried out in multi-well microplates [
7], are often deployed with a view towards evaluating the biological activities of natural product extracts, including extracts of medicinal plant parts like
Moringa oleifera seeds. Usually, the underlying principle for biological activity involves the plant extract interacting with a disease pathogen (bacteria, fungi, virus) or its enzymes to inhibit the growth of the pathogen. A positive test is indicated by colour changes in most cases. Unlike its counterparts from around the world, not much information is available in the literature regarding the qualitative phytochemical screening and biological activities of South African
Moringa oleifera seed.
The
M. oleifera, in addition to its popular use in water treatment, also finds application in curing eye diseases and headaches. Its other recorded uses involve the management of fevers, snake bites, scorpion stings, and warts. It also treats ulcers, gastritis, skin disorders, bladder infections, scurvy, abdominal tumours, and schistosomes. The phytochemicals responsible include (benzylglucosinate di-oleic-triglyceride Mono-palmitic acid [
8]). Apart from the seeds,
M. oleifera seed oils have some medicinal uses, amongst them, their use as a purgative, for the alleviation of leprosy, ulcers, treatment of rheumatism, gout, skin pathogens, lupus, and bladder disorders, and phytochemical groups like tocopherols, palmitic, stearic, and arachidic acids are linked to the activity of the seed oils [
7].
Antimicrobial resistance is a leading public health challenge globally. Even though there are current efforts, including microbial stewardship, patience adherence and compliance to manage the issue of antimicrobial resistance [
9], the World Health Organization still classifies
Enterococcus faecium,
Staphylococcus aureus,
Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Acinetobacter baumannii,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and
Enterobacter spp. (ESKAPE) pathogens as critical multidrug-resistant bacteria [
10], for which effective therapies are urgently required. To support the search for new anti-microbial agents, medicinal plant research is in the forefront of harnessing active extracts as well as new chemical entities that could serve as new lead compounds for clinical trials and interventions. To this end, this study is aimed at determining the classes of phytochemicals, antibacterials, antioxidants, and the identification of specific in-the-oil compounds that may be responsible for the biological potential of the oil. The stability study of the
M. oleifera oils was equally conducted to establish indicators for quality control and commercialization. Findings would contribute to the existing body of knowledge to further add value to the traditional uses and commercialization of
Moringa oleifera seed and its seed oils across South Africa and beyond.
2. Materials and Methods
All chemicals and reagents used in the study were of analytical reagent grade and of the highest quality available, and were purchased from Rochelle Chemicals (Johannesburg, South Africa) or Sigma-Aldrich (Johannesburg, South Africa). These include concentrated nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, ferric chloride, the Folin–Ciocalteu Reagent (FCR), sodium carbonate solution (Na2CO3) 20% (w/v), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), micro Propette (20–200 µL), and Propette (10–1000 µL). Distilled water from a purification system was used in all experiments, and chemicals were used as received.
2.1. Plant Material Collection and Preparation
2.1.1. Sample Collection
The South African M. oleifera seed sample was purchased in March 2020 from a farm located at Lebowakgomo in Limpopo, trading under the name Patience Wellness Centre (23°54′30.5″ S 29°26′22.9″ E). The plant was identified by an Indigenous Knowledge System (IKS) Practitioner who owns the farm. Further identification of the seeds was performed by a botanist at the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), and voucher specimen MOS001 was deposited at the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, South Africa.
2.1.2. Sample Preparation
The brown shells that covered each seed were manually cracked and each shell was peeled off by hand, to obtain white seeds. The white seeds were ground into fine powder using a grinding machine (Kinematica AG, Lucerne, Switzerland), mortar and pestle, and later a blender. The seeds are known to be very oily, so during the grinding process they became stuck in the machine, causing an oily layer, which made the machine difficult to use and meant we had to clean it after around 5 seeds had been ground. However, by taking them in small portions, all the seeds were ground using the mortar and pestle to obtain a damp powder.
2.1.3. Extraction Method for Moringa oleifera Seeds
Prior to the sequential extraction, 5.0 g of the gum seed resin was extracted using the same extraction protocol used in the preliminary assessment of the phytoconstituents of the plant. Thereafter, sequential extraction of the plant material was conducted using hexane, dichloromethane, acetone, and methanol. This set of solvents was chosen because both polar and non-polar phytocomponents of the oil were targeted. This study deployed the extraction method by Lavenburg and co-workers [
11] but with minor modifications. Briefly, 223.5 g of finely powered seed material was weighed using an analytical balance, and the seed resinous material was then transferred into a 1000 mL glass beaker. Then, 500 mL of solvent (hexane) was dispensed using a measuring cylinder and poured into the 1000 mL beaker with the plant material, which was then closed with a parafilm. The mixture was extracted by ultra-sonication (Labotec Pty Ltd., Midrand, South Africa) at a temperature of 25 °C for 30 min, after which the mixture was left to cool for 2 min. The mixture was filtered into an Erlenmeyer flask, using Whatman No. 1 filter paper with a pore size of 40 μm. The extraction process was repeated two more times and the combined filtrate collated. The filtrate mixture was evaporated using a rotary evaporator (Cole Parmer Ltd., Stone-England, UK) connected to a Vacuubrand MZ 2C NT pump (Vacuubrand GmBH + Co Kg, Wertheim, Germany) set at the boiling temperature of the extracting solvents, such that the solvent was evaporated to dryness, to afford an oil solution, which was then transferred into small beakers which were each weighed and labelled. The plant residue from the hexane extract was dried for 45 min, and the same extraction protocol was used to sequentially extract it using dichloromethane (DCM), acetone (ACTN), and methanol (MeOH), based on their respective solvent polarity of least to most polar. Oily extracts from hexane, DCM, ACTN, and MeOH were obtained after filtration and concentration under pressure, with rotary evaporation and air drying. The percentage yield of each of the dry extracts was calculated using Equation (1) below:
2.1.4. Qualitative Phytochemical Screening of M. oleifera Seeds
The qualitative assay of phytochemical compounds was conducted using the methods already established to assess for categories of phytochemical compounds in plant extracts, as described by Balamurugan et al. [
5]. The compounds that were evaluated for absence and/or presence included alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids, tannins, anthraquinones, saponins, glycosides, proteins, flavonoids, and phenols, which have been documented to exert a biological influence on animal tissues. The dry hexane, dichloromethane, acetone, and methanol extracts of
M. oleifera leaves obtained were evaluated for their phytochemical content. The standard protocols used, with slight modifications in some experiments, are summarized in
Table 1.
2.1.5. Preliminary Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Conditions
Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) silica gel 60 F
254 plates were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck), 290 Concord Road, Billerica, MA, 01821, USA. TLC studies were carried out for all the extracts on aluminum pre-coated silica gel (G) 60 F
254 plates. The best resolution of the test extracts was achieved by developing the TLC plates using a mobile phase consisting of different solvent combinations. The solution of the seed extracts was spotted on the TLC plates by using capillary tubes and developed in a TLC chamber using a suitable mobile phase. The developed TLC plates were air-dried and observed under ultraviolet (UV) light. They were later sprayed with MeOH: H
2SO
4 (
v/
v), and some were placed on a hot plate for 1 min for the development of colour and to enhance the visibility of the separated bands. The resolution of the phytochemical bands/spots was expressed by the retardation factor (Rf) values, calculated using Equation (2).
2.2. Biological Activity Assay of M. oleifera Seed Extracts
2.2.1. Antioxidant Assay of M. oleifera Seeds Extracts Using a DPPH Assay
Extracts dissolved in their respective solvents were spotted on the silica gel 60 F254 plates and developed in adequate solvent systems. Thereafter, all the plates were sprayed with a methanolic solution of DPPH (2 mg/mL). The antioxidant compounds in the extracts appeared as yellow bands on a light purple background.
2.2.2. In Vitro Qualitative Antimicrobial Assay of M. oleifera Seed Extracts
The four clinical isolate bacterial strains used in this study were
Acinetobacter baumannii (BAA 747),
Escherichia coli (ATCC 35218),
Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 25922), and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853). Only Gram-negative strains were used in the qualitative assay, because TLC detection was the only expected outcome. These strains were selected from our strain collection, which included Gram-negative bacteria. The methodology outlined by [
15] Nonye and Ojiako (2019) was used with slight modification for the qualitative antimicrobial assay. Cultures were incubated at their favourable growth conditions overnight and tested at 37 °C. Overnight cultures grown in Mueller–Hinton (MH) broth of specific profiled
A. baumannii,
E. coli,
K. pneumoniae, and
P. aeruginosa strains were used. The growth was adjusted to 0.5 Mac Farhland for all strains. The chromatograms on the developed TLC plates were sprayed with bacterial suspension until wet. This process was carried out in a Laminar flow cabinet Labotec (Midrand, South Africa). Thereafter, the plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C and 100% relative humidity in the dark and then sprayed with a 2 mg/mL solution of
p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (INT) Sigma-Aldrich (Johannesburg, South Africa) for the detection of zones of inhibition [
16] and further incubated overnight before being evaluated for bacterial activity.
2.2.3. In Vitro Quantitative Antimicrobial (MIC) Assay of M. oleifera Seed (MOS) Hexane Oil Extract
The isolated Gram-positive and Gram-negative
P. aeruginosa (ATCC9721),
S. pyrogens (ATCC19615),
E. coli (ATCC105363),
Bacillus cereus (ATCC14579), and
S. aureus (ATCC25923) strains were used because the spectrum of activity of the oil was being investigated based on a microbroth dilution method in 96 multi-well microtiter plates with slight modifications [
16]. Each bacterial culture was prepared in Luria Berthani (LB) broth/agar and/or Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB). A 1.0 mg/mL solution of the oil was prepared. Briefly, 30 µL of Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) was transferred to every well, and 50 µL of the oil (in triplicate) was added to wells in Row A of the microtiter plate, together with the negative (1% dimethyl sulfoxide) and positive controls (ciprofloxacin). Additionally, a blank (sterile MH broth) and standardized bacterium (control) were prepared by transferring 50 µL to the wells, respectively. Two-fold serial dilutions were performed, resulting in decreasing concentrations over the range of 1000 to 1.0 μg/mL. Thereafter, 10 µL of the standardized bacterium was added to the wells of the micro-well plate. After 24 h incubation at 37 °C, 10 μL of resazurin indicator solution (prepared by dissolving a 270 mg tablet in 40 mL of sterile distilled water) was added and incubated for a further 30 min to 1 h, until an optimal colour developed. Bacterial growth inhibition (clear wells, no colour change) was assessed visually and recorded. The MIC was recorded as the lowest concentration of the extract that inhibited bacterial growth.
2.2.4. GC-MS Stability Studies of M. oleifera Hexane Oil
Briefly, 1.0 mg of the oil was dissolved in 1.0 mL of hexane and vortex for 15 s to afford a homogenous solution. A total of 1.0 µL from the stock solution was injected into a split/splitless mode of an Agilent 7890 GC coupled to an Agilent 5977B inert MSD mass spectrometer with a triple axis detector operating in the positive electron ionization (EI) mode. Agilent MSD ChemStation G1701EA, E.02.01.177 (California, USA) was used for the data management. The GC-MS operating conditions are given in
Table 2.
2.2.5. UV–Vis Spectrophotometer
A spectrophotometer, Nanocolor® uv/vis, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, (Düren Germany) was used. This is a high-precision instrument consisting of reference detection technology (RDT), a halogen lamp (visible range), a Deuterium lamp (UV range), and a monochromator at a wavelength range of 190–110 nm with an operating unit of 10–40 °C at 80% relative humidity. The power supply ranged between 119 and 240 AC and 50/60 Hz. Samples were scanned in less than 1 min, with spectral bands of <2 nm.
2.2.6. TLC Plate UV Visualization Cabinet
The developed TLC plates were visualized under white light, at a short wave (254 nm) and long wave (366 nm). The UV Spectroline lamp model FE (230 volts 50Hz 0.2 Amps) was mounted on a fluorescence analysis cabinet Model CM-10A (Spectronics Corporation, Westbury, NY, USA) TLC viewing chamber. In some instances, though, the plates were visualized by spraying with either 9:1 v/v methanol/H2SO4 solution or 2 mM solution of DPPH dissolved in methanol.
2.2.7. Statistical Analysis
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) single factor test was conducted in Excel, while the average of the replicated data obtained from the MIC analysis was computed, and the results are presented as the mean and standard deviation.