Lactic-Fermented Tomato as a Natural Colorant and Bioprotective Ingredient Replacing Cochineal Carmine in Fresh Pork Sausage
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Characterization of Tomato Flour
2.2. Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Strains
2.3. Upstream Bioprocessing
2.4. Fermentation
2.5. Downstream Bioprocessing
2.6. Efficacy Assessment
2.6.1. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration Test
2.6.2. Shelf-Life Study
2.6.3. Color Measurement
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Color Attributes
4.1.1. Partial Replacement of Cochineal Carmine with Lactic-Fermented Tomato Flour
4.1.2. Total Replacement of Cochineal Carmine by Lactic-Fermented Tomato Flour
4.1.3. Technological Implications
4.2. Microbiological Analysis
4.2.1. Dose-Dependent Antimicrobial Activity in the In Vitro Model
4.2.2. Antimicrobial Performance in the Meat Matrix and Growth Kinetics
4.2.3. Shelf-Life Extension
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| LAB | Lactic acid bacteria |
| CMDS | Computational Microbial Density Scanning |
| BHI | Brain Heart Infusion |
| MRS | de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (agar) |
| CFU | Colony-forming units |
| w/v | Weight per volume |
| v/v | Volume per volume |
| ISO | International Organization for Standardization |
| PID | Proportional–Integral–Derivative |
| ANOVA | Analysis of variance |
| HSD | Honestly Significant Difference |
| PCA | Plate Count Agar |
| OD | Optical density |
| CIELAB | Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage Lab* color space |
| L* | Lightness |
| a* | Redness/greenness coordinate |
| b* | Yellowness/blueness coordinate |
| C* | Chroma |
| h° | Hue angle |
| Ymax | Maximum specific growth rate |
| Xmax | Absolute microbial growth |
| N(growth) | Microbial growth kinetics in the exponential phase |
| N(deceleration) | Microbial growth kinetics in the deceleration phase |
| PT100 | Platinum resistance temperature sensor |
References
- de Barcellos, M.D.; de Melo Saab, M.S.; Pérez-Cueto, F.A.; Perin, M.G.; Neves, M.F.; Verbeke, W. Pork Consumption in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities for the Brazilian Pork Production Chain. J. Chain Netw. Sci. 2011, 11, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Andrade, J.C.; Nalério, E.S.; Giongo, C.; de Barcellos, M.D.; Ares, G.; Deliza, R. Consumer Sensory and Hedonic Perception of Sheep Meat Coppa under Blind and Informed Conditions. Meat Sci. 2018, 137, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hötzel, M.J.; Vandresen, B. Brazilians’ Attitudes to Meat Consumption and Production: Present and Future Challenges to the Sustainability of the Meat Industry. Meat Sci. 2022, 192, 108893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leroy, F.; Degreef, F. Convenient Meat and Meat Products. Societal and Technological Issues. Appetite 2015, 94, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arildsen Jakobsen, L.M.; Vuholm, S.; Aaslyng, M.D.; Kristensen, M.; Sørensen, K.V.; Raben, A.; Kehlet, U. Sensory Characteristics and Consumer Liking of Sausages with 10% Fat and Added Rye or Wheat Bran. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 534–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal (ABPA). Relatório Anual ABPA 2025; Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal (ABPA): São Paulo, Brazil, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Matera, J.A.; Cruz, A.G.; Raices, R.S.L.; Silva, M.C.; Nogueira, L.C.; Quitério, S.L.; Cavalcanti, R.N.; Freiras, M.Q.; Conte Júnior, C.A. Discrimination of Brazilian Artisanal and Inspected Pork Sausages: Application of Unsupervised, Linear and Non-Linear Supervised Chemometric Methods. Food Res. Int. 2014, 64, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- do Amaral, D.S.; Cardelle-Cobas, A.; do Nascimento, B.M.S.; Monteiro, M.J.; Madruga, M.S.; Pintado, M.M.E. Development of a Low Fat Fresh Pork Sausage Based on Chitosan with Health Claims: Impact on the Quality, Functionality and Shelf-Life. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 2768–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luong, N.-D.M.; Jeuge, S.; Coroller, L.; Feurer, C.; Desmonts, M.-H.; Moriceau, N.; Anthoine, V.; Gavignet, S.; Rapin, A.; Frémaux, B.; et al. Spoilage of Fresh Turkey and Pork Sausages: Influence of Potassium Lactate and Modified Atmosphere Packaging. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaillou, S.; Chaulot-Talmon, A.; Caekebeke, H.; Cardinal, M.; Christieans, S.; Denis, C.; Hélène Desmonts, M.; Dousset, X.; Feurer, C.; Hamon, E.; et al. Origin and Ecological Selection of Core and Food-Specific Bacterial Communities Associated with Meat and Seafood Spoilage. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1105–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benson, A.K.; David, J.R.; Gilbreth, S.E.; Smith, G.; Nietfeldt, J.; Legge, R.; Kim, J.; Sinha, R.; Duncan, C.E.; Ma, J.; et al. Microbial Successions Are Associated with Changes in Chemical Profiles of a Model Refrigerated Fresh Pork Sausage during an 80-Day Shelf-life Study. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5178–5194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Essid, I.; Medini, M.; Hassouna, M. Technological and Safety Properties of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains Isolated from a Tunisian Traditional Salted Meat. Meat Sci. 2009, 81, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertens, L.; Van Derlinden, E.; Van Impe, J.F. A Novel Method for High-Throughput Data Collection in Predictive Microbiology: Optical Density Monitoring of Colony Growth as a Function of Time. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancini, R.A.; Hunt, M.C. Current Research in Meat Color. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 100–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faustman, C.; Cassens, R.G. The Biochemical Basis for Discoloration in Fresh Meat: A Review. J. Muscle Foods 1990, 1, 217–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okraszewska-Lasica, W.; Bolton, D.J.; Sheridan, J.J.; McDowell, D.A. Airborne Salmonella and Listeria Associated with Irish Commercial Beef, Sheep and Pig Plants. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakil, M.H.; Trisha, A.T.; Rahman, M.; Talukdar, S.; Kobun, R.; Huda, N.; Zzaman, W. Nitrites in Cured Meats, Health Risk Issues, Alternatives to Nitrites: A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClure, B.N.; Sebranek, J.G.; Kim, Y.H.; Sullivan, G.A. The Effects of Lactate on Nitrosylmyoglobin Formation from Nitrite and Metmyoglobin in a Cured Meat System. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1072–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellucci, E.R.B.; Barretto, T.L.; Rodriguez, J.M.L.; Bis-Souza, C.V.; Barba, F.J.; Barretto, A.C.d.S. Natural Colorants Improved the Physicochemical and Sensorial Properties of Frozen Brazilian Sausage (Linguiça) with Reduced Nitrite. Sci. Agric. 2021, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brazil. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply (MAPA). Normative Instruction No. 4 of 31 March 2000: Technical Regulation of Identity and Quality for Sausages. Available online: https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/portaria-sda/mapa-n-971-de-8-de-dezembro-de-2023-5302711662000; (accessed on 7 February 2026).
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). International Trade in Non-Wood Forest Products: Cochineal (Dactylopius coccus); FAO: Rome, Italy, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Sigurdson, G.T.; Tang, P.; Giusti, M.M. Natural Colorants: Food Colorants from Natural Sources. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 8, 261–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Delgado-Vargas, F.; Jiménez, A.R.; Paredes-López, O. Natural Pigments: Carotenoids, Anthocyanins, and Betalains—Characteristics, Biosynthesis, Processing, and Stability. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2000, 40, 173–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, Y.; Yadav, D.N.; Ahmad, T.; Narsaiah, K. Recent Trends in the Use of Natural Antioxidants for Meat and Meat Products. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2015, 14, 796–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herbach, K.M.; Stintzing, F.C.; Carle, R. Betalain Stability and Degradation—Structural and Chromatic Aspects. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, R41–R50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leroy, F.; De Vuyst, L. Lactic Acid Bacteria as Functional Starter Cultures for the Food Fermentation Industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gálvez, A.; Abriouel, H.; López, R.L.; Omar, N.B. Bacteriocin-Based Strategies for Food Biopreservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 120, 51–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lücke, F.-K. Utilization of Microbes to Process and Preserve Meat. Meat Sci. 2000, 56, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Vuyst, L.; Leroy, F. Bacteriocins from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Production, Purification, and Food Applications. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 13, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, A.F.; de Paula, B.P.; dos Santos Gomes, E.L.; Guerra, C.A.; Costa, L.M.; Zarur Coelho, M.A.; Luchese, R.H.; Giacomini, A.; Corich, V. Optimization of Culture Medium for Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DTA-83 to Produce Biopreservatives Enhancing Meat Product Durability. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2025, 67, 103684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, W.; Zeng, Y.; Shen, J.; Li, K.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, X.; Pan, D. Enhanced Bacteriocin Production by Lactic Acid Bacteria by Co-Culture of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Limosilactobacillus fermentum. Food Biosci. 2025, 68, 106358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khubber, S.; Marti-Quijal, F.J.; Tomasevic, I.; Remize, F.; Barba, F.J. Lactic Acid Fermentation as a Useful Strategy to Recover Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compounds from Food and By-Products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2022, 43, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fioravante Guerra, A.; Gava Barreto, A.; Rodrigues Viviani, I.; Marques Costa, L.; Alberto Guerra, C.; Corich, V.; Giacomini, A.; Lemos Junior, W.J.F. Impact of a Biopreservative Derived from Lactic Fermentation on Quality after Food Processing: A Case Study on Sliced Cooked Ham. Fermentation 2024, 10, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barcenilla, C.; Ducic, M.; López, M.; Prieto, M.; Álvarez-Ordóñez, A. Application of Lactic Acid Bacteria for the Biopreservation of Meat Products: A Systematic Review. Meat Sci. 2022, 183, 108661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Lima, A.L.; Guerra, C.A.; Costa, L.M.; de Oliveira, V.S.; Lemos Junior, W.J.F.; Luchese, R.H.; Guerra, A.F. A Natural Technology for Vacuum-Packaged Cooked Sausage Preservation with Potentially Postbiotic-Containing Preservative. Fermentation 2022, 8, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, A.V.; Agarwal, S. Role of Lycopene as Antioxidant Carotenoid in the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: A Review. Nutr. Res. 1999, 19, 305–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J. Lycopene in Tomatoes: Chemical and Physical Properties Affected by Food Processing. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2000, 20, 293–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voragen, A.G.J.; Coenen, G.-J.; Verhoef, R.P.; Schols, H.A. Pectin, a Versatile Polysaccharide Present in Plant Cell Walls. Struct. Chem. 2009, 20, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 10523:2012; Water Quality—Determination of PH. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
- Toh, H.; Oshima, K.; Nakano, A.; Takahata, M.; Murakami, M.; Takaki, T.; Nishiyama, H.; Igimi, S.; Hattori, M.; Morita, H. Genomic Adaptation of the Lactobacillus casei Group. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, S.W.; Yang, J.; Park, S.; Kim, B.; Seo, S.W. Complete Genome Sequence of Lactic Acid Bacterium Pediococcus acidilactici Strain ATCC 8042, an Autolytic Anti-Bacterial Peptidoglycan Hydrolase Producer. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2019, 24, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 4833-1; Microbiology of the Food Chain—Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Microorganisms—Part 1: Colony Count at 30 Degrees C by the Pour Plate Technique. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
- ISO 7218:2024; Microbiology of the Food Chain—General Requirements and Guidance for Microbiological Examinations. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
- Guerra, C.A.; Barboza Júnior, E.P.; Alves, L.G.d.O.; Guerra, A.F. Biosafe Control of Staphylococcal Enterotoxins Production in Shelf-Stable Bacon. Fermentation 2025, 11, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, C.A.; Costa, L.M.; de Oliveira, V.S.; de Paula, B.P.; Junior, W.J.F.L.; Luchese, R.H.; Corich, V.; Giacomini, A.; Guerra, A.F. Correlation between Natural Microbial Load and Formation of Ropy Slime Affecting the Superficial Color of Vacuum-Packaged Cooked Sausage. Meat Sci. 2023, 201, 109197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saldaña, E.; Soletti, I.; Martins, M.M.; Menegali, B.S.; Merlo, T.C.; Selani, M.M.; Teixeira, A.C.B.; da Silva, F.G.; Contreras-Castillo, C.J. Understanding Consumers’ Dynamic Sensory Perception for Bacon Smoked with Different Brazilian Woods. Meat Sci. 2019, 154, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, I.-S.; Jin, S.-K.; Mandal, P.K.; Kang, S.-N. Quality of Low-Fat Pork Sausages with Tomato Powder as Colour and Functional Additive during Refrigerated Storage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 48, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eyiler, E.; Oztan, A. Production of Frankfurters with Tomato Powder as a Natural Additive. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartkiene, E.; Gražina, J.; Zadeike, D.; Viskelis, P.; Urbonaviciene, D. The Use of Tomato Powder Fermented with Pediococcus pentosaceus and Lactobacillus sakei for the Ready-to-Cook Minced Meat Product Quality Improvement. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 53, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mikami, N.; Yamashiro, Y.; Nagaoka, S.; Akamatsu, Y.; Maeda, H.; Shimada, K. Effects of Different Tomato Products on the Lipid Oxidation, Color, and Texture of Uncured Cooked Pork Sausages in Storage. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2023, 29, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, I.S.; Jin, S.K.; Yang, M.R.; Chu, G.M.; Park, J.H.; Rashid, R.H.I.; Kim, J.Y.; Kang, S.N. Efficacy of Tomato Powder as Antioxidant in Cooked Pork Patties. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26, 1339–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skwarek, P.; Karwowska, M. Fatty Acids Profile and Antioxidant Properties of Raw Fermented Sausages with the Addition of Tomato Pomace. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madsen, H.L.; Stapelfeldt, H.; Bertelsen, G.; Skibsted, L.H. Cochineal as a Colorant in Processed Pork Meat. Colour Matching and Oxidative Stability. Food Chem. 1993, 46, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, R.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Zeng, K.; Yi, L. Transformation of Inferior Tomato into Preservative: Fermentation by Multi-Bacteriocin Producing Lactobacillus paracasei WX322. Foods 2021, 10, 1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricci, A.; Bertani, G.; Maoloni, A.; Bernini, V.; Levante, A.; Neviani, E.; Lazzi, C. Antimicrobial Activity of Fermented Vegetable Byproduct Extracts for Food Applications. Foods 2021, 10, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Bacteriocins: Developing Innate Immunity for Food. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricke, S.C. Perspectives on the Use of Organic Acids and Short Chain Fatty Acids as Antimicrobials. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agriopoulou, S.; Stamatelopoulou, E.; Sachadyn-Król, M.; Varzakas, T. Lactic Acid Bacteria as Antibacterial Agents to Extend the Shelf-life of Fresh and Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables: Quality and Safety Aspects. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaveh, S.; Hashemi, S.M.B.; Abedi, E.; Amiri, M.J.; Conte, F.L. Bio-Preservation of Meat and Fermented Meat Products by Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains and Their Antibacterial Metabolites. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, D.; Nanda, P.K.; Pateiro, M.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Dhar, P.; Das, A.K. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacteriocins: Novel Biotechnological Approach for Biopreservation of Meat and Meat Products. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Ingredients | Treatments (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | |
| Pork leg | 84.35 | 80.75 | 83.15 |
| Water | 12.00 | 12.00 | 12.00 |
| Lactic-fermented tomato flour | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
| Sodium chloride | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| MasterMix Toscana 0822/BR * | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.10 |
| Master Cura SM ** | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Cochineal carmine *** | 0.80 | 0.40 | |
| Parameters | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| L* | 42.91 ± 2.21 a | 41.38 ± 4.05 a | 45.38 ± 1.55 b |
| a* | 15.29 ± 3.45 ab | 18.70 ± 3.54 a | 12.74 ± 2.65 b |
| b* | 7.80 ± 1.11 b | 14.02 ± 1.00 a | 13.55 ± 3.07 a |
| C* | 17.16 ± 3.51 b | 23.37 ± 1.24 a | 18.60 ± 3.45 b |
| h° | 27.05 ± 2.43 a | 36.85 ± 5.12 b | 46.76 ± 1.19 c |
| Shapiro–Wilk Test | ||||
| Parameters | α | Test Statistic (p) | Critical Value (pr) | Conclusion |
| Xmax. | 0.05 | 16.9087 | 0.916 | Parametric |
| Ymax. | 29.4126 | Parametric | ||
| ANOVA | ||||
| Concentrations (%) | Ymax * | Xmax ** | ||
| CP | 0.105 ± 0.021 a | 1.289 ± 0.111 a | ||
| 0.5% | 0.108 ± 0.051 a | 1.232 ± 0.151 a | ||
| 1.0% | 0.079 ± 0.022 a | 1.266 ± 0.091 a | ||
| 2.0% | 0.034 ± 0.027 a | 0.883 ± 0.081 b | ||
| 3.0% | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.258 ± 0.024 c | ||
| 4.0% | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.053 ± 0.011 c | ||
| 5.0% | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.103 ± 0.022 c | ||
| 10.0% | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.120 ± 0.01 c | ||
| 15.0% | 0.001 ± 0.000 | 0.113 ± 0.012 c | ||
| 20.0% | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.113 ± 0.009 c | ||
| 25.0% | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.054 ± 0.029 c | ||
| CN | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | ||
| In Vitro Trial | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation | Total Microbial Count (log CFU/g) | |||
| Temperature (°C) | Time (Days) | T1 | T2 | T3 |
| 0 | 3.95 | 3.90 | 4.01 | |
| 7 | 1 | 4.12 | 3.99 | 4.02 |
| 2 | 4.35 | 4.21 | 4.13 | |
| 25 | 1 | 6.54 | 5.67 | 5.01 |
| 2 | 9.01 | 8.56 | 6.57 | |
| In Silico Trial | ||||
| Temperature profile | Parameters | |||
| Refrigerated | N(growth) * | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.05 |
| N(deceleration) ** | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.03 | |
| Refrigerated with abuse | N(growth) * | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.09 |
| N(deceleration) ** | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.05 | |
| Room | N(growth) * | 1.22 | 0.98 | 0.55 |
| N(deceleration) ** | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.16 | |
| Shelf-Life (Days) *** | ||||
| Refrigerated | 48 | 64 | 129 | |
| Refrigerated with abuse | 28 | 37 | 70 | |
| Room | 6 | 7 | 15 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Guerra, C.A.; Guerra, A.F.; Costa, L.M. Lactic-Fermented Tomato as a Natural Colorant and Bioprotective Ingredient Replacing Cochineal Carmine in Fresh Pork Sausage. Fermentation 2026, 12, 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12050220
Guerra CA, Guerra AF, Costa LM. Lactic-Fermented Tomato as a Natural Colorant and Bioprotective Ingredient Replacing Cochineal Carmine in Fresh Pork Sausage. Fermentation. 2026; 12(5):220. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12050220
Chicago/Turabian StyleGuerra, Carlos A., André F. Guerra, and Lucas M. Costa. 2026. "Lactic-Fermented Tomato as a Natural Colorant and Bioprotective Ingredient Replacing Cochineal Carmine in Fresh Pork Sausage" Fermentation 12, no. 5: 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12050220
APA StyleGuerra, C. A., Guerra, A. F., & Costa, L. M. (2026). Lactic-Fermented Tomato as a Natural Colorant and Bioprotective Ingredient Replacing Cochineal Carmine in Fresh Pork Sausage. Fermentation, 12(5), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12050220

