Can Pre-Fermented Juice Be an Alternative Probiotic Helping to Reduce Heat Stress in Laying Japanese Quails (Metabolism and Nutrition)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Animals and Design
2.2. Preparation of Fermented Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Culture
2.3. Heat Stress Application
2.4. Egg Production and Quality Measurements
2.5. Incubation Application
2.6. Cecum Content Analyses
2.7. Biochemical Analyses
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Qin, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M.; Dai, Y.; Li, S.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, P. Effects of melittin on production performance, antioxidant function, immune function, heat shock protein, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota in heat-stressed quails. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulkadir, A.; Reddy, D. A scoping review of the impact of heat stress on the organs of the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). J. Basic Appl. Zool. 2023, 84, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatipoglu, D.; Senturk, G.; Aydin, S.S.; Kirar, N.; Top, S.; Demircioglu, İ. Rye-grass-derived probiotics alleviate heat stress effects on broiler growth, health, and gut microbiota. J. Therm. Biol. 2024, 119, 103771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydin, S.S.; Hatipoglu, D. Probiotic strategies for mitigating heat stress effects on broiler chicken performance. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2024, 68, 2153–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fathi, M.; Al-Homidan, I.; Al-Dokhail, A.; Ebeid, T.; Abou-Emera, O.; Alsagan, A. Effects of dietary probiotic Bacillus subtilis supplementation on productive performance, immune response, and egg quality characteristics in laying hens under high ambient temperature. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 17, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulkifli, I.; Abdullah, N.; Azrin, N.M.; Ho, Y.W. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial broiler strains fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracycline under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000, 41, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- TSE No: 9610; Animal Feed-Metabolic (Reversible) Energy Determination (Chemical Method). Turkish Standards Institute: Ankara, Turkey, 1991.
- Masuko, T.; Hariyama, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Cao, L.M.; Goto, M.; Ohshima, M. Effect of addition of fermented juice of epiphytic lactic acid bacteria prepared from timothy and orchardgrass on fermentation quality of silages. Grassl. Sci. 2002, 48, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haugh, R.R. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg Poult. Mag. 1937, 43, 522–525. [Google Scholar]
- Çimrin, T.; Demirel, M. Influences of rosemary essential oil on some blood parameters and small instentine microflora laying hens. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 4, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duman, A.; Sezer, C.; Oral, N.B. Kars’ ta Satis a Sunulan Suzme Ballarin Kalite Niteliklerinin Aras tirilmasi. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2008, 14, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sert, S.; Kıvanç, M. Microbiological studies on fresh cottage and lor cheeses. Food 1985, 10, 251–254. [Google Scholar]
- Harrigan, W.F. Laboratory Methods in Food Microbiology; Gulf Professional Publishing: Houston, TX, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- McCance, M.E.; Harrigan, W.F. Laboratory Methods in Food and Dairy Microbiology; Blackwell Science: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Brooks, J.C.; Martinez, B.; Stratton, J.; Bianchini, A.; Krokstrom, R.; Hutkins, R. Survey of raw milk cheeses for microbiological quality and prevalence of foodborne pathogens. Food Microbiol. 2012, 31, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alçay, A.Ü. İstanbul’da satılan pişmiş tavuk dönerlerin mikrobiyolojik kalitesinin araştırılması. Türk Mikrobiyoloji Cemiy. Derg. 2019, 49, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, M.; Lund, C.W. Improved gas-liquid chromatography for simultaneous determination of volatile fatty acids and lactic acid in silage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1980, 28, 1040–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SPSS Inc. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS/PC+); SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, Y.; Li, X.; Guan, H.; Huang, L.; Ma, X.; Peng, Y.; Li, Z.; Nie, G.; Zhou, J.; Yang, W.; et al. Microbial community and fermentation characteristics of Italian ryegrass silage prepared with corn stover and lactic acid bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 279, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, R. Role of biological additives in crop conservation. In Biotechnology in the Feed Industry, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium, Washington, DC, USA, 23–28 July 1995; Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UK, 1995; pp. 627–646. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, R.; Gogerddan, P. The importance of quality fermentation in silage making and future trends in forage production. In Proceedings of the Alltech 8th Annual European Lecture Tour, Dunboyne, Ireland, 21 February 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Guney, M.; Kale, C.; Temur, C.; Bingol, N.T.; Aksu, T. The effect of molasses and pre-fermented lactic acid juice on silage quality and in vitro digestibility of sugar beet pulp + wheat straw silage. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2018, 27, 7454–7459. [Google Scholar]
- Bureenok, S.; Langsoumechai, S.; Pitiwittayakul, N.; Yuangklang, C.; Vasupen, K.; Saenmahayak, B.; Schonewille, J.T. Effects of fibrolytic enzymes and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of Napier grass silage. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 1438–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohshima, M.; Kimura, E.; Yokota, H. A method of making good quality silage from direct-cut alfalfa by spraying previously fermented juice. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 1997, 66, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denek, N.; Can, A.; Avci, M.; Aksu, T.; Durmaz, H. The effect of molasses-based pre-fermented juice on the fermentation quality of first-cut lucerne silage. Grass Forage Sci. 2011, 66, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bureenok, S.; Namihira, T.; Tamaki, M.; Mizumachi, S.; Kawamoto, Y.; Nakada, T. Fermentative quality of guinea grass silage using fermented juice of the epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (FJLB) as a silage additive. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 807–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydın, S.S.; Denek, N. The effect of fermented lactic acid juice prepared with different levels of sucrose and incubation times on the alfalfa silage quality. Harran Univ. Vet. Fac. J. 2019, 8, 44–51. [Google Scholar]
- Aydın, S.S.; Denek, N. Amount of lactic acid bacteria in fermented natural lactic acid bacteria liquids prepared with varying sucrose inclusion at different incubation periods. Med. Weter. 2022, 78, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydın, S.S.; Denek, N. Determination of lactic acid bacterial numbers of lyophilized or frozen natural lactic acid bacterial liquids prepared with different methods and stored for different times. Kocatepe Vet. J. 2024, 17, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pambuka, S.R.; Sjofjan, O.; Radiati, L.E. Effect of liquid probiotics mixed culture supplements through drinking water on laying hens’ performance and yolk cholesterol. J. World’s Poult. Res. 2014, 4, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
- Ölmez, M.; Şahin, T.; Karadağoğlu, Ö.; Uysal, S.; Bekinkayan, B.; Filizoğlu, E.; Yörük, M.A. The effect of probiotic supplementation on performance and egg quality in laying quails under heat stress. Van Health Sci. J. 2021, 14, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lokapirnasari, W.P.; Dewi, A.R.; Fathinah, A.; Hidanah, S.; Harijani, N.; Karimah, B.; Andriani, A.D. Effect of probiotic supplementation on organic feed as alternative antibiotic growth promoter on production performance and economics analysis of quail. Vet. World 2017, 10, 1508–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astuti, F.K.; Busono, W.; Sjofjan, O. Effect of liquid probiotics addition in feed on the production in broiler. J. PAL 2015, 6, 99–104. [Google Scholar]
- Suroso, K.; Kalsum, U. Effects of probiotics encapsulation addition to feed consumption, egg production, and feed efficiency in quail. J. Anim. Res. 2016, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Ayaşan, T.; Özcan, B.A.H.R.İ.; Baylan, M.; Canoğulları, S. The effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic protexin on egg yield parameters of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 5, 776–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lokapirnasari, W.P.; Al Arif, A.; Soeharsono, S.; Fathinah, A.; Najwan, R.; Wardhani, H.C.P.; Noorrahman, N.F.; Huda, K.; Ulfah, N.; Yulianto, A.B. Improves in external and internal egg quality of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) by giving lactic acid bacteria as alternative antibiotic growth promoter. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2019, 11, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cufadar, Y.; Beyari, E.A.; Hassoubah, S.A.; Curabay, B.; Sevim, B.; Aksoy, A.; Alfassam, H.E.; Rudayni, H.A.; Allam, A.A.; Youssef, I.M.; et al. Impacts of Bacillus probiotics on productive performance and egg quality criteria in laying Japanese quails. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2024, 33, 100445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalsum, U.; Soetanto, H.; Achmanu, A.; Sjofjan, O. Effect of probiotic containing Lactobacillus salivarius on the laying performance and egg quality of Japanese quails. Med. Vet. 2012, 29, 65–73. [Google Scholar]
- Nahashon, S.N.; Nakaue, H.S.; Mirosh, L.W. Production variables and nutrient retention in Single Comb White Leghorn laying pullets fed diets supplemented with direct-fed microbials. Poult. Sci. 1994, 73, 1699–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Huang, Z.; Yu, M.; Kemp, B.; Zhang, M.; van den Brand, H. Impact of chronic heat stress in broiler breeders on egg quality, hatchability, and day-old chick quality. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.R.; Ryu, C.; Lee, S.D.; Cho, J.H.; Kang, H. Effects of heat stress on the laying performance, egg quality, and physiological response of laying hens. Animals 2024, 14, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mack, L.A.; Felver-Gant, J.N.; Dennis, R.L.; Cheng, H.W. Genetic variations alter production and behavioral responses following heat stress in two strains of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marder, J.; Arad, Z. Panting and acid-base regulation in heat stressed birds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Physiol. 1989, 94, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, H.; Lu, Y.; Li, D.; Yan, C.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Du, R.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Probiotic mediated intestinal microbiota and improved performance, egg quality, and ovarian immune function of laying hens at different laying stages. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1041072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikulski, D.; Jankowski, J.; Naczmanski, J.; Mikulska, M.; Demey, V. Effects of dietary probiotic (Pediococcus acidilactici) supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, egg traits, egg yolk cholesterol, and fatty acid profile in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2691–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oluwagbenga, E.M.; Tetel, V.; Schober, J.; Fraley, G.S. Chronic heat stress part 1: Decrease in egg quality, increase in cortisol levels in egg albumen, and reduction in fertility of breeder Pekin ducks. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 1019741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahiwe, E.U.; Abdallh, M.E.; Chang’a, E.P.; Omede, A.A.; Al-Qahtani, M.; Gausi, H.; Graham, H.; Iji, P.A. Influence of dietary supplementation of autolyzed whole yeast and yeast cell wall products on broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 33, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.-C.; Wang, X.-H.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H.-J.; Wu, S.-G.; Qi, G.-H. Dietary tea polyphenol supplementation improved egg production performance, albumen quality, and magnum morphology of Hy-line Brown hens during the late laying period. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Upadhaya, S.D.; Rudeaux, F.; Kim, I.H. Efficacy of dietary Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis supplementation continuously in pullet and lay period on egg production, excreta microflora, and egg quality of Hyline-Brown birds. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 4722–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, M.; Wei, C.; Khalid, A.; Hu, Q.; Yang, R.; Dai, B.; Cheng, H.; Wang, Z. Effect of Bacillus velezensis to substitute in-feed antibiotics on the production, blood biochemistry, and egg quality indices of laying hens. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macit, M.; Karaoglu, M.; Celebi, S.; Esenbuga, N.; Yoruk, M.A.; Kaya, A. Effects of supplementation of dietary humate, probiotic, and their combination on performance, egg quality, and yolk fatty acid composition of laying hens. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, S.H.; Lee, J.; Kong, C. Effects of multi-strain probiotics on egg production and quality in laying hens fed diets containing food waste products. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2015, 14, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
- Song, D.; Wang, Y.W.; Lu, Z.X.; Wang, W.W.; Miao, H.J.; Zhou, H.; Wang, L.; Li, A.K. Effects of dietary supplementation of microencapsulated Enterococcus fecalis and the extract of Camellia oleifera seed on laying performance, egg quality, serum biochemical parameters, and cecal microflora diversity in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2880–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- César, O.; Maribel, J.F.; César, A.S.; Robles, E.F.F. Effect of probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis as an alternative to growth-promoting antibiotics on performance, egg quality, and health parameters in young laying hens. Eur. PMC 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, E.A.; Mendes, A.A.; Pizzolante, C.C.; Gonçalves, H.C.; Oliveira, R.P.; Silva, M.A. Effect of cantaxanthin levels on performance and egg quality of laying hens. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2002, 4, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, C.L.; Andretta, I.; Galli, G.M.; Stefanello, T.B.; Camargo, N.d.O.T.; Mendes, R.E.; Pelisser, G.; Balamuralikrishnan, B.; Melchior, R.; Kipper, M. Dietary supplementation with β-mannanase and probiotics as a strategy to improve laying hen performance and egg quality. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1229485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eroğlu, A.; Al’Abri, I.S.; Kopec, R.E.; Crook, N.; Bohn, T. Carotenoids and their health benefits as derived via their interactions with gut microbiota. Adv. Nutr. 2023, 14, 238–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humam, A.M.; Loh, T.C.; Foo, H.L.; Samsudin, A.A.; Mustapha, N.M.; Zulkifli, I.; Izuddin, W.I. Effects of feeding different postbiotics produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, carcass yield, intestinal morphology, gut microbiota composition, immune status, and growth gene expression in broilers under heat stress. Animals 2019, 9, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Mahfuz, S.; Song, H. Effects of Flammulina velutipes Stem Base on microflora and volatile fatty acids in the cecum of growing layers under heat stress condition. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2019, 21, eRBCA-2019-0989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, D.; Bai, L.; Qu, Q.; Zhou, S.; Yang, M.; Guo, S.; Li, Q.; Liu, C. Impact of gut microbiota structure in heat-stressed broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2405–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, J.; Xiao, K.; Ke, Y.; Jiao, L.; Hu, C.; Diao, Q.; Shi, B.; Zou, X. Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siriken, B.; Bayram, I.; Önol, A.G. Effects of probiotics: Alone and in a mixture of Biosacc plus zinc bacitracin on the cecal microflora of Japanese quail. Res. Vet. Sci. 2003, 75, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rondón, A.; González, J.; Rodríguez, M.; Milián, G.; Martínez, M.; Beruvides, A.; Valdivia, A.; Vera, R. In vitro metabolic activity of Lactobacillus salivarius and its effect on productive and health indicators of lactating calves. Cuba. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 54, 169–181. [Google Scholar]
- Mahfuz, S.; Hui, S.; Zongjun, L. Improved production performance and health status with winter mushroom stem (Flammulina velutipes) in laying chickens: Review. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2017, 16, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meimandipour, A.; Shuhaimi, M.; Soleimani, A.F.; Azhar, K.; Hair-Bejo, M.; Kabeir, B.M.; Javanmard, A.; Anas, O.M.; Yazid, A.M. Selected microbial groups and short-chain fatty acids profile in a simulated chicken cecum supplemented with two strains of Lactobacillus. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, S.T.; Park, B.S.; Bang, H.T.; Kang, H.K.; Hwangbo, J. Effects of anti-heat diet and inverse lighting on growth performance, immune organ, microorganisms, and short-chain fatty acids of broiler chickens under heat stress. J. Environ. Biol. 2016, 37, 185–192. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, R.U.; Naz, S.; Ullah, H.; Ullah, Q.; Laudadio, V.; Bozzo, Q.G.; Tufarelli, V. Physiological dynamics in broiler chickens under heat stress and possible mitigation strategies. Anim. Biotechnol. 2023, 34, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Novak, R.; Matijašić, B.B.; Terčič, D.; Červek, M.; Gorjanc, G.; Holcman, A.; Levart, A.; Rogelj, I. Effects of two probiotic additives containing Bacillus spores on carcass characteristics, blood lipids, and cecal volatile fatty acids in meat-type chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2011, 95, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLong, J.P.; Hanley, T.C.; Vasseur, D.A. Competition and the density dependence of metabolic rates. J. Anim. Ecol. 2014, 83, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghedini, G.; White, C.R.; Marshall, D.J. Does energy flux predict density-dependence? An empirical field test. Ecology 2017, 98, 3116–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettersen, A.K.; Hall, M.D.; White, C.R.; Marshall, D.J. Metabolic rate, context-dependent selection, and the competition-colonization trade-off. Evol. Lett. 2020, 4, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, T.; Hashem, M.A.; Afrin, A.; Lahiry, A.; Rahman, S.; Bungo, T.; Das, S.C. Effects of fasting on heat-stressed broiler chickens: Part I—Growth performance, meat quality, gut histomorphological and microbial responses. bioRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Khalaifa, H.; Al-Nasser, A.; Al-Surayee, T.; Al-Kandari, S.; Al-Enzi, N.; Al-Sharrah, T.; Ragheb, G.; Al-Qalaf, S.; Mohammed, A. Effect of dietary probiotics and prebiotics on the performance of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 4465–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Önol, A.G.; Sari, M.; Ogüz, F.K.; Gülcan, B.; Erbas, G. The effect of probiotic supplementation on the performance and some blood parameters of quails during periods of chronic heat stress. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2003, 27, 857–862. [Google Scholar]
- İnci, H. The effect of probiotic use against temperature stress on some blood parameters in laying quails. Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci. 2019, 6, 887–892. [Google Scholar]
- Bedford, M.R.; Apajalahti, J.H. The role of feed enzymes in maintaining poultry intestinal health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 1759–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Güçlü, B.K. Effects of probiotic and prebiotic (mannanoligosaccharide) supplementation on performance, egg quality, and hatchability in quail breeders. Ank. Univ. Vet. Fac. J. 2011, 58, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, W.; Dong, X.; Tong, J.; Zhang, Q. The probiotic Bacillus licheniformis ameliorates heat stress-induced impairment of egg production, gut morphology, and intestinal mucosal immunity in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Tarabany, M.S. The effect of thermal stress on fertility and egg quality in Japanese quails. J. Therm. Biol. 2016, 61, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahin, K.; Sahin, N.; Kucuk, O.; Hayirli, A.; Prasad, A. Role of dietary zinc in heat-stressed poultry: A review. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 2176–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obidi, J.; Onyeanusi, B.; Ayo, J.; Rekwot, P.; Abdullahi, S. Effect of timing of artificial insemination on fertility and hatchability of Shikabrown breeder hens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2008, 7, 1224–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonato, M.; Malecki, I.A.; Rybnik-Trzaskowska, P.K.; Cornwallis, C.K.; Cloete, S.W. Predicting ejaculate quality and libido in male ostriches: Effect of season and age. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 151, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Türk, G.; Çeribaşı, A.O.; Şimşek, Ü.G.; Çeribaşı, S.; Güvenç, M.; Kaya, Ş.Ö.; Çiftçi, M.; Sönmez, M.; Yüce, A.; Bayrakdar, A.; et al. Dietary rosemary oil alleviates heat stress-induced structural and functional damage through lipid peroxidation in the testes of growing Japanese quail. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 164, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fouad, A.; Chen, W.; Ruan, D.; Wang, S.; Xia, W.; Zheng, C. Impact of heat stress on meat, egg quality, immunity, and fertility in poultry and nutritional factors that overcome these effects: A review. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2016, 15, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDaniel, C.D.; Bramwell, R.K.; Howarth, B. The male contribution to broiler breeder heat-induced infertility as determined by sperm-egg penetration and sperm storage within the hen’s oviduct. Poult. Sci. 1996, 75, 1546–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyamoto, T.; Horie, T.; Fujiwara, T.; Fukata, T.; Sasai, K.; Baba, E. Lactobacillus flora in the cloaca and vagina of hens and its inhibitory activity against Salmonella enteritidis in vitro. Poult. Sci. 2000, 79, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Coillie, E.; Goris, J.; Cleenwerck, I.; Grijspeerdt, K.; Botteldoorn, N.; Van Immerseel, F.; De Buck, J.; Vancanneyt, M.; Swings, J.; Herman, L.; et al. Identification of lactobacilli isolated from the cloaca and vagina of laying hens and characterization for potential use as probiotics to control Salmonella enteritidis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 102, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haines, M.D.; Parker, H.M.; McDaniel, C.D.; Kiess, A.S. When rooster semen is exposed to Lactobacillus fertility is reduced. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 3778–3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiess, A.S.; Hirai, J.H.; Triplett, M.D.; Parker, H.M.; McDaniel, C.D. Impact of oral Lactobacillus acidophilus gavage on rooster seminal and cloacal Lactobacilli concentrations. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 1934–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aydın, S.S.; Denek, N. Effect of adding lactic acid bacteria to maize silage on nutritive quality, fermentation properties and in vitro digestibility. J. Agric. Sci. 2023, 29, 1050–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Raw Material Meadow Grass | PFJ: Data of the Fermented Natural Lactic Acid Bacteria Obtained from the Meadow Grass Plant 5% Sugar as Substrate | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) | 3.1 × 104 cfu/mL | 7.7 × 1010 cfu/mL |
| Yeast | 6.2 × 105 cfu/mL | 2.2 × 106 cfu/mL |
| Molds | 4.2 × 103 cfu/mL | 4.5 × 102 cfu/mL |
| Total Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria (TAB) | 2.9 × 108 cfu/mL | 3.2 × 109 cfu/mL |
| Coliform | 5.1 × 105 cfu/mL | 6.9 × 102 cfu/mL |
| Enterobacter | 8.8 × 106 cfu/mL | 2.2 × 105 cfu/mL |
| E. coli | 2.9 × 105 cfu/mL | <10 |
| pH | 6.36 | 3.64 |
| Components | Material Content | Components | Material Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients | % | Nutrient levels | |
| Corn | 63 | ME/(MJ/kg) value | 10.92 |
| Soybean meal | 24 | Crude protein value, % | 15.73 |
| Limestone | 8 | Lysine value, % | 0.82 |
| Premix | 5 | Methionine value, % | 0.41 |
| Total | 100 | Calcium value, % | 3.32 |
| 0 Day | 1–4. Weeks Day | 4–8. Weeks Day | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBW | FBW | AEW | LR | AEW | LR | FC | FCR | AEW | LR | FC | FCR | ||
| TN | TNC | 287.98 | 289.43 | 12.65 | 85.00 | 13.44 | 84.56 | 36.98 | 3.32 | 13.83 | 80.77 | 30.00 | 2.70 |
| TNPFJ | 281.93 | 288.08 | 13.20 | 86.43 | 13.66 | 83.48 | 27.34 | 2.43 | 13.59 | 80.54 | 28.93 | 2.61 | |
| HS | HSC | 282.80 | 291.49 | 12.92 | 85.00 | 13.21 | 82.86 | 27.92 | 2.53 | 13.05 | 80.98 | 27.81 | 2.78 |
| HSPFJ | 280.73 | 287.11 | 12.27 | 88.57 | 12.88 | 83.30 | 27.02 | 2.36 | 12.66 | 78.93 | 24.84 | 2.61 | |
| S*PFJ | C | 285.39 | 290.46 | 12.78 | 85.00 | 13.32 | 83.71 | 32.45 | 2.92 | 13.44 | 80.88 | 28.91 | 2.74 |
| PFJ | 281.33 | 287.60 | 12.73 | 87.50 | 13.27 | 83.39 | 27.18 | 2.39 | 13.13 | 79.73 | 26.89 | 2.61 | |
| Source of variation | PFJ | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | *** | ** | ** | NS | ** | NS |
| HS | NS | NS | NS | NS | *** | NS | *** | ** | *** | NS | *** | NS | |
| HS*PFJ | NS | NS | * | NS | * | NS | *** | * | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| TN | HS | HS*PFJ | Source of Variation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | PFJ | C | PFJ | C | PFJ | SEM | PFJ | HS | PFJXHS | ||
| Egg weight | B | 12.65 | 13.20 | 12.91 | 12.26 | 12.78 | 12.73 | 0.11 | 0.82 | 0.15 | 0.01 |
| 30 | 13.44 | 13.65 | 13.20 | 12.87 | 13.32 | 13.26 | 0.05 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.02 | |
| 60 | 13.83 | 13.59 | 13.05 | 12.66 | 13.44 | 13.12 | 0.05 | 0.008 | 0 | 0.48 | |
| Egg shape index | B | 79.14 | 78.46 | 78.87 | 78.80 | 79.01 | 78.61 | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.95 | 0.56 |
| 30 | 78.74 | 78.14 | 77.86 | 78.91 | 78.30 | 78.48 | 0.62 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.86 | |
| 60 | 78.05 | 77.44 | 78.30 | 78.15 | 78.17 | 77.76 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.48 | |
| Shell thickness (mm) | B | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.37 | 0.59 |
| 30 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.004 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.02 | |
| 60 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0,002 | 0.87 | 0.35 | 0.87 | |
| Shell percentage (%) | B | 8.95 | 8.24 | 8.73 | 8.62 | 8.84 | 8.41 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.69 | 0.06 |
| 30 | 8.98 | 8.67 | 8.73 | 8.47 | 8.85 | 8.58 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.12 | |
| 60 | 8.75 | 8.83 | 8.72 | 8.75 | 8.74 | 8.79 | 0.13 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.84 | |
| Yolk percentage (%) | B | 30.10 | 28.19 | 29.61 | 30.63 | 29.85 | 29.27 | 0.32 | 0.50 | 015 | 0.50 |
| 30 | 29.92 | 30.48 | 31.23 | 31.15 | 30.58 | 30.78 | 0.29 | 0.69 | 0.11 | 0.69 | |
| 60 | 30.07 | 32.70 | 31.45 | 30.95 | 30.76 | 31.92 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.75 | 0.09 | |
| Albumen percentage (%) | B | 60.96 | 63.57 | 61.66 | 60.75 | 61.31 | 62.32 | 0.36 | 0.26 | 0.16 | 0.26 |
| 30 | 61.10 | 60.85 | 60.04 | 60.39 | 60.57 | 60.64 | 0.33 | 0.94 | 0.27 | 0.94 | |
| 60 | 61.18 | 58.47 | 59.83 | 60.30 | 60.51 | 59.28 | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.72 | 0.11 | |
| Specific gravity (g/cm3) | B | 101.00 | 103.00 | 100.00 | 101.25 | 100.50 | 102.22 | 0.64 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.22 |
| 30 | 101.00 | 103.00 | 100.00 | 101.25 | 100.50 | 102.22 | 0.64 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.22 | |
| 60 | 101.00 | 103.00 | 100.00 | 101.25 | 100.50 | 102.22 | 0.64 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.22 | |
| Haugh unit | B | 95.93 | 96.28 | 84.54 | 94.49 | 90.23 | 95.49 | 0.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 94.75 | 92.52 | 89.25 | 90.25 | 92.00 | 91.51 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.001 | 0.51 | |
| 60 | 91.94 | 90.92 | 89.12 | 91.12 | 90.53 | 91.01 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.29 | 0.69 | |
| Albumen Index | B | 3.64 | 3.62 | 2.26 | 3.43 | 2.95 | 3.54 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 3.26 | 3.16 | 2.60 | 2.67 | 2.93 | 2.95 | 0.06 | 0.92 | 0 | 0.92 | |
| 60 | 3.08 | 2.94 | 2.62 | 2.75 | 2.85 | 2.86 | 0.06 | 0.96 | 0.02 | 0.96 | |
| Yolk index | B | 49.88 | 49.38 | 48.61 | 47.91 | 49.25 | 48.73 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.07 | 0.41 |
| 30 | 48.36 | 46.62 | 43.02 | 43.59 | 45.69 | 45.28 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0 | 0.54 | |
| 60 | 46.11 | 44.02 | 43.74 | 45.09 | 44.93 | 44.50 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.60 | |
| Yolk color | B | 8.00 | 8.87 | 8.00 | 8.01 | 8.00 | 8.49 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| 30 | 8.00 | 13.67 | 11.61 | 12.41 | 9.81 | 13.11 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 60 | 8.00 | 12.81 | 10.96 | 12.57 | 9.48 | 12.70 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cecum pH | Cecum Dry Matter | Cecum Lactic Acid (LA) | Cecum Acetic Acid (AA) | Lactic Acid Bacteria Log10 cfu/mL | Total Mesophilic Aerobic Bacteria Log10 cfu/mL | Enterobacter Log10 cfu/mL | Coliform Log10 cfu/mL | E. coli Log10 cfu/mL | Yeast Log10 cfu/mL | Mold Log10 cfu/mL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN | C | 6.54 | 20.85 | 24.68 | 8.33 | 9.48 | 9.53 | 6.65 | 5.90 | 5.87 | 2.95 | 1.48 |
| PFJ | 6.47 | 21.57 | 24.82 | 8.33 | 9.60 | 9.51 | 6.51 | 5.32 | 6.25 | 2.53 | 2.57 | |
| HS | C | 6.98 | 23.27 | 14.97 | 6.45 | 8.95 | 8.95 | 6.87 | 6.78 | 6.65 | 3.83 | 2.38 |
| PFJ | 7.60 | 25.33 | 8.26 | 4.26 | 9.52 | 8.90 | 5.38 | 5.45 | 4.91 | 3.51 | 1.70 | |
| HS*PFJ | K | 6.76 | 22.06 | 19.83 | 7.39 | 9.22 | 9.24 | 6.76 | 6.34 | 6.26 | 3.39 | 1.93 |
| PFJ | 7.04 | 23.45 | 16.54 | 6.30 | 9.56 | 9.20 | 5.94 | 5.38 | 5.58 | 3.02 | 2.13 | |
| 0.0140 | 0.0120 | 0.4910 | 0.2040 | 0.0030 | 0.0030 | 0.0040 | 0.0040 | 0.0040 | 0.0030 | 0.0040 | ||
| PFJ | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0100 | 0.0280 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
| S | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0650 | |
| HS*PFJ | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0080 | 0.0280 | 0.0000 | 0.0640 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| Total Proteın (g/dL) | Clor (mmol/L) | Phosphorus (mmol/L) | Trıglycerıdes (mg/dL) | AST (u/L) | Cholesterol (mg/dL) | HDL (mg/dL) | LDL (mg/dL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN | C | 4.12 | 113.80 | 9.62 | 1035.20 | 399.60 | 252.60 | 81.80 | 64.60 |
| PFJ | 3.56 | 115.00 | 8.08 | 809.00 | 444.20 | 324.40 | 93.00 | 82.40 | |
| HS | C | 3.18 | 113.60 | 7.06 | 993.80 | 312.00 | 180.00 | 78.20 | 60.00 |
| PFJ | 2.84 | 111.00 | 11.02 | 1045.60 | 327.00 | 322.40 | 99.20 | 59.20 | |
| HS*PFJ | C | 3.65 | 113.70 | 8.34 | 1014.50 | 355.80 | 216.30 | 80.00 | 62.30 |
| PFJ | 3.2 | 113.00 | 9.55 | 927.30 | 385.60 | 323.40 | 96.10 | 70.80 | |
| SEM | 0.08 | 0.85 | 0.42 | 64.80 | 14.62 | 26.64 | 5.75 | 6.78 | |
| PFJ | 0.01 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.54 | |
| HS | 0 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 0.46 | 0.003 | 0.49 | 0.91 | 0.32 | |
| HS*PFJ | 0.52 | 0.28 | 0.005 | 0.29 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| Fertility Ratio | |||||
| Fertilized | Unfertilized | X2 | SD | p | |
| TNC | 131 a (95.6) | 6 b (4.4) | |||
| TNPFJ | 91 b (82.7) | 19 a (17.3) | |||
| HSC | 93 b (78.8) | 25 a (21.2) | 22.835 | 3 | 0.000 |
| HSPFJ | 90 b (75.0) | 30 a (25.0) | |||
| Total | 405 | 80 | |||
| Hatchability Yield | |||||
| Hatched Chicks | Unhatched Eggs | X2 | SD | p | |
| TNC | 121 a (88.3) | 16 b (11.7) | |||
| TNPFJ | 69 b (62.7) | 41 a (37.3) | |||
| HSC | 70 b (59.3) | 48 a (40.7) | 41.167 a | 3 | 0.000 |
| HSPFJ | 65 b (54.2) | 55 a (45.8) | |||
| Total | 325 | 160 | |||
| Chick Output Rate | |||||
| Hatched Chicks | Unhatched Chicks | X2 | SD | p | |
| TNC | 121 a (92.4) | 10 b (7.6) | |||
| TNPFJ | 69 b (75.8) | 22 a (24.2) | |||
| HSC | 70 b (75.3) | 23 a (24.7) | 18.372 | 3 | 0.000 |
| HSPFJ | 65 b (72.2) | 25 a (27.8) | |||
| Total | 325 | 80 | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Aydin, S.S.; Avci, M.; Kirar, N.; Oruç, A.; Savrunlu, M.; Daş, A. Can Pre-Fermented Juice Be an Alternative Probiotic Helping to Reduce Heat Stress in Laying Japanese Quails (Metabolism and Nutrition). Fermentation 2026, 12, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12020109
Aydin SS, Avci M, Kirar N, Oruç A, Savrunlu M, Daş A. Can Pre-Fermented Juice Be an Alternative Probiotic Helping to Reduce Heat Stress in Laying Japanese Quails (Metabolism and Nutrition). Fermentation. 2026; 12(2):109. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12020109
Chicago/Turabian StyleAydin, Sadık Serkan, Mehmet Avci, Nurcan Kirar, Ahmet Oruç, Mehmet Savrunlu, and Aydin Daş. 2026. "Can Pre-Fermented Juice Be an Alternative Probiotic Helping to Reduce Heat Stress in Laying Japanese Quails (Metabolism and Nutrition)" Fermentation 12, no. 2: 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12020109
APA StyleAydin, S. S., Avci, M., Kirar, N., Oruç, A., Savrunlu, M., & Daş, A. (2026). Can Pre-Fermented Juice Be an Alternative Probiotic Helping to Reduce Heat Stress in Laying Japanese Quails (Metabolism and Nutrition). Fermentation, 12(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12020109

