Next Article in Journal
The Antarctic Yeast Sporobolomyces roseus AL103 as a Promising Source of Health-Promoting Biologically Active Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Screening Dietary Fat Sources and Concentrations Included in Low- and High-Forage Diets Using an In Vitro Gas Production System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Impact of Commercial Lachancea thermotolerans Immobilized in Biocapsules on Wine Quality: Odor Active Compounds and Organoleptic Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Indigenous Lactic Acid Bacteria for Industrial Fermented Sausage Production: Microbiological, Chemico-Physical and Sensory Features and Biogenic Amine Content

1
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena, Italy
2
Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Agri-Food Research, University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena, Italy
3
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(10), 507; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10100507
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 12 September 2024 / Accepted: 29 September 2024 / Published: 1 October 2024

Abstract

:
The use of starter cultures in the meat industry is common, even if the number of available commercial cultures is limited, inducing product standardisation and microbial diversity reduction. On the other hand, some artisanal products relying on spontaneous fermentation can represent a source of isolation of new interesting strains. In this work, four LAB strains derived from Mediterranean spontaneously fermented sausages were tested as new starter cultures for the industrial production of fermented sausages, in comparison to a commercial starter culture. The products obtained were analysed for physico-chemical parameters, microbiota, biogenic amines and aroma profile. A consumer test was also performed to evaluate product acceptability. The strains induced different acidification kinetics. LAB counts showed high persistence when Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55 was used as the starter culture, while the addition of Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22 resulted in a high concentration of enterococci (6 log CFU/g), 2 log higher than in other samples. Tyramine was detected at concentrations of 150–200 mg/kg, except for in the sample produced with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum BPF2 (60 mg/kg). Differences were observed in the aroma profile, with a high amount of 2-butanone found in the samples obtained with Comp. alimentarius CB22. These latter sausages also showed the lowest score in terms of acceptability. This study allowed us to select new LAB strains for fermented sausage starter cultures, increasing the product diversification.

1. Introduction

Fermented sausages are generally produced using minced lean and fat meat combined with salt, spices and additives (sugar, ascorbate, nitrates and nitrites). After stuffing into natural or synthetic casing, the meat mixture is subjected to fermentation and ripening processes, during which products achieve the final desired characteristics. For centuries, salt has been added as an important strategy for food preservation, as it lowers aw. Moreover, its presence contributes to the textural properties of the product, allowing sol–gel system formation, as well as the development of its aroma profile [1]. However, food industries have started to reduce salt concentrations due to health concerns. This has lead to research into different strategies, such as the use of selected starter and bioprotective cultures, which are able to strictly guide the controlled fermentation process.
Microorganisms involved in meat fermentation exert an important role in both safety and technological features [2,3]. In this context, since the 1960s, the use of starter culture mixtures of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (containing Latilactobacillus sakei, Lat. curvatus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Pediococcus acidilactici and P. pentosaceus) and staphylococci (Staphylococcus xylosus and Staph. carnosus) has been introduced in the fermented meat industry [4,5]. The addition of LAB aids fermentation through a rapid drop in pH in the first days of production, with a consequent reduction in the potential growth of pathogen and spoilage microorganisms. The use of different LAB species can determine different acidification kinetics and also affect technological parameters as well as sensory attributes [6]. Moreover, some studies have also investigated the addition of probiotic LAB strains as starter cultures to enhance the functional properties of the final product, thus generating health-related benefits for consumers [7]. On the other hand, the use of staphylococci promotes the formation of a typical aroma profile, avoiding colour defects, during the following ripening phase [8].
However, the availability of commercial starter cultures is limited to a small number of strains that can guarantee fermented sausage safety but, on the other hand, can also cause a reduction in their natural microbial biodiversity. These requirements may result in a standardisation of the products, with a loss in their recognisability and typicity linked to local cultural heritage [9]. In fact, despite the large diffusion of the use of starter cultures in the meat industry, the Mediterranean area is characterised by a wide array of artisanal fermented sausages, still obtained through spontaneous fermentation [10]. For this reason, in recent years, an increasing interest has been focused on the isolation of new autochthonous strains that can potentially be used as starter cultures to obtain fermented meat products characterised by peculiar sensory properties [11,12,13]. Moreover, new LAB strains have been selected, not only based on their technological properties but also for their antimicrobial potential. Indeed, they can be applied both as starter and bioprotective cultures, which are able to prevent the growth of undesirable microorganisms (pathogenic and spoilage microflora) through the production of specific metabolites with antimicrobial activity (i.e., bacteriocins), ensuring high-quality products with improved safety and prolonged shelf-life [14,15]. In this context, artisanal spontaneously fermented sausages can represent a relatively unexplored reservoir of microbial biodiversity, within which it is possible to find new microorganisms with relevant biotechnological properties, both for fermentation and bioprotection purposes.
The aim of this work was to investigate the potential of selected LAB strains, deriving from Mediterranean spontaneously fermented sausages [10], as new starter cultures, valorising microbial biodiversity and product differentiation while maintaining their safety features. In particular, strains belonging to different LAB species occurring in fermented sausages (namely Latilactobacillus sakei, Latilactobacillus curvatus, Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum and Companilactobacillus alimentarius) were added as starter cultures during the production of Italian traditional sausages in an industrial plant. It is noteworthy that, to our knowledge, this is the first study in which a strain of Comp. alimentarius, a species not frequently isolated from fermented sausages (and found mainly in Spanish products), was tested as a starter culture. A control sample, obtained with the addition of the usual commercial starter culture, was also produced. The different fermented sausages were monitored during fermentation and ripening to evaluate the changes in physico-chemical parameters (pH, aw and weight loss), the principal microbial groups and the formation of aroma profile. Moreover, biogenic amine (BA) content in the samples at the end of ripening was assessed. Finally, a consumer test was performed in order to evaluate the acceptability of the final products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. LAB Strains Used as Starter Cultures

The strains to be tested as starter cultures are listed in Table 1 and were chosen based on previous research, in which LAB were isolated from spontaneously fermented sausages collected in the Mediterranean area [10]. Starting from about 150 different biotypes, LAB strains were characterised by their safety, i.e., the absence of antibiotic resistance and the inability to produce biogenic amines [16,17,18]. The resulting safe LAB were further studied for some technological features [18,19], and the most promising strains, in terms of growth performances in different in vitro conditions (increasing NaCl concentration, low temperature), were selected for this trial in a real system. Moreover, the strain Lpl. paraplantarum BPF2 was also chosen for its bioprotective features against Listeria monocytogenes, demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo (in Spanish fermented sausages), making this strain another promising candidate to increase product safety [17,20].

2.2. Fermented Sausage Production

The fermented sausages analysed in this study were produced by C.l.a.i. Soc. Coop. (Imola, Italy). The meat batter (40 kg) consisted of pork meat (about 83% lean meat from shoulders and 17% fat from throat) combined with salt (2.4% w/w), dextrose (0.2% w/w), black pepper (0.1% w/w), red garlic (0.03% w/w), ascorbic acid (0.08% w/w), KNO3 (0.015% w/w) and NaNO2 (0.02% w/w). The mixture was then divided into five different batches (approx. 10 kg each), inoculated with different LAB strains as starter cultures at an initial concentration of 7.5 log CFU/g (Table 1). Their performances were compared with those of a commercial starter culture traditionally used for the same product (Tera Meat® TMX-M, Teracell S.r.l., Cremona, Italy) inoculated in the same conditions.
Moreover, the same strain of Staphylococcus xylosus, isolated from a commercial starter culture, was inoculated in each batch at a concentration of 5 log CFU/g.
Aliquots of meat batter (approx. 500 g) were stuffed into a natural (beef middle) casing, with a diameter of about 6.5 cm and a length of about 30 cm. The fermentation and ripening process was carried out at a temperature ranging from 20 to 10 °C and at a relative humidity (RH) between 90 and 65% for 45 days. The obtained samples were evaluated during all the production process. The analysis was performed in triplicate (three independent sausages for each batch) immediately after the production and 5, 11, 20 and 45 days after the production.

2.3. Physico-Chemical Parameters

The samples were monitored during fermentation and ripening regarding physico-chemical parameters as reported for similar fermented meat products [21]. pH was measured using a pH-meter HD2105.2 (Delta Ohm, Padova, Italy) by weighing 10 g of sample, adding an equal amount of distilled water and then homogenising in a Lab Blender Stomacher (Seward Medical, London, UK) for 2 min. aw values were measured with an Aqualab CX3-TE (Labo-Scientifica, Parma, Italy) in two different parts of the sausages: the external section (1.5 cm immediately below the casing) and internal section (centre of the sausages). Moreover, the samples were weighed to calculate the mean weight loss (%) with respect to the initial weight. All the analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.4. Microbial Counts

For each sample, the principal microbial groups were detected through plate counting. Briefly, after aseptically removing the casing, a slice of approx. 10 g of sample was diluted with 90 mL of 0.9% (w/v) NaCl sterile solution in a sterile bag and homogenised in a Lab Blender Stomacher (Seward Medical, London, UK) for 2 min. Subsequently, decimal dilutions were prepared and plated onto selective media (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK): lactobacilli, coagulase negative cocci and yeasts and moulds were enumerated onto de Man–Rogosa–Sharpe Agar (MRS) supplemented with cycloheximide (200 mg/L), Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) and Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SAB) supplemented with chloramphenicol (200 mg/L), respectively, after 48 h of incubation at 30 °C. Enterococci were detected on Slanetz and Bartley medium (SL) incubated for 24 h at 42 °C; Enterobacteriaceae were detected on Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar (VRBGA) after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. All media were provided by Oxoid (Basingstoke, UK). All these analyses were performed in triplicate (three different sausages).

2.5. Biogenic Amine Quantification

Biogenic amine (BA) content in the samples at the end of ripening was assessed through extraction and HPLC analysis. Briefly, 10 g of each sample was treated with a trichloroacetic acid (TCA) 5% w/v solution and the extracts were then subjected to dansyl chloride derivatisation (Sigma Aldrich, Gallarate, Italy), according to the method of Martuscelli et al. [22]. The samples obtained were injected into an HPLC Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity with an automatic injector (G1329B ALS 1260, loop of 20 µL), equipped with a UV detector (G1314F VWD 1260) set at 254 nm. A C18 Waters Spherisorb ODS-2 (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm) column was used for the chromatographic separation, with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min and the following gradient elution: acetonitrile/water 35:65 for 1 min, acetonitrile/water 55:45 reached in 5 min, acetonitrile/water 60:40 reached in 10 min, acetonitrile/water 90:10 reached in 8 min and maintained for 11 min, then initial acetonitrile/water ratio (35:65) restored in 5 min and maintained for 5 min.
The amounts of amines were expressed as mg/kg with reference to a calibration curve obtained through aqueous dansyl-chloride-derivatised amine standards of concentrations ranging from 10 to 200 mg/L (Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy). The detection limit for all the amines was 3 mg/kg of the sample under the adopted conditions. All the analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.6. Aroma Profile

Volatile organic compounds of products were detected through gas chromatography–mass spectrometry coupled with the solid-phase microextraction technique (GC-MS-SPME) after 20 days and at the end of ripening. An Agilent Hewlett–Packard 7890A GC gas chromatograph coupled with an MS 5975 MSD detector (Hewlett–Packard, Geneva, Switzerland) was used. A known amount of 4-methyl-2-pentanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was added as an internal standard to 3 g of sample placed in a 10 mL sterilised vial, sealed by PTFE/silicon septa. The sample was heated for 10 min at 45 °C and then a fused silica SPME fibre covered with 75 µm carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS StableFlex) (Supelco, Steinheim, Germany) was introduced into the headspace for 40 min. Adsorbed molecules were desorbed in the gas chromatograph for 10 min. The chromatographic conditions were those reported by Montanari et al. [23]. Volatile peak identification was carried out using the Agilent Hewlett–Packard NIST 2011 mass spectral library (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) [24]. All the analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.7. Consumer Test

To evaluate the sample acceptability, the final products were subjected to a consumer test with 40 untrained panellists, who were distributed into 55% female and 45% male. The age of consumers involved was between 21 and 70 years, distributed as follows: 21–30 years old (30%), 31–40 years old (25%), 41–50 years old (20%), 51–60 years old (12.5%) and 61–70 years old (12.5%). The samples were prepared as reported by García-López et al. [20] and analysed regarding four selected descriptors (colour intensity, odour intensity, aroma intensity and acceptability), using a 5-point hedonic scale (1 = do not like at all, 5 = like very much). A single session was organised, in which the different sausages were evaluated in a randomised order by the panellists.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data collected were statistically analysed through a one-way ANOVA procedure and significant differences in each sample at each sampling time were evaluated with the LDS test (p < 0.05) and highlighted with different letters or asterisks. The influence of starter cultures on the product aroma profile at the end of ripening was also explored by principal component analysis (PCA). The data of the consumer test were analysed using the Mann–Whitney test to determine differences among the sausages obtained with different starter cultures (p < 0.05). All statistical analyses were carried out with Statistica 8.1 (StatSoft Italy srl, Vigonza, Italy).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Evolution of Physico-Chemical Parameters (pH, aw and Weight Loss)

During fermentation and ripening, pH, aw and weight losses were monitored. The results showed, in general, a pH decrease from approx. 5.85 to 5.35, with significantly different kinetics depending on the strains used as starter cultures (Figure 1). The behaviour of Lat. curvatus HNS55 and Comp. alimentarius CB22 after 5 days was similar to the control. Otherwise, in the sample obtained with Lpl. paraplantarum BPF2 and Lat. sakei HZK39, the acidification kinetics appeared significantly slower. In fact, the pH reached values of 5.40 at the end of fermentation, while the lowest pH (5.32) was measured after 11 days. After this phase, pH rapidly increased, especially in the HNS55 samples, which showed values significantly higher than the other products because of the proliferation of other microbial species besides LAB. In particular, this increase was due to mould growth, which was scarcely present at the beginning of the process but then proliferated, reaching values of about 5 log cfu/g after 10 days. It is known that this microbial group is able to degrade the lactic acid produced by LAB, thus increasing fermented sausage pH [25]. The final pH ranged from 5.47 to 5.57, depending on the inoculated strain.
Regarding aw, measurements were carried out in the inner and outer sections. The results of the inner part of the products showed similar kinetics among samples until 20 days after production (Figure 2a). During the following ripening period, differences among the samples, according to ANOVA, were observed. The HZK39 sample was characterised by lower final values with respect to the other products (0.918 vs. 0.922–0.928, respectively). The same considerations can be applied to the data about the outer part (Figure 2b), in which the HZK39 sample showed, again, a lower aw value (0.901). The values observed are in agreement with similar Mediterranean products [24,25] and, together with the pH drop (Figure 1), can be considered hurdles that can inhibit the most common spoilage (e.g., pseudomonads) or pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes [25].
The weight losses of the fermented sausages obtained with different starter cultures showed similar behaviour during the whole process, regardless of the used LAB strain, with final values of about 40% at the end of production (Figure 2c).

3.2. Microbial Characterisation

The principal microbial groups associated with fermented sausages were evaluated during fermentation and ripening, and the results are summarised in Table 2. Lactobacilli, including the starter cultures added at a concentration of about 7.5 log CFU/g, were characterised by a rapid growth in the control and the sample inoculated with Lat. curvatus HNS55, reaching values of about 9 log CFU/g after 5 days of production. Conversely, the growth kinetics in the first 5 days were significantly slower in the other samples and this difference was confirmed at 11 days after production. Concerning the evolution of LAB counts during ripening, the cell load was maintained in the samples obtained with the strain HNS55, while in the control, a progressive reduction was observed, reaching a final value of 7.62 log CFU/g, similar to the sausages in which HZK39 was used as a starter culture.
The strain Lat. curvatus HNS55 had already shown good technological features in terms of growth performances in laboratory conditions simulating stresses occurring during fermented sausage production such as increasing NaCl concentration and low temperature [16]. These features could explain its high persistence throughout the whole ripening process. The acidification behaviour reflected this massive LAB proliferation (Figure 1). The other tested strains showed slower growth kinetics, reaching concentrations of 8.0–8.4 log CFU/g at the end of fermentation. They were characterised, with respect to the control, by a higher persistence during the whole ripening phase, except for the sample inoculated with Lat. sakei HZK39 (7.69 log CFU/g 45 days after production).
Regarding staphylococci, added in the meat batter as starter cultures (approx. 5 log CFU/g), their concentration was characterised by a lower increase during production. The final staphylococci cell load ranged between 5.25 and 6.85 log CFU/g with significant differences in relation to the tested strains. In particular, the control and HNS55 samples presented higher counts, i.e., 6.30 and 6.85 log CFU/g, respectively.
The concentration of enterobacteria detected in the meat batter was rather limited (approx. 2 log CFU/g) and their presence remained stable, except for in the BPF2 and HZK39 samples, in which a slight reduction was observed (0.4–0.8 log cycles), and in the case of CB22, which presented a significantly higher value in the final samples. The control of this microbial group, which can include both spoilage and pathogenic species (i.e., Salmonella and Escherichia coli), is crucial to assess the quality and safety of the final product. Moreover, some of them can produce biogenic amines, which can cause several adverse reactions in the consumers if accumulated in high amounts. However, the enterobacteria counts in the samples obtained through the inoculum of the tested strains were not alarming and in accordance with those found in other similar products [26].
Enterococci counts varied in relation to the inoculated LAB strain. In particular, the initial concentration of about 2 log CFU/g remained constant during fermented sausage productions in the control and in the BPF2 sample, with a final increase of 1 log cycle at the end of ripening. Conversely, in the other samples, the same microbial group increased significantly from the first phases, reaching values up to 6 log CFU/g in the products obtained with the strain Comp. alimentarius CB22. This level of enterococci is higher than that usually found in this kind of meat product [27,28], due also to the fact that this group needs to be monitored because it can raise safety concerns. In particular, besides their marked capability to produce biogenic amines, in particular tyramine, they showed the ability to acquire and transfer antibiotic resistance and the potential presence of virulence factors [29,30].
Finally, yeasts were characterised by similar behaviours in all the samples with a slight increase of about 1 log cycle during production (2.62–3.22 log CFU/g). Moulds, added onto the product surfaces to guide a proper drying process, showed similar growth kinetics, with a relevant increase in cell counts (up to about 5 log CFU/g) until the 11th day after production, followed by a progressive reduction to a concentration of about 2 log cycles during the remaining ripening period.
The LAB considered in these trials belonged to different species. The species Lat. sakei and Lat. curvatus are highly adapted to meat environments and are often part of commercial starter cultures because they are characterised by a high persistence in the sausages during ripening when the sugars added at the beginning are completely fermented [5,9]. From this perspective, it is noteworthy that in the sausages in which Lat. sakei strains were used (control and HZK39), the LAB counts at the end of ripening were the lowest. On the other hand, the raw material used for sausage manufacturing contains an autochthonous microbiota, which includes LAB. These microorganisms can multiply during ripening, even in the presence of starter cultures. It has been demonstrated that active LAB starter cultures can represent an important proportion of these bacteria, but other wild species can grow and affect (positively or negatively) the quality of the final product [20,21,27]. Concerning Lpl. paraplantarum, the strain BPF2, isolated from fermented sausage and characterised by the production of an effective anti-listeria bacteriocin [17], already demonstrated a good potential in driving sausage fermentation [20], even if, as in this case, the kinetics of LAB growth in the samples in which it was present appear to be slower compared with the other strains. Interestingly, Comp. alimentarius CB22 was not competitive against enterococci. This species, to our knowledge not yet used as a starter culture, is sporadically isolated from fermented sausages, and its major presence in this environment has been observed in Spanish products [10,31,32].

3.3. Biogenic Amine Determination

Biogenic amine content was analysed in the samples at the end of ripening. Histamine, putrescine, cadaverine and 2-phenylethylamine were below the detection limits (<3 mg/kg). Tyramine was the only biogenic amine present at concentrations ranging from 150 to 195 mg/kg in the samples obtained with the commercial starter and autochthonous HSN55, CB22 and HZK39 strains (Figure 3). The amounts of tyramine detected in the final products are not alarming and follow those reported for similar products [10,33].
These tyramine concentrations can be due to the presence of wild decarboxylase-positive strains in the raw materials and production environments, which are able to grow and compete with starter cultures and can affect the safety and quality of the final product [20,21,27]. On the other hand, Lpl. paraplantarum BPF2 was able to counteract the accumulation of tyramine, resulting in a final amount of about 60 mg/kg in these samples, which is significantly lower than the other tested strains (Figure 3). A similar behaviour of the strain BPF2 was also observed in salchichónes, a type of traditional Spanish fermented sausage, which was able to limit biogenic amine accumulation [20]. This phenomenon can be due to antagonistic activity against wild microflora, including tyraminogenic LAB.

3.4. Aroma Profile of Fermented Sausages

The fermented sausages after 20 days of ripening and at the end of production (45 days) were analysed using SPME-GC-MS to evaluate how the different LAB strains used as starter cultures could affect the aroma profile. The results are reported in Table 3.
Aldehydes, almost absent in the meat batter, increased during ripening, as expected. In particular, benzaldehyde and benzeneacetaldeyde, deriving from aromatic amino acid (tyrosine and phenylalanine) metabolism [34], at the end of ripening (45 days) were significantly higher (approx. 20% of the total volatile profile) in the samples obtained with the commercial starter culture (Control) and Lpl. paraplantarum BPF2, with respect to the others. The presence of aldehydes deriving from lipid oxidation was limited, since only small quantities of nonanal were detected. Usually, these compounds are found in larger amounts in Mediterranean fermented sausages; in particular, hexanal was detected in notable concentrations in similar Italian fermented sausages, in which other aldehydes were also accumulated [35]. The presence of remarkable contents of molecules belonging to this chemical class was also observed in Mediterranean spontaneously fermented sausages, in which the values were variable in relation to process parameters such as the presence of preservatives, the fat content, etc. [10,36]. The limited content of aliphatic aldehydes detected in the present study could be due to the low initial fat content (about 17%).
Regarding ketones, they generally increased during ripening, and in the final samples, significantly higher amounts were detected when Comp. alimentarius CB22 and Lat. sakei HZK39 were used as starter cultures (49.84% and 41.21%, respectively). This chemical group was mainly represented by acetone, 2-butanone and acetoin (3-hydroxy, 2-butanone). These molecules are generally always present in the volatile profile of fermented sausages [37,38], but their amounts and ratios can be significantly different, affecting the sensory properties of the final product. Indeed, high amounts of 2-butanone have been associated with olfactive defects [27,35]. This molecule derives from LAB metabolism, starting from diacetyl through the action of a diol dehydratase [39]. At the end of ripening, its percentage was at least double in CB22 and HZK39 samples (25.16% and 19.81%, respectively) than in the other fermented sausages (less than 10% of the total volatile compounds detected).
Among alcohols, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol and 2-hexanol represented the principal compounds. A higher percentage of ethanol (about 8% of the total peak area) was detected in the control samples 20 days after production; then, its amount decreased in all the samples, reaching values between 1.77% and 3.86% at the end of ripening. Usually, ethanol is the main alcohol detected in Italian fermented sausages [23,40] where its concentrations are lower with respect to other Mediterranean fermented sausages, such as Spanish or Croatian ones [10]. Its presence can be attributed to several pathways and can result from the LAB metabolism of lactate [41].
Finally, acids were mainly characterised by the presence of acetic acid, as expected, resulting, together with ethanol, from LAB metabolism [41]. The percentage of this molecule was significantly lower in the control after 20 days of ripening with respect to the other samples (approx. 34% vs. 48–57%). This trend was observed also at the end of ripening, even if the differences were reduced.
To better highlight the difference between the aroma profile of samples, data were also elaborated through principal component analysis (PCA), which showed a good separation of the samples in relation to the ripening time, as expected, on the basis of Factor 1 (52.02%) and Factor 2 (26.57%) (Figure 4). It is worth noting that the control samples after 20 days and at the end of ripening (45 days) were located in the same quadrant of the graph. Samples obtained with autochthonous LAB strains are grouped in the second quadrants after 20 days of ripening, while they are in the right part of the graph at the end of ripening, separated from the other samples based on Factor 1.
In Table 4, the factor coordinates of the most significant variables for Factor 1 and Factor 2 (representing 78.59% of the total variability) are also reported.

3.5. Sensory Analysis

Sensory analysis of the ripened samples was carried out by a consumer test with 40 untrained panellists considering four descriptors (colour intensity, odour intensity, aroma intensity and acceptability), in order to evaluate the acceptability of the obtained products. The mean score values for each attribute are reported in Figure 5. The BPF2 sample presented values similar to the control and was characterised by higher rates in terms of odour and aroma intensity. It was more appreciated than the control sample, together with the HZK39 and HNS55 samples, even if the latter was characterised by a low score regarding the other descriptors. Finally, the sample obtained with Comp. alimentarius CB22 as the starter culture was, in general, not appreciated; indeed, it showed the lowest score values for most of the tested descriptors and was judged the worst in terms of acceptability. This can be related to the high concentrations of molecules potentially responsible for spoilage phenomena such as 2-butanone [27].

4. Conclusions

The technological parameters of the fermented sausages obtained with different starter cultures presented differences depending on the LAB strain used. In particular, the pH decrease was faster in the sample with Lat. curvatus HNS55, as well as in the control, with respect to the others. However, at the end of ripening, after the deacidification process, the control sample showed a lower pH value (5.47), while the HNS55 sample reached a value of 5.57. As expected, LAB were the main microbial group, since the different starter cultures were inoculated at a concentration of about 7.5 log CFU/g to guide the fermentation. LAB behaviour in the fermented sausages obtained with Lat. curvatus HNS55 was similar to the control, probably because of the high adaption of this species to the environment (cell counts of about 9 log CFU/g 5 days after production), but differently from the control, a higher persistence during ripening was observed. The samples inoculated with Comp. alimentarius CB22, a species rarely isolated from meat products and typical of a specific ecological niche like Andalusian Spanish sausages, were characterised by high levels of enterococci, suggesting a low competitiveness of this strain against wild microflora. Conversely, Lpl. paraplantarum BPF2 seems to exert an antagonist activity against autochthonous microorganisms, reducing enterococci and enterobacteria counts, as well as limiting the content of tyramine, the only biogenic amine detected in these products. The use of different starter cultures also affected the aroma profile of products, mainly in terms of ketones (2-butanone, acetone and acetoin), ethanol and acetic acid, and these differences were reflected in the sensory profile of the products and were also perceived by panellists during the consumer test.
This trial, performed at the industrial level, demonstrated the ability of the tested strains to grow in this meat environment, with the strain Lat. curvatus HNS55 characterised by performances similar to the control (obtained with a commercial starter) but higher persistence over time. Moreover, between the tested strains, Lpl. paraplantarum BPF2 resulted in the most promising starter cultures due to its ability to reduce the accumulation of tyramine in the final product and its organoleptic impact on the sausages’ aroma profile.
Therefore, this study allowed us to select LAB strains that could be potentially employed as new starter cultures in traditional fermented sausages, increasing product diversification.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.T. and F.G.; methodology, C.M.; formal analysis, F.B. and C.A.; investigation, F.B.; data curation, C.M. and G.T.; writing—original draft preparation, F.B. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, G.T.; supervision, F.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the PRIMA programme under BioProMedFood (Project ID 1467; CUP: J34I19004820005). The PRIMA programme was supported by the European Union H2020 programme.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Gabriele Gardini and Rudy Magnani, from C.l.a.i. Soc. Coop., Via Gambellara 62/A, 40026 Imola (BO), Italy, for their support and technical assistance during the industrial production of fermented sausages.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Feiner, G. Meat Products Handbook. Practical Science and Technology, 1st ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cocconcelli, P.S.; Fontana, C. Starter cultures for meat fermentation. In Handbook of Meat Processing; Toldrá, F., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; pp. 199–218. [Google Scholar]
  3. García-Díez, J.; Saraiva, C. Use of starter cultures in foods from animal origin to improve their safety. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 2021, 18, 2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cocconcelli, P.S.; Fontana, C. Bacteria. In Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry; Toldrá, F., Hui, Y.H., Astiasarán, I., Sebranek, J.G., Talon, R., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Ames, IA, USA, 2014; pp. 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  5. Laranjo, M.; Potes, M.E.; Elias, M. Role of starter cultures on the safety of fermented meat products. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Seleshe, S.; Kang, S.N. Effect of Different Pediococcus pentosaceus and Lactobacillus plantarum strains on quality characteristics of dry fermented sausage after completion of ripening period. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2021, 41, 636–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Trząskowska, M.; Kołożyn-Krajewska, D.; Wójciak, K.; Dolatowski, Z. Microbiological quality of raw-fermented sausages with Lactobacillus casei LOCK 0900 probiotic strain. Food Control 2014, 35, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carballo, J. The role of fermentation reactions in the generation of flavor and aroma of foods. In Fermentation, Effects on Food Properties; Mehta, B.M., Kamal-Eldin, A., Iwanski, R.Z., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 51–83. [Google Scholar]
  9. Franciosa, L.; Alessandria, V.; Dolci, P.; Rantsiou, K.; Cocolin, L. Sausage fermentation and starter cultures in the era of molecular biology methods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 279, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barbieri, F.; Tabanelli, G.; Montanari, C.; Dall’Osso, N.; Šimat, V.; Smole Možina, S.; Baños, A.; Özogul, F.; Bassi, D.; Fontana, C.; et al. Mediterranean spontaneously fermented sausages: Spotlight on microbiological and quality features to exploit their bacterial biodiversity. Foods 2021, 10, 2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. dos Santos Cruxen, C.E.; Funck, G.D.; Haubert, L.; da Silva Dannenberg, G.; de Lima Marques, J.; Chaves, F.C.; da Silva, W.P.; Fiorentini, Â.M. Selection of native bacterial starter culture in the production of fermented meat sausages: Application potential, safety aspects, and emerging technologies. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Franciosa, I.; Ferrocino, I.; Corvaglia, M.R.; Giordano, M.; Coton, M.; Mounier, J.; Rantsiou, K.; Cocolin, L. Autochthonous starter culture selection for Salame Piemonte PGI production. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162, 112007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Talon, R.; Leroy, S.; Lebert, I.; Giammarinaro, P.; Chacornac, J.P.; Latorre-Moratalla, M.; Vidal-Carou, C.; Zanardi, E.; Conter, M.; Lebecque, A. Safety improvement and preservation of typical sensory qualities of traditional dry fermented sausages using autochthonous starter cultures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 126, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chikindas, M.L.; Weeks, R.; Drider, D.; Chistyakov, V.A.; Dicks, L.M. Functions and emerging applications of bacteriocins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oliveira, M.; Ferreira, V.; Magalhães, R.; Paula Teixeira, P. Biocontrol strategies for Mediterranean-style fermented sausages. Food Res. Int. 2018, 103, 438–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bassi, D.; Milani, G.; Belloso Daza, M.V.; Barbieri, F.; Montanari, C.; Lorenzini, S.; Šimat, V.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G. Taxonomical identification and safety characterization of Lactobacillaceae from Mediterranean natural fermented sausages. Foods 2022, 11, 2776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. García-López, J.D.; Teso-Pérez, C.; Martín-Platero, A.M.; Peralta-Sánchez, J.M.; Fonollá- Joya, J.; Martínez-Bueno, M.; Baños, A. Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2 and Pediococcus acidilactici ST6, two bacteriocinogenic isolated strains from Andalusian spontaneous fermented sausages. Foods 2023, 12, 2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tabanelli, G.; Barbieri, F.; Baños, A.; Garcia Madero, J.M.; Belloso Daza, M.V.; Cortimiglia, C.; Milani, G.; Bassi, D.; Gardini, F.; Montanari, C. Companilactobacillus alimentarius: An extensive characterization of strains isolated from spontaneous fermented sausages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024, 410, 110489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Milani, G.; Tabanelli, G.; Barbieri, F.; Montanari, C.; Gardini, F.; Belloso Daza, M.V.; Castellone, V.; Bozzetti, M.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Bassi, D. Technological traits and mitigation activity of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria from mediterranean fermented meat-products. LWT 2024, 196, 115861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. García-López, J.D.; Barbieri, F.; Baños, A.; Garcia Madero, J.M.; Gardini, F.; Montanari, C.; Tabanelli, G. Use of two autochthonous bacteriocinogenic strains as starter cultures in the production of salchichónes, a type of Spanish fermented sausages. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023, 7, 100615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Montanari, C.; Barbieri, F.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G. Competition between starter cultures and wild microbial population in sausage fermentation: A case study regarding a typical Italian salami (Ventricina). Foods 2021, 10, 2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martuscelli, M.; Crudele, M.A.; Gardini, F.; Suzzi, G. Biogenic amine formation and oxidation by Staphylococcus xylosus strains from artisanal fermented sausages. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 31, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Montanari, C.; Bargossi, E.; Gardini, A.; Lanciotti, R.; Magnani, R.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G. Correlation between volatile profiles of Italian fermented sausages and their size and starter culture. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. NIST. NIST/NIH/EPA mass spectral library. In Standard Reference Database 1, NIST 11. Standard Reference Data Program; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vignolo, G.; Fontana, C.; Fadda, S. Semidry and dry fermented sausages. In Handbook of Meat Processing; Toldrá, F., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2010; Chapter 22; pp. 379–398. [Google Scholar]
  26. Montanari, C.; Barbieri, F.; Gardini, G.; Magnani, R.; Gottardi, D.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G. Effects of starter cultures and type of casings on the microbial features and volatile profile of fermented sausages. Fermentation 2022, 8, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pellegrini, M.; Barbieri, F.; Montanari, C.; Iacumin, L.; Bernardi, C.; Gardini, F.; Comi, G. Microbial spoilage of traditional goose sausages produced in a Northern Region of Italy. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Comi, G.; Urso, R.; Iacumin, L.; Rantsiou, K.; Cattaneo, P.; Cantoni, C.; Cocolin, L. Characterisation of naturally fermented sausages produced in the North East of Italy. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Barbieri, F.; Montanari, C.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G. Biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria: A review. Foods 2019, 8, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ladero, V.; Fernández, M.; Calles-Enríquez, M.; Sánchez-Llana, E.; Cañedo, E.; Martin, M.C.; Alvarez, M.A. Is the production of the biogenic amines tyramine and putrescine a species-level trait in enterococci? Food Microbiol. 2012, 30, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. García Fontán, M.C.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Parada, A.; Franco, I.; Carballo, J. Microbiological characteristics of Androlla, a Spanish traditional pork sausage. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. García Fontán, M.C.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Martínez, S.; Franco, I.; Carballo, J. Microbiological characteristics of Botillo, a Spanish traditional pork sausage. LWT 2007, 40, 1610–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. EFSA. Scientific opinion on risk based control of biogenic amine formation in fermented foods. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2248–2393. [Google Scholar]
  34. Smid, E.J.; Kleerebezem, M. Production of aroma compounds in lactic fermentations. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 5, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Montanari, C.; Gatto, V.; Torriani, S.; Barbieri, F.; Bargossi, E.; Lanciotti, R.; Grazia, L.; Magnani, R.; Tabanelli, G.; Gardini, F. Effects of the diameter on physico-chemical, microbiological and volatile profile in dry fermented sausages produced with two different starter cultures. Food Biosci. 2018, 22, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Olivares, A.; Navarro, J.L.; Flores, M. Effect of fat content on aroma generation during processing of dry fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 2011, 87, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Flores, M. Understanding the implications of current health trends on the aroma of wet and dry cured meat products. Meat Sci. 2018, 144, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ordóñez, J.A.; Hierro, E.M.; Bruna, J.M.; de la Hoz, L. Changes in the components of dry-fermented sausages during ripening. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1999, 39, 329–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Speranza, G.; Corti, S.; Fontana, G.; Manitto, P. Conversion of meso-2,3-butanediol into 2-butanol by Lactobacilli. Stereochemical and enzymatic aspects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 3476–3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gänzle, M.G. Lactic metabolism revisited: Metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 2, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. von Wright, A.; Axelsson, L. Lactic acid bacteria: An introduction. In Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological and Functional Aspects, 4th ed.; Lahtinen, S., Ouwehand, A.C., Salminen, S., von Wright, A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Evolution of pH during the production of the Italian fermented sausages (salami) obtained with the different LAB used as starter cultures (black: commercial starter; green: Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; yellow: Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; red: Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; blue: Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39). At each time, the presence of an asterisk indicates significant differences among the samples.
Figure 1. Evolution of pH during the production of the Italian fermented sausages (salami) obtained with the different LAB used as starter cultures (black: commercial starter; green: Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; yellow: Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; red: Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; blue: Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39). At each time, the presence of an asterisk indicates significant differences among the samples.
Fermentation 10 00507 g001
Figure 2. Inner aw (a), outer aw (b) and weight loss (c) monitored during fermentation and ripening of the fermented sausages obtained with the different LAB as starter cultures (black: commercial starter; green: Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; yellow: Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; red: Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; blue: Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39). At each time, the presence of an asterisk indicates significant differences among the samples.
Figure 2. Inner aw (a), outer aw (b) and weight loss (c) monitored during fermentation and ripening of the fermented sausages obtained with the different LAB as starter cultures (black: commercial starter; green: Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; yellow: Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; red: Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; blue: Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39). At each time, the presence of an asterisk indicates significant differences among the samples.
Fermentation 10 00507 g002
Figure 3. Tyramine content (expressed as mg/kg) in the fermented sausages obtained with the different LAB starter cultures (control with commercial starter culture; Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39) at the end of ripening. The differences among the samples according to ANOVA are indicated by the presence of different letters.
Figure 3. Tyramine content (expressed as mg/kg) in the fermented sausages obtained with the different LAB starter cultures (control with commercial starter culture; Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39) at the end of ripening. The differences among the samples according to ANOVA are indicated by the presence of different letters.
Fermentation 10 00507 g003
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the aroma profile of Italian fermented sausages obtained with different LAB strains as starter cultures (control with commercial starter culture; Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39) after 20 days and at the end of ripening.
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the aroma profile of Italian fermented sausages obtained with different LAB strains as starter cultures (control with commercial starter culture; Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39) after 20 days and at the end of ripening.
Fermentation 10 00507 g004
Figure 5. Spider plot reporting the sensory data attributed to fermented sausages obtained with different LAB starter cultures at the end of ripening (black: commercial starter; green: Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; yellow: Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; red: Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; blue: Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39). For each attribute, the presence of an asterisk indicates significant differences among the samples.
Figure 5. Spider plot reporting the sensory data attributed to fermented sausages obtained with different LAB starter cultures at the end of ripening (black: commercial starter; green: Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; yellow: Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; red: Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; blue: Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39). For each attribute, the presence of an asterisk indicates significant differences among the samples.
Fermentation 10 00507 g005
Table 1. Fermented sausage samples and LAB strains used as starters.
Table 1. Fermented sausage samples and LAB strains used as starters.
Sample NameLAB StrainOrigin
ControlLatilactobacillus sakei TMXCommercial starter
BPF2Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2Spanish fermented sausage
HNS55Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55Croatian fermented sausage
CB22Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22Spanish fermented sausage
HZK39Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39Croatian fermented sausage
Table 2. Microbial counts (log CFU/g) detected in the traditional Italian fermented sausages obtained with the different LAB as starter cultures (control with commercial starter culture; Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39) during fermentation and ripening. For each microbial group at each sampling time, differences among the samples (by row) according to ANOVA are indicated by the presence of different letters.
Table 2. Microbial counts (log CFU/g) detected in the traditional Italian fermented sausages obtained with the different LAB as starter cultures (control with commercial starter culture; Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum BPF2; Latilactobacillus curvatus HNS55; Companilactobacillus alimentarius CB22; Latilactobacillus sakei HZK39) during fermentation and ripening. For each microbial group at each sampling time, differences among the samples (by row) according to ANOVA are indicated by the presence of different letters.
Microbial GroupTime (Days)ControlBPF2HNS55CB22HZK39
LactobacilliMeat batter4.23 ± 0.63
07.79 a7.72 a7.60 a7.41 a7.67 a
59.10 a 8.12 bc 9.07 a 8.37 b 8.01 c
119.17 a8.39 b9.10 a8.60 c8.21 b
208.73 a8.43 b8.97 a8.45 b8.06 c
457.62 a8.50 b9.06 c9.02 c7.69 a
StaphylococciMeat batter3.57 ± 0.15
05.57 a4.90 b5.24 a4.80 b5.07 b
55.50 a4.70 b5.20 c4.95 c5.01 c
116.30 a5.17 b6.15 a5.39 b5.19 b
206.00 a5.82 a6.21 a5.48 b5.27 b
456.30 a5.90 b6.85 c6.02 b5.25 d
EnterobacteriaMeat batter2.12 ± 0.07
02.01 a2.04 a1.98 a2.01 a2.00 a
52.24 a2.20 a2.19 a2.03 a1.70 a
111.92 a1.87 a1.87 a2.02 a1.72 a
201.69 a1.50 a1.84 a1.65 a1.75 a
452.02 a1.24 b2.10 a2.42 c1.59 d
EnterococciMeat batter2.09 ± 0.94
01.96 a2.01 a2.00 a1.98 a1.94 a
52.47 a2.14 b2.69 a 4.44 c 2.82 a
112.43 a2.10 a3.14 b 4.84 c 2.84 b
202.29 a1.93 b4.33 c 5.56 d 3.51 e
452.96 a3.00 a4.14 b 6.07 c3.17 a
YeastsMeat batter1.69 ± 0.30
02.10 a2.05 a2.03 a2.09 a2.10 a
51.80 a2.22 a1.79 a2.33 a1.73 a
113.22 a 3.12 a3.30 a 2.38 b 2.91 a
202.56 ab 2.90 a3.06 a 2.39 b 3.00 a
452.87 a2.83 a3.04 a3.22 a2.62 a
MouldsMeat batter<1 *
0<1 a<1 a<1 a<1 a<1 a
51.58 a1.46 a0.49 b1.78 ac2.14 c
115.14 a5.18 a5.02 a4.70 b 5.12 a
204.44 a 5.11 b 4.70 a 4.62 a 4.61 a
453.09 a 4.19 b 3.67 c 4.19 b 4.20 b
* below the detection limit (1 log CFU/g).
Table 3. Aroma profile of fermented sausages obtained with different LAB starter cultures (control with commercial starter culture; bE-GC-MS after 20 days and at the end of ripening. Data are expressed as a percentage of the ratio between the peak area of each molecule and the peak area of the internal standard (4-methyl-2-pentanol). Results are the mean of three independent repetitions. For each molecule at each sampling time (20 or 45 days), differences among the samples according to ANOVA are indicated by the presence of different letters.
Table 3. Aroma profile of fermented sausages obtained with different LAB starter cultures (control with commercial starter culture; bE-GC-MS after 20 days and at the end of ripening. Data are expressed as a percentage of the ratio between the peak area of each molecule and the peak area of the internal standard (4-methyl-2-pentanol). Results are the mean of three independent repetitions. For each molecule at each sampling time (20 or 45 days), differences among the samples according to ANOVA are indicated by the presence of different letters.
Compound (%)20 Days45 Days
ControlBPF2HNS55CB22HZK39ControlBPF2HNS55CB22HZK39
Nonanal0.68 a0.36 b0.40 b0.39 b0.32 b0.93 a0.74 b0.87 a1.07 a1.10 a
Benzaldehyde1.76 a1.12 b0.80 c0.68 c0.75 c2.85 a2.52 a0.83 b1.04 b0.91 b
Benzeneacetaldehyde10.40 a3.84 b1.45 c0.92 d1.04 cd18.60 a17.01 a3.58 b2.25 c6.68 d
Aldehydes12.83 a5.31 b2.65 c1.99 c2.11 c22.38 a20.27 a5.28 b4.37 b8.70 c
Acetone7.69 a6.06 b12.70 c7.96 a8.46 a12.38 a9.84 b14.86 c11.96 a11.14 a
2-butanone4.90 a1.45 b2.94 c2.42 c1.79 b8.45 a8.06 a9.79 b25.1619.81 c
2-pentanone2.23 a2.50 a3.58 b4.16 c2.63 a2.77 a4.85 b3.55 c3.83 c2.48 a
Methyl isobutyl ketone3.95 a4.25 a4.74 b5.74 c4.61 b3.39 a2.15 b2.67 b1.94 b2.19 b
Acetoin7.25 a14.23 b3.53 c6.91 a4.80 c7.27 a6.54 a5.87 b6.40 a5.19 b
2-nonanone0.93 a0.04 b0.19 b0.27 b0.03 b1.04 a0.00 b0.32 c0.54 c0.40 c
Ketones26.96 a28.53 a27.68 a27.46 a22.33 b35.31 a31.45 b37.06 a49.84 c41.21 d
Isopropyl alcohol6.82 a0.58 b0.73 b0.72 b0.65 b0.921.121.191.021.21
Ethanol8.03 a5.21 b4.49 c3.97 c2.98 d1.77 a3.86 b3.42 b2.21 c2.86 c
2-hexanol2.80 a2.82 a3.01 a4.00 b3.17 a2.25 a2.37 a0.96 b0.60 b0.95 b
1-pentanol0.67 a0.29 b0.42 a0.55 a0.57 a0.35 a1.52 b0.59 a0.92 c0.53 a
3-buten-1-ol, 3-methyl-0.41 a0.62 a0.66 a0.75 a0.55 a0.30 a0.26 a0.39 a0.26 a0.30 a
2-buten-1-ol, 3-methyl-0.71 a0.54 a0.89 a0.77 a0.56 a0.48 a0.37 a0.42 a0.26 a0.24 a
1-octen-3-ol0.71 a0.35 b0.37 b0.62 a0.37 a0.28 a0.74 b0.40 a0.78 b0.40 a
Alcohols20.15 a10.40 b10.56 b11.37 b8.85 c6.35 a10.25 b7.38 a6.04 a6.49 a
Acetic acid34.12 a48.81 b50.90 b52.06 b57.94 c29.34 a35.00 a44.77 b36.83 a39.92 ab
Propanoic acid0.31 a0.41 a0.77 b0.52 ab0.64 b0.510.280.550.300.39
Butanoic acid3.22 a5.10 b5.68 b4.79 c6.25 d3.94 a1.91 b3.21 a1.36 c1.99 b
Hexanoic acid0.69 a0.96 b1.16 b1.06 b1.11 b0.69 a0.35 b0.81 a0.60 a0.58 a
Octanoic acid1.72 a0.48 b0.60 b0.75 b0.77 b1.49 a0.49 b0.94 c0.65 bc0.72 bc
Acids40.06 a55.76 b59.11 b59.18 b66.71 c35.97 a38.03 a50.28 b39.75 c43.61 d
Table 4. Factor coordinates of the variables for the first two factors (representing 78.59% of the total variability), based on correlations.
Table 4. Factor coordinates of the variables for the first two factors (representing 78.59% of the total variability), based on correlations.
CompoundFactor Coordinates of the Variables, Based on Correlations
Factor 1Factor 2
Nonanal0.17090.0474
Benzaldehyde0.1108−0.3169
Benzeneacetaldehyde0.6580−0.0887
Acetone1.5160−0.2415
2-butanone4.2191−0.1024
2-pentanone0.4112−0.0984
Methyl isobutyl ketone−0.1700−0.0860
Acetoin0.31770.0267
2-nonanone0.0333−0.0016
Isopropyl alcohol−0.0828−0.0317
Ethanol−0.09131.7874
2-hexanol−0.22040.0148
1-pentanol0.13220.1523
3-buten-1-ol, 3-methyl-−0.01610.0509
2-buten-1-ol, 3-methyl-−0.0330−0.1103
1-octen-3-ol0.07500.0474
Acetic acid2.3249−0.3169
Propanoic acid0.0093−0.0887
Butanoic acid−0.2668−0.2415
Hexanoic acid−0.0017−0.1024
Octanoic acid0.0137−0.0984
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barbieri, F.; Montanari, C.; Angelucci, C.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G. Use of Indigenous Lactic Acid Bacteria for Industrial Fermented Sausage Production: Microbiological, Chemico-Physical and Sensory Features and Biogenic Amine Content. Fermentation 2024, 10, 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10100507

AMA Style

Barbieri F, Montanari C, Angelucci C, Gardini F, Tabanelli G. Use of Indigenous Lactic Acid Bacteria for Industrial Fermented Sausage Production: Microbiological, Chemico-Physical and Sensory Features and Biogenic Amine Content. Fermentation. 2024; 10(10):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10100507

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barbieri, Federica, Chiara Montanari, Chiara Angelucci, Fausto Gardini, and Giulia Tabanelli. 2024. "Use of Indigenous Lactic Acid Bacteria for Industrial Fermented Sausage Production: Microbiological, Chemico-Physical and Sensory Features and Biogenic Amine Content" Fermentation 10, no. 10: 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10100507

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop