Review Reports
- Ana María Cabanas1,*,
- Nicolás Sáez1 and
- Patricio O. Collao-Caiconte2
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Sergei Popov
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsOverall, the authors had conducted a comprehensive and systematic review.
- There is only one key comment regarding the title of manuscript: the title is not clear. It does not specify which aspects of the applications of pulse oximetry would be.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe paper calls: "Assessing the Reliability of AI in Pulse Oximetry: Performance Evaluation and Comprehensive Bias Analysis" and it is large review article concerned of Pulse Oximetry measurement topic. The advantage of article large quantity of data with long references list 71 ones.
The main disadvantage of article is absence of technical details (just links in first paragraph in introduction). In my opinion authors should add pictures and text descriptions which describes methods of oximetry in details.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf