Insects as Sentinels of Oxidative Stress Induced by Environmental Contaminants: Biomarkers and Analytical Approaches
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Temporal Distribution and Contextual Issues of Papers
3. Analytical Methods
3.1. Sample Treatment
3.2. Reactive Species Assays
3.2.1. Nitrogen Oxides
3.2.2. Reactive Oxygen Species
3.2.3. Hydrogen Peroxide
3.2.4. Superoxide
3.3. Enzyme Activity Assays
3.3.1. Catalase Activity
3.3.2. Superoxide Dismutase Activity
3.3.3. Glutathione S-Transferase Activity
3.3.4. Glutathione Reductase Activity
3.3.5. Glutathione Peroxidase Activity
3.4. Low-Molecular-Weight Antioxidant Molecule Assays
3.4.1. Glutathione
3.4.2. Total Reduced Thiols
3.4.3. α-Tocopherol
3.5. Oxidative Damage Assays
3.5.1. Lipid Damage
3.5.2. Protein Damage
3.5.3. DNA Damage
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
8-OHdG | 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine |
8-oxoG | 8-oxoguanine |
BaP | benzo[a]pyrene |
CAT | catalase |
CDNB | 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene |
CHP | cumene hydroperoxide |
DCF-DA | 2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate |
DCHBS | 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid |
DHE | dihydroethidium |
DNP | 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone |
DNPH | 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine |
DTNB | 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) |
GONPs | graphene oxide nanoparticles |
GPx | glutathione peroxidase |
GPx-I | selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase |
GPx-II | selenium-independent glutathione peroxidase |
GR | glutathione reductase |
GSH | glutathione |
GSSG | glutathione disulfide |
GST | glutathione S-transferase |
HRP | horseradish peroxidase enzyme |
INT | p-iodonitrotetrazolium |
LHP | lipid hydroperoxide |
LPO | lipid peroxidation |
MDA | malondialdehyde |
MTLPs | metallothionein-like proteins |
NBT | nitroblue tetrazolium |
NBT+ | formazan |
OGG1 | 8-oxoguanine glycosylase |
OPT | o-phthalaldehyde |
PAH | polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon |
PC | protein carbonyls |
PMSF | phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride |
PQ | paraquat |
PT | protein thiols |
RNS | reactive nitrogen species |
ROS | reactive oxygen species |
RS | reactive species |
SOD | superoxide dismutase |
SSA | sulfosalicylic acid |
TBARS | thiobarbituric acid reactive substances |
TCA | trichloroacetic acid |
Tsh | total thiols |
WST | tetrazolium salt |
α-toc | alpha-tocopherol |
Appendix A
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Rotenone (50 μM) | 7 days | Increased | 150 μL 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 20 μL supernatant, and 25 μL Griess’ reagent were incubated at room temperature, in low or no illumination. | - | [15] |
Syagrus coronata fixed oil (0.2 mg/mL) | ns | ||||||
Rotenone (50 μM) + S. coronata fixed oil (0.2 mg/mL) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | CdCl2 (0.05 mM) | 7 days | Increased | Sample was incubated with Griess reagent in a 1:1 ratio at room temperature for 20 min. | 550 nm | [47] |
hesperidin (50 and 100 μM) | ns | ||||||
CdCl2 (0.05 mM) + hesperidin (50 and 100 μM) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | FeSO4 (1.0 and 10.0 μM) | 10 days | ns | Sample was incubated with Griess reagent in a 1:1 ratio at room temperature for 20 min. | 550 nm | [49] |
Rotenone (50.0 μM) | ns | ||||||
FeSO4 (1.0 and 10.0 μM) + rotenone | Increased | ||||||
Locusta migratoria | Testicular tissues | Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) | Single dose injection | Increased (*) | Nitric oxide assay kit (ab65328, Abcam Co., Berlin, Germany). | - | [13] |
Al2O3 NPs + Periplaneta americana extract (0.05 mg/g body weight) | ns |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Bombyx mori (silkworm), larvae | Midgut, Malpighian tubules, and fat body with adhered tissues | Polystyrene nanoplastics (0.25 mg/0.5 g diet) | 10 days for behavior analysis and 21 days for biochemical analyses | ns | Sample in 100 μL of PBS and 8.3 μL of DCFH-DA (10 mg mL−1 in DMSO) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. | Ex/Em = 485/530 nm | [65] |
Bombyx mori (silkworm), cell culture and female adults | Ovary cell line | Graphene oxide nanoparticles (GONPs 25 mg/L) | 24 h, 48 h and 72 h | Increased (*) | DCFH-DA kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) | Ex/Em = 500/525 nm | [66] |
Ovarian tissues of female adults | GONPs (25 mg/L) | 48 h | Increased (*) | ||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly), cell culture | - | Sb (1.2 mg/mL) | 48 h | Increased (**) | DCFH-DA assay kit (S0033, Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Cells were incubated with DCFH-DA probe for 30 min in the dark. After incubation, the cells were washed in PBS. | Ex/Em = 488/525 nm | [21] |
Sb (1.2 mg/mL) + N-acetylcysteine (NAC at 0.15, 0.75 and 1.50 mg/mL) | ns | ||||||
Sb (1.2 mg/mL) + glutathione (GSH at 0.15, 0.75 and 1.50 mg/mL) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body (Cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions) | Paraquat (PQ, 10, 20, and 40 mM in 5% sucrose solution) | 24 h | Increased with PQ at 20 and 40 mM | 2 mL Locke’s buffer (pH 7.4), 0.1 mL cytosol (100 μg protein), and 10 μL DCFH-DA (5μM) were incubated for 15 min at room temperature. | Ex/Em = 484/530 nm | [48] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Eugenia uniflora leaves essential oil (3, 15 and 30 μg/mL) | 3, 6 and 12 h | Increased (3 h) | 100 μL sample were incubated in the presence of 5 μM DCF-DA at 37 °C for 1 h [92]. | Ex/Em = 485/530 nm | [50] |
Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm) cell culture | Cells | Camptothecin (CPT) and hydroxyl-camptothecin (HCPT) at 0.1, 1, 5 and 10 μM | 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h | Increased | 500 μL PBS containing 10 μM DCFH-DA were added to the collected cells and then incubated at 37 °C for 20 min in the dark. After incubation, the cells were washed in PBS. | Ex/Em = 485/528 nm | [75] |
Tenebrio molitor (mealworm larvae) | Whole body | Polyethylene (3 g) | 24 days | Increased | DHE assay kit (Biolab Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Supernatant was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. | Ex/Em = 488–535/610 nm | [41] |
Polystyrene (3 g) | Increased | ||||||
polyvinyl chloride (3 g) | Increased |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance a) | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | Environmental pollutants produced by waste burning (metals) | 1 week | ns in control bees before and after the fire | Colorimetric/Fluorometric assay kit (ab102500, BioVision Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). | 570 nm | [10] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | Se(IV) (0.6, 6, 60, 600 μg/mL) | 2 days | Increased (*, 60 μg/mL; 600 μg/mL) | Colorimetric/Fluorometric assay kit ab102500 (BioVision Abcam) | 570 nm Ex/Em = 535/587 nm | [57] |
Se(VI) (0.6, 6, 60, 600 μg/mL) | ns | ||||||
Bombyx mori (silkworm), cells culture and female adults | Ovarian tissues of female adults | Graphene oxide nanoparticles (GONPs, 25 mg/L) | 48 h | Increased | Assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology) | 405 nm | [66] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | CdCl2 (0.05 mM) | 7 days | Increased | Wolff’s method [94]: 590 μL FOX 1 + 10 μL sample and 30 min of incubation at room temperature. | 560 nm | [47] |
hesperidin (50 and 100 μM) | ns | ||||||
CdCl2 (0.05 mM) + hesperidin (50 and 100 μM) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body (cytosolic fraction) | Paraquat (PQ, 10, 20, and 40 mM in 5% sucrose solution) | 24 h | Increased with PQ at 20 and 40 mM | Wolff’s method [94]: 100 μg cytosolic protein was added to 1 mL of FOX reagent and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. | 560 nm | [48] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | FeSO4 (1.0 and 10.0 μM) | 10 days | ns | Wolff’s method [94]: 290 µL FOX 1 + 10 µL sample and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. | 560 nm | [49] |
Rotenone (50.0 μM) | ns | ||||||
FeSO4 (1.0 and 10.0 μM) + rotenone | Increased | ||||||
Hermetia illucens (black soldier fly), larvae | Gut tissues | Contaminated soils with 2% solution of Cd, Fe or Pb, or catechol, or organic compound used for pesticide production mixed with organic wastes (fruit, vegetable or kitchen) in a 2:0.5 ratio | 7 days | All values depict significant differences among control and the different waste types except fruit wastes + Cd, kitchen wastes or kitchen wastes + Cd | Potassium iodide assay [95]: 0.5 mg of sample + 1 mL of potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM; pH = 7.0) containing 0.25 mL Trichloroacetic acid (0.1%, w/v), 0.5 mL KI (1 M) | 240 nm | [53] |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance a) | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Aedes aegypti “Bora-Bora” (mosquito), larvae | Whole body | 0.5, 5 and 50 µg/L of fluoranthene or benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) or to a 1:1 wt:wt mix of both 0.5, 5 and 50 µg/L of fluoranthene or benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) or to a 1:1 wt:wt mix of both (0.25, 2.5 and 25 µg/L of each pollutant for a final concentration of 0.5, 5 and 50 µg/L of total PAHs, respectively) | 24 h (1 h irradiation) | Higher PAH concentrations reduced ROS production, particularly for BaP and the PAH mixture, regardless of UV exposure. In PAH-unexposed larvae, UV exposure caused an 80% increase in ROS b. | Chemical reduction of the redox dye NBT [97]: 20 larvae were added to 1 mL of a 1 mg/L NBT solution for 2 h in the dark at room temperature. Larvae were washed twice in ethanol, air-dried, and the formazan produced was then dissolved in 50 μL KOH (2 M) and 75 μL DMSO. | 630 nm | [42] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body (Mitochondrial fraction) | Paraquat (PQ, 10, 20, and 40 mM in 5% sucrose solution) | 24 h | Increased with PQ at 20 and 40 mM | DHE oxidation method [96], 25 μg of mitochondrial protein. | Ex/Em = 490/590 nm | [48] |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Acheta domesticus (house cricket) | Hemolymph | Nanodiamonds (NDs, 20 and 200 µg/g food) | 7 weeks | ns | H2O2 decomposition [99]: supernatant + 0.05 M phosphate Sørensen buffer (pH 7.4) were incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. Then, 10 mM of H2O2 were added. | 40 s (with an 8 s interval) at 240 nm | [78] |
Head | ND 200 increased (*) | ||||||
Gut | ND 200 increased (*) | ||||||
Gonads | ND 200 increased (*) | ||||||
Fat body | ns | ||||||
Acridoidea (grasshoppers) | Gut | Azadirachtin (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 ppm) | One application per 25 g of food plants | Increased (**) | Gel zymography assay [100]: The nondenaturing (8%) acrylamide gel + 25 µg proteins in distilled water for 10 min. The gel was shaken in 100 mL distilled water + 100 µL H2O2 for 10 min and then it was washed with distilled water for 5 min. | - | [84] |
Aiolopus thalassinus (grasshopper), nymph | Brain | Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd), PO43−, and SO42− in soil samples from low and high polluted sites | - | The level of CAT activity from the high polluted site revealed a significant decrease (*) compared to individuals from the control and low-pollution sites. The highest value of CAT was found in the gut of nymphs from the low polluted site | H2O2 decomposition [99] | 240 nm | [79] |
Thoracic muscles | |||||||
Gut | |||||||
Aiolopus thalassinus (grasshopper) | Brain, thoracic muscles, and gut | Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd), PO43−, and SO42− in soil samples from low and high polluted sites | - | The level of CAT activity revealed a significant (*) decreasing effect compared to the individuals from the control site. A strong inhibition of CAT activity was especially observed in the case of females. | H2O2 decomposition [99]: 510 µL supernatant + 3060 µL potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) + 40 µL H2O2 (10 mM). | 240 nm | [80] |
Anaceana globulus (water scavenger beetle | Whole body | Heavy metal polluted water (Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, Pb, Co and Cd) | Highly significant in samples collected from the polluted site in compare the reference one. | H2O2 decomposition [99] | 240 nm | [39] | |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Thorax–abdomen (cytosolic fraction) | Sited with different degrees of environmental pollution mainly related to agricultural and industrial activities | Only the CAT enzyme showed slightly higher activity in bees from urban areas compared to those collected from natural areas | H2O2 decomposition: the assay was carried out in phosphate buffer (pH 7) and H2O2 24 mM. | 240 nm | [11] | |
Apis cerana | Whole body | CdCl2 ((12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg/L) | 48 h | ns | CAT-assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) | 405 nm | [56] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | Pb(II) (15 μg) | One dose of 8 μL | ns | H2O2 decomposition [106]: 5 µL sample + 600 μL reaction mixture (150 μL of 3% v/v H2O2 in 400 μL of phosphate buffer solution pH = 7) + incubated for 10 min at 22 °C. | 240 nm | [58] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee), queens and foragers | Hemolymph | Imidacloprid (5 and 200 ppb) | - | Significant differences in function of age, role, and concentration (*) | H2O2 decomposition [99,105] | 240 nm | [59] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Head | Thiamethoxam Flusilazole (FSZ) +combination (LC50 values) | 2-day and 4-day intervals | The CAT activity was steeply diminished under the high dose of FSZ exposure than at the baseline level. | Commercial kit | - | [60] |
Bombyx mori (silkworm) larvae | Midgut, Malpighian tubules, and fat body with adhered tissues | Polystyrene NPs (0.25 mg/0.5 g diet) | 10 days | ns | Decomposition of H2O2 (50 mM) in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) [98,109]. | 240 nm | [65] |
Bombyx mori (silkworm), female adults | Ovarian tissues of female adults | Graphene oxide NPs (GONPs, 25 mg/L) | 48 h | Increased | CAT-assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) | - | [66] |
Bombyx mori (silkworm), larvae | Hemolymph | ZnO-NPs (50 and 100 μg/mL) | The larvae were fed three times per day. | Increased | Phosphate buffer + H2O2 were added to hemolysate [73]. | 3 min at 240 nm | [67] |
Chironomida, Gomphus, and Lestes | Whole body | The study was conducted mainly on three rivers in polluted area | - | The highest CAT activities were recorded in the turbid river, while the lowest ones were recorded in the clear river. | CAT-assay kit (ECAT-100, Bio Assay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA): 10 µL supernatant + 10 µL assay buffer + 1 µL 4.8 mM H2O2 (by mixing 5 µL 3% H2O2 and 914 µL dH2O) incubate for 30 min at room temperature. | 470 nm | [83] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Esfenvalerate (ESF, 0.075, 0.3 and 1.2 mg/L) | 24 h | Decreased at 0.3 and 1.2 mg/L ESF | H2O2 decomposition [101]. | 240 nm | [20] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Spinosad (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256 μg/L) | 48 h | ns | H2O2 decomposition [101] 10 μL of protein, 190 μL K2HPO4 (pH = 7) and 0.5 μL H2O2. The blank was done using 10 μL of homogenization buffer instead of protein. | 1 min at 240 nm | [44] |
Indoxacarb (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 μg/L) | ns | ||||||
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Tetracycline (2, 20, and 200 μg/L) | 48 h | The significantly highest value is for TC at 1.83 ug/L | H2O2 decomposition [101]. | 240 nm | [45] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | Brilliant black PN (azo dye, E151; 1, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL) | 5 mL | Decreased at 5 mg/mL | H2O2 decomposition [99]. | 240 nm | [19] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | CdCl2 (0.05 mM) | 7 days | Decreased | H2O2 decomposition [99]: 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 300 mM H2O2 and sample (1:50 dilution). | 2 min at 240 nm | [47] |
hesperidin (50 and 100 μM) | ns | ||||||
CdCl2 (0.05 mM) + hesperidin (50 and 100 μM) | Decreased with hesperidin 50 μM | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body (Cytosolic fraction) | Paraquat (PQ, 10, 20, and 40 mM in 5% sucrose solution) | 24 h | Increased at PQ 20, and 40 mM | H2O2 decomposition [99]. | 3 min at 240 nm | [48] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | FeSO4 (1.0 and 10.0 μM) | 10 days | ns | H2O2 decomposition [99]: 10 µL of sample (1:50 dilution) and 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) followed with 300 mM H2O2. | 2 min at 240 nm | [49] |
Rotenone (50.0 μM) | ns | ||||||
FeSO4 (1.0 and 10.0 μM) + rotenone | Decreased | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Eugenia uniflora leaves essential oil (3, 15 and 30 μg/mL) | 3 and 12 h | ns | H2O2 decomposition [99]: 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10 mM H2O2, 0.012% Triton X100. | 240 nm | [50] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Experimental food: 4% yeast, 0.25%, 1%, 4%, 10% or 20% sucrose, 1.25% (w/v) agar and 0.4% (v/v) propionic acid (carbohydrate deficit) | 25 mL | Catalase activity had the lowest value in male flies grown on 0.25% sucrose and was not affected by diets used in females | - | - | [51] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut | CuO-NPs (size < 50 µm, 10 μg/L) | 15 days | Increased | H2O2 decomposition [103]. | 240 nm | [68] |
Fat body | Increased | ||||||
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut Fat body | Al2O3 nanopowder (size: <50 nm) and micron powder (size: 45–75 μm) at 10, 50, and 100 μg/mL | One injection of 10 μL of suspension | Increased at 50 and 100 μg/mL Al2O3 micropowder; decreased (*) in Al2O3 NPs (in fat body decreased at 50 μg/mL and increased at 100 μg/mL) | H2O2 decomposition [103]. | 240 nm | [69] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut or fat body | CuSO4 (10 mg/L) | 72 h | Increased (midgut) | H2O2 decomposition [103]. | 240 nm | [70] |
ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | Decreased | ||||||
CuSO4 + ZnCl2 (1:1 ratio) | Decreased | ||||||
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Tissue | Juglone at LC10 (0.5 mg), LC30 (1.5 mg) and LC50 (2.3 mg) in a 2 g diet. | - | Increased at LC30 and LC50, while decreased (**) at LC10 | H2O2 decomposition [100]. | 3 min at 240 nm | [72] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Hemolymph | Azadirachtin (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 3 μg/larva) | 24 and 72 h post treatment | Decreased significantly at 1, 1.5, and 2 μg/larva doses after 24 h, but increased at all doses except for 0.5 μg/larva at 72 h post treatments. The effect of AZA on CAT activity in larval hemolymph was dose- and time-dependent. | H2O2 decomposition [100]. | 3 min at 240 nm | [73] |
Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle), larvae and adults | Whole body | Glyphosate based herbicide (450 g/L) | - | CAT activity increased with body mass in the adult beetles in GBH treatment | CAT-assay kit (CAT100, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) with modifications [111,112]: 0.6 mg/mL sample + assay buffer (50 mM KF + 0.1% TritonX100, pH 7.0), chromogen reagent (0.25 mM 4-aminoantipyrene + 2 mM 3,5-dicloro-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid in 150 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0), peroxidase solutions (from horseradish), stop solution (15 mM NaN3), and 200 mM and 10 mM H2O2. | 520 nm | [40] |
Locusta migratoria (Locust) | Testicular tissues | Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) | Single dose injection | Increased (**) | H2O2 decomposition [99]. | 240 nm | [13] |
Al2O3 NPs + Periplaneta americana extract (0.05 mg/g body weight) | ns | ||||||
Oncopeltus fasciatus (large milkweed bug) | Whole body | FeSO4·7H2O + ascorbic acid (2000 and 5000 mg/L) | 96 h | Increased | H2O2 decomposition [99]. | 1 min at 240 nm | [54] |
Periplaneta americana (American cockroaches) | Whole body | Bendiocarb (0.1 nM) | 1 mL | Increased (**) | H2O2 decomposition [107]: the diluted sample was added to phosphate buffer and 30 mM H2O2. | 3 min, at 1 min intervals, at 240 nm | [37] |
Reticulitermes speratus (termite: workers, queens, soldiers, and nymphs) | Whole body | UV-B (312 nm, 10.4 kJ/m2) | 20 min | Increased in queens | 15 μg total protein + reaction buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2.5 mM EDTA and 10 mM H2O2 [110]. | 240 nm | [38] |
Stenopsyche marmorata (caddisfly) larvae | Whole body (except head, tail, and gut) | Anthropogenic pollutants by effluents of wastewater treatment plants (WWT) | - | WWTP effluent induced CAT | H2O2 decomposition [102]. | 240 nm | [82] |
Spodoptera litura (tobacco worm) larvae | Gut | Fipronil (20, 40, 60 and 80 mg/L) | 24–72 h | At the lower concentration and early exposure, time, CAT activity did not increase significantly. As the exposure time increased, the CAT activity increased significantly during the 24 h and 48 h and then decreased compared to the control after 72 h of exposure. | H2O2 decomposition [104]. | - | [77] |
Trachyderma hispida (desert beetle) | Midgut | The polluted site is characterized by the presence of agricultural land and high concentrations of elements (especially P, S, and Na) due to the proximity of a textile plant. | - | Decreased in polluted site | H2O2 decomposition [99]. | 240 nm | [16] |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Acridoidea (Grasshopper) | Gut | Azadirachtin (1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 ppm) | One application per 25 g of food plants | Increased (**) at 10 mg/kg | Gel zymography [124]: supernatant from tissue homogenate was electrophoresed in riboflavin gel at 4 °C. Gels were first incubated in 2.4 mM NBT in deionized water for 15 min and then in 0.028 mM riboflavin/280 mM N,N,N,N-tetramethyl-ethylenediamine (TEMED) in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) for 15 min in the darkroom. After washing, the gel was illuminated under fluorescent light to get a distinct SOD activity band. | - | [84] |
Aiolopus thalassinus, nymph | Brain | Environmental pollution (low or high level) | - | Increased b (low level) | Epinephrine autoxidation [116]. | 480 nm | [79] |
Thoracic muscles | ns | ||||||
Gut | ns | ||||||
Aiolopus thalassinus | Brain, thoracic muscles, and gut | Environmental pollution: fertilizer industry surroundings | - | Sex-, tissue-, and distance-dependent | Epinephrine autoxidation [116]: 402 µL of a sodium carbonate buffer (200 mM; pH 10.0), 35 µL of EDTA (10 mM), 87 µL of the supernatant of the appropriate tissue and 2835 µL of freshly prepared epinephrine (15 mM). | 480 nm | [80] |
Apis cerana (honeybee) | Whole body | CdCl2 (5.1 mg/L) | 14 days | Decreased | SOD assay kit (A001, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) | 550 nm | [56] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Thorax–abdomen (cytosolic fraction) | Environmental pollution | - | - | 50 mM Na2CO3 buffer pH 10 with 0.1 mM EDTA, 500 mM cytochrome C, 1 mM hypoxanthine, and xanthine oxidase. | 550 nm | [11] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee), queens and foragers | Hemolymph | Imidacloprid (5 and 200 µg/kg) | 1 month | Decreased (5 µg/kg *) | p-iodonitrotetrazolium/ xanthine/xanthine oxidase method [121]. | 505 nm | [59] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Head | Flusilazole (2.3–37 mg/L) | 7 days | Decreased (37 mg/L) | SOD assay kit (A001, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). | - | [60] |
thiamethoxam (0.3–5.5 μg/L) | Decreased (1.3 μg/L) | ||||||
flusilazole (0.06–0.92 mg/L) + thiamethoxam (0.009–0.014 μg/L) | Modulated | ||||||
Atta sexdens (leafcutter ant), workers | Fat body | Sulfaramid (0.005% in acetone) | 24–48 h | ns | Pyrogallol autoxidation inhibition in EDTA (pH 8.2) [115]: 20 μL of supernatant from samples and 180 μL 0.2 mM pyrogallol. | 20 min at 420 nm | [64] |
Fipronil (0.001% in acetone) | 24–72 h | Increased (24 h) | |||||
Mg-1 complex (2 g/L) | 48–96 h | Decreased (96 h) | |||||
Bombyx mori (silkworm) larvae | Midgut, Malpighian tubules, and fat body with adhered tissues | Polystyrene nanoplastics (0.5 mg/kg in 0.5 g of feeding) | 21 days | Decreased | The activity was quantified measuring the degree of inhibition of cytochrome C (0.3 mM) in 50 mM phosphate buffer + EDTA (0.1 mM), generated by the reaction mix of 1.5 mM hypoxanthine and xanthine oxidase 56.1 mU mL−1. | 550 nm | [65] |
Bombyx mori (silkworm), female adults | Ovarian tissues | Graphene oxide nanoparticles (GONP) (25 mg/L in 100 µL of culture medium) | 24 h | Increased | SOD assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). | - | [66] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Spinosad (0.5–8 μg/L) | 48 h | ns | Cytochrome c reduction [122]. | 5 min at 550 nm | [44] |
Indoxacarb (2–8 μg/L) | ns | ||||||
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Tetracycline (1.83–174 μg/L) | 48 h | Decreased (18.5 µg/L) | Inhibition of cytochrome c reduction in the presence of the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase O2−radical dot generator system [122]. | - | [45] |
Chironomidae, Gomphus, and Lestes | Whole body | Comparison of different rivers on different insect genera | - | - | 20 μL of standard + 20 µL sample + 160 µL of assay buffer, 5 µL of xanthine + 5 µL of WST-1 + 20 µL xanthine oxidase enzyme. | 440 nm | [83] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | Brilliant black PN (azo dye, E151) (1–5 mg/L) | up to development of the larvae | Increased (5 mg/L) | Nitroblue tetrazolium reduction rate [120]. | 560 nm | [19] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly), cells | - | Sb(III) (Potassium antimonyl tartrate trihydrate) (1.2 mg/mL) | entire growth cycle, from embryos to hatching adults | Increased ** | Epinephrine autoxidation [116]. | 4 min at 30 °C at 480 nm | [21] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body (cytosolic or mitochondrial fraction) | Paraquat (PQ) (10–40 mM) | 24 h | Increased (20 mM) | Inhibition of quercetin autooxidation [117]: 1 mL reaction contained 3–5 μg protein; 0.016 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8); 8 mM TEMED, 0.08 mM EDTA, and the reaction was started by adding 0.15% quercetin dissolved in dimethyl formamide. | 3 min at 406 nm | [48] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Eugenia uniflora leaves essential oil (3 mg/L) | 3, 6, 12 h | Increased (12 h) | Inhibition of quercetin autooxidation [117]. | 406 nm | [50] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Sucrose/yeast larval diet (0.25–20% as sucrose) | up to pupation (96 h) | - | Inhibition of quercetin autooxidation [118]. | - | [51] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut | CuO-NPs (size <50 µm) (10 µg/L) | 15 days | ns | Decrease in cytochrome c by the xanthine oxidase/hypoxanthine system [122]. | - | [68] |
Fat body | Decreased | ||||||
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut Fat body | Al2O3-NPs (<50 µm, or <50 nm) (10–100 mg/L in 10 µL volume) | Single injection | NPs size-, dose-, and tissue-dependent | Decrease in cytochrome c by the xanthine oxidase/hypoxanthine system [122]. | - | [69] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth) | Midgut | CuSO4 (10 mg/L) | 72 h | Increased | Decrease in cytochrome c by the xanthine oxidase/hypoxanthine system [122]. | 550 nm | [70] |
ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | Increased | ||||||
CuSO4 (10 mg/L) + ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | Decreased | ||||||
Fat body | CuSO4 (10 mg/L) | Decreased | |||||
ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | Decreased | ||||||
CuSO4 (10 mg/L) + ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | Decreased | ||||||
Galleria mellonella (wax moth) | Hemolymph | Gibberellic acid (GA3) (0.05–5 g/kg) | up to a weight target of approx. 18 g | Modulated | SOD assay kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)—xanthine/xanthine oxidase systems. | 450 nm | [71] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Whole body | Juglone (0.25–1.15 mg/g) | up to a weight target of approx. 18 g | Modulated | SOD assay kit (Cayman Chemical)—xanthine/xanthine oxidase systems. | 450 nm | [72] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Hemolymph | Azadirachtin (0.5–3 µg/larva) | 24 h delayed analysis | Decreased (1 µg/L) | SOD assay kit (Cayman Chemical) using xanthine and xanthine oxidase systems. | 450 nm | [73] |
72 h delayed analysis | Decreased (0.5 µg/L) | ||||||
Hermetia illucens (black soldier fly), larvae | Gut tissues | Vegetable, fruit, or kitchen wastes + Cd, Fe, Pb, or Catechol | - | - | Epinephrine autoxidation [116]: 1.5 mL Na2CO3 buffer (200 mM; pH 10.0), 0.5 mL EDTA (10 mM), 0.5 mL of the supernatant, and 0.5 mL freshly prepared epinephrine (15 mM). | 480 nm | [53] |
Hydropsyche pellucidula (net-spinning caddisfly), larvae | Whole body | Polypropylene microplastics (125 µg/L) | 10 days | ns b | Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.2) and pyrogallol [114]. | 420 nm | [81] |
Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle), larvae and adults | Whole body | Glyphosate based herbicide (long-term contaminated-soil growth potatoes) | 9 days | Increased c | SOD assay kit (19160, Sigma-Aldrich). | 450 nm | [40] |
Locusta migratoria (Locust) | Testicular tissues | Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) | single injection | Increased ** | SOD assay kit (MBS433565, MyBioSource Co., San Jose, CA, USA). | 560 nm | [13] |
Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) + PAE (Periplaneta americana extract) (0.05 mg/g body weight) | ns | ||||||
Stenopsyche marmorata (caddisfly), larvae | Whole body (except head, tail, and gut) | Environmental pollution: wastewater treatment plants (comparison of spots and seasons) | - | - | SOD assay kit-WST (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan). | 450 nm | [82] |
Spodoptera litura (tobacco worm) larvae | Gut | Fipronil (FP) (20–80 mg/L) | 12–72 h | Modulated | Pyrogallol method [115]: 2.8 mL of reaction mixture contains Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.2), and 50 µL of the supernatant. The final volume was raised to 2.9 mL with Tris-EDTA buffer, and 100 µL of pyrogallol was added to start the reaction. | 3 min at 440 nm | [77] |
Tenebrio molitor (mealworm larvae) | Whole body | polyethylene (3 g per 100 larvae) | 24 h (dose refreshed every 4 days) | Increased | SOD assay kit (Abbkine Scientific Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). | 450 nm | [41] |
polystyrene (3 g per 100 larvae | Increased | ||||||
polyvinyl chloride (3 g per 100 larvae) | Increased | ||||||
Trachyderma hispida (desert beetle) | Midgut | Textile industry soil (metal contaminants) | - | Decreased d | Autoxidation of 5,6,6a,11b—tetrahydro-3,9,10-trihydroxybenzo[c]fluorene (BXT) [126]: pH 8.8, 37 °C, in 50 mM air-saturated 2-amino-2-methyl-1,3-propanediol buffer containing 3 mM boric acid and 0.1 mM diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. | 1 min at 525 nm | [16] |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Aedes aegypti (mosquito), larvae | Whole body | A: Fluoranthene (0.5–50 μg/L) | 1 h irradiation | Modulated | GSH-CDNB assay [86]: the reaction mixture contained 20 μg protein from the cytosolic fraction, 1.3 mM reduced glutathione and 1 mM CDNB in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.9). | 1 min at 340 nm | [42] |
B: benzo[a]pyrene (0.5–50 μg/L) | ns | ||||||
C: Fluoranthene (0.25–25 μg/L) + benzo[a]pyrene (0.25–25 μg/L) | ns | ||||||
A + UV-A (375 nm, 30 W/m2) | Modulated | ||||||
B + UV-A (375 nm, 30 W/m2) | ns | ||||||
C + UV-A (375 nm, 30 W/m2) | ns | ||||||
Apis cerana (honeybee) | Whole body | CdCl2 (5.1 mg/L) | 14 days | Increased | GST assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). | 412 nm | [56] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Thorax–abdomen (cytosolic fraction) | Environmental pollution | - | - | NaH2PO4 + Na2HPO4 100 mM buffer (pH 6.5) with GSH and CDNB 2 mM [126] | 340 nm | [11] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) queens and foragers | Hemolymph | Imidacloprid (5 and 200 μg/kg) | 1 month | Age-, role-, and concentration-dependent | GSH-CDNB assay [105]: 215 μL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 13 μL 20 mM GSH, and 13 μL 20 mM CDNB in 95% ethanol. | 340 nm | [59] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Abdomen | Flusilazole (2.3–37 mg/L), | 7 days | ns | GST assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). | - | [60] |
thiamethoxam (0.3–5.5 μg/L), | ns | ||||||
flusilazole (0.06–0.92 mg/L) + thiamethoxam (0.009–0.014 μg/L) | ns | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Head Abdomen Midgut | Imidacloprid (0.1–10 μg/L), difenoconazole (0.1–10 μg/L), or glyphosate (0.1–10 μg/L) + binary combination | 20 days | Concentration-, tissue-, and time-dependent | GSH-CDNB assay [127]: 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM GSH, 1 mM CDNB, and 100 mM disodium phosphate (pH 7.4). | 340 nm | [61] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Midgut | Environmental pollution | - | - | GSH-CDNB assay [125]: 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM GSH, 1 mM CDNB as the substrate and 40 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4). | 340 nm | [62] |
Bombyx mori (silkworm) larvae | Midgut, Malpighian tubules, and fat body with adhered tissues | Polystyrene nanoplastics (0.5 mg/kg in 0.5 g of feeding) | 21 days | ns | GSH-CDNB assay [98]: GSH (20 mM) in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and the substrate CDNB (20 mM). | 340 nm | [65] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Esfenvalerate (0.075–1.2 mg/L) | 24 h | ns | GSH-CDNB assay [125]: the activity of GST was determined in post mitochondrial supernatant following conjugation of GSH with CDNB. | 340 nm | [20] |
Chironomus kiiensis, larvae | Whole body | Phenol (1–100 mg/L) | 6–48 h | Decreased (100 mg/L) | GSH-CDNB assay [128]: 100 μL of supernatant, 500 μL of 1 mmol L−1 GSH, 100 μL of 0.1 mol L−1 CDNB and 0.1 mol L−1 PBS up to 3.0 mL. | 3 min at 340 nm | [43] |
12–48 h | Decreased (10 mg/L) | ||||||
48 h | Decreased (1 mg/L) | ||||||
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Spinosad (0.5–8 μg/L) | 48 h | ns | GSH-CDNB assay [125]. | 3 min at 340 nm | [44] |
Indoxacarb (2–8 μg/L) | Increased (4 μg/L) | ||||||
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Tetracycline (1.83–174 μg/L) | 48 h | Decreased (18.5 μg/L) | GSH-CDNB assay [129]. | 340 nm | [45] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body (protein fraction) | Tire rubber micro particles (1 and 10 mg/L) | 24 h | ns | GSH-CDNB assay [125]. | - | [46] |
Tire rubber leachate (0.0125 and 5%) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | CdCl2 (0.05 mM) | exposure went through the entire growth cycle, from 1–3 days larvae to hatching adults | Decreased | GSH-CDNB assay [130]: 270 μL of a solution made up of (20 μL of 0.25 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, with 2.5 mM EDTA, 10.5 μL of distilled water and 500 μL of 0.1 M GSH at 25 °C), 10 μL of 25 mM CDNB and 20 μL of sample (1:5 dilution). | 5 min (10 s intervals) at 340 nm | [47] |
CdCl2 (0.05 mM) + hesperidin (0.05 and 0.01 mM) | Decreased (0.05 mM) | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body (cytosolic or mitochondrial fraction) | Paraquat (PQ) (10–40 mM) | 24 h | Increased (20 mM) | GSH-CDNB assay [131]: 50 μL of sample added to 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, with1 mM EDTA, 20 mM reduced GSH, and 20 mM CDNB. | 340 nm | [48] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | FeSO4 (1 and 10 μM) | 10 days | ns | GSH-CDNB assay [130]: 270 µL of solution (0.25 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) + 2.5 mM EDTA + 0.1 M GSH),10 µL of 25 mM CDNB and 20 µL of sample (1:5 dilution). | 5 min (10 s intervals) at 340 nm | [49] |
Rotenone (50 μM) | ns | ||||||
FeSO4 (1 and 10 μM) + rotenone (50 μM) | Decreased (1 μM) | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Eugenia uniflora leaves essential oil (3 mg/L) | 3, 6, 12 h | Increased (6 h) | GSH-CDNB assay [130]: 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM GSH, and 2.5 mM CDNB. | 340 nm | [50] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Adults whole body | Sucrose/yeast larval diet (0.25–20% as sucrose) | up to pupation (96 h) | - | - | . | [51] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) larvae and adults | Whole body | CuSO4 (0.1–1.0 mM) | 5, 9, 13 days | Modulated | GSH-CDNB assay [125]: 20 μL of GST buffer (0.25 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing 2.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 60 μL of sample (the total protein content in each well was 60 μg), 10 μL of 100 mM GSH, and 10 μL of 25 mM CDNB. | 8 min (30 s intervals) at 340 nm | [52] |
Head, body (thorax and abdomen) | Sex- and concentration-dependent | ||||||
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut | CuO-NPs (size < 50 µm) (10 µg/L) | 15 days | ns | GSH-CDNB assay [125]. | 340 nm | [68] |
Fat body | Increased | ||||||
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut Fat body | Al2O3-NPs (<50 µm, or <50 nm) (10–100 mg/L in 10 µL volume) | Single injection | NP size-, dose-, and tissue-dependent | GSH-CDNB assay [125]. | 340 nm | [69] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth) | Midgut | CuSO4 (10 mg/L) | 72 h | Increased | GSH-CDNB assay [125]. | 340 nm | [70] |
ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | ns | ||||||
CuSO4 (10 mg/L) + ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | Decreased | ||||||
Fat body | CuSO4 (10 mg/L) | Increased | |||||
ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | Increased | ||||||
CuSO4 (10 mg/L) + ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | Decreased | ||||||
Galleria mellonella (wax moth) | Hemolymph | Gibberellic acid (GA3) (0.05–5 g/kg) | up to a weight target of approx. 18 g | Modulated | GSH-CDNB assay kit (Cayman Chemical) [125]. | 5 min at 340 nm | [71] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Whole body | Juglone (0.25–1.15 mg/g) | up to a weight target of approx. 18 g | Modulated | GSH-CDNB assay kit (Cayman Chemical). | 5 min at 340 nm | [72] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Hemolymph | Azadirachtin (0.5–3 µg/larva) | 24 h delayed analysis | Increased (0.5 µg) | GSH-CDNB assay kit (Cayman Chemical). | 5 min at 340 nm | [73] |
72 h delayed analysis | Modulated | ||||||
Hydropsyche pellucidula larvae | Whole body | Polypropylene microplastics (125 µg/L) | 10 days | ns | GSH-CDNB assay [125]. | 5 min at 340 nm | [81] |
Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle) larvae and adults | Whole body | Glyphosate based herbicide (long-term contaminated-soil growth potatoes) | 9 days | Increased b | GST assay kit (CS0410, Sigma-Aldrich): 2 μL of each sample in triplicate and our own reagents: Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), 200 mM GSH, and 100 mM CDNB in ethanol. | 340 nm | [40] |
Locusta migratoria (Locust) | Testicular tissues | Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) | single injection | Decreased * | GST was estimated according to a previous method [132]. | - | [13] |
Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) + PAE (Periplaneta americana extract) (0.05 mg/g body weight) | ns | ||||||
Oncopeltus fasciatus (large milkweed bug) | Whole body | FeSO4·7H2O (2 or 5 g/L) + Ascorbic acid (2 or 5 g/L) | 96 h | ns | GSH-CDNB assay [130]. GST activity was set at 30 °C. | 2 min at 340 nm | [54] |
Spodoptera litura (tobacco worm) larvae | Gut | Fipronil (FP) (20–80 mg/L) | 12–72 h | Modulated | GSH-CDNB assay [125]: 3 mL contains 50 µL of 50 mM CDNB, 150 µL of 50 mM GSH and 20 µL of supernatant in sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 6.5). | 10 min at 340 nm | [77] |
Trachyderma hispida (desert beetle) | Midgut | Textile industry soil (metal contaminants) | - | Decreased c | GSH-CDNB assay [125]. | - | [16] |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significant dose) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Thorax–abdomen (cytosolic fraction) | Environmental pollution | - | - | NADPH oxidation [126]: NaH2PO4 + Na2HPO4 100 mM buffer (pH 7), 1 mM GSSG, and 0.06 mM NADPH. | 340 nm | [11] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Spinosad (0.5–8 μg/L), or Indoxacarb (2–8 μg/L) | 48 h | ns | NADPH oxidation [134]. | 1 min at 340 nm | [44] |
Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle) larvae and adults | Whole body | Glyphosate based herbicide (long-term contaminated-soil growth potatoes) | 9 days | ns b | GR-assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich): assay buffer (100 mM potassium phosphate buffer + 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5), 2 mM GSSG, 3 mM DTNB, and 2 mM NADPH. | 412 nm | [40] |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance a) | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Acheta domesticus (house cricket) | Hemolymph | Diamond nanoparticles | 7 weeks | Increased (200 mg/kg) | Cumene oxide reduction: 0.1 M phosphate buffer with additives (2 mM EDTA, 2 mM NaN3), GR (1.6 mg protein mL−1), 10 mM GSH, 2.5 mM NADPH, supernatant and 10 µL (15 mM) of cumene oxide. | 3 min (with an interval of 15 s) at 340 nm | [78] |
Head | ns | ||||||
Gut | Modulated | ||||||
Gonads | Increased (200 mg/kg) | ||||||
Fat body | Modulated | ||||||
Anaceana globulus (water scavenger beetle) | Whole body | Heavy metal polluted water (Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, Pb, Co and Cd) | - | Decreased b | The GSSG produced upon the reduction of an organic hydroperoxide (ROOH) by GPx [136]. | 340 nm | [39] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Thorax–abdomen (cytosolic fraction) | Environmental pollution | - | - | NADPH oxidation/H2O2 [126]: NaH2PO4 + Na2HPO4 100 mM buffer, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.12 mM NADPH, 2 mM GSH, 1 U of GR, 1 mM NaN3, and 0.6 mM H2O2. | 340 nm | [11] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) queens and foragers at different ages | Hemolymph | Imidacloprid (5 and 200 μg/kg) | 1 month | Age-, role-, and concentration-dependent | Pyrogallol method [87,100,105]: 25 μL of the assay mixture: 125 μM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), 50 μM pyrogallol, 50 μM H2O2, and 5 μL hemolymph. This was incubated for 5 min at 25 °C, after which the reaction was stopped by adding 5 μL of 5% H2SO4. | 420 nm | [59] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Spinosad (0.5–8 μg/L) | 48 h | Increased (8 μg/L) | NADPH oxidation [137] as a result of GR conversion of GSSG to GSH. | 3 min at 340 nm | [44] |
Indoxacarb (2–8 μg/L) | Increased (8 μg/L) | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | Brilliant black PN (azo dye, E151) (1–5 mg/L) | up to development of the larvae | Decreased (5 mg/L *) | NADPH oxidation [138]. | 340 nm | [19] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut or fat body | CuO-NPs (size <50 µm) (10 µg/L) | 15 days | ns | NADPH oxidation (pH 7) [135]: GPx activity in the presence of GSSG-reductase, GSH, cumene hydroperoxide as substrate. | 5 min at 340 nm | [68] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Midgut Fat body | Al2O3-NPs (<50 µm and <50 nm studies) (10–100 mg/L in 10 µL volume) | single injection, analysis delayed by 48 h | NPs size-, dose-, and tissue-dependent | NADPH oxidation (pH 7) [135]. | 5 min at 340 nm | [69] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth) | Midgut Fat body | CuSO4 (10 mg/L) and/or ZnCl2 (30 mg/L) | 72 h | Decreased in both matrices in every treatment | NADPH oxidation (pH 7) [135]. | 340 nm | [70] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Whole body | Juglone (0.25–1.15 mg/g) | up to a weight target of approx. 18 g | Modulated | NADPH oxidation with GPx assay kit (703102, Cayman Chemical) | 5 min at 340 nm | [72] |
Hydropsyche pellucidula larvae | Whole body | Polypropylene microplastics (125 µg/L) | 10 days | ns c | NADPH/H2O2 [141]. | 2 min at 340 nm | [81] |
Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle) larvae and adults | Whole body | Glyphosate-based herbicide (long-term contaminated-soil growth potatoes) | 9 days | ns d | GPx assay (CGP1, Sigma-Aldrich): 2 mM H2O2 instead of t-Bu-OOH as a substrate [140]. | 340 nm | [40] |
Locusta migratoria (Locust) | Testicular tissues | Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) | single injection | Decreased ** | H2O2 consumption and continuous monitoring of GSSG [139]. | - | [13] |
Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) + Periplaneta americana extract (PAE at 0.05 mg/g body weight) | ns * |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significant Dose/Time) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Anaceana globulus (water scavenger beetle) | Whole body | Heavy metal polluted water (Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, Pb, Co and Cd) | - | Decreased b | DTNB reduction with GSH to produce a yellow compound [144]. | 412 nm | [39] |
Atta sexdens (leafcutter ant), workers | Fat bodies | Sulfaramid (0.005% in acetone) | 24–48 h | ns | GSH-DTNB assay: 50 μL of samples (or standard), 175 μL of 0.3 mM NADPH, and 10 μL of glutathione reductase, incubated for 10 min at 37 °C and then 25 μL of 6 mM DTNB was added. | 5 min at 412 nm | [64] |
Fipronil (0.001% in acetone) | 24–72 h | ns | |||||
Mg-1 complex (2 g/L) | 48–96 h | Decreased (48 h) | |||||
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Esfenvalerate (0.075–1.2 mg/L) | 24 h | Decreased (0.075 mg/L) | GSH-DTNB assay: postmitochondrial supernatant fraction + GSH + DTNB in the presence of GR excess [146]. | 412 nm | [20] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | Brilliant black PN (azo dye, E151) (1–5 mg/mL) | up to development of the larvae | Decreased (2.5 mg/L **; 5 mg/L ***) | GSH-DTNB assay [145]. | 412 nm | [19] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly), cells | - | Sb(III) (Potassium antimonyl tartrate trihydrate) (1.2 mg/mL) | entire growth cycle, from embryos to hatching adults | Increased ** | GSH assay kit (BC1175, Solarbio, Beijing, China). | - | [21] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body (cytosolic fraction) | Paraquat (PQ) (10–40 mM) | 24 h | Increased (20 mM) | Fluorimetric method employing o-phthalaldehyde (OPT) [150]: an aliquot of cytosol (0.1 M formic acid was added to stabilize reduced GSH in tissue sample and centrifuged at 5200× g for10 min) was allowed to react with OPT (1 mg/mL in methanol) at room temperature for 30 min. | Ex/Em = 345/425 nm | [48] |
Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle) larvae and adults | Whole body | Glyphosate based herbicide (long-term contaminated-soil growth potatoes) | 9 days | tGSH increased c GSH:GSSG ns | Total GSH and the ratio of GSH:GSSG were measured with a ThioStar® glutathione fluorescent detection kit (K005-FI, Arbor Assays, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). | Ex/Em = 405/510 nm | [40] |
Periplaneta americana (American cockroaches) | Whole body | Bendiocarb (0.1 nM) | 1 h | Decreased d,* | GSH-DTNB assay [133]: supernatant was added to 2.3 mL of deionized water, 100 mL of 0.3 M EDTA, 300 mL of 0.32 M tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, and 100 mL of 6 mM DTNB. Samples were maintained at 10 °C for 10 min. | 412 nm | [37] |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Rotenone (0.05 mM) | 7 days | Decreased | Ellman’s reagent method [133]: 170 μL of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 20 μL of the sample, and 10 μL of Ellman’s reagent, DTNB. DTNB reacts with free thiol groups, forming a yellow product known as TNB when interacting with thiol groups. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. | 405 nm | [15] |
Rotenone (0.05 mM) + Syagrus coronata fixed oil (0.2 mg/mL) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | CdCl2 (0.05 mM) | exposure went through the entire growth cycle, from 1–3 days larvae to hatching adults | Decreased | Ellman’s reagent method [133]: 510 μL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 20 μL of sample, 35 μL of 1 mM DTNB and 35 μL of distilled water. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. | 412 nm | [47] |
CdCl2 (0.05 mM) + hesperidin (0.05 and 0.01 mM) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | FeSO4 (1, and 10 μM) | 10 days | ns | Total thiol level was determined in the fly head according to the Ellman method [133]. Nonprotein thiol was measured as described by Jollow et al. [151]. The reaction mixture included 270 µL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 10 µL of sample, and 20 µL of 1 mM DTNB. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. | 412 nm after 30 min | [49] |
Rotenone (50 μM) | ns | ||||||
FeSO4 (1, and 10 μM) + rotenone (50 μM) | Decreased (1 μM) |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | AlCl3 (20–130 mg/L) | 10 days | ns b | Reversed-phase HPLC [153]: homogenate (1.5 mL) was mixed with 1 mL of MeOH (0.1% BHT), vortexed for 30 s, and extracted three times with hexane:acetone (50:50) with 4 mL for the first extraction, and 3 mL for the second and third extractions. The α-tocopherol was detected using the chromatographic method. | 292 nm | [17] |
CdCl2 (0.005–0.030 mg/L) | Increased b (0.03 mg/L) | ||||||
PbCl2 (0.05–0.30 mg/L) | Increased b (0.05 mg/L *) | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | FeCl2·4H2O (40, 200 mg/kg) with or without CdCl2 (0.03 mg/kg), | 10 days | ns | Reversed-phase HPLC [153]. | 292 nm | [63] |
Atrazine (5 ng/bee), and/or glyphosate (5 ng/bee) with or without CdCl2 (0.03 mg/kg) |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Aiolopus thalassinus (grasshopper), nymph | Brain, thoracic muscles, and gut | Different polluted level sites | - | Increased b | TBARS assay with xylenol orange [165]: reaction mixture, containing 350 μL supernatant, 1750 μL of 1 mM FeSO4, 700 μL of 0.25 M H2SO4, and 700 μL of 1 mM xylenol orange, was incubated in darkness and at room temperature for 3 h; Then, 10 μL of 0.5 mM cumene hydroperoxides were added to the mixture and incubated for 1 h. | 580 nm | [79] |
Aiolopus thalassinus (grasshopper) | Brain, thoracic muscles, and gut | Fertilizer industry surroundings | - | Increased | TBARS assay with xylenol orange [165]: frozen tissue samples were homogenized (1:10, w/v) in cold 1.1% phosphoric acid. Then, 0.4 mL of homogenate was mixed with 0.4 mL of 1% TBA/50 mM NaOH/0.1 mM BHT solution and 0.2 mL of 7% phosphoric acid (pH 1.6–1.7). Subsequently, samples were heated for 15 min at 100 °C, and then 1.5 mL of butanol was added. | 580 nm | [80] |
Anaceana globulus (water scavenger beetle) | Whole body | Heavy metal polluted water (Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, Pb, Co and Cd) | - | Increased c | MDA/TBARS assay [155]: acidic medium at 95 °C for 30 min. | 534 nm | [39] |
Apis cerana (honeybee) | Whole body | CdCl2 (5.1 mg/L) | 14 days | Increased | MDA assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). | - | [56] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | Al (AlCl3) (20–130 mg/L) | 10 days | Increased d (50 mg/L *) | MDA/TBARS [153]: 20 μL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (10%), 150 μL of acetic acid (20% pH 3.5), and 150 μL of TBA (0.6% in 0.05 N NaOH), then, incubated at 100 °C for 1 h. | Ex/Em = 532/553 nm | [17] |
Cd (CdCl2) (0.005–0.030 mg/L) | ns d | ||||||
Pb (PbCl2) (0.05–0.30 mg/L) | ns d | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Head | Flusilazole (2.3–37 mg/L), | 7 days | Increased (37 mg/L) | MDA assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute). | - | [60] |
thiamethoxam (0.3–5.5 μg/L), | ns | ||||||
flusilazole (0.06–0.92 mg/L) + thiamethoxam (0.009–0.014 μg/L) | Modulated | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | FeCl2·4H2O (40, 200 mg/kg) with or without CdCl2 (0.03 mg/kg), | 10 days | Concentration- and combination-dependent | MDA/TBARS [153]: in 200 μL bees’ homogenates. | Ex/Em = 532/553 nm | [63] |
Atrazine (5 ng/bee), and/or glyphosate (5 ng/bee) with or without CdCl2 (0.03 mg/kg) | |||||||
Bombyx mori (silkworm) larvae | Midgut, Malpighian tubules, and fat body with adhered tissues | Polystyrene nanoplastics (0.5 mg/kg in 0.5 g of feeding) | 21 days | ns | Oxidative damage [155]: 100 mL of each homogenate were placed in glass tubes with 500 mL of 12% (v/v) TCA in deionized water, 400 mL of 0.6 M Tris HCl and 500 mL of 0.37% (v/v) TBA in deionized water and incubated 1 h in boiling water. The suspension was then refreshed in ice and centrifuged at 15,000× g for 10 min at 20 °C. | 535 nm | [65] |
Bombyx mori (silkworm) Female adults | Ovary tissue | Graphene oxide nanoparticles (GONP) (25 mg/L in 100 µL of culture medium) | 24 h | Increased | MDA/TBARS assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). | 535 nm | [66] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Esfenvalerate (0.075–1.2 mg/L) | 24 h | Increased (1.2 mg/L) | MDA/TBARS assay [156]: 4 μL of a 4% solution of the antioxidant compound butylated hydroxytoluene in methanol. | 535 nm | [20] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Spinosad (0.5–8 μg/L) | 48 h | Increased (2 μg/L) | MDA/TBARS assay [155,156]. | 535 nm | [44] |
Indoxacarb (2–8 μg/L) | ns | ||||||
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Tetracycline (1.83–174 μg/L) | 48 h | Increased (18.5 μg/L) | MDA/TBARS assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) [155]. | - | [45] |
Chironomidae, Gomphus, and Lestes | Whole body | Comparison of different rivers on different insect genera | - | - | MDA assay kit (Bioxytech, MDA-586 TM, Oxis Research TM, Portland, USA): 10 µL of probucol + 200 µL of sample or standard + 640 μL of diluted R1 solution (N-methyl-2-phenylindole in acetonitrile) + 150 μL of R2 solution (concentrated hypo chloric acid), incubated at 45 °C for 1 h. | 586 nm | [83] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | Rotenone (0.05 mM) | 7 days | Increased | MDA/TBARS [155]: 50 μL supernatant from flies treated with and without the specified conditions were mixed with 150 μL 0.1% phosphoric acid and 100 μL TBA 0.6%. The resulting solution was incubated at 100 °C in water bath for 1 h. | 405 nm | [15] |
Rotenone (0.05 mM) + Syagrus coronata fixed oil (0.2 mg/mL) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | Brilliant black PN (azo dye, E151) (1–5 mg/mL) | up to development of the larvae | ns | MDA/TBARS assay [155]. | 532 nm | [19] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly), cells | - | Sb(III) (Potassium antimonyl tartrate trihydrate) (1.2 mg/mL) | entire growth cycle, from embryos to hatching adults | Increased ** | Commercial kit (BC5245, Solarbio, Beijing, China). | - | [21] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | CdCl2 (0.05 mM) | exposure went through the entire growth cycle, from 1–3 days larvae to hatching adults | Increased | MDA/TBARS assay [158]: equal volumes of TCA (10%, w/v) and TBA (0.75%, w/v) in 0.1 M HCl. 100 μL of supernatant and 200 μL of stock reagent were incubated at 95 °C for 1 h. | 532 nm | [47] |
CdCl2 (0.05 mM) + hesperidin (0.05 and 0.01 mM) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body cytosolic fraction | Paraquat (PQ) (10–40 mM) | 24 h | ns | TBA method [155]: the reaction mixture contained 500 μL cytosol, 1.5 mL acetic acid (pH 3.5, 20%), 1.5 mL of TBA (0.8% w/v), 200 μL SDS (8% w/v). The mixture was heated to boiling, and adducts formed were extracted into 3 mL of 1-butanol. | 532 nm | [48] |
mitochondrial fraction | Increased (40 mM) | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | FeSO4 (1, and 10 μM) | 10 days | ns | MDA/TBARS assay [155]: the reaction mixture contained 5 µL of 10 mM BHT, 100 µL of 0.67% TBA, 300 µL of 1% O-phosphoric acid, 55 µL of distilled water and 40 µL of supernatant. This was followed by an incubation time of 45 min at 90 °C. | 535 nm | [49] |
Rotenone (50 μM) | ns | ||||||
FeSO4 (1, and 10 μM) + rotenone (50 μM) | Increased (1 µM) | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Adult’s whole body | Eugenia uniflora leaves essential oil (3 mg/L) | 3, 6, 12 h | Increased (6 h) | MDA/TBARS assay [155]: the supernatant was incubated in acetic acid 0.45 M/HCl buffer pH 3.4, containing TBA 0.28%, SDS 1.2%, at 95 °C over 1 h for color development. | 532 nm | [50] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Adult’s whole body | Sucrose/yeast larval diet (0.25–20% as sucrose) | up to pupation (96 h) | - | TBARS assay with xylenol orange [165]. | 580 nm | [51] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Whole body | Juglone (0.25–1.15 mg/g) | up to a weight target of approx. 18 g | Increased (0.75 mg/g) | MDA/TBARS assay kit (Cayman Chemical): reaction of MDA with TBA at 95 °C. | 530 nm | [72] |
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Hemolymph | Azadirachtin (0.5–3 µg/larva) | 24 h delayed analysis | Modulated | MDA/TBARS assay kit (Cayman Chemical), incubation at 95 °C. | 530 nm | [73] |
72 h delayed analysis | Increased (1.5 µg) | ||||||
Hydropsyche pellucidula larvae | Whole body | Polypropylene microplastics (125 µg/L) | 10 days | Increased b | Lipid peroxidation was tested using 10% of the extracted S9 protein fraction; this colorimetric reaction was conducted using phosphoric acid 1% (v/v) and TBA 0.6% (w/v) [168]. | Ex/Em = 520–535 nm | [81] |
Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Colorado potato beetle) larvae and adults | Whole body | Glyphosate-based herbicide (long-term contaminated-soil growth potatoes) | 9 days | ns | TBARS assay with xylenol orange [166]: 45 μL sample, 5 μL 10 mM thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) or methanol, and 950 μL FOX reagent. Cumene hydroperoxide was used as a standard. | 570 nm | [40] |
Locusta migratoria (locust) | Testicular tissues | Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) | single injection | Increased ** | MDA/TBARS assay [155]: is based on a reaction between TBA and MDA at 95 °C. | 532 nm | [13] |
Al2O3 NPs (0.03 mg/g body weight) + PAE (Periplaneta americana extract) (0.05 mg/g body weight) | ns | ||||||
Oncopeltus fasciatus (large milkweed bug) | Whole body | FeSO4·7H2O (2 or 5 g/L) + Ascorbic acid (2 or 5 g/L) | 96 h | Increased | MDA/TBARS assay [156]. | 535 nm | [54] |
Oncopeltus fasciatus (large milkweed bug), two generations; parental exposed, filial not exposed | Whole body | TiO2 NPs | 5 days (parental) | ns | 200 μL sample were boiled with 1 mL of 10% w/v TCA plus 100 μL of 500 mg/L butylated hydroxytoluene for 30 min and centrifuged at 2500× g for 10 min. To duplicate aliquots of the supernatant, an equal volume of 0.375% w/v TBA with 10% v/v sulfuric acid was added, and the reaction mixture was boiled again [167]. | 532 nm | [55] |
Al2O3 NPs | ns | ||||||
Al2O3 (bulk form) | ns | ||||||
TiO2 NPs | 0 days (filial) | ns | |||||
Al2O3 NPs | ns | ||||||
Al2O3 (bulk form) | Increased | ||||||
Ostrinia nubilalis (European corn borer) | Whole body | Cd(II) (1–100 mg/kg) | 28 days | Increased (41.7 mg/kg) | MDA/TBARS assay. | 532 nm | [74] |
Periplaneta americana (American cockroaches) | Whole body | Bendiocarb (0.1 nM) | 1 h | ns | MDA/TBARS assay [159,162]: the samples were incubated with 15% TCA and 0.37% TBA in boiling water bath for 20 min. Butylated hydroxytoluene in ethanol was added to the mixture to prevent artifactual lipid peroxidation during the boiling step. After incubation, samples were centrifuged (15 min, 12,000× g) and the absorbance of supernatant was measured. | 535 nm | [37] |
Reticulitermes speratus (termite), queens vs. workers comparison | Whole body | UV-B (312 nm, 12.1 W/m2) | 20 min | ns | MDA/TBARS assay kit (Cayman Chemical). MDA standard or samples were mixed with 50 μL 10% SDS solution (w/v) and 1 mL color reagent (0.53% TBA, w/v) in 10% acetic acid solution (v/v) and 1.5% NaOH solution (v/v), and incubated for 30 min at 100 °C. Samples were incubated on ice for 10 min to stop the reaction and then centrifuged at 17,000× g for 10 min at 25 °C. | 532 nm | [38] |
Spodoptera exigua cells culture | Cells | Camptothecin and derivates (0.1–10 µM) | 24 h | Increased (10 µM) | MDA/TBARS assay kit [154]: supernatant with MDA was heated for 15 min at 100 °C. | 532 nm | [75] |
48 h | Increased (10 µM) | ||||||
Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm), larvae | Whole body | Cd(II) (44 mg/kg of dry feeding) without starvation | 200 generations development | ns b | MDA/TBARS assay [160]: 50 µL of sample was mixed with 50 µL of 10% of TCA. Then, the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. After centrifugation, 70 µL of 1% of TBA was added to 90 µL of the supernatant, and the mixture was vortexed. Then, the samples were heated at 100 °C for 1 h. | 532 nm | [76] |
with 1 day starvation | Increased b | ||||||
Spodoptera litura (tobacco worm) larvae | Gut | Fipronil (FP) (20–80 mg/L) | 12 h | Increased (80 mg/L) | MDA/TBARS [155]: 1.9 mL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 100 µL of supernatant were mixed at pH 6.5 and then incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After incubation, TCA (10% v/v) was added and centrifuged for 15 min at 5000 rpm, and the supernatant was collected. The collected supernatant was boiled for 15 min in a water bath. | 532 nm | [77] |
24 h | Increased (40 mg/L) | ||||||
48–72 h | Increased (20 mg/L) | ||||||
Stenopsyche marmorata (caddisfly) larvae | Whole body (except head, tail, and gut) | Environmental pollution: wastewater treatment plants (comparison of spots and seasons) | - | - | Oxidative damage method using TBARS [155,169]. | Ex/Em = 530/560 nm | [82] |
Tenebrio molitor (mealworm larvae) | Whole body | polyethylene (3 g per 100 larvae) | 24 h (dose refreshed every 4 days) | Increased | MDA assay kit (Abbkine Scientific Co., Ltd.). | 532 nm, 600 nm | [41] |
polystyrene (3 g per 100 larvae | Increased | ||||||
polyvinyl chloride (3 g per 100 larvae) | Increased | ||||||
Trachyderma hispida (desert beetle) | Midgut | Textile industry soil (metal contaminants) | - | Increased c | MDA/TBARS assay [155]. | - | [16] |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Aiolopus thalassinus (grass hopper), nymph | Brain, thoracic muscles, and gut | Different polluted level sites | - | Increased b (except in gut at high level pollution, no significant change) | Tissues were isolated and homogenized in 5 mL of PBS with additives (Triton X-100, CaCl2) and centrifuged at 2000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Then, 800 μL supernatant + 800 μL of 30% TCA, followed by incubation (30 min; room temperature) and centrifugation (5000× g; 10 min, 4 °C). Protein carbonyl assay was performed on precipitated pellets [80,171]. | 366 nm | [79] |
Aiolopus thalassinus (grasshopper), male and female adults | Brain, thoracic muscles, and gut | Fertilizer industry surroundings | - | Increased (different levels, depending on sex) | 800 µL supernatant + 800 µL 30% TCA → incubation for 30 min at room temperature and then centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The assay of protein carbonyls was conducted on precipitated pellets [171]. | . | [80] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | Environmental pollution | - | - | Protein carbonyl content assay kit (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany): bee proteins were solubilized by milling each bee in a 1.5-mL tube with 500 μL of a protein extraction buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 30 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol. Subsequently, the sample was centrifuged at 5000× g for 12 min and the supernatant treated with the kit. | 375 nm | [10] |
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Whole body | Al (AlCl3) (20–130 mg/L) | 10 days | ns c | Protein concentrations were estimated with bovine serum albumin as the standard [173]. | - | [17] |
Cd (CdCl2) (0.005–0.030 mg/L) | Increased c (0.01 mg/L; 0.03 mg/L *) | ||||||
Pb (PbCl2) (0.05–0.30 mg/L) | ns c | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Thorax | Se(IV) (0.6–600 μg/L) | 2 days | Increased (600 µg/L *) | Protein carbonyl content assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich) | - | [57] |
Se(VI) (0.6–600 μg/L) | Increased (600 µg/L) | ||||||
Apis mellifera (honeybee) | Midgut | Environmental pollution | - | - | Protein concentrations were estimated with bovine serum albumin as the standard [173]. | - | [62] |
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Whole body | CdCl2 (0.05 mM) | exposure went through the entire growth cycle, from 1–3 days larvae to hatching adults | Increased | DNPH/TCA assay [171]: 2 mg of protein was incubated with 10 mM DNPH in 2 M HCl (1 mL) for 30 min at room temperature. The sample proteins were precipitated with 10% (w/v) TCA and recovered by centrifugation for 5 min at 7500× g. The protein pellets were washed 3 times with 1 mL of ethanol/ethyl acetate (ratio 1:1, v/v) to remove free DNPH reagent and redissolved in 1 mL of 6 M guanidine hydrochloride (pH 2.3). | 370 nm | [47] |
CdCl2 (0.05 mM) + hesperidin (0.05 and 0.01 mM) | ns | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Head | FeSO4 (1, and 10 μM) | 10 days | ns | DNPH/TCA assay [172]: samples were mixed with 20% TCA (ratio 1:1) to precipitate the protein present in the sample. Next, DNPH was added to the resulting mixture to obtain the stable DNP product that was finally suspended in guanidine hydrochloride (6 M). | 375 nm | [49] |
Rotenone (50 μM) | ns | ||||||
FeSO4 (1, and 10 μM) + rotenone (50 μM) | Increased (1 μM) | ||||||
Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) | Adult’s whole body | Sucrose/yeast larval diet (0.25–20% as sucrose) | up to pupation (96 h) | - | Flies were homogenized in a ratio of 1:10 (w/v) in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer containing 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Amount of protein was assayed in supernatants after centrifugation (13,000× g, 15 min, 4 °C) with bovine serum albumin as the standard [173]. Content of carbonyl groups in proteins was measured detecting the amount of DNP formed in the reaction with DNPH [170]. | 370 nm | [51] |
Hermetia illucens (black soldier fly), larvae | Gut tissues | Vegetable, fruit, or kitchen wastes + Cd, Fe, Pb, or catechol | 7 days | Cadmium and catechol increase protein oxidation in larvae. | DNPH/TCA assay [171]: samples were homogenized in 5 mL of ice-cold phosphate buffer (containing 0.25 mL TCA (0.1% (w/v), 0.25 mL Triton x-100 (1%)). Then, the samples were centrifuged at 2000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. After that, 800 µL supernatant + 200 µL of 10 mM DNPH prepared in 2 M HCl, followed by incubation for 30 min at room temperature and further precipitation with 1 mL of 10% TCA. The pellet was washed four times with an ethanol/ethyl acetate (1:1) mixture and dissolved in 1 mL of sodium phosphate buffer. | 366 nm | [53] |
Reticulitermes speratus (termite) | Whole body | UV-B (312 nm, 12.1 W/m2): queens or workers | ns d | Protein carbonyl colorimetric assay kit (Cayman Chemical): termite whole bodies were homogenized in 200 μL ice-cold buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2% protease inhibitor cocktail (v/v)). After centrifugation at 16,200× g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were placed into a new tube with DNPH reagent followed by incubation in the dark at room temperature for 1 h. Then, 1 mL of 20% TCA solution (w/v) was added to the samples before centrifugation at 16,200× g for 10 min. The pellets were washed three times with 1 mL of (1:1) ethanol/ethyl acetate mixture. | 370 nm | [38] | |
Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm), cells culture | Cells | Camptothecin and derivates (0.1–10 µM) | 24 h | Modulated | Protein carbonyl content assay kit: 100 μL of sample containing 0.5–2.0 mg of protein and 100 μL of DNPH solution, followed by incubation for 10 min at room temperature + 30 μL of the 100% TCA solution was added to the reaction and incubated on ice for 5 min. The reaction solution was centrifuged at 13,000× g for 2 min to carefully remove the supernatant. The resulting pellet was added 500 μL of ice-cold acetone placed in a sonication bath for 30 s and then incubated at −20 °C for 5 min. After that, the pellet was centrifuged at 13,000× g for 2 min to remove acetone. Guanidine solution (200 μL, 6 M) was added to the pellet and sonicated again briefly. | 375 nm | [75] |
48 h | Increased (10 µM) |
Insect | Sample Type | Exposure | Effect (Significance) a | Method | Reading Wavelength | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contaminant Type (Dose) | Period | ||||||
Acheta domesticus (house cricket) | Hemolymph | Diamond nanoparticles (20 and 200 mg/kg of feeding) | 14 weeks | Increased | Comet assay | - | [78] |
Aiolopus thalassinus (grass hopper), nymph | Brain | Different polluted level sites | - | Increased b | Comet assay [176,177]. | - | [79] |
Thoracic muscles | Increased b | ||||||
Gut | Site-dependent | ||||||
Bombyx mori (silkworm), cells culture | BmN cell line | GONPs (25 mg/L in 100 µL) | 24 h | ns | Oxidative DNA damage by 8-hydroxy-2 deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) using an 8-OHdG kit (KeJing Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). | - | [66] |
Chironomus riparius (harlequin fly), larvae | Whole body | Spinosad (0.5–8 μg/L) | 48 h | ns | DNA damage assay [176,180]. | Ex/Em = 360/460 nm | [44] |
Indoxacarb (2–8 μg/L) | ns | ||||||
Galleria mellonella (wax moth), larvae | Hemolymph | Juglone (0.25–1.15 mg/g) | Up to a weight target of approx. 18 g | Increment of all parameters | Comet assay [175]. | - | [72] |
Reticulitermes speratus (termite) | Whole body | UV-B (312 nm, 12.1 W/m2): queens or | 20 min | ns c | Oxidative DNA damage by 8-OHdG assay kit (colorimetric, Epigentek). | 450 nm within 2–15 min | [38] |
workers | Increased c | ||||||
Spodoptera litura (tobacco worm) larvae | Gut | Fipronil (FP) (20–80 mg/L) | 12–72 h | Modulated | The levels of 8-OHdG in the supernatant were determined using a competitive ELISA kit as per the vendor’s protocol (highly sensitive 8-OHdG Check, Japan Institute for control of Aging, Shizuoka, Japan). | - | [77] |
Trachyderma hispida (desert beetle) | Midgut | Textile industry soil (metal contaminants) | - | Increased c | DNA damage was detected by the comet assay and was performed under alkaline conditions [78,174]. | - | [16] |
References
- Grotewiel, M.S.; Martin, I.; Bhandari, P.; Cook-Wiens, E. Functional Senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Ageing Res. Rev. 2005, 4, 372–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, J.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, J.; Guo, J.; Li, Z.; Hao, K.; Liu, L.; Cheng, Z.; Tong, X.; Dai, F. Metformin Prolongs Lifespan through Remodeling the Energy Distribution Strategy in Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Aging 2019, 11, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goodman, L.D.; Bellen, H.J. Recent Insights into the Role of Glia and Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer’s Disease Gained from Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2022, 72, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Astolfi, M.L.; Conti, M.E.; Messi, M.; Marconi, E. Probiotics as a Promising Prophylactic Tool to Reduce Levels of Toxic or Potentially Toxic Elements in Bees. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astolfi, M.L.; Conti, M.E.; Ristorini, M.; Frezzini, M.A.; Papi, M.; Massimi, L.; Canepari, S. An Analytical Method for the Biomonitoring of Mercury in Bees and Beehive Products by Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry. Molecules 2021, 26, 4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conti, M.E.; Astolfi, M.L.; Finoia, M.G.; Massimi, L.; Canepari, S. Biomonitoring of Element Contamination in Bees and Beehive Products in the Rome Province (Italy). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 36057–36074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conti, M.E.; Astolfi, M.L.; Mele, G.; Ristorini, M.; Vitiello, G.; Massimi, L.; Canepari, S.; Finoia, M.G. Performance of Bees and Beehive Products as Indicators of Elemental Tracers of Atmospheric Pollution in Sites of the Rome Province (Italy). Ecol. Indic. 2022, 140, 109061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, S.; Dubey, V.K.; Choudhury, S.; Das, A.; Jeengar, D.; Sujatha, B.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, N.; Semwal, A.; Kumar, V. Insects as Bioindicator: A Hidden Gem for Environmental Monitoring. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1146052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parikh, G.; Rawtani, D.; Khatri, N. Insects as an Indicator for Environmental Pollution. Environ. Claims J. 2021, 33, 161–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giampaoli, O.; Messi, M.; Merlet, T.; Sciubba, F.; Canepari, S.; Spagnoli, M.; Astolfi, M.L. Landfill Fire Impact on Bee Health: Beneficial Effect of Dietary Supplementation with Medicinal Plants and Probiotics in Reducing Oxidative Stress and Metal Accumulation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 32, 10331–10347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Porta, G.; Magara, G.; Goretti, E.; Caldaroni, B.; Dörr, A.J.M.; Selvaggi, R.; Pallottini, M.; Gardi, T.; Cenci-Goga, B.T.; Cappelletti, D.; et al. Applying Artificial Neural Networks to Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Forager Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) for Ecological Assessment. Toxics 2023, 11, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaitanya, R.K.; Shashank, K.; Sridevi, P. Oxidative Stress in Invertebrate Systems. In Free Radicals and Diseases; InTech: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Arafat, E.A.; El-Sayed, D.S.; Hussein, H.K.; Flaven-Pouchon, J.; Moussian, B.; El-Samad, L.M.; El Wakil, A.; Hassan, M.A. Entomotherapeutic Role of Periplaneta americana Extract in Alleviating Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticles-Induced Testicular Oxidative Impairment in Migratory Locusts (Locusta migratoria) as an Ecotoxicological Model. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirci-Çekiç, S.; Özkan, G.; Avan, A.N.; Uzunboy, S.; Çapanoğlu, E.; Apak, R. Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2022, 209, 114477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- dos Santos Nunes, R.G.; de Amorim, L.C.; Bezerra, I.C.; da Silva, A.J.; dos Santos, C.A.L.; Gubert, P.; de Menezes, I.R.A.; Duarte, A.E.; Barros, L.M.; da Silveira Andrade-da-Costa, B.L.; et al. Syagrus Coronata Fixed Oil Prevents Rotenone-Induced Movement Disorders and Oxidative Stress in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2024, 87, 497–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Gendy, A.H.; Augustyniak, M.; Toto, N.A.; Al Farraj, S.; El-Samad, L.M. Oxidative Stress Parameters, DNA Damage and Expression of HSP70 and MT in Midgut of Trachyderma hispida (Forskål, 1775) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) from a Textile Industry Area. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 267, 115661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gauthier, M.; Aras, P.; Jumarie, C.; Boily, M. Low Dietary Levels of Al, Pb and Cd May Affect the Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant Capacity in Caged Honey Bees (Apis mellifera). Chemosphere 2016, 144, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, K.K.; Dos Santos, A.B.; Dos Anjos, J.S.; Leandro, L.P.; Mariano, M.T.; Pinheiro, F.L.; Farina, M.; Franco, J.L.; Posser, T. Increased Iron Levels and Oxidative Stress Mediate Age-Related Impairments in Male and Female Drosophila melanogaster. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2023, 2023, 7222462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karaman, M. Biochemical and Molecular Assessment of Oxidative Stress in Fruit Fly Exposed to Azo Dye Brilliant Black PN. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2024, 51, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodrigues, A.C.M.; Gravato, C.; Quintaneiro, C.; Barata, C.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Pestana, J.L.T. Sub-Lethal Toxicity of Environmentally Relevant Concentrations of Esfenvalerate to Chironomus riparius. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 207, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, Q.; Chen, X.; Ji, L.; Cheng, X.; Shi, Y.; Yu, S.; Tang, J.; et al. A Drosophila Model of Gestational Antimony Exposure Uncovers Growth and Developmental Disorders Caused by Disrupting Oxidative Stress Homeostasis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2023, 208, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dai, D.-F.; Chiao, Y.A.; Marcinek, D.J.; Szeto, H.H.; Rabinovitch, P.S. Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress in Aging and Healthspan. Longev. Healthspan 2014, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, B.H.; Nehring, V.; Buttstedt, A.; Heinze, J.; Korb, J.; Libbrecht, R.; Meusemann, K.; Paxton, R.J.; Séguret, A.; Schaub, F.; et al. Oxidative Stress and Senescence in Social Insects: A Significant but Inconsistent Link? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2021, 376, 20190732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, P.; Halliwell, B. Free Radicals and Hearing: Cause, Consequence, and Criteria. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 884, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valko, M.; Rhodes, C.J.; Moncol, J.; Izakovic, M.; Mazur, M. Free Radicals, Metals and Antioxidants in Oxidative Stress-Induced Cancer. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2006, 160, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lushchak, V.I. Free Radicals, Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Stress and Its Classification. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2014, 224, 164–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Munro, D.; Treberg, J.R. A Radical Shift in Perspective: Mitochondria as Regulators of Reactive Oxygen Species. J. Exp. Biol. 2017, 220, 1170–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deska, M. Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes under Induced Oxidative Stress. J. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 21, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katerji, M.; Filippova, M.; Duerksen-Hughes, P. Approaches and Methods to Measure Oxidative Stress in Clinical Samples: Research Applications in the Cancer Field. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 1279250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vašková, J.; Kočan, L.; Vaško, L.; Perjési, P. Glutathione-Related Enzymes and Proteins: A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Houten, B.; Santa-Gonzalez, G.A.; Camargo, M. DNA Repair after Oxidative Stress: Current Challenges. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2018, 7, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koch, R.E.; Hill, G.E. An Assessment of Techniques to Manipulate Oxidative Stress in Animals. Funct. Ecol. 2017, 31, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pisoschi, A.M.; Pop, A. The Role of Antioxidants in the Chemistry of Oxidative Stress: A Review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 97, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Headlam, H.A.; Davies, M.J. Markers of Protein Oxidation: Different Oxidants Give Rise to Variable Yields of Bound and Released Carbonyl Products. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 36, 1175–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Messi, M. Probiotics and Medicinal Plants as “Green” Tools to Protect Bees and Hive Products from Chemicals. Ph.D. Thesis, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 2025. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1738987 (accessed on 14 August 2025).
- Anet, A.; Olakkaran, S.; Kizhakke Purayil, A.; Hunasanahally Puttaswamygowda, G. Bisphenol A Induced Oxidative Stress Mediated Genotoxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 370, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jankowska, M.; Augustyn, B.; Maliszewska, J.; Przeździecka, B.; Kubiak, D.; Chełchowska, O.; Kaczorek, J.; Knop, D.; Krajnik, K.; Kletkiewicz, H.; et al. Sublethal Biochemical, Behavioral, and Physiological Toxicity of Extremely Low Dose of Bendiocarb Insecticide in Periplaneta americana (Blattodea: Blattidae). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 47742–47754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tasaki, E.; Kobayashi, K.; Matsuura, K.; Iuchi, Y. An Efficient Antioxidant System in a Long-Lived Termite Queen. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0167412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shonouda, M.L.; El-Samad, L.M.; Mokhamer, E.; Toto, N. Use of Oxidative Stress and Genotoxic Biomarkers of Aquatic Beetles Anaceana globulus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) as Biomonitors of Water Pollution. J. Entomol. 2016, 13, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rainio, M.J.; Margus, A.; Virtanen, V.; Lindström, L.; Salminen, J.-P.; Saikkonen, K.; Helander, M. Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Has Soil-Mediated Effects on Potato Glycoalkaloids and Oxidative Status of a Potato Pest. Chemosphere 2020, 258, 127254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, B.-Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, S.; Chen, J.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y. Unveiling the Residual Plastics and Produced Toxicity during Biodegradation of Polyethylene (PE), Polystyrene (PS), and Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Microplastics by Mealworms (Larvae of Tenebrio molitor). J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 452, 131326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tetreau, G.; Chandor-Proust, A.; Faucon, F.; Stalinski, R.; Akhouayri, I.; Prud’homme, S.M.; Régent-Kloeckner, M.; Raveton, M.; Reynaud, S. UV Light and Urban Pollution: Bad Cocktail for Mosquitoes? Aquat. Toxicol. 2014, 146, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Cao, C. Effects of Phenol on Glutathione S-Transferase Expression and Enzyme Activity in Chironomus kiiensis Larvae. Ecotoxicology 2019, 28, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Monteiro, H.R.; Pestana, J.L.T.; Novais, S.C.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Lemos, M.F.L. Toxicity of the Insecticides Spinosad and Indoxacarb to the Non-Target Aquatic Midge Chironomus riparius. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 666, 1283–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Z.; Tang, J.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Hua, R. Bioconcentration, Metabolism and the Effects of Tetracycline on Multiple Biomarkers in Chironomus riparius Larvae. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 1590–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caballero-Carretero, P.; Carrasco-Navarro, V.; Kukkonen, J.V.K.; Martínez-Guitarte, J.L. Gene Expression Analysis of Chironomus riparius in Response to Acute Exposure to Tire Rubber Microparticles and Leachates. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 342, 123111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asejeje, F.O.; Ogunro, O.B.; Asejeje, G.I.; Adewumi, O.S.; Abolaji, A.O. An Assessment of the Ameliorative Role of Hesperidin in Drosophila melanogaster Model of Cadmium Chloride-Induced Toxicity. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 263, 109500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosamani, R. Muralidhara Acute Exposure of Drosophila melanogaster to Paraquat Causes Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2013, 83, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adedara, A.O.; Otenaike, T.A.; Olabiyi, A.A.; Adedara, I.A.; Abolaji, A.O. Neurotoxic and Behavioral Deficit in Drosophila melanogaster Co-Exposed to Rotenone and Iron. Metab. Brain Dis. 2023, 38, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Cunha, F.A.B.; Wallau, G.L.; Pinho, A.I.; Nunes, M.E.M.; Leite, N.F.; Tintino, S.R.; Da Costa, G.M.; Athayde, M.L.; Boligon, A.A.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; et al. Eugenia uniflora Leaves Essential Oil Induces Toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster: Involvement of Oxidative Stress Mechanisms. Toxicol. Res. 2015, 4, 634–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rovenko, B.M.; Kubrak, O.I.; Gospodaryov, D.V.; Perkhulyn, N.V.; Yurkevych, I.S.; Sanz, A.; Lushchak, O.V.; Lushchak, V.I. High Sucrose Consumption Promotes Obesity Whereas Its Low Consumption Induces Oxidative Stress in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 2015, 79, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halmenschelager, P.T.; da Rocha, J.B.T. Biochemical CuSO4 Toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster Depends on Sex and Developmental Stage of Exposure. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 189, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alaaeldin Abdelfattah, E.; Renault, D. Does the Presence of Heavy Metal and Catechol Contaminants in Organic Waste Challenge the Physiological Performance of the Bioconverter Hermetia illucens? J. Insect Physiol. 2023, 144, 104469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrero, A.; Torreblanca, A.; Garcerá, M.D. Assessment of the Effects of Orally Administered Ferrous Sulfate on Oncopeltus fasciatus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 8551–8561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- López-Muñoz, D.; Ochoa-Zapater, M.A.; Torreblanca, A.; Garcerá, M.D. Evaluation of the Effects of Titanium Dioxide and Aluminum Oxide Nanoparticles through Tarsal Contact Exposure in the Model Insect Oncopeltus fasciatus. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 666, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Guo, D.; Wang, C.; Chi, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Guo, X.; Wang, N.; Xu, B.; et al. Toxic Effects of the Heavy Metal Cd on Apis cerana Cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae): Oxidative Stress, Immune Disorders and Disturbance of Gut Microbiota. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alburaki, M.; Smith, K.D.; Adamczyk, J.; Karim, S. Interplay between Selenium, Selenoprotein Genes, and Oxidative Stress in Honey Bee Apis mellifera L. J. Insect Physiol. 2019, 117, 103891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmarsow, R.; de la Paz Moliné, M.; Damiani, N.; Domínguez, E.; Medici, S.K.; Churio, M.S.; Gende, L.B. Toxicity and Sublethal Effects of Lead (Pb) Intake on Honey Bees (Apis mellifera). Chemosphere 2023, 344, 140345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paleolog, J.; Wilde, J.; Miszczak, A.; Gancarz, M.; Strachecka, A. Antioxidation Defenses of Apis Mellifera Queens and Workers Respond to Imidacloprid in Different Age-Dependent Ways: Old Queens Are Resistant, Foragers Are Not. Animals 2021, 11, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, D.; Lv, L.; Gao, Z.; Zhu, Y.-C.; Weng, H.; Yang, G.; Wang, Y. Joint Toxic Effects of Thiamethoxam and Flusilazole on the Adult Worker Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.). Environ. Pollut. 2023, 317, 120806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almasri, H.; Tavares, D.A.; Pioz, M.; Sené, D.; Tchamitchian, S.; Cousin, M.; Brunet, J.-L.; Belzunces, L.P. Mixtures of an Insecticide, a Fungicide and a Herbicide Induce High Toxicities and Systemic Physiological Disturbances in Winter Apis mellifera Honey Bees. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 203, 111013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badiou-Bénéteau, A.; Benneveau, A.; Géret, F.; Delatte, H.; Becker, N.; Brunet, J.L.; Reynaud, B.; Belzunces, L.P. Honeybee Biomarkers as Promising Tools to Monitor Environmental Quality. Environ. Int. 2013, 60, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jumarie, C.; Aras, P.; Boily, M. Mixtures of Herbicides and Metals Affect the Redox System of Honey Bees. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poiani, S.B.; Dobeš, P.; Kunc, M.; Pereira, M.C.; Bueno, O.C.; Hyršl, P. The Influence of Selected Insecticides on the Oxidative Response of Atta Sexdens (Myrmicinae, Attini) Workers. Neotrop. Entomol. 2023, 52, 1088–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parenti, C.C.; Binelli, A.; Caccia, S.; Della Torre, C.; Magni, S.; Pirovano, G.; Casartelli, M. Ingestion and Effects of Polystyrene Nanoparticles in the Silkworm Bombyx mori. Chemosphere 2020, 257, 127203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Li, M.; Qu, J.; Ye, W.; Li, F.; Wei, J.; Sun, H.; Li, B. An Assessment of the Reproductive Toxicity of GONPs Exposure to Bombyx mori. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 210, 111888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belal, R.; Gad, A. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Oxidative Stress, Genotoxicity, and Apoptosis in the Hemocytes of Bombyx mori Larvae. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sezer Tuncsoy, B.; Tuncsoy, M.; Gomes, T.; Sousa, V.; Teixeira, M.R.; Bebianno, M.J.; Ozalp, P. Effects of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles on Tissue Accumulation and Antioxidant Enzymes of Galleria mellonella L. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 102, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuncsoy, B.; Tuncsoy, M. Particle Size Effect of Micro and Nano Aluminium Oxides on Antioxidant Defence System of Model Organism Galleria mellonella. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2023, 110, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mese, Y.; Tuncsoy, B.; Ozalp, P. Effects of Cu, Zn and Their Mixtures on Bioaccumulation and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ecotoxicology 2022, 31, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Altuntaş, H. Determination of Gibberellic Acid (GA3)-Induced Oxidative Stress in a Model Organism Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altuntaş, H.; Duman, E.; Kılıç, G. Juglone Induced Oxidative and Genotoxic Stress in the Model Insect Galleria mellonella L. (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci 2020, 40, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dere, B.; Altuntaş, H.; Nurullahoğlu, Z.U. Insecticidal and Oxidative Effects of Azadirachtin on the Model Organism Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 89, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vukašinović, E.L.; Čelić, T.V.; Kojić, D.; Franeta, F.; Milić, S.; Ninkov, J.; Blagojević, D.; Purać, J. The Effect of Long Term Exposure to Cadmium on Ostrinia Nubilalis Growth, Development, Survival Rate and Oxidative Status. Chemosphere 2020, 243, 125375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, L.; Jiang, H. Oxidative Stress Induced by Camptothecin and Hydroxyl-Camptothecin in IOZCAS-Spex-II Cells of Spodoptera exigua Hübner. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 216, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pompka, A.; Szulińska, E.; Kafel, A. Starvation and Cadmium Affect Energy Reserves and Oxidative Stress in Individuals of Spodoptera exigua. Ecotoxicology 2022, 31, 1346–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jameel, M.; Alam, M.F.; Younus, H.; Jamal, K.; Siddique, H.R. Hazardous Sub-Cellular Effects of Fipronil Directly Influence the Organismal Parameters of Spodoptera litura. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 172, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karpeta-Kaczmarek, J.; Dziewięcka, M.; Augustyniak, M.; Rost-Roszkowska, M.; Pawlyta, M. Oxidative Stress and Genotoxic Effects of Diamond Nanoparticles. Environ. Res. 2016, 148, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousef, H.A.; Abdelfattah, E.A.; Augustyniak, M. Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Responses to Environmentally Induced Oxidative Stress in the 5th Instar Nymphs of Aiolopus thalassinus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 3823–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yousef, H.A.; Abdelfattah, E.A.; Augustyniak, M. Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Aiolopus thalassinus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Collected from Areas Polluted by the Fertilizer Industry. Ecotoxicology 2017, 26, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Piccardo, M.; Bertoli, M.; Pastorino, P.; Barceló, D.; Provenza, F.; Lesa, D.; Anselmi, S.; Elia, A.; Prearo, M.; Pizzul, E.; et al. Lethal and Sublethal Responses of Hydropsyche pellucidula (Insecta, Trichoptera) to Commercial Polypropylene Microplastics after Different Preconditioning Treatments. Toxics 2021, 9, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, J.; Nakano, D.; Imamura, M.; Yamamoto, R.; Fujita, M. Assessing a Polluted River Environment by Oxidative Stress Biomarker Responses in Caddisfly Larvae. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 696, 134005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patang, F.; Soegianto, A. Oxidative Responses of Macro-Invertebrates in Relation to Environmental Variables in Rivers of East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 36, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manna, B.; Dutta, S.M.; Dalapati, S.; Maiti, S. Oxidative Stress-Induced Toxicity and DNA Stability in Some Agri-Field Based Livestock/Insect by Widely Used Pesticides. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen 2020, 23, 972–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milivojević, T.; Glavan, G.; Božič, J.; Sepčić, K.; Mesarič, T.; Drobne, D. Neurotoxic Potential of Ingested ZnO Nanomaterials on Bees. Chemosphere 2015, 120, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Riaz, M.A.; Poupardin, R.; Reynaud, S.; Strode, C.; Ranson, H.; David, J.P. Impact of Glyphosate and Benzo[a]Pyrene on the Tolerance of Mosquito Larvae to Chemical Insecticides. Role of Detoxification Genes in Response to Xenobiotics. Aquat. Toxicol. 2009, 93, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łoś, A.; Strachecka, A. Fast and Cost-Effective Biochemical Spectrophotometric Analysis of Solution of Insect “Blood” and Body Surface Elution. Sensors 2018, 18, 1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, N.S.; Grisham, M.B. Methods to Detect Nitric Oxide and Its Metabolites in Biological Samples. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grisham, M.B.; Granger, D.N.; Lefer, D.J. Modulation of Leukocyte–Endothelial Interactions by Reactive Metabolites of Oxygen and Nitrogen: Relevance to Ischemic Heart Disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1998, 25, 404–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajjuri, R.R.; O’Donnell, J.M. Novel Whole-Tissue Quantitative Assay of Nitric Oxide Levels in Drosophila Neuroinflammatory Response. J. Vis. Exp. 2013, 82, 50892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, L.C.; Wagner, D.A.; Glogowski, J.; Skipper, P.L.; Wishnok, J.S.; Tannenbaum, S.R. Analysis of Nitrate, Nitrite, and [15N]Nitrate in Biological Fluids. Anal. Biochem. 1982, 126, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Severiano, F.; Santamaría, A.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J.; Medina-Campos, O.N.; Ríos, C.; Segovia, J. Increased Formation of Reactive Oxygen Species, but No Changes in Glutathione Peroxidase Activity, in Striata of Mice Transgenic for the Huntington’s Disease Mutation. Neurochem. Res. 2004, 29, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danta, C.C.; Sahu, A.N. Naturally Occurring Anticancer Drugs. In Medicinal Chemistry of Chemotherapeutic Agents; Acharya, P.C., Kurosu, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 539–588. [Google Scholar]
- Wolff, S.P. Ferrous Ion Oxidation in Presence of Ferric Ion Indicator Xylenol Orange for Measurement of Hydroperoxides. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1994; Volume 233, pp. 182–189. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Junglee, S.; Urban, L.; Sallanon, H.; Lopez-Lauri, F. Optimized Assay for Hydrogen Peroxide Determination in Plant Tissue Using Potassium Iodide. Am. J. Analyt. Chem. 2014, 5, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarpey, M.M.; Fridovich, I. Methods of Detection of Vascular Reactive Species. Circ. Res. 2001, 89, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reynaud, S.; Duchiron, C.; Deschaux, P. 3-Methylcholanthrene Increases Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate-Induced Respiratory Burst Activity and Intracellular Calcium Levels in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) Macrophages. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2001, 175, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parenti, C.C.; Ghilardi, A.; Della Torre, C.; Magni, S.; Del Giacco, L.; Binelli, A. Evaluation of the Infiltration of Polystyrene Nanobeads in Zebrafish Embryo Tissues after Short-Term Exposure and the Related Biochemical and Behavioural Effects. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 112947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aebi, H. Catalase in Vitro. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1984; Volume 105, pp. 121–126. ISBN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Chance, B.; Maehly, A.C. Assay of Catalases and Peroxidases. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1955; pp. 764–775. [Google Scholar]
- Claiborne, A. Catalase Activity. In Handbook of Methods for Oxygen Radical Research; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1985; pp. 283–284. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, G.; Dembiec, D.; Marcus, J. Measurement of Catalase Activity in Tissue Extracts. Anal. Biochem. 1970, 34, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenwald, R.A. Handbook Methods for Oxygen Radical Research, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; ISBN 9781351072922. [Google Scholar]
- Lück, H. Catalase. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1965; pp. 885–894. [Google Scholar]
- Strachecka, A.; Olszewski, K.; Paleolog, J. Varroa Treatment with Bromfenvinphos Markedly Suppresses Honeybee Biochemical Defence Levels. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2016, 160, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubovskii, I.M.; Grizanova, E.V.; Chertkova, E.A.; Slepneva, I.A.; Komarov, D.A.; Vorontsova, Y.L.; Glupov, V. V Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species and Activity of Antioxidants in Hemolymph of the Moth Larvae Galleria mellonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Piralidae) at Development of the Process of Encapsulation. J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 46, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orta-Zavalza, E.; Briones-Martin-del-Campo, M.; Castano, I.; Penas, A.D. Las Catalase Activity Assay in Candida Glabrata. Bio-Protocol 2014, 4, e1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prokić, M.; Borković-Mitić, S.; Krizmanić, I.; Gavrić, J.; Despotović, S.; Gavrilović, B.; Radovanović, T.; Pavlović, S.; Saičić, Z. Comparative Study of Oxidative Stress Parameters and Acetylcholinesterase Activity in the Liver of Pelophylax Esculentus Complex Frogs. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Della Torre, C.; Parolini, M.; Del Giacco, L.; Ghilardi, A.; Ascagni, M.; Santo, N.; Maggioni, D.; Magni, S.; Madaschi, L.; Prosperi, L.; et al. Adsorption of B(α)P on Carbon Nanopowder Affects Accumulation and Toxicity in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Embryos. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 1132–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iuchi, Y.; Okada, F.; Onuma, K.; Onoda, T.; Asao, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Fujii, J. Elevated Oxidative Stress in Erythrocytes Due to a SOD1 Deficiency Causes Anaemia and Triggers Autoantibody Production. Biochem. J. 2007, 402, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deisseroth, A.; Dounce, A.L. Catalase: Physical and Chemical Properties, Mechanism of Catalysis, and Physiological Role. Physiol. Rev. 1970, 50, 319–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fossati, P.; Prencipe, L.; Berti, G. Use of 3,5-Dichloro-2-Hydroxybenzenesulfonic Acid/4-Aminophenazone Chromogenic System in Direct Enzymic Assay of Uric Acid in Serum and Urine. Clin. Chem. 1980, 26, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zerbetto, E.; Vergani, L.; Dabbeni-Sala, F. Quantification of Muscle Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Enzymes via Histochemical Staining of Blue Native Polyacrylamide Gels. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2059–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, R.; Yuan, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, X. Mechanism of Pyrogallol Autoxidation and Determination of Superoxide Dismutase Enzyme Activity. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1998, 45, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marklund, S.; Marklund, G. Involvement of the Superoxide Anion Radical in the Autoxidation of Pyrogallol and a Convenient Assay for Superoxide Dismutase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1974, 47, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Misra, H.P.; Fridovich, I. The Role of Superoxide Anion in the Autoxidation of Epinephrine and a Simple Assay for Superoxide Dismutase. J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 3170–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kostyuk, V.A.; Potapovich, A.I. Superoxide-Driven Oxidation of Quercetin and a Simple Sensitive Assay for Determination of Superoxide Dismutase. Biochem. Int. 1989, 19, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar]
- Lozinsky, O.V.; Lushchak, O.V.; Kryshchuk, N.I.; Shchypanska, N.Y.; Riabkina, A.H.; Skarbek, S.V.; Maksymiv, I.V.; Storey, J.M.; Storey, K.B.; Lushchak, V.I. S-Nitrosoglutathione-Induced Toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster: Delayed Pupation and Induced Mild Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress in Eclosed Flies. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2013, 164, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nebot, C.; Moutet, M.; Huet, P.; Xu, J.Z.; Yadan, J.C.; Chaudiere, J. Spectrophotometric Assay of Superoxide Dismutase Activity Based on the Activated Autoxidation of a Tetracyclic Catechol. Anal. Biochem. 1993, 214, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, Y.; Oberley, L.W.; Li, Y. A Simple Method for Clinical Assay of Superoxide Dismutase. Clin. Chem. 1988, 34, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Podczasy, J.J.; Wei, R. Reduction of Iodonitrotetrazolium Violet by Superoxide Radicals. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1988, 150, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCord, J.M.; Fridovich, I. Superoxide Dismutase. J. Biol. Chem. 1969, 244, 6049–6055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ukeda, H.; Kawana, D.; Maeda, S.; Sawamura, M. Spectrophotometric Assay for Superoxide Dismutase Based on the Reduction of Highly Water-Soluble Tetrazolium Salts by Xanthine-Xanthine Oxidase. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1999, 63, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weydert, C.J.; Cullen, J.J. Measurement of Superoxide Dismutase, Catalase and Glutathione Peroxidase in Cultured Cells and Tissue. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-Transferases. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elia, A.C.; Dörr, A.J.M.; Mastrangelo, C.; Prearo, M.; Abete, M.C. Glutathione and Antioxidant Enzymes in the Hepatopancreas of Crayfish Procambarus Clarkii (Girard, 1852) of Lake Trasimeno (Italy). Bull. Français Pêche Piscic. 2006, 380–381, 1351–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, S.M.; Belzunces, L.P.; Carvalho, G.A.; Brunet, J.L.; Badiou-Beneteau, A. Enzymatic Biomarkers as Tools to Assess Environmental Quality: A Case Study of Exposure of the Honeybee Apis mellifera to Insecticides. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2013, 32, 2117–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Booth, J.; Boyland, E.; Sims, P. An Enzyme from Rat Liver Catalysing Conjugations with Glutathione. Biochem. J. 1961, 79, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mannervik, B.; Guthenberg, C. Glutathione Transferase (Human Placenta). In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1981; Volume 77, pp. 231–235. [Google Scholar]
- Habig, W.H.; Jakoby, W.B. Assays for Differentiation of Glutathione S-Transferases. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1981; Volume 77, pp. 398–405. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Guthenberg, C.; Ålin, P.; Mannervik, B. Glutathione Transferase from Rat Testis. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1985; Volume 113, pp. 507–510. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Carmagnol, F.; Sinet, P.-M.; Rapin, J.; Jerome, H. Glutathione-S-Transferase of Human Red Blood Cells; Assay, Values in Normal Subjects and in Two Pathological Circumstances: Hyperbilirubinemia and Impaired Renal Function. Clin. Chim. Acta 1981, 117, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellman, G.L. Tissue Sulfhydryl Groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1959, 82, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cribb, A.E.; Leeder, J.S.; Spielberg, S.P. Use of a Microplate Reader in an Assay of Glutathione Reductase Using 5,5′-Dithiobis(2-Nitrobenzoic Acid). Anal. Biochem. 1989, 183, 195–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrence, R.A.; Burk, R.F. Glutathione Peroxidase Activity in Selenium-Deficient Rat Liver. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1976, 71, 952–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paglia, D.E.; Valentine, W.N. Studies on the Quantitative and Qualitative Characterization of Erythrocyte Glutathione Peroxidase. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1967, 70, 158–169. [Google Scholar]
- Mohandas, J.; Marshall, J.J.; Duggin, G.G.; Horvath, J.S.; Tiller, D.J. Differential Distribution of Glutathione and Glutathione-Related Enzymes in Rabbit Kidney. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1984, 33, 1801–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wendel, A. Glutathione Peroxidase. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1981; Volume 77, pp. 325–333. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Flohé, L.; Günzler, W.A. Assays of Glutathione Peroxidase. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1984; Volume 105, pp. 114–120. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Rainio, M.J.; Margus, A.; Lehmann, P.; Helander, M.; Lindström, L. Effects of a Glyphosate-Based Herbicide on Survival and Oxidative Status of a Non-Target Herbivore, the Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part—C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 215, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badary, O.A.; Abdel-Maksoud, S.; Ahmed, W.A.; Owieda, G.H. Naringenin Attenuates Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Life Sci. 2005, 76, 2125–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drisko, J.A. Chelation Therapy. In Integrative Medicine; Rakel, D., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1004–1015.e3. [Google Scholar]
- Gad, S.C. Glutathione. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 4th ed.; Wexler, P., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2024; pp. 1001–1002. ISBN 978-0-323-85434-4. [Google Scholar]
- Beutler, E.; Duron, O.; Kelly, B.M. Improved Method for the Determination of Blood Glutathione. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1963, 61, 882–888. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Sedlak, J.; Lindsay, R.H. Estimation of Total, Protein-Bound, and Nonprotein Sulfhydryl Groups in Tissue with Ellman’s Reagent. Anal. Biochem. 1968, 25, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baker, M.A.; Cerniglia, G.J.; Zaman, A. Microtiter Plate Assay for the Measurement of Glutathione and Glutathione Disulfide in Large Numbers of Biological Samples. Anal. Biochem. 1990, 190, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, M.E. Determination of Glutathione and Glutathione Disulfide in Biological Samples. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1985; Volume 113, pp. 548–555. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Tietze, F. Enzymic Method for Quantitative Determination of Nanogram Amounts of Total and Oxidized Glutathione: Applications to Mammalian Blood and Other Tissues. Anal. Biochem. 1969, 27, 502–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rainio, M.J.; Eeva, T.; Lilley, T.; Stauffer, J.; Ruuskanen, S. Effects of Early-Life Lead Exposure on Oxidative Status and Phagocytosis Activity in Great Tits (Parus major). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part—C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 167, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokrasch, L.C.; Teschke, E.J. Glutathione Content of Cultured Cells and Rodent Brain Regions: A Specific Fluorometric Assay. Anal. Biochem. 1984, 140, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jollow, D.J.; Mitchell, J.R.; Zampaglione, N.; Gillette, J.R. Bromobenzene-Induced Liver Necrosis. Protective Role of Glutathione and Evidence for 3,4-Bromobenzene Oxide as the Hepatotoxic Metabolite. Pharmacology 2008, 11, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coskun, M.; Kayis, T.; Gulsu, E.; ALP, E. Effects of Selenium and Vitamin E on Enzymatic, Biochemical, and Immunological Biomarkers in Galleria mellonella L. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helmer, S.H.; Kerbaol, A.; Aras, P.; Jumarie, C.; Boily, M. Effects of Realistic Doses of Atrazine, Metolachlor, and Glyphosate on Lipid Peroxidation and Diet-Derived Antioxidants in Caged Honey Bees (Apis mellifera). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 8010–8021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsikas, D. Assessment of Lipid Peroxidation by Measuring Malondialdehyde (MDA) and Relatives in Biological Samples: Analytical and Biological Challenges. Anal. Biochem. 2017, 524, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ohkawa, H.; Ohishi, N.; Yagi, K. Reaction of Linoleic Acid Hydroperoxide with Thiobarbituric Acid. J. Lipid Res. 1978, 19, 1053–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bird, R.P.; Draper, H.H. Comparative Studies on Different Methods of Malonaldehyde Determination. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1984; Volume 105, pp. 299–305. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Draper, H.H.; Squires, E.J.; Mahmoodi, H.; Wu, J.; Agarwal, S.; Hadley, M. A Comparative Evaluation of Thiobarbituric Acid Methods for the Determination of Malondialdehyde in Biological Materials. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1993, 15, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puntel, R.L.; Nogueira, C.W.; Rocha, J.B.T. Krebs Cycle Intermediates Modulate Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Species (TBARS) Production in Rat Brain In Vitro. Neurochem. Res. 2005, 30, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheeseman, K.H.; Slater, T.F. An Introduction to Free Radical Biochemistry. Br. Med. Bull. 1993, 49, 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bar-Or, D.; Rael, L.T.; Lau, E.P.; Rao, N.K.R.; Thomas, G.W.; Winkler, J.V.; Yukl, R.L.; Kingston, R.G.; Curtis, C.G. An Analog of the Human Albumin N-Terminus (Asp-Ala-His-Lys) Prevents Formation of Copper-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 284, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vuori, K.; Lehtonen, K.; Kanerva, M.; Peltonen, H.; Nikinmaa, M.; Berezina, N.; Boikova, E. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in the Copepod Limnocalanus Macrurus from the Northern Baltic Sea: Effects of Hydrographic Factors and Chemical Contamination. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2015, 538, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buege, J.A.; Aust, S.D. Microsomal Lipid Peroxidation. In Methods in Enzymology; Fleischer, S., Packer, L., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1978; Volume 52, pp. 302–310. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Kosugi, H.; Kojima, T.; Kikugawa, K. Thiobarbituric Acid-Reactive Substances from Peroxidized Lipids. Lipids 1989, 24, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guillén-Sans, R.; Guzmán-Chozas, M. The Thiobarbituric Acid (TBA) Reaction in Foods: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1998, 38, 315–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hermes-Lima, M.; Willmore, W.G.; Storey, K.B. Quantification of Lipid Peroxidation in Tissue Extracts Based on Fe(III)Xylenol Orange Complex Formation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1995, 19, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bou, R.; Codony, R.; Tres, A.; Decker, E.A.; Guardiola, F. Determination of Hydroperoxides in Foods and Biological Samples by the Ferrous Oxidation-Xylenol Orange Method: A Review of the Factors That Influence the Method’s Performance. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 377, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cervera, A.; Maymo, A.C.; Martinez-Pardo, R.; Garcera, M.D. Antioxidant Enzymes in Oncopeltus fasciatus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) Exposed to Cadmium. Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uchiyama, M.; Mihara, M. Determination of Malonaldehyde Precursor in Tissues by Thiobarbituric Acid Test. Anal. Biochem. 1978, 86, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, J.; Imamura, M.; Nakano, D.; Yamamoto, R.; Fujita, M. Effects of Water Turbidity and Different Temperatures on Oxidative Stress in Caddisfly (Stenopsyche marmorata) Larvae. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 630, 1078–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levine, R.L.; Williams, J.A.; Stadtman, E.P.; Shacter, E. Carbonyl Assays for Determination of Oxidatively Modified Proteins. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1994; Volume 233, pp. 346–357. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Levine, R.L.; Garland, D.; Oliver, C.N.; Amici, A.; Climent, I.; Lenz, A.-G.; Ahn, B.-W.; Shaltiel, S.; Stadtman, E.R. Determination of Carbonyl Content in Oxidatively Modified Proteins. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; Volume 186, pp. 464–478. ISSN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
- Dalle-Donne, I.; Rossi, R.; Colombo, R.; Giustarini, D.; Milzani, A. Biomarkers of Oxidative Damage in Human Disease. Clin. Chem. 2006, 52, 601–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, N.P.; McCoy, M.T.; Tice, R.R.; Schneider, E.L. A Simple Technique for Quantitation of Low Levels of DNA Damage in Individual Cells. Exp. Cell. Res. 1988, 175, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duman, E.; Altuntaş, H. Azadirachtin’in Galleria mellonella lepidoptera: Pyralidae üzerindeki genotoksisitesi. Biol. Divers Conserv. 2018, 11, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
- Abdelfattah, E.A.; Augustyniak, M.; Yousef, H.A. Biomonitoring of Genotoxicity of Industrial Fertilizer Pollutants in Aiolopus thalassinus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Using Alkaline Comet Assay. Chemosphere 2017, 182, 762–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilbao, C.; Ferreiro, J.A.; Comendador, M.A.; Sierra, L.M. Influence of Mus201 and Mus308 Mutations of Drosophila melanogaster on the Genotoxicity of Model Chemicals in Somatic Cells in Vivo Measured with the Comet Assay. Mutat. Res. 2002, 503, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gyori, B.M.; Venkatachalam, G.; Thiagarajan, P.S.; Hsu, D.; Clement, M.-V. OpenComet: An Automated Tool for Comet Assay Image Analysis. Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olive, P.L. DNA Precipitation Assay: A Rapid and Simple Method for Detecting DNA Damage in Mammalian Cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 1988, 11, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Lafontaine, Y.; Gagné, F.; Blaise, C.; Costan, G.; Gagnon, P.; Chan, H.M. Biomarkers in Zebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) for the Assessment and Monitoring of Water Quality of the St Lawrence River (Canada). Aquat. Toxicol. 2000, 50, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Messi, M.; Giorgione, R.; Astolfi, M.L. Insects as Sentinels of Oxidative Stress Induced by Environmental Contaminants: Biomarkers and Analytical Approaches. Toxics 2025, 13, 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080698
Messi M, Giorgione R, Astolfi ML. Insects as Sentinels of Oxidative Stress Induced by Environmental Contaminants: Biomarkers and Analytical Approaches. Toxics. 2025; 13(8):698. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080698
Chicago/Turabian StyleMessi, Marcello, Roberta Giorgione, and Maria Luisa Astolfi. 2025. "Insects as Sentinels of Oxidative Stress Induced by Environmental Contaminants: Biomarkers and Analytical Approaches" Toxics 13, no. 8: 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080698
APA StyleMessi, M., Giorgione, R., & Astolfi, M. L. (2025). Insects as Sentinels of Oxidative Stress Induced by Environmental Contaminants: Biomarkers and Analytical Approaches. Toxics, 13(8), 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080698