Next Article in Journal
Comparison of ZnO Nanoparticles Prepared by Precipitation and Combustion for UV and Sunlight-Driven Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue
Previous Article in Journal
Determinants Analysis Regarding Household Chemical Indoor Pollution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Source Apportionment and Model Applicability of Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soil Based on Three Receptor Models

1
Key Laboratory of Soil Contamination Bioremediation of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, China
2
Department of Applied Engineering, Gandong University, Fuzhou 344000, China
3
Hangzhou Zhonglan Shunong Ecological Technology Co., Ltd., Lin’an 311300, China
4
Jingning Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Lishui 323000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxics 2023, 11(3), 265; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030265
Submission received: 14 February 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 11 March 2023 / Published: 13 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Toxicity Reduction and Environmental Remediation)

Abstract

The identification of the source of heavy metal pollution and its quantification are the prerequisite of soil pollution control. The APCS-MLR, UNMIX and PMF models were employed to apportion pollution sources of Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd, Cr and Ni of the farmland soil in the vicinity of an abandoned iron and steel plant. The sources, contribution rates and applicability of the models were evaluated. The potential ecological risk index revealed greatest ecological risk from Cd. The results of source apportionment illustrated that the APCS-MLR and UNMIX models could verify each other for accurate allocation of pollution sources. The industrial sources were the main sources of pollution (32.41~38.42%), followed by agricultural sources (29.35~31.65%) and traffic emission sources (21.03~21.51%); and the smallest proportion was from natural sources of pollution (11.2~14.42%). The PMF model was easily affected by outliers and its fitting degree was not ideal, leading to be unable to get more accurate results of source analysis. The combination of multiple models could effectively improve the accuracy of pollution source analysis of soil heavy metals. These results provide some scientific basis for further remediation of heavy metal pollution in farmland soil.
Keywords: heavy metals; source apportionment; APCS-MLR; UNMIX; PMF heavy metals; source apportionment; APCS-MLR; UNMIX; PMF

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, J.; Lanwang, K.; Liao, S.; Zhong, B.; Chen, Z.; Ye, Z.; Liu, D. Source Apportionment and Model Applicability of Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soil Based on Three Receptor Models. Toxics 2023, 11, 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030265

AMA Style

Ma J, Lanwang K, Liao S, Zhong B, Chen Z, Ye Z, Liu D. Source Apportionment and Model Applicability of Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soil Based on Three Receptor Models. Toxics. 2023; 11(3):265. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030265

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Jiawei, Kaining Lanwang, Shiyan Liao, Bin Zhong, Zhenhua Chen, Zhengqian Ye, and Dan Liu. 2023. "Source Apportionment and Model Applicability of Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soil Based on Three Receptor Models" Toxics 11, no. 3: 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030265

APA Style

Ma, J., Lanwang, K., Liao, S., Zhong, B., Chen, Z., Ye, Z., & Liu, D. (2023). Source Apportionment and Model Applicability of Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soil Based on Three Receptor Models. Toxics, 11(3), 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11030265

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop